interested in anarchy, in Belgium or anywhere! — J. A. A. —
On Apr 22, 3:08 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> "In terms of comparative social spending on welfare-related programs as
> a percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), Denmark ranks first,
> spending more than 29 percent of GDP on its welfare-related programs.
> Next is Sweden (nearly 29 percent), followed by France, Germany,
> Belgium, Switzerland, Austria, and Finland. The United Kingdom ranks in
> the middle of the pack in 13th place (nearly 22 percent of GDP). The
> United States ranks near the bottom, in 26th place (out of 29), spending
> less than 15 percent of its GDP on social welfare programs. The United
> States ranks just ahead of Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea."
>
> http://pagerankstudio.com/Blog/2011/03/what-is-welfare-state/
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> On 04/22/2011 08:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > On average, yes they are! Few in Belgium look to government for
> > handouts. In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout.
> > Anything over 5% is excessive. But that's why I've written my New
> > Constitution�to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings
> > business! � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> > On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those in
> >> the United States?
>
> >>> J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> >>> in civil war... � J. A. A. �
> >>> On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> John,
> >>>> It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> >>>> government. Belgium has been without a national government for more than
> >>>> 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make much
> >>>> of a difference in their daily lives."
> >>>> On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> >>>>> conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> >>>>> because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> >>>>> deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> >>>>> opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> >>>>> than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> >>>>> within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
> >>>>> no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> >>>>> having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> John,
> >>>>>> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> >>>>>> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> >>>>>> questions posed to you.)
> >>>>>> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> >>>>>>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> >>>>>>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> >>>>>>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>>>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> >>>>>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> >>>>>>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> >>>>>>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask
> >>>>>>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> >>>>>>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are
> >>>>>>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
> >>>>>>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> >>>>>>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
> >>>>>>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> >>>>>>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> >>>>>>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
> >>>>>>>>>> tremendous task?
> >>>>>>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> >>>>>>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> >>>>>>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> >>>>>>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>>>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>>>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> >>>>>>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>>>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>>>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>>>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> >>>>>>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>>>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>>>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> >>>>>>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>>>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>>>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> >>>>>>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>>>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>>>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> >>>>>>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>>>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>>>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>>>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> feel.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. � John A. Armistead �
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In K�ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. � John A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment