Dear plainol...: I began writing my New Constitution in 1996 after I
became incensed by the faulty reasoning that was used to convict a
black man of rape. Did you ever see 'To Kill a Mockingbird'? Do you
not know that blacks have been lynched and hanged just on the whim of
whites? And do you not know about the KKK and John Birch Society?
Even ONE person in jail for a crime they didn't commit is too many.
It is a proven fact that eyewitness testimony that such and such
"black" committed the crime is largely bogus, because research has
shown that whites have little or no provable ability to recognize a
black they may have only seen for a few seconds in the dark. The
screwed-up CULTURE of our police state causes those guys to feel
obligated to send someone to jail in EVERY case involving a black.
Our justice system convicts and punishes blacks more harshly than
whites.
Ask yourself this: If, 16 years ago, you saw a competently reported,
hour-long TV show talking about the injustices to Blacks, and you
spent much of the intervening time writing a New Constitution to
CORRECT those injustices, would you be offended to be asked to cite
the source for that referenced percentage? You people KNOW what I
have been doing to help humanity. What have YOU ever done in those
regards, plainol... ?
— John A. Armistead —
On Jul 19, 12:39 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> which, you claim
> forty percent are now incarcerated innocently:
> ---
> no ... NoEinstein claimed this and I asked him to cite source.
>
> This "problem" is growing, because of naive Americans such as
> yourself!
> ---
> were you drinking when you wrote this?
>
> This "Problem" has been caused by the Black Leadership in our
> Nation, in concert with the Democratic Party of the United States and
> our
> federal government, but another thread, for another day.
> ----
> I agree.
>
> On Jul 19, 2:36 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > John,
>
> > Here is but one more very recent example of the poor Black children who
> > are repeatedly discriminated against without cause; continuously profiled
> > for no apparant reason other than their skin color; and of which, you claim
> > forty percent are now incarcerated innocently:
>
> > http://rt.com/usa/news/teenagers-walmart-store-florida-502/
>
> > Here's one more:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRsf4yX13bA&feature=related
>
> > And another:
>
> >http://baltimore.cbslocal.com/2012/04/06/crowd-beats-strips-robs-tour...
>
> > And another:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRhaoWWKE-k&feature=related
>
> > And Another:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0pBbJP8osvM
>
> > And some more:
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N4WOYMWp29g
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=csvlHXJ_pk4
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LRhaoWWKE-k&feature=related
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ufsAfYUfJA&feature=related
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XVNZkLqDQFM
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ISN1RCxko2Q&feature=related
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pZvPCy7OBRw&feature=related
>
> >http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iF0N1QoRjlA&feature=related
>
> > I too am "color-blind"; and have on many occasions represented Blacks in
> > what I perceived discriminatory actions by City Officials as well as in the
> > public. Unlike you, I am not naive, and this "problem" needs to be
> > addressed! This "problem" is growing, because of naive Americans such as
> > yourself! This "Problem" has been caused by the Black Leadership in our
> > Nation, in concert with the Democratic Party of the United States and our
> > federal government, but another thread, for another day.
>
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 10:42 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> > > wrote:
> > > a minimum of 40% of the blacks in prison are there for
> > > crimes they never committed
> > > ---
> > > cite source
>
> > > The only "damn" racists, here, are the whites who don't
> > > value the civil liberties of ALL Americans.
> > > ---
> > > most white do value civil liberties ... even among racist minorities
> > > who use their skin color for an advantage through affirmative action
>
> > > If there is anything that
> > > I am, it is color blind.
> > > ---
> > > poor feller ... does your wife dress you?
>
> > > Everyone is a racist to some degree. Those who deny it are also liars.
>
> > > On Jul 18, 1:07 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > Dear Keith: If you were walking through a 7-11 parking lot and saw a
> > > > piece of jewelry lying on the pavement, you would pick it up, right?
> > > > In the 4th Amendment to the US Constitution (and in my New
> > > > Constitution, as well), unreasonable searches and seizures are
> > > > prohibited. Possessing jewelry is NOT a capital crime! And nothing
> > > > thatZimmermandid was the result of his being privy to the contents
> > > > of that bag. Most of you are implying that since whites are fed up
> > > > with crime, that every person who MIGHT be guilty of petty theft can
> > > > be shot and killed. I particularly take issue with your making the
> > > > spurious statement that there is no evidence for what I just
> > > > explained. FOX News repeatedly ran video ofZimmermangetting out of
> > > > the police car, in handcuffs. He didn't seem to be in any pain; and
> > > > the (distant) view of his head showed no apparent injuries. Having
> > > > his injuries be SEEN was crucial to the majority bigot position at
> > > > FOX. That network got police to release a photo made just after the
> > > > police had arrived on the scene. That photo, taken from about three
> > > > feet away, and on axis with his right mastoid bone (behind the ear),
> > > > clearly shows FLOWING blood, trailing vertically, without any
> > > > smudges. Since the body tries to seal off bleeding, automatically, it
> > > > is probable thatZimmermanhad self-inflicted ALL of those short
> > > > lacerations to his head no more than a minute before the police got
> > > > there. If you, or anyone, doubt my voracity, you had better get
> > > > prepared to see the PROSECUTION have forensic experts confirm
> > > > everything that I have said and reasoned.
