Sunday, June 5, 2011

Re: Vendor of President Barack Obama condoms arrested again in New York

I was enjoying your point of view and sound thought about this case.  I was thinking-wow: What a great legal point of view.  Then I got to the last line and had a fantastic chuckle.  One that is well needed first thing in the morning....

On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 5:03 AM, Keith In Köln <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
Assuming that this gentleman prevails on Appeal, which I assume he will based on what I know of this case,  he should file against the City of New York, and specifically against whatever law enforcement agency is arresting him after a court has said that his actions are legal.  this is clearly in violation of 42 USC Section 1983 & 1985, and I don't believe that any law enforcement agent who arrests this guy would be immune from litigation.  In other words, law enforcement,  in my professional opinion,  could very well be liable for damages caused by the arrest, loss of profit, loss of sales,  the consequences of being incarcerated,  (again loss of sales and profit; just on another level)  and collateral damages. 
 
I hope he busts the City of New York's ass over this; and whatever bureaucratic Moonbat is giving instructions for his arrest.
 


 
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Fox News turned on Palin

Boy.....This is sure, "Much Ado, About Nothing".....
 


 
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 6:49 PM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:








June 2, 2011

Fox News turned on Palin

http://www.israpundit.com/archives/36487

To be fair, a number of people who read this story on C4P came to the defense of FOX in part. They cited Hannity and Greta, Judge Jeanine and Judge Neapolitano as still favourably inclined. On the other hand Smith and others have now taken to calling her Contributor Palin rather than Gov Palin. You decide. Ted Belman

With Friends Like Fox News Palin Is Better Off With Her Enemies
by: Sheya

Recently we had a series of discussions with someone familiar with the inside dealings of Fox News regarding the way Fox News treats Governor Palin. While I don't condone using anonymous sources (I usually make fun of those citing anonymous sources) unfortunately we can't not reveal the source. So we have therefore gathered the evidence that will back up everything we were told and it's up to the reader to come to his or her own conclusion. Whichever way you look at it, the evidence is astonishing on how Fox News is out to sabotage Governor Palin.


When Roger Ailes hired Governor Palin, he thought he was hiring a puppet. He thought that he would groom her, train her, educate her and prop her up to become his candidate for president and that he would be able to pull her strings. Sort of being to Sarah Palin what George Soros is to Barack Obama.

It didn't take him long to find out that Governor Palin comes with no strings attached. No one tells her what to do, no one dictates to her, and no one controls her. Unlike the current occupant of the Oval Office, Governor Palin has a mind of her own.

In March 2010, when Governor Palin did Real American Stories, Fox News botched it up by using an interview with LL Cool J without asking him. They eventually took it out but it became an international controversy which took away from the effect of the show and hurt the Governor. Governor Palin didn't take it sitting down and she confronted Fox about the debacle. Ailes didn't take it lightly.

When Bill O'Reilly kept interrupting her interviews and finally Governor Palin confronted him on television, Bill's ego was hurt and he didn't like it. Governor Palin warned O'Reilly to behave or else.

In an article in the New York Mag Gabriel Sherman writes about Roger Ailes:

"He thinks things are going in a bad direction," another Republican close to Ailes told me. "Roger is worried about the future of the country. He thinks the election of Obama is a disaster. He thinks Palin is an idiot. He thinks she's stupid. He helped boost her up. People like Sarah Palin haven't elevated the conservative movement."

Fox of course stonewalled and came out and sort of denied it. The truth is that both are right. Ailes does not think Governor Palin is an idiot, far from it. He thinks Palin is shrewd. Though, as Sherman points out that "Fox's PR department is notoriously strict when it comes to internal leaks," Fox deliberately had that leaked in an attempt to kick Governor Palin in the shins. Ailes does believe that he helped boost her up and that she owes him her fame. He also believes that Palin is hurting the Fox brand.

It has been reported that before Governor Palin made the video in response to being accused of murder, she called Roger Ailes and asked for his advice. Governor Palin called a number of people and the advice was split; some told her to ignore it, others advised her that it would do her good to respond. Everyone she spoke to was well aware that she was simply reaching out to hear opinions and their advice was non-committal. Roger Ailes advised her to "lie low, there's no need to inject yourself into the story"

After examining her options, Governor Palin decided to do the video. Ailes was disappointed that she didn't take his advice. But why?

In an interview with Russell Simmons that was posted on the website, globalgrind.com, Ailes said in relation to the Arizona shooting that "I told all of our guys, shut up, tone it down, make your argument intellectually. You don't have to do it with bombast. I hope the other side does that." To protect the Fox brand, Ailes also wanted the network to distance itself from Palin who was the number one target of the left. Ailes feared that by Governor Palin's association to the network, which was also somewhat targeted, Fox would be pulled into it even deeper.

It was at that point when Fox decided to throw Governor Palin under the bus. Ailes' advice to Governor Palin had nothing to do with protecting her; it was all about protecting the Fox brand. Governor Palin realized that she was on her own and even those who she thought she could count on to defend her were about to stab her in the back. It was from that point onwards that Fox's attitude towards Palin changed and in the following days every pundit on the network went from "Palin needs to respond" just a day before her video was released, to "Palin should have shut up" the next day.  The day before the video was released Bill O'Reilly complained that he invited Palin on his show to respond, which he thought was important for her to do, but the next day argued she should have ignored it.

That was the turning point for Ailes where he decided that Governor Palin is not his candidate and that he'll do whatever he can to make sure she isn't. Ailes needed someone he could control and Governor Palin clearly wasn't that person. Sometime in recent months the word went out internally that reporters, anchors and contributors should push the narrative that Palin isn't running as hard they can. No matter what Palin says or does or what the polls say, the rule is simple "Palin isn't running and everything she does is either for fun or for money".

At the time of this posting we have mixed reports and cannot confirm whether the message came down as "this is the way we're doing it" or if it came in by way of leading the staff to believe that management has information that Governor Palin was in fact not running. The difference comes down to whether the show hosts are being misled or are playing along.

Simultaneously, all the show hosts went from Governor Palin being a first tier candidate to Palin is not running. Chris Wallace went from Palin is a serious contender, to Palin isn't running,  Fox and Friends hosts went from being very much supportive of Palin to Palin isn't running. Only this week on Tuesday did Steve Doocy, Gretchen Carlson and Brian Kilmeade discuss wehther Palin's one nation bus tour was a sign that Governor Palin is running for president. Wednesday, Doocy said, "is she running, probably not." Carlson appeared to be biting her tongue. It appeared they got the memo a little late. If by accident some contributor or host does suggest she may be running they quickly, turn it to "but she has no shot at winning"

At the time of writing this post the following appeared on the Fox News home page as the line of the night:

Fox went into high gear hyping Michele Bachmann. Not that Ailes thinks much of Bachmann (some suggest because Fox didn't want to appear sexist, hyping another female candidate gives them cover), but it was to push a narrative that Palin is stepping on Bachmann's toes.  Never mind that Governor Palin was a potential candidate for nearly three years and the only reason Bachmann got in was because she saw an opening after the Arizona shooting. Ironically at the same time Ailes decided to throw Palin under the bus.

The facts speak for themselves. In my research for this article I was astonished at the level Fox stooped to diminish Palin. While this has been going on for weeks, this post can only be so long, the following examples are from the past seven days or so alone:

• When other politicians only jokingly say that they are thinking about running for president like they think about other stuff, Fox immediately runs with that person being a serious potential candidate. However when Palin does things that had any other candidate have done the exact same things Fox would have reported it as them seriously considering a run, with Palin it's covered as her just building her brand.

• Usually when Fox does segments they try to keep it fair and balanced. They'll usually bring on two people one from each side of the argument. Lately on segments related to Palin they'll bring on one democrat who'll claim Palin isn't running and is doing it for money, while the republican or "supposedly" Palin defender will just agree with what the democrat said or slightly spin  it in a different direction such as saying that Palin isn't running and she's playing for king maker role. Conservatives4Palin has reached out to Fox and offered to go on the network to defend and talk about the Governors record to balance those segments. While the person we spoke to was originally enthusiastic about the idea, Fox suddenly stopped responding to emails.

• On May 26 Gallup released a poll showing Palin effectively tied with Romney, while Fox displayed the poll on screen, during the segment Palin's name didn't even come up once, not even by accident. While all the other potential and non-potential candidates, even the completely irrelevant ones, were discussed at length.

• This week during Palin's bus tour Fox had not on a single contributor who even remotely suggested that Palin may be running while even those who regularly defended Palin were beginning to take cheap shots at the Governor.

• The Bus tour itself was embargoed till Thursday (May 26th) 3pm but it was Fox news's Carl Cameron who broke the embargo at noon.

• Bill O'Reilly had multiple segments this week discussing Governor Palin, he didn't find it necessary to bring in even one person that would even remotely suggest that Palin may even be considering a run. He let Dick Morris get away with claiming that Palin has ADD, and allowed Charles Krauthammer, whose frame of reference about Palin is weak, go on and talk about a topic he knows nothing about.

• On Monday May 31st Fox news Special Report did a Bachmann vs palin poll and even though Palin led 71-28 Fox reported it that Bachmann was leading 55 to 45 the following snapshot was taken within 10 minutes of the results being announced.

• Every time Governor Palin does an interview on Fox, she'll talk policy for 15 minutes and just at the end the host will ask some dumb question related to some controversial issue and that is the headline Fox will be running with, ignoring her substance and run with the trivia. Fox practically forced Governor Palin to come on to talk about the controversy surrounding the White House inviting the rapper common to the poetry ceremony. Something they would never have asked another potential presidential candidate to do.

• Fox has also been giving quite a bit of attention to the hit piece book by disgruntled Palin aid Frank Bailey. The book was mentioned on multiple segments on various shows.  Bailey appeared on the Hannity show where he was excoriated by Sean Hannity, but he also appeared on Alan Colmes' radio show. Colmes was sympathetic to Bailey. It was the Colmes interview that made it to the Fox website soon after it aired while the Hannity interview was posted 24 hours later.

And this is how the Fox Nation ran with the Bailey story. While generally supportive of Governor Palin, it leads with this rather damning paragraph:

A former member of Sarah Palin's inner circle has written a scathing tell-all, saying Palin was ready to quit as governor months before she actually resigned and was eager to leave office when more lucrative opportunities came around.

Now for the revelation: Fox wants Palin out but they don't want to suspend her contract because by doing so they'll be conceding that she's a serious contender. Fox won't do anything that would lend her credibility. They just want her to resign. The tactic now is to make Palin's life as difficult and as miserable as possible until Palin just gets frustrated and leaves on her own citing irreconcilable differences. Things are going to get worse. Fox is about to up the ante and it's going to get ugly.

While the entire Fox cast, reporters and contributors alike, have all teamed up, by leading or being misled, to sabotage Governor Palin, the Governor does have two friends at the network: Sean Hannity and Greta van Susteren. They still defend her and take her seriously. It is for this reason that while Fox is increasingly reducing Governor Palin's appearances on the network, the Governor is mostly only doing interviews with Hannity and Greta.

Yesterday Governor Palin met with her bosses at Fox News. While we are not aware of what went on in that meeting and what if anything came of it, in a statement executive vice president of programming Bill Shine said "Right now there is no change in her status with FOX News." Ben Smith makes an interestingobservation:

The "right now" didn't appear in earlier statements.

Hopefully Ben is on to something and the "right now" is short lived. Governor Palin doesn't need this crap, it's time for her to leave Fox News so she can freely do what she wants to do, that is talk to other networks who, even though they trash her all day, at least they take her as a serious threat and presidential contender.

Posted by Ted Belman @ 10:16 pm | 18 Comments »



 


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Vendor of President Barack Obama condoms arrested again in New York

Assuming that this gentleman prevails on Appeal, which I assume he will based on what I know of this case,  he should file against the City of New York, and specifically against whatever law enforcement agency is arresting him after a court has said that his actions are legal.  this is clearly in violation of 42 USC Section 1983 & 1985, and I don't believe that any law enforcement agent who arrests this guy would be immune from litigation.  In other words, law enforcement,  in my professional opinion,  could very well be liable for damages caused by the arrest, loss of profit, loss of sales,  the consequences of being incarcerated,  (again loss of sales and profit; just on another level)  and collateral damages. 
 
I hope he busts the City of New York's ass over this; and whatever bureaucratic Moonbat is giving instructions for his arrest.
 


 
On Sat, Jun 4, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Don't allow foreigners to come to the US and steal and American born child from his mother

Hey Mark,
 
Where did you learn of these facts that you are basing your opinion on?
 


 
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 1:52 AM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
Sharon,

You obviously are guilty of child abduction. Any acts committed by
your ex (?) prior to your marriage and that were known to you
(therefore considered "forgiven") are of course inadmissible. Each
time he was arrested and you did not press charges can not be used...
you forgave him by moving back in. Your child is a DUAL citizen with
rights in both countries... you were obviously domiciled in Sweden,
therefore their law (convention of the child to which only the US and
Somalia are not signatories) is the prevailing law. The time the child
spent with you, the kidnapper, does not count as custodial time.
Therefore the only threats that can be considered would be the ones
done at a distance of several thousand miles... why you did not seek a
protective order at that time one does not know. Because of this lack
of exhibited real concern shown for your own safety or that of your
child's; prior acts are inadmissible. You claim to be an MD, an
educated person. Your education failed you or you chose to ignore it.
You broke the law of the land where you resided by kidnapping the
child. You will be lucky to not do time in a Swedish prison. The
"gender card" you try to play does not suit or play well in European
courts and by extension in US courts hearing a European case. Moms are
not inherently more capable than Dads when raising kids... and you
know it.

Truly sorry for your self inflicted plight.

On Jun 4, 8:55 am, "Sharon Fuentes, M.D." <oneforentr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> This is a petition I started after my 29 month old was sent back to an
> admitted addict, alcoholic, violent man.  I am writing Congress and
> petitioning  that they change the law so that this does not happen
> again.  No foreigner should maek a mockery of our judicial system and
> lie the way these people did and steal a US born child from his
> perfectly normal and stable mother.
>
> Click the link below to see the petition page on Change.org.http://www.change.org/petitions/addictedviolent-father-given-son-by-u...

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** ہمارےنظام تعلیم میں تبدلیاں ضروری ہیں

Wajih.jpg ہمارےنظام تعلیم میں تبدلیاں ضروری ہیں
شمشیر حق۔۔۔محمد وجیہہ السماء
ہمارے ملک میں تعلیم عام کرو اور اس کو بڑہاؤ نعرہ ایک خوش اخلاق اور سب سے اچھا معلوم ہوتا ہے تا کہ ہمارے ملک کو ایجو کیشن ریٹ اوپر ہو جا ئے اور اس سے ہمارے پورے سسٹم کو فا ئد ہ پہنچے گا معشیت مضبوط ہو گی۔ملک تر قی کرے گا لو گو ں کو شعور آ ئے گا ان کا رہنے کا طریقہ تبدیل ہو گا ہر اچھے برے کی تمیز کر یں گے حق و باطل کی پہنچان کر یں گے اور یہ تب ہی ممکن ہے جب ہمارا نظام تعلیم میں تبدیلیاں ہو نگی لوگ ان تبدیلیوں پر خوش ہو نگے
سب سے پہلے تو ہمارے ٹیچرز کی طرف دہیان دینا چاہیئے کہ وہ کس سبجیکٹ کو اچھے اور منظم طریقے پڑھا سکتے ہیں آ یا ان میں وہ اہلیت ہے کہ وہ اپنے سبجیکٹ پر ہاوی ہیں کیا وہ جھنجلا ہٹ ، خوف اور بے چینی کا شکار تو نہیں ہو تے جب وہ پڑہا رہے ہو تے ہیں وہ بچوں کے سوالوں کے جواب آ رام سے دیتے ہیں اور کیا وہ اپنے لیکچرز پڑھ کر آ تے ہیں؟؟یا ویسے ہی آ جا تے ہیں کیا وہ صحیح طریقے سے پڑہا ر ہے ہیں یا جا ن چھو ڑا ر ہے ہیں کلاس رومز کا ما حول کیا ہے کیا بچے اپنا کام ٹھیک طر یقے سے کر رہے ہیںیا خوش گپیوں میں مصروف نظر آ تے ہیں۔پڑہا ئی کی طر ف کم اور کھیل کود کو ز یا دہ تر جیح دیتے ہیں ۔اور پڑ ہا ئی پر کم تو جہ دینا جیسے ان کا اس سے دور دور تک کا بھی واسطہ نہیں بچے ٹیچرز سے اور ٹیچرز بچوں سے کیا چا ہتے ہیں
ایسے بہت سے سوالات لو گوں، ٹیچرز ، اور طلباء کے ذہن میں آ تے ہیں اگر ان سوالوں کے جواب حل کر لیئے جا ئیں تو کافی حد تک نظام تعلیم میں فر ق پڑتے گااور اس کے ساتھ ساتھ ان سوالوں کے جواب تلاش کر نا شروع کریں تو ز یا دہ تر ٹیچزز اور پروفیسزز اپنے لیکچزز دیکھ کر نہیں آ تے طلبا ء کو جب علم نہیں د یا جا ئے گا تو وہ بیزار ہو تے ہیں
آ ج کل کے طلباء اور ٹیچرز کو پڑھا ئی کو کو ئی سروکار نہیں اگر استاتذہ پڑھا تے نہیں تو اپنی '' ڈہا ری'' لگا نے کے لئے کلاس میں آ تے ہیں تو دوسری طرف طلباء بھی بے خوف و خطر کلاس رومز میں خوش گپیوں میں نظر آ تے ہیں
ہمارے استاتذہ کو ان کی اہلیت کے مطا بق سبجیکٹ بھی نہیں دیئے جا تے یہ سب سے بڑی وجہ ہے کہ ہمارے ملک کا نظام تعلیم کا ریٹ اوپر نہیں ہو رہا چا ہے وہ سرکاری سکو ل ہو یا پرا ئیو ٹ۔ کہنے کو تواستاد تمام سبجیکٹ پڑہا لیتا ہے مگر حقیقت میں ان کی اہلیت نہیں ہو تی کہ وہ ان کتابوں کو پڑھا ئیںیا اس پر ھاوی ہوں
ایک اور بات سالانہ امتحانات کے ٹائم پر جو کیسزز بنائے جا تے ہیں ان میں کچھ طلباء تو معصوم ہو تے ہیں جو اپنی معصومیت کی وجہ سے مار ے جا تے ہیں اور کچھ طلبا ء بہت تیز ہو تے ہیں۔ مگر پھنسا دونوں کو دیا جا تا ہے
boards/ universties کو چا ہیئے کہ وہ اپنے ایڈ و کیٹ مقرر کر ے تا کہ وہ طلبا ء کی مدد کر یں اور ان کی اخلاقی اور سماجی مدد کی جا ئے اورا س سزا سے بچ سکیں جو انکو بوڑدز ۔ یو نیورسٹیز ز دے دیتی ہیں جس سے ایک طا لب علم کا مستقبل تباہ ہو کے رہ جا تا ہے
ایسے کیسزز میں نا تو کو ئی اپنا کا م آ تا ہے او رنا ہی استاتذہ،یعنی اگر طالب علم سکول کا ہے تو وہاں اپنے استاتذہ بھی کچھ نہیں کر سکتے نا مدد کر یں گے اور اگر کالج کا ہے تو پھر بھی پروفیسرز مدد نہیں کر سکیں گے صرف اور صرف خدا پر نظر ہو تی ہے اور دوسری طرف بوڑدز ، یو نیو رسٹیزز پر ہو تی ہے کہ وہ کیا فیصلہ کر تے ہیں
ہمارے خیا ل میں اگر ان کیااستاتذہ سے را بطہ کیا جا ئے جن طلبا ء کے کیسزز بنا ئے جا تے ہیں۔ ان کے ستاتذہ سے ان کے بار ے میں پوچھ گچھ کر نی چا ہیئے اگر ان کا رویہ اور پڑھا ئی میں اچھے ہو ں تو ان کا کیس ختم کر نا چا ہیئے اور ویسے بھی ان بورڈز ، یو نیورسٹیزز کی سزائیں بھی بہت زیادہ ہیں کیو نکہ اگر کسی بی اے کے بچے کا کیس بنا یا جا ئے تو اس کی عمر بیس سے چو بیس سال تک کی ہو تی ہے اور اگر وہ تین سال تک با ہر کر دیا جا ئے اور اسے جیل کی سزا بھی سنا دی جا ئے تو ان میں انتشار پیدا ہو گا اور وہ خو د سے بھی بیزار نظر آئیں گے انکی چھو ٹی سی غلطی کی بڑی سزا ہے اگر وہ جیل سے ہو کے آئیں گے تو پھر بڑ ے مجر م بھی بن جا تے ہیں
یہ بات الگ ہے کہ لوگ کہتے ہیں کہ جیل سے ہو کر آ نے والا سید ہا را ستہ اپنا لیتا ہے تصویر کا دوسرا رخ بھی دیکھنا چا ہیئے۔اس با ت پر سو چنے کی ضرورت ہے اور بور ڈز ، یو نیور سٹیزز کو ان با توں کی طرف خصو صی تو جہ دینی چا ہیئے اور اس کے ساتھ ساتھ طلبا ء کا بھی فر ض بنتا ہے کہ اس غیر اخلاقی حر کات نا کر یں جن سے ان کا مستقبل داؤ پر لگ جا ئے
آ ج کل پڑہے لکھے لو گ بیروز گار ہیں اس لئے ہر کو ئی کہتا ہے جیسا بھی کو ئی کام ملے بس '' ڈھنگ ٹپاؤ اور روزی کماؤ'' تا کہ اپنے پیٹ کا جہنم بھرا جا سکے
ہمارے طلباء کو بھی لیکچرز کی عز ت کا خیال نہیں کئی بار ایسے ہو تا ہے کہ طلباء اور ٹیچرز میں فر ق محسوس نہیں ہو تا ایسے با ت کر تے ہیں جیسے گھر میں بیٹھے ہو ں چلوا ستاتذہ کے لئے تو ایک پڑھا نے کا طر یقہ ہے مگر جب طلباء استاتذہ سے اس قسم کی گفتگو کر یں تو بہت سارے مسا ئل پیدا ہو تے ہیں
ہمارے استاتذہ کو بھی کلاس رومز میں رویہ سخت رکھا ہوا ہے ایسے لگتا ہے جیسے جنگل کے بادشا ہ و ہی ہیںیہ بھی ٹھیک نہیں ۔انہیں بھی تھوڑا ماحول کو سکون دہ بنانا ہو گا
اب اگر اب باتوں پر تھو ڑا سا دھیان د ے لیا جا ئے توامید ہے ہمارے نظام تعلیم میں کا فی حد تک کامیابی ملے گی اور نطام تعلیم کا معیار بہتر ہو گا

 Do remember me in your prayers.*
* *BEST REGARDS     
     
    
                  *http://wajisama.wordpress.com/*   



                          




*
 







--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197