Saturday, March 24, 2012

**JP** Daughter....." Beti .... "بیٹی "


Thanks and JazakAllah for the very nice and useful and mubarak write up with the references from Allah and Rasoo.
 
May I add that people spend a lot of money unfortunately on Jahez, and earn the wrath of Allah on this overspending and seting of wrong examples.
But the Haq-e-Meher is not given its due respect. If the bride's family spends ten lac  rupees on jahez and the bridegroom's family spends fixes the Haq-e-Meher at a much lower level, (sometimes even less than one lac rupees)  then it just shows that the bridegroom's family is out to punish the bride's family. They should be ashamed that they demand (or expect) a huge jahez, but when it comes to fixing the Haq-e-Meher, they talk of simplicity. What a shame
 
----- Original Message -----

 

 

 

 

بسم اللہ الرحمٰن الرحیم
السلامُ علیکم و رحمۃ اللہ و برکاتہ

 

بیٹی

 

https://fbcdn-sphotos-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/378234_2715878948550_1604264791_31929783_1657935731_n.jpg

 

بیٹی آئی گھر میں،،،


اور چلی گئی اپنے اصلی گھر میں،،،

یہ دو تصاویر ہیں ایک تصویر میں ایک بیٹی آئی ہے
دوسری تصویر میں جا رہی ہے

 کہ بیٹیوں کو جانا ہی ہوتا ہے.

اگر ماں باپ کو اللہ تقدیر لکھنے کا موقع دیتا

 تو وہ اپنی بیٹی کی تقدیر میں
دنیا جہاں کی خوشیاں لکھ دیتے

بیٹی کیا ہوتی ہے؟

 

اللہ اور رسول صلی الله عليه وسلم

 

کی نظر میں یہ اللہ کی طرف سے رحمت ہوتی ہے.

 تمام ہی مذاہب کے لوگ ایک بات کو مانتے ہیں

 کہ رزق عورت کی قسمت میں ہوتا ہے .

مرد محنت کرتا ہے

 لیکن اپنی محنت کا پھل عورت کے نصیب کے درخت سے پاتا ہے.

میرے آقا صلی اللہ علیہ و سلم کا فرمان ذیشان ہے

کہ رزق عورت کی قسمت میں ہوتا ہے.

آپ صلی الله عليه وسلم نے

 تنگدست صحابہ کو شادی کرنے کا حکم دیا

 تاکہ رزق میں کشادگی ھو .

 اور پھر واقعی لوگوں نے دیکھا کہ

ان پر رزق کی بارش ہوئی .


بیٹی کی محبت کیا ہوتی ہے؟

 

ہم سب جانتے ہیں کہ کس طرح میرے آقائے دوجہاں صلی الله عليه وسلم

اپنی پیاری بیٹی کو آتا دیکھ کر کھڑے ہوجاتے تھے

 اور کس طرح پیشانی مبارک پر بوسہ دیا کرتے تھے.
کسی نے کیا خوبصورت بات کہی کہ بیٹا صرف اس وقت تک بیٹا ہوتا ہے

 جب تک اس کی شادی نہیں ہوجاتی اور
بیٹی اس وقت تک بیٹی رہتی ہے

 جب تک قبر کی مٹی اس کے وجود کو ہمیشہ کیلئے اپنی آغوش میں نہیں لے لیتی .

بیٹیاں الله کی رحمت ہوتی ہیں

 

مگر آج کل کے دور میں جہیز جیسی لعنت نے ہر کسی کو اپنی لپیٹ میں لے رکھا ہے ،

 جہیز ہمارے معاشرے کا ایک مہلک ناسور بن گیا ہے۔۔

اور اس کی جڑیں اس طرح مضبوط ہوگئی ہیں کہ اہل ثروت کے ساتھ ساتھ غریب بھی نا چاہتے ہوئے اس مرض کے شکار ہیں۔۔

 

اپنی جھوٹی شان و شوکت،

 

 معاشرے میں ناک اونچی رکھنے کے لئے اور بیٹی کو اپنی بہن کو سسرال میں عزت دلانے کے لئے جہیز کے نام پر اتنا کچھ دیا جا رہا ہے کہ عقل دنگ رہ جاتی ہے۔

خیال آتا ہے کہ جیسے ہم زمانہ جاہلیت میں گرتے چلے جا رہے ہوں۔
دوسری طرف غریب آدمی کی پہنچ سے نکاح جیسا مقدس بندھن بھی دور ہوتا جا رہا ہے۔

اس کی وجہ لوگوں کے اندر جہیز جیسی لعنت کا لالچ،

 زیادہ قیمتی سازوسامان کی ہوس اور حرص نے لوگوں کو بے حس کر دیا ہے۔

اس لعنت کی وجہ سے رشتوں کا لحاظ ختم ہو گیا ہے۔

جھوٹی شان و شوکت،

 

سوسائٹی میں ناک اونچی رکھنے کی خاطر کیا ہم بہت سے خونی رشتوں کا گلہ نہیں گھونٹ رہے ہیں۔

 ہم ایسا کر رہے ہیں کیونکہ کہیں ہم اونچا خاندان دیکھتے ہیں

 کہیں ہم ذات پات، قبیلے، دیکھتے ہیں،

 پر کیا یہ ساری باتیں ہندوﺅں کے لئے نہیں ہیں۔ یہ خاندان کا معیاریہ ذات، برادری یہ سارا کچھ تو ہندو کرتے ہیں۔

مسلمان تو ایسا نہیں کرتے ہیں۔

دیکھئے قرآن پاک میں

 

 کہ کل کائنات کے خالق و مالک اللہ سبحانہ و تعالیٰ کیا کہتے ہیں۔

 

سورة الجرات

میں ارشاد باری تعالیٰ ہے کہ :
" اے لوگو !

 بے شک ہم نے تمہیں ایک مرد اور ایک عورت سے پیدا کیا ہے

 اور ہم نے تمہیں برادریاں اور قبیلے کر دیا

 تاکہ تم ایک دوسرے کو پہچانو۔

بے شک اللہ کے ہاں تم میں سے زیادہ عزت والا

وہ ہے کہ جو تم میں سے زیادہ پرہیزگار ہے۔ بے شک اللہ جاننے والا، خبر رکھنے والا ہے"۔

 

ہمیں اللہ کے ہاں عزت اور مرتبہ، اونچے

 خاندان، زمین و دولت، قبیلے اور برادریوں کی بنا پر نہیں ملنا بلکہ ہمارے اپنے اعمال کی وجہ سے ہر مقام و رتبہ ملنا ہے۔

پھر ہم کن کھیل تماشوں میںخود کو برباد کر رہے ہیں۔

 یہ مایوں، مہندی، سب فضول اور ہندوﺅں کی رسمیں ہیں

میرے آقا حضرت محمد مصطفیٰ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے "نکاح کو نصف ایمان قرار دیا ہے"۔

 اسلامی تاریخ اٹھا کر دیکھیے آج سے تقریباً چودہ سو سال پہلے آنحضرت صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے اپنی پیاری بیٹی حضرت فاطمۃ الزھرۃ کے نکاح مبارک میں نہ کوئی نمود و نمائش کی ہے نہ کوئی جھوٹی شان و شوکت دکھائی ہے اور نہ جہیز میں بڑا گھر دیا ہے۔؟

 بس ایک عدد جائے نماز، آٹا پیسنے والی چکی اور چند گھریلو ضرورت کی اشیاءاور مہمانوں کی خاطر کھجوروں اور دودھ سے کی گئی۔ معمولی حق مہر کی رقم، نبی صلی الله عليه وسلم کی بیٹی کی شادی اور سادگی کی منہ بولتی تصویر، ہم وہ کیوں نہیں کرتے جو ہمیں کرنے کو ہمارا اسلام کہتا ہے۔

اسلام کہتا ہے کہ سادگی اپناﺅ،

 

 زندگی کے تمام معاملات، نکاح مسجد میں کرو، ولیمہ کا اعلان مسجد میں کرو۔

 غریبوں، یتیموں، مسکینوں کو کھانا کھلاﺅ اور ہم غریبوں کو اپنی دعوتوں کے پاس سے گزرنے نہیں دیتے ہیں۔

 ہم جب تک بڑے بڑے ہوٹلز میں مہندی، بارات، ولیمہ کی تقریب نہ کر لیں ہمیں لوگ عزت دار نہیں کہتے ہیں کیونکہ ہمارے خیال میں جس کے پاس پیسہ ہے معاشرے میں اسی کی عزت ہے اور اسی کے پاس ساری پاور ہے۔

 غریب چاہے روز گھٹ گھٹ کر جیتا رہے یا مرتا رہے اس کو کوئی پوچھنے والا نہیں ہے۔ بھلے جہیز نہ لانے پر اس کی بیٹی کو زندہ جلایا جائے یا بچے چھین کر گھر سے ہی کیوں نہ نکالا جائے ہمیں اس سے کیا ہم نے تو اپنا دل خوش کرنا ہے۔

 خواہ غریب کی بیٹیاں خودکشی ہی کیوں نہ کریں۔

ہمارا کیا جاتا ہے ہمارے پاس تو پیسہ ہے ہم اپنی بہنوں، بیٹیوں کو سب کچھ دینے کی صلاحیت رکھتے ہیں۔

جب قرآن و حدیث سے ہمیں سب سبق ملتا ہے تو پھر کیوں نہ اس کو پھیلاتے ہوئے جہیز کے
ناسور کو معاشرے سے ختم کر دیں۔

 اس لعنت سے چھٹکارا حاصل کر لیں۔

 پہلا قدم اٹھانا مشکل ہے مگر ناممکن نہیں ہے۔

 اس جہیز جیسی لعنت کی شروعات ہم ہی لوگوں نے کی ہیں اور ہم ہی اس کو ختم کریں گے۔

 کوئی باہر سے مسیحا نہیں آئے گا،

 کوئی معجزہ رونما نہیں ہو گا۔

آئیں آج خود سے عہد کریں کہ ہم یہ کوشش ضرور کریں گے کہ ہم سادگی کو اپنا اوڑھنا بچھونا بنا لیں۔

کہیں ایسا نہ ہو کہ اس کی جڑیں ہمارے معاشرے میں گہری ہو جائیں۔

آخر میں بس اتنا کہنا ہے کہ بیٹیوں کو جانا ہی ہوتا ہے.


اللہ ہر بیٹی کے نصیب اچھے کرے

اور ہم سب کو بھی

 سنت رسول صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم

 کی پیروی میں بچیوں کی شادی

 سادگی سے کرنے کی اور ہر مسلمان کو

 خاص کر نوجوانوں کو جہیز جیسی لعنت سے بچنے کی توفیق عطاء فرمائے

اور ہم سب کو قرآن و حدیث کے مطابق زندگی گزارنے کی توفیق عطا فرمائے۔
اللہ ہم سب کا حامی و ناصر ہو۔
آمین


 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

 

 

 

 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Re: **JP** Picture of the Day!

IS  IT  THAT  HEAVEN ?????????????????????????????????
= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
 
 
 
On 23 March 2012 03:37, JoinPakistan <joinpakistan@gmail.com> wrote:

 
Heaven on Earth
Pakistan is one of the biggest blessings of Allah for any Pakistani. Whatever we have today it's all because of Pakistan, otherwise, we would have nothing. Please be sincere to Pakistan.
Pakistan Zindabad!

ہم پاکستان ایک وطن ایک قوم



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

CAIR: Supporting America...




In Defense Of The Constitution

News & Analysis

March 23, 2012
http://www.anti-cair-net.org/CAIRSupportingAmerica....html


     CAIR:  Supporting America...

     Since the founding of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), the majority of non-Muslim citizens of the United States have been constantly accused of "Islamophobia" (a word created as a propaganda tool used by CAIR), "racism" (even though there is no such race as "Muslim"), and "intolerance" (a word used by many groups to describe those who disagree with them without using words of substance or evidence to back up their accusations).

     Our country cowers in submission, much like England, France, The Netherlands, and Germany, in that we cannot even have a rational discussion on political/radical Islam in the United States without having to gain "permission" from CAIR and other alphabet-soup so-called "Muslim Civil Rights Groups".  Even our military services are forced to accept questionable Muslim chaplains vetted by the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), yet another front group for radical Islam.

     The current state of the "Mainstream Media" in the United States is partly to blame.  Consider that the New York Times (NYT) is still believed by many Americans (and other newspapers) as the "paper of record".  NYT articles and columnists are followed throughout the United States.  While the NYT may get it right on occasion, the simple fact is that it appears willfully wrong on the Islamist threat to our country.

     This ability to overlook the obvious is not limited to the NYT. It infects any number of American papers whose reporters and editorial staff simply aren't up to the challenge of honest reporting regarding the fascist ideology of CAIR members and their ilk.  And really, who can blame them?  Events all over the world have demonstrated that murder and mayhem may await any paper, reporter, or social commentator who dare to take an objective look at the threat of radical Islamic ideology. (It's much "safer" to pick on Christians and Jews who are known for actually praying for those who insult their faith, not terror murdering them or their children.)

     So where should we turn if the mainstream press won't report the truth?  Due to a poor educational system and a deliberate policy of "speak no evil" when it comes to the darker side of Islamic beliefs by our local, state, and national governments, it seems that we the people are over a barrel when it comes to seeking answers from those whose responsibility it is to provide them.  If the government won't speak the truth regarding radical Islam, how can we count on it to protect us from the terror of radical Islam?

     Even more disturbing forces are at play.  For example; Congressman Peter King recently attended a rally in support of the New York City Police Department (NYPD).  The rally came about in response to a NYT article outing on-going investigations of various Islamic groups in the New York - New Jersey area.  Apparently, Governor Christie of New Jersey was upset that the NYPD hadn't kissed the ring of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (JTTF) unit in Newark, New Jersey before pursuing its investigation. While Governor Christie can complain over what is, essentially, hurt feelings, the underlying question that should be asked is: "Why didn't the NYPD approach the JTTF?"  Could it be that the NYPD knows something about the JTTF that made the JTTF an unreliable partner?  Perhaps the JTTF administrators would have refused to back the investigation and label it as being "un-American"?  Was there a security issue? We'll never know because the mainstream media won't investigate.

     CAIR and CAIR's fellow travelers are constantly brow beating us on how oppressed "Muslims" are in the United States.  We can take CAIR at their word. The highly esteemed (and deported) CAIR Community Relations Director Bassem Khafagi (currently running for president of Egypt), said of the United States: "I loved the place I lived in, but I never loved the US, the infidel country".  We can suppose he didn't love the USA because he was deported following his conviction on two charges of bank fraud and one count of visa fraud.  In his running for president of Egypt, he has promised to "complete the implementation of Islamic law in Egypt. I do not hide this truth in any way, because it is in keeping with the inclination of the Egyptian people."  One has to wonder, did Khafagi bother to ask the Copts or Jews (are there any Jews left in Egypt?) how they feel about living under Sharia Law with it's well-known respect for human rights and religious liberty?  Will Friday services at the Mosque be followed by amputation of various body parts at the local mall parking lot for Sharia Law-breakers, as is very common in that paragon of Islamic jurisprudence, Saudi Arabia?  So much for CAIR's stated position of respect for all religions.

     Our forefathers bequeathed us a country founded in respect for the law and tolerance of religious beliefs.  Our enemies should not interpret our tolerance as weakness.  Our governing bodies and press should discontinue their policies of appeasement of political/radical Islam that serves no practical purpose beyond conditioning our people to accept the unacceptable.  Now is the time to take a stand and say "no more".

     There is no law that demands the mainstream media quote CAIR and no government policy that requires CAIR be consulted on anything Islamic.

     CAIR, founded by terrorists, is a media parasite.

     Starve CAIR of exposure and it will dry up and blow away like dog dung on a hot sidewalk. 

     This is as it should be.



Andrew Whitehead
Director
Anti-CAIR
ajwhitehead@anti-cair-net.org
www.anti-cair-net.org


Story Links:
http://frontpagemag.com/2011/11/11/islamophobia-a-license-to-kill/print/
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/12/01/exclusive-concerns-military-chaplain-vetting-policy/
http://globalspin.blogs.time.com/2011/11/02/firebombed-french-paper-a-victim-of-islamistsor-its-own-obnoxious-islamophobia/
http://www.investigativeproject.org/3478/american-islamist-groups-mum-on-iranian-repression
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/charlesmoore/9152440/Home-grown-freedoms-are-the-strongest.html
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/france/8864063/French-satirical-newspaper-Charlie-Hebdo-firebombed-after-prophet-Mohammed-announcement.html
http://www.aolnews.com/2010/05/11/muhammad-cartoonist-attacked-during-college-lecture/
http://www.politicker.com/2012/03/05/peter-king-slams-left-wing-rumormongers-in-the-press-for-criticizing-nypds-treatment-of-muslims/
http://www.investigativeproject.org/3460/why-muslim-student-group-concerned-the-nypd
http://www.investigativeproject.org/3477/nypd-criticism-draws-new-scrutiny-to-chris
http://www.njsp.org/divorg/invest/counter-terrorism-bureau.html
http://www.investigativeproject.org/3486/under-oath-alamoudi-ties-mas-to-brotherhood
http://www.investigativeproject.org/3489/cair-official-sees-nypd-cia-israeli-conspiracy
http://www.memri.org/report/en/0/0/0/0/0/0/6201.htm
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/03/05/why-nypd-monitoring-should-be-welcome-news-to-us-muslims.html
http://www.danielpipes.org/3511/cair-backs-down-from-anti-cair


Follow Anti-CAIR on twitter
Get private updates on your cell phone by texting
follow AntiCAIR to 40404 in the United States
http://twitter.com/AntiCAIR



ADVISORY:
Please use a non-corporate/non-work e-mail address if you contact CAIR or Anti-CAIR or receive our material.  CAIR may attempt to shame your employer into terminating you if they believe you are receiving "objectionable" material. We make every reasonable effort to protect our mailing list, but we cannot guarantee confidentiality. Anti-CAIR does not share, loan, sell, rent or otherwise publicize our mailing list.  We respect your privacy!

TIPS:
All persons are invited to submit tips and leads.  Anti-CAIR will acknowledge receipt of all tips/leads, but we will NOT acknowledge the source of ANY tip or lead in our Press Releases or on our web site. Exceptions are made for leading media personalities at the discretion of Anti-CAIR and only on request of the person(s) submitting the tip or lead.


setstats


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

A Personal Note as Obama Speaks on Death of Trayvon Martin

From Coleman

A Personal Note as Obama Speaks on Death of Boy
By JACKIE CALMES and HELENE COOPER

NYTimes Published: March 23, 2012
WASHINGTON — President Obama did not mention race even as he addressed
it on Friday, instead letting his person and his words say it all: "If
I had a son, he'd look like Trayvon."


A rally was held on Thursday in Sanford, Fla., to protest handling of
the Trayvon Martin case.

Weighing in for the first time on the death of Trayvon Martin, the
unarmed black teenager shot and killed a month ago in Florida by a
neighborhood watch volunteer, Mr. Obama in powerfully personal terms
deplored the "tragedy" and, as a parent, expressed sympathy for the
boy's mother and father.

"I can only imagine what these parents are going through. And when I
think about this boy, I think about my own kids," Mr. Obama said.
"Every parent in America," he added, "should be able to understand why
it is absolutely imperative that we investigate every aspect of this
and that everybody pulls together — federal, state and local — to
figure out exactly how this tragedy happened."

While speaking movingly from his perspective as the father of two
girls, one a teenager, Mr. Obama notably made no reference to the
racial context that has made the killing of Trayvon and the gunman's
claim of self-defense a rallying point for African-Americans. Since
Mr. Obama first began campaigning to be "president of all the people,"
as his advisers would put it when pressed on racial issues, he has
been generally reluctant to talk about race. And after his historic
election as the first black president, Mr. Obama learned the hard way
about the pitfalls of the chief executive opining on law enforcement
matters involving civil rights.

His remark at a news conference in the summer of 2009 that a white
police officer in Cambridge, Mass., had acted "stupidly" in arresting
a black Harvard law professor, Henry Louis Gates Jr., at his home led
to a national controversy that ended with Mr. Obama holding a
peacemaking "beer summit" with the two men at the White House.

Until Friday, Mr. Obama had refrained from commenting on the death of
Trayvon, 17, a high school student who was killed on the night of Feb.
26 in Sanford, Fla., near Orlando. George Zimmerman, 28, the
neighborhood watch volunteer, said he fired at Trayvon in
self-defense, although there is no apparent evidence that the
teenager, who held only a bag of Skittles candy and an iced tea, was
doing anything wrong.

But when a reporter asked about the case at a White House event
introducing Jim Yong Kim as his choice to be president of the World
Bank, Mr. Obama, who typically leaves such events ignoring the shouted
questions of reporters, seemed prepared.

"It was inevitable given the high-profile nature of this story that he
would be asked about it," his press secretary, Jay Carney, said later.
He added that Mr. Obama "had thought about it and was prepared to
answer that question when he got it."

Mr. Carney himself had refused for days to speak for Mr. Obama about
Trayvon's death, and other advisers on Friday likewise declined to
weigh in on the thinking at the White House about the case and its
repercussions. Mr. Obama's mostly white male inner circle has long
been reluctant to talk for their boss when the subject is race, given
how personal it is for him. One aide, speaking only on the grounds of
anonymity, said that there was no internal debate about how to respond
to Trayvon's death, but that Mr. Obama wanted to await the Justice
Department's initial review of the case and the announcement this week
by his attorney general, Eric H. Holder Jr., that the civil rights
division would investigate.

In his remarks, Mr. Obama endorsed the Justice Department
investigation as well as efforts by local and state agencies in
Florida to examine the circumstances of the shooting. Trayvon's
parents "are right to expect that all of us as Americans are going to
take this with the seriousness it deserves, and that we're going to
get to the bottom of exactly what happened," Mr. Obama said.

The president indicated his caution in not reacting earlier was due to
the hazards of addressing an issue under inquiry. "I'm the head of the
executive branch and the attorney general reports to me so I've got to
be careful about my statements to make sure that we're not impairing
any investigation that's taking place right now," he said.

The Rev. Al Sharpton, the civil rights leader who organized a rally on
Thursday night in Florida protesting the handling of the case and has
been working with the Martin family, praised Mr. Obama's comments and
took issue with black critics who say the president should have spoken
out sooner.

"We're trying to win a case, not just have the president make
high-profile statements," Mr. Sharpton said in an interview. "As one
who's been with the family, the president making a statement before
the Justice Department announced an investigation could have been used
by Zimmerman to say the White House was pre-judging a legal case."

Charles J. Ogletree, an African-American law professor at Harvard who
taught Mr. Obama there and remains a confidant, said there was no
doubt the president had been moved by Trayvon's death. "Nothing is
more frightening for a parent than losing a child," Professor Ogletree
said. "I know personally that he felt this pain, from the moment he
was made aware of the case." He added: "He has two young daughters.
This is personal."

Mr. Carney said he could not say whether Mr. Obama planned to call
Trayvon's parents, as some black activists have urged. Boyce D.
Watkins, a Syracuse University professor and the founder of the Your
Black World coalition, said Friday in a Twitter message, "If Trayvon's
mother were white, would Obama give her a call?"

Dr. Watkins, in an interview, called Mr. Obama's statement "a step in
the right direction," but added that the president could "squash a
great deal of the criticism" with a call to the parents. And while
applauding Mr. Obama's comment that his own son would look like
Trayvon, Dr. Watkins said the president's remarks were characteristic
of how Mr. Obama talks to black people.

"That's what I would refer to as a standard political smoke signal
that President Obama sends through the back door to the black
community," Dr. Watkins said. "He communicates to the black community
in code language. That's a subtle way of saying, 'I know this kid is
black.' "

Mr. Obama's comments appeared to prompt several of the Republicans
campaigning to run against him to weigh in against the shooting for
the first time. Both Newt Gingrich and Rick Santorum said that based
on what they knew, Florida's "Stand Your Ground" self-defense law
should not apply in Mr. Zimmerman's case.

Speaking publicly for the first time on Friday evening, Craig A.
Sonner, Mr. Zimmerman's lawyer, said on CNN that he would not use the
Stand Your Ground defense should his client be charged in the
shooting. He said he would use self-defense.

Mr. Santorum, campaigning at a shooting range in Louisiana, which
holds a presidential primary on Saturday, called the decision of local
officials not to immediately prosecute Mr. Zimmerman "another chilling
example of horrible decisions made by people in this process." Mitt
Romney, the Republican front-runner, told reporters in Louisiana that
the shooting was "a terrible tragedy, unnecessary, uncalled for and
inexplicable at this point."


Richard A. Oppel Jr. contributed reporting from West Monroe and Shreveport, La.


There are 2 things you must know about how I work:
When you need me but do not want me,
I must stay.
When you want me but do not need me,
I must go.
- Nanny McPhee

-= The Creative World of Coleman Wheeler =-
http://www.angelfire.com/il/adventureclub


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Fwd: [New post] Notes on a General Theory of the Social Cycle



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: ThinkMarkets
Date: Wednesday, March 21, 2012
Subject: [New post] Notes on a General Theory of the Social Cycle
To: majors.bruce@gmail.com


New post on ThinkMarkets

<http://s.wordpress.com/i/emails/blavatar-default.png>

Notes on a General Theory of the Social Cycle

by gcallah

by Gene Callahan

Monday past at our colloquium Andreas Hoffman presented a fascinating paper attempting to depict Austrian Business Cycle Theory as a special case of a more general business cycle theory based upon Hayek's later work on spontaneous orders. Hoffman's general idea (I won't do it justice in this brief summary, so please have a look at the paper) is that business cycles occur when a "displacement" creates a situation in which people are uncertain how to make "adjustments" to move back closer to equilibrium. The period during which people are groping about for what to do creates the slump, and the upturn comes, of course, once they have gotten the hang of the new situation.

A lively discussion followed, during which Israel Kirzner, Mario Rizzo, and others pressured Hoffman on just what he meant by an "adjustment," a "displacement," and why these things would create a cycle, rather than merely ongoing "churning," to use Kirzner's word. (He also mentioned Lachmann's notion of the "kaleidic society" in this context.)

Riding home on the subway afterwards, what struck me was that we lacked a general framework of accepted definitions for talking about things like adjustments, displacements, and social cycles. (I will justify the use of "social" later.) As soon as I noticed this, the following thoughts entered my mind, essentially all at once. Some of them were drawn directly from the discussion. And they are all very preliminary: but that is one thing that blogs are for, is it not? In any case, feedback on these presently sketchy ideas is welcomed. Read more of this post

gcallah | March 21, 2012 at 2:11 pm | Categories: Austrian Business Cycle, Austrian Economics, Hayek | URL: http://wp.me/pmseG-1mr

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://thinkmarkets.wordpress.com/2012/03/21/notes-on-a-general-theory-of-the-social-cycle/

Thanks for flying with <http://s.wordpress.com/i/emails/wp-footericon.png> WordPress.com
<http://stats.wordpress.com/b.gif?host=thinkmarkets.wordpress.com&blog=5351758&post=5235&subd=thinkmarkets&ref=&email=1&email_o=wpcom>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.