>
> > > > Lastly, when a minimum of 40% of the blacks in prison are there for
> > > > crimes they never committed, it is understandable that the Black
> > > > "establishment" would be most insistent that justice be done in the
> > > > Martin case. The only "damn" racists, here, are the whites who don't
> > > > value the civil liberties of ALL Americans. If there is anything that
> > > > I am, it is color blind. If everyone would be like me, and take the
> > > > high moral ground, there wouldn't be so much unjustified hatred in the
> > > > world. Consider being like that, Keith. — J. A. Armistead —
>
> > > > On Jul 17, 12:58 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I'm not sure how John came to the conclusions that he has come to.
> > > There
> > > > > is nothing as of yet on the record that establishes such a scenario,
> > > and
> > > > > all of Armistead's "theories" are just that, "speculative theory".
>
> > > > > What we do know, is that Trayvon Martin was a young black male,
> > > dressed in
> > > > > dark, non-descript clothing, (save for the dark "Hoodie" that he was
> > > > > sporting) and at the time that he was shot, was found with jewelry
> > > that was
> > > > > not his; in a neighborhood which had been having frequent home
> > > > > invasions/burglaries.
>
> > > > > We know that law enforcement looked at this case for a month, and
> > > could
> > > > > not come up with any conclusive evidence that this was in fact anything
> > > > > more than a tragic scenario but nevertheless, a tragic scenario that
> > > was
> > > > > self defense. We then had numerous race baiters flock to the scene in
> > > > > Central Florida, their sole purpose was to stir up trouble, and "race
> > > > > bait". We have seen mainstream media even attempt to modify the actual
> > > > > recordings ofZimmerman, and portray Martin as some sweet cherub
> > > teenager
> > > > > who was non-threatening, when in fact, Mr. Martin was a thug who had
> > > been
> > > > > suspended from his school for drugs; whose moniker was
> > > "No_Limit_Nigga" on
> > > > > Twitter; who had unaccountable jewelry on his person at the time of
> > > the
> > > > > incident.
>
> > > > > On the other hand, contrary to the media hype, Mr.Zimmermanis far
> > > from
> > > > > "White"; MrZimmermanand his wife tutored underprivileged black
> > > youths at
> > > > > their home; and there is nothing whatsoever to date that would suggest
> > > > > that Mr.Zimmermanshot this man because he is a racist, or under the
> > > > > scenario that John Armistead has surmised and attempted to portray.
>
> > > > > I think a more likely scenario, is that after being told not to pursue
> > > > > Martin by law enforcement, Martin circled around, and confronted
> > > > >Zimmerman. Martin asked him, "Are you followimg me?" and when
> > >Zimmerman
> > > > > replied, "No", Martin said something to the effect of, "Well you got
> > > me
> > > > > now", when Martin attacked him, and they tumbled to the ground.
>
> > > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <
> > > markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:> Einstein... I guessZimmermanis afraid of
> > > his Grandfather... a proud
> > > > > > BLACK man...Zimmermanthinks his Grandfather is a thief and all the
> > > > > > other negatives that you have implied...
>
> > > > > > The race card does NOT fly when you need it to, does it?
>
> > > > > > Poor Martin was shot after he elevated a tense VERBAL confrontation
> > > > > > into a physical one..Why would any reasonable person do this??.... if
> > > > > > I were 5'7" and weighed in at a chubby 190 and was attacked
> > > physically
> > > > > > by a 6'1" physically fit individual I would fear for my well being
> > > > > > just asZimmermandid... thus a legal shooting.
>
> > > > > > On Jul 17, 10:03 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > OK, Bruce: What you are saying is thatZimmermanPROFILED anyone
> > > > > > > wearing a hoodie as being a crook who could be shot on sight with
> > > > > > > impunity. If 80% of teenage males are slender, then 80% of those,
> > > > > > > regardless of their race, can be tried, convicted, and executed by
> > > the
> > > > > > > shooter without any formal auspices being stated. Committing
> > > unarmed
> > > > > > > robbery isn't a capital crime. But shooting someone to death when
> > > > > > > one's life isn't in danger can be a capital crime. To wit: Once
> > > there
> > > > > > > was a case where a neighborhood was having a lot of break-ins. A
> > > home-
> > > > > > > owner rigged a shotgun to automatically shoot and kill anyone
> > > breaking
> > > > > > > through his window. That man is now serving life in prison.
> > > Learn to
> > > > > > > think, Bruce. People who do so seldom get labeled as bigots. —
> > > J. A.
> > > > > > > Armistead —
>
> > > > > > > On Jul 16, 6:57 pm, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Someone had been breaking into houses s in the neighborhood,
> > > including
> > > > > > > > houses with women and children in them.
>
> > > > > > > > The person doing it had been seen and he looked more like Trayon
> > > than
> > > > > > he
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment