Wednesday, August 1, 2012

House Ethics Committee Finds Rep. Laura Richardson (D) Guilty of 7 Counts of Ethics Violation

Any one sinle ethics violation should be automatic dismissal from the House.  And banned from there forever lobbying including.

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

House Ethics Committee Finds Rep. Laura Richardson (D) Guilty of 7 Counts of Ethics Violation

by Scotty Starnes

Another member of the Congressional Black Caucus guilty. Why does the CBC contain so many crooks?

From The Hill:

The House Ethics Committee issued a report on Wednesday finding Rep. Laura Richardson (D-Calif.) guilty on seven counts of violating the chamber's rules by improperly pressuring her staff to campaign for her, destroying evidence and tampering with witness testimony.

Richardson agreed to pay a fine of $10,000 within four months and promised to require staffers who work on her campaign to sign a waiver stating that they haven't been pressured to do so.

The verdict comes as Richardson faces one of the toughest member-on-member races this year against fellow Democrat Rep. Janice Hahn (Calif.).

The Ethics committee said it found Richardson guilty of "requiring or compelling her official staff to perform campaign work" and "obstructing the investigation of the committee and the [investigative subcommittee] through the alteration or destruction of evidence."

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/house-ethics-committee-finds-rep-laura-richardson-d-guilty-of-7-counts-of-ethics-violation/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: VIOLENCE ON WHITES - REAL RACISM IGNORED

Thanks.  Just my lousy IE8 I guess.

On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 3:31 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
Hey Travis,
 
No,  I don't subscribe to the page, but I am not having any problem opening up the web page or its links.
 


 
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:
Keith:  I am having subscribing to Volence Against Whites blog.  Every time I open the link my IE locks up and I have to end he program.  Do you sub to it  travis


On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
I encourage John "NoEinstein"  Armistead, as well as all members to watch this video:
 
 
And check out this link:
 
 


 
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 9:59 PM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

A Sign for Obama




New post on Fellowship of the Minds

A Sign for Obama

by Dr. Eowyn

Raymond Gaster is the owner of Gaster Lumber and Hardware, a small business in Savannah, Georgia.

This is the sign he put up in front of his store:

And here's his message to America:

"When the prez of the U.S. stands up and says that 'you didn't build that, someone else did,' he insulted every businessman who ever started a business and tried to run a successful business. It's time we stood up and say 'NO, Mr. President, you are wrong. I built this business.' If you have a marque or a sign board you owe it to your country to answer back. This is my answer to Obama."

-Raymond Gaster
Gaster Lumber & Hardware
Celebrating 27 Years of Providing Materials for Savannah's Finest Homes

H/t FOTM's Miss May

~Eowyn

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/a-sign-for-obama/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

WTF? House Passes Bill Eliminating Senate Confirmation for Presidential Appointees




New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

WTF? House Passes Bill Eliminating Senate Confirmation for Presidential Appointees

by Scotty Starnes

What in the hell are Republicans thinking. Did they forget whose in the White House and the radicals he's already appointed? The same guy who constantly usurps congressional power and ignore the checks and balances set up by the Constitution.

From DC:

UPDATEThe House passed the legislation Tuesday night by a vote of 261-116. The bill now goes to President Obama's desk for his signature.

The House of Representatives is set to consider legislation Tuesday that would exempt certain presidential appointees from having to be confirmed by the Senate.

But a number of conservative groups are arguing that the "Presidential Efficiency and Streamlining Act" amounts to Congress neutering itself and giving the executive branch unprecedented power.

Presidential appointees that would no longer require Senate confirmation under the legislation include the treasurer of the United States and the deputy administrator of the Federal Aviation Administration.

"The United States Constitution does not bestow kingly powers on the President to appoint the senior officers of the government with no process," wrote Thomas McClusky, the senior vice president for the Family Research Council's legislative arm, in a Monday memo to lawmakers.

Sources told The Daily Caller that there is concern in the ranks among conservatives opposed to the legislation that House leaders will bring the legislation up for a voice vote to avoid putting members on the record.

"I can tell you that there will be members who want this vote on the record," an aide to one conservative member told TheDC. "Whether or not they'll get the chance is still in question."

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor's office didn't comment on questions Tuesday from TheDC about the bill.

But the intent of the legislation is to help tackle the backlog of presidential appointees needing congressional confirmation. Critics like McClusky argue this is the result of a larger problem.

"If the Senate wants to streamline the process, it should eliminate some of the administration's positions," McClusky wrote.

The legislation, sponsored by New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, passed the Senate in June 2011, with 20 Republicans voting against it. The Senate bill has 17 co-sponsors, including both Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and Republican Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

McClusky of FRC Action estimated in his memo that "thousands of positions would be filled by the President without any Senate vetting."

The legislation would affect appointments across the executive branch, including to the Defense, Homeland Security and Justice departments.

Referencing the Obama administration, McClusky wrote that, "In an administration that's already circumvented Congress with dozens of controversial 'czars' this would mean even less accountability for the White House."

Continue reading>>>

 

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/wtf-house-passes-bill-eliminating-senate-confirmation-for-presidential-appointees/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Gold Medal Winning Olympians Will Pay $9,000 to IRS for Each Medal Won




New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Gold Medal Winning Olympians Will Pay $9,000 to IRS for Each Medal Won

by Scotty Starnes

Taxing our Olympians who represent our country? Wanna bet it was a tax-cheat liberal who wrote this tax law.

WASHINGTON, D.C. — While 529 hardworking athletes proudly represent the United States in the 2012 Olympics, any medals and money they earn wearing red, white and blue will be taxed by the IRS. According to research done by the Americans for Tax Reform Foundation, U.S. Olympic athletes are liable to pay income tax on medals earned and prizes received at the London games.

American medalists face a top income tax rate of 35 percent. Under U.S. tax law, they must add the value of their Olympic medals and prizes to their taxable income. It is therefore easy to calculate the tax bite on Olympic glory.

At today's commodity prices, the value of a gold medal is about $675.  A silver medal is worth about $385 while a bronze medal is worth under $5.

There are also prizes that accompany each medal:  $25,000 for gold, $15,000 for silver, and $10,000 for bronze.

So how much will U.S. Olympic medal winners have to pay in taxes to the IRS?

Medal Tax Prize Tax Total Tax Burden
Gold $236 $8,750 $8,986
Silver $135 $5,250 $5,385
Bronze $2 $3,500 $3,50

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/08/01/gold-medal-winning-olympians-will-pay-9000-to-irs-for-each-medal-won/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.