brutal dictator. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 24, 11:29 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no where
> near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I never said
> I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you are going to talk
> about him.
>
> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India?
> > Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation
> > destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the
> > USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be
> > welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). — J. A. A. —
>
> > On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current Events.
>
> > > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the US) their
> > > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown causes
> > > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President) is that
> > > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all State
> > functions
> > > still happen, all taxes are paid.
>
> > > One would think that something as basic as
>
> > > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?"
> > > (answer is a resounding "No")
>
> > > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States and those
> > > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare" are left
> > > operating as usual.
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> > > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> > > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no protected food
> > > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> > > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start using
> > > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> > > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> > > > survive without some the public order that is provided by well thought-
> > > > out and agreed-to laws.
>
> > > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> > > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> > > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their laws. Our
> > > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because Congress
> > > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run things.
> > > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!! Read my
> > > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> > > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any government
> > > > employee or elected official, including the President! — J. A.
> > > > Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Onestone,
>
> > > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the "experimental"
> > > > stage.
> > > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that cares.
> > Just
> > > > why
> > > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil war ??
> > The
> > > > laws
> > > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
>
> > > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein <
> > noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would
> > be
> > > > > > in civil war... — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age
> > without
> > > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national government for
> > more
> > > > than
> > > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't
> > make
> > > > much
> > > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
>
> > > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an
> > untra-
> > > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of
> > anyone,
> > > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> > > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> > > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more
> > > > conservative
> > > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone
> > ages'
> > > > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So, your
> > "ideal"
> > > > of
> > > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth.
> > Is
> > > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead
> > �
> > > > > > Patriot
> > > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >> John,
>
> > > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right"
> > of
> > > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER
> > answer
> > > > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
>
> > > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist.
> > I
> > > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning
> > > > government.
> > > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very
> > long
> > > > on
> > > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> > > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > >>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist
> > > > constitution.
> > > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the
> > capitalist
> > > > system
> > > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that
> > government
> > > > > > should
> > > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you
> > > > even
> > > > > > ask
> > > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are
> > a
> > > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The
> > remaining
> > > > 5%
> > > > > > are
> > > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A.
> > > > Armistead
> > > > > > �
> > > > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> > > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>> John,
> > > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades
> > > > websites
> > > > > > based
> > > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much
> > about
> > > > your
> > > > > > > >>>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of
> > > > > > expression means.
> > > > > > > >>>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and
> > social
> > > > harm
> > > > > > to the
> > > > > > > >>>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including
> > Hitler"
> > > > seems
> > > > > > > >>>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to
> > > > pull
> > > > > > off this
> > > > > > > >>>>>> tremendous task?
> > > > > > > >>>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American
> > > > multinational
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View,
> > > > California.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you
> > are
> > > > > > very
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's
> > neck
> > > > from
> > > > > > the
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who
> > > > commit
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on
> > > > > > moderation
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should
> > be
> > > > > > killed?
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those
> > who
> > > > > > kill
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans
> > > > have
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack
> > of
> > > > jobs
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He
> > has
> > > > > > caused
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other
> > > > person
> > > > > > who
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our
> > > > government
> > > > > > and
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that
> > bastard
> > > > > > arrested,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the
> > > > Constitution
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested
> > that
> > > > you,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive".
> > He's
> > > > > > viewed
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I
> > suspect
> > > > you
> > > > > > are so
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against
> > > > having a
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia.
> > Get
> > > > some
> > > > > > couch-
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead �
> > Patriot
> > > > > > > >>>>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<
> > markmka...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Einstein,
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under
> > the
> > > > > > present, or
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received
> > is
> > > > the
> > > > > > standard
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used
> > to
> > > > it. It
> > > > > > > >>>>>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable
> > under
> > > > US
> > > > > > law.
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment