>
On Apr 26, 5:29 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> The banner at the top of his official website
> <http://www.algathafi.org/html-english/index.htm> spells it, "AL
> Gathafi." But if you go deeper into the site, you'll see it variously
> rendered as "Al Qaddafi," "Algathafi," and "Al-Gathafi."
>
> On 04/26/2011 12:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark: Fox News (gag) is the only approximately tollerable news
> > network I watch. They spell his name: Qaddafi. "G", why would that
> > be? � J. A. A. �
> > On Apr 25, 1:44 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> "G" it is. I believe he knows how to spell his own name....
>
> >> On Apr 25, 7:18 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> >>> Thanks, Jonathan! Mark, with his 'G', is no closer to correct than
> >>> my 'Q' but with ff. I'd rate the guy a double F grade. Agreed? � J.
> >>> A. A. �
> >>> On Apr 24, 11:37 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>> His name in Arabic is /Mu?ammar al-Qad_d_a-fi-. /
> >>>> On 04/24/2011 08:29 PM, Mark wrote:
> >>>>> I am a Tico. We have monkeys. ..... Belgiums per capita income is no
> >>>>> where near The US...It is much lower... Moslems are welcome here.... I
> >>>>> never said I support Gaddafi.. please learn to spell his name if you
> >>>>> are going to talk about him.
> >>>>> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 6:39 PM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net
> >>>>> <mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>> wrote:
> >>>>> Mark: Where do you live with monkeys in your back yard? India?
> >>>>> Because of the beauty of Belgium, making it a choice vacation
> >>>>> destination, the per capita income in Belgium is higher than in the
> >>>>> USA. You should move there. But my guess is that Muslims wouldn't be
> >>>>> welcomed (said because you have defended Qadaffi). � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> On Apr 22, 12:00 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com
> >>>>> <mailto:markmka...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>> > What is happening in Belgium is not History but rather Current
> >>>>> Events.
> >>>>> > They have law enforcement, welfare (higher percentage that the
> >>>>> US) their
> >>>>> > food is protected and as you say ...on and on. All the shutdown
> >>>>> causes
> >>>>> > (without explicit instructions from congress and the President)
> >>>>> is that
> >>>>> > nothing NEW can take place. Supervisors still supervise, all
> >>>>> State functions
> >>>>> > still happen, all taxes are paid.
> >>>>> > One would think that something as basic as
> >>>>> > "Do we need Congress, a President, or the Supreme Court to survive?"
> >>>>> > (answer is a resounding "No")
> >>>>> > would be really important to a Constitutionalist. The States
> >>>>> and those
> >>>>> > Federal departments that are necessary to "the Public Welfare"
> >>>>> are left
> >>>>> > operating as usual.
> >>>>> > On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 9:27 AM, NoEinstein
> >>>>> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net<mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>>wrote:
> >>>>> > > Mark: I'm not a world history buff, so forget about Belgium. The
> >>>>> > > welfare system in this country would stop; companies that had
> >>>>> > > government contracts would shut down; there would be no
> >>>>> protected food
> >>>>> > > supply; there would be no law enforcement; crime would surge; the
> >>>>> > > power grid would shut down, and on-and-on. People would start
> >>>>> using
> >>>>> > > their guns to protect themselves. Once "minorities" started
> >>>>> > > wanting... their share, there would be civil war. The USA can't
> >>>>> > > survive without some the public order that is provided by well
> >>>>> thought-
> >>>>> > > out and agreed-to laws.
> >>>>> > > You are most correct that just and acceptable (to the masses) laws
> >>>>> > > don't require a government. My minimum, efficient government will
> >>>>> > > depend on having the citizens agree with and abide by their
> >>>>> laws. Our
> >>>>> > > present federal government is totally dysfunctional, because
> >>>>> Congress
> >>>>> > > and the White House wrongly suppose that it is they who run
> >>>>> things.
> >>>>> > > WRONG! It is the People, in a Republic, who run things!!!!!
> >>>>> Read my
> >>>>> > > New Constitution to see that even one law-abiding citizen,
> >>>>> > > knowledgeable of that document, is more powerful than any
> >>>>> government
> >>>>> > > employee or elected official, including the President! � J. A.
> >>>>> > > Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> > > On Apr 21, 9:39 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com
> >>>>> <mailto:markmka...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > Onestone,
> >>>>> > > > At one full year with no government it is way past the
> >>>>> "experimental"
> >>>>> > > stage.
> >>>>> > > > It is running and no services have been cut to anyone that
> >>>>> cares. Just
> >>>>> > > why
> >>>>> > > > would the lack of a Congress and President would cause civil
> >>>>> war ?? The
> >>>>> > > laws
> >>>>> > > > are in place and so are the programs that see to peoples needs.
> >>>>> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 7:34 PM, NoEinstein
> >>>>> <noeinst...@bellsouth.net<mailto:noeinst...@bellsouth.net>
> >>>>> > > >wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The
> >>>>> USA would be
> >>>>> > > > > in civil war... � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> > > > > On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley
> >>>>> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com<mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> >>>>> > > > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > John,
> >>>>> > > > > > It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone
> >>>>> age without
> >>>>> > > > > > government. Belgium has been without a national
> >>>>> government for more
> >>>>> > > than
> >>>>> > > > > > 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government
> >>>>> doesn't make
> >>>>> > > much
> >>>>> > > > > > of a difference in their daily lives."
> >>>>> > > > > > On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > > Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I
> >>>>> am an untra-
> >>>>> > > > > > > conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left"
> >>>>> of anyone,
> >>>>> > > > > > > because that would seem to make me... a God-damned
> >>>>> liberal. I
> >>>>> > > > > > > deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am
> >>>>> the exact
> >>>>> > > > > > > opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more
> >>>>> > > conservative
> >>>>> > > > > > > than me, consider this: The USA would return to the
> >>>>> 'stone ages'
> >>>>> > > > > > > within one month of there being no government(s). So,
> >>>>> your "ideal"
> >>>>> > > of
> >>>>> > > > > > > no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on
> >>>>> Earth. Is
> >>>>> > > > > > > having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A.
> >>>>> Armistead �
> >>>>> > > > > Patriot
> >>>>> > > > > > > On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan
> >>>>> Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
> >>>>> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> >>>>> > > > > > > wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > >> John,
> >>>>> > > > > > >> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one
> >>>>> be "right" of
> >>>>> > > > > > >> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you
> >>>>> NEVER answer
> >>>>> > > > > > >> questions posed to you.)
> >>>>> > > > > > >> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > >>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is
> >>>>> socialist. I
> >>>>> > > > > > >>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution
> >>>>> banning
> >>>>> > > government.
> >>>>> > > > > > >>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't
> >>>>> survive very long
> >>>>> > > on
> >>>>> > > > > > >>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> > > > > > >>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>> > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
> >>>>> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> >>>>> > > > > > >>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist
> >>>>> > > constitution.
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the
> >>>>> capitalist
> >>>>> > > system
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing
> >>>>> that government
> >>>>> > > > > should
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact
> >>>>> that you
> >>>>> > > even
> >>>>> > > > > ask
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction
> >>>>> that you are a
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are.
> >>>>> The remaining
> >>>>> > > 5%
> >>>>> > > > > are
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. �
> >>>>> J. A.
> >>>>> > > Armistead
> >>>>> > > > > �
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> Patriot
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>> > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com
> >>>>> <mailto:jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>>
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> John,
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely
> >>>>> downgrades
> >>>>> > > websites
> >>>>> > > > > based
> >>>>> > > > > > >>>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment