Friday, April 22, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

J. Ashley: If I say so, then it is so! — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 21, 9:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> So, let's assume the vast majority of People want "that candidate" to
> represent them. Do you think one oposing individual (let's say you) is
> going to have any luck enforcing your rediculous scheme?
>
> > J. A.:  A single law-abiding citizen who witnesses a candidate using
> > "labels", who can record that candidate making the remark, can kick
> > the candidate out of the race!  There are no Czars required to police
> > these things.  The national media documents those who violate my New
> > Constitution.  Like The Donald likes to do, just say: "You're fired!"
> > and that candidate will be out of the race!  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �
> > On Apr 21, 11:57 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> 1) Who decides if a "public official" has "tagged" another individual
> >> "as being left or right"?
>
> >> 2) If you could come up with some convoluted scheme for determining such
> >> violations, how do you propose to enforce this?
>
> >> On 04/20/2011 08:33 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Jonathan:  My New Constitution makes it a crime for any public
> >>> official to "tag" anyone as being left or right.  The USA will survive
> >>> ONLY if all group-against-group fighting stops!  Capitalism will
> >>> benefit all the people, not just the had-been conservatives.  Less
> >>> expensive government leaves more money in people's pockets.  And that
> >>> will encourage more charity close to home.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> >>> On Apr 20, 12:43 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> Rush Limbaugh is at best a neo-conservative who spouts off when "the
> >>>> left" does something insane but keeps his mouth shut when "the right"
> >>>> does the same insane thing. He does nothing more than perpetuate a
> >>>> left-right war of the mindless for profit.
> >>>> Anyone who blindly sides with "the left" or "the right" is someone who
> >>>> does not think for themselves.
> >>>> On 04/20/2011 01:49 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Mark:  Your being in Gaza... does that mean you are Jewish?  Rush
> >>>>> Limbaugh is the number one conservative radio talk-show host in
> >>>>> America.  He isn't screwing-up anything, because he doesn't have the
> >>>>> balls to actually lead the revolution that's needed to take back this
> >>>>> country from the socialist-communists.  If you aren't an American,
> >>>>> then I can't see why you care about what I do to save this country.
> >>>>> Your oblique protections of Barack Obama show you to be pro left.  If
> >>>>> I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right.
> >>>>> Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed.  ï¿½  John A.
> >>>>> Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>> Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would
> >>>>>> say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real
> >>>>>> world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for
> >>>>>> anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to
> >>>>>> meet their own idea of what and who people should be.
> >>>>>> As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What
> >>>>>> has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the
> >>>>>> last ten years ??
> >>>>>> On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>> Dear Mark:  Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch
> >>>>>>> the news and think about what is going on in the world.  I simply
> >>>>>>> don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil
> >>>>>>> that's everywhere.  Listen to Rush Limbaugh.  He has the world
> >>>>>>> situation pegged fairly well.  ï¿½  J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>>>> Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> >>>>>>>> give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> >>>>>>>> there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
> >>>>>>>> Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> >>>>>>>> considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
> >>>>>>>> Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> >>>>>>>> about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> >>>>>>>> (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> >>>>>>>> clear and present danger??
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Dear Mark:  I own Google stock.  It's an American multinational
> >>>>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California.  Google
> >>>>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well.  In many ways you are very
> >>>>>>>>> naive.  Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence.  Would you put on moderation
> >>>>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>>>>>> their citizens?  Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies.  He has caused
> >>>>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense.  Those in our government and
> >>>>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy.  Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".  He's viewed
> >>>>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before.  As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>>>>>> better government.  That means you have schizophrenia.  Get some couch-
> >>>>>>>>> time, Mark.  You need it!  ï¿½  J. A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Dear Keith:  I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>>>>>> nice people.  Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>>>>>> capitalism.  Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>>>>>> is skating on?"  There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say.  Of course that in
> >>>>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job.  If you
> >>>>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>>>>>> now  been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read.  The last
> >>>>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>>>>>> with, first hand.  Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum.  The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now.  You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET.  ï¿½ John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation!  Jonathan,  Mark  and MJ are
> >>>>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor!  Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People!  Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid.  ï¿½  John A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>      wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up.  The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren.  There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes.  By adapting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured!  ï¿½ John
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> A. Armistead �  Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

No comments:

Post a Comment