words. In the USA if you proposed atheism and "organized" followers
for that, you would be subverting the government (a Representative
Republic) and that would be TREASON. If your ideal is having a
minimum efficient government, that is legal. But advocating no
government will get you in a heap of trouble very quickly. What would
most likely happen is that you would be arrested and made to undergo
psychiatric evaluation. It's unlike you would pass muster. Sorry I
can't be more supportive. Being "right" of me is to be guilty of
TREASON. — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Apr 25, 11:58 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> John,
>
> Once again you have twisted what was said to reflect what you want to hear.
>
> I never said that Belgium was "the ideal of the world." I merely pointed
> out that Belgium has gone more than 300 days without a national
> government and they are doing just fine.
>
> On 04/25/2011 06:15 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Mark: Tell that to J. Ashley. He's holding up Belgium as the ideal
> > of the world, and Jonathan is an out-and-out anarchist. — J. A. A. —
> > On Apr 24, 11:37 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> There is no "anarchy in Belgium:
> >> *an·ar·chy*/ˈanərkē/Noun
> >> 1. A state of disorder due to absence or nonrecognition of authority.
> >> 2. Absence of government and absolute freedom of the individual, regarded as
> >> a political ideal.
>
> >> It is not history, it is current events.
>
> >> If you are writing a constitution you should have known this. You should
> >> also know that absolute Democracy, absolute Communism and Socialism are for
> >> the most part identical in practice (if it were possible)
>
> >> To say we need more Democracy as you often do is the same as saying we need
> >> more Communism and or Socialism....
>
> >> Just how ignorant are you ??
>
> >> On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:02 PM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> >>> Mark: Please find yourself a history buff. I'm not the least
> >>> interested in anarchy, in Belgium or anywhere! — J. A. A. —
> >>> On Apr 22, 4:33 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> And it still functions without the lawmakers.... Go figure.
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:08 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>> "In terms of comparative social spending on welfare-related programs as
> >>> a
> >>>>> percentage of the gross domestic product (GDP), Denmark ranks first,
> >>>>> spending more than 29 percent of GDP on its welfare-related programs.
> >>> Next
> >>>>> is Sweden (nearly 29 percent), followed by France, Germany, Belgium,
> >>>>> Switzerland, Austria, and Finland. The United Kingdom ranks in the
> >>> middle of
> >>>>> the pack in 13th place (nearly 22 percent of GDP). The United States
> >>> ranks
> >>>>> near the bottom, in 26th place (out of 29), spending less than 15
> >>> percent of
> >>>>> its GDP on social welfare programs. The United States ranks just ahead
> >>> of
> >>>>> Ireland, Mexico, and South Korea."
> >>>>>http://pagerankstudio.com/Blog/2011/03/what-is-welfare-state/
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>> On 04/22/2011 08:41 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> On average, yes they are! Few in Belgium look to government for
> >>>>> handouts. In the USA, close to 45% want a government handout.
> >>>>> Anything over 5% is excessive. But that's why I've written my New
> >>>>> Constitution—to get government out of the hand-out, pull-the-strings
> >>>>> business! — John A. Armistead — Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 21, 9:56 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <
> >>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> So, you're saying the People of Belgium are better People than those
> >>> in
> >>>>> the United States?
> >>>>> J. Ashley: Run your experiments in Belgium, then! The USA would be
> >>>>> in civil war... � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> On Apr 21, 12:04 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <
> >>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>> It is highly doubtful that we would return to the stone age without
> >>>>> government. Belgium has been without a national government for more
> >>> than
> >>>>> 313 days and "Belgians say the absence of a government doesn't make
> >>> much
> >>>>> of a difference in their daily lives."
> >>>>> On 04/20/2011 08:42 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Jonathan: You are showing some smarts there! Since I am an untra-
> >>>>> conservative capitalist, I don't like being... "left" of anyone,
> >>>>> because that would seem to make me... a God-damned liberal. I
> >>>>> deliberately avoided using the "L" word, because I am the exact
> >>>>> opposite. If your ego considers being an anarchist more conservative
> >>>>> than me, consider this: The USA would return to the 'stone ages'
> >>>>> within one month of there being no government(s). So, your "ideal" of
> >>>>> no taxation and no government won't benefit a soul on Earth. Is
> >>>>> having you "get real" too much to ask? � J. A. Armistead �
> >>> Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 20, 12:50 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <
> >>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>> Since anarchy is absence of government, how can one be "right" of
> >>>>> anarchy? (I don't actually expect an answer, as you NEVER answer
> >>>>> questions posed to you.)
> >>>>> On 04/20/2011 01:54 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
> >>>>> suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
> >>>>> Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
> >>>>> your own. � J. A. A. �
> >>>>> On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <
> >>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
> >>>>> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> >>>>> that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> >>>>> control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask
> >>>>> that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> >>>>> socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are
> >>>>> just stupid. You're in both of those groups. � J. A. Armistead �
> >>>>> Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> <
> >>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> John,
> >>>>> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites
> >>> based
> >>>>> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> >>>>> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression
> >>> means.
> >>>>> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> >>>>> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> >>>>> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off
> >>> this
> >>>>> tremendous task?
> >>>>> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> >>>>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> >>>>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> >>>>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>>>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>>>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> >>>>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>>>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>>>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>>>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>>>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> >>>>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>>>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>>>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> >>>>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>>>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>>>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> >>>>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> >>>>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>>>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>>>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> >>>>> time, Mark. You need it! � J. A. Armistead � Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> <
> >>> markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>> Einstein,
> >>>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> <
> >>> noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>> feel.
> >>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> >>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> >>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> >>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment