On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 9:10 AM, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote:
Naturalization, of course, is the acquisition of citizenship and nationality by somebody who was not a citizen or national of that country when he or she was born and has absolutely NOTHING to do with Immigration. You actually PROVE the point as such would have been the ideal place to provide such a power.
Regard$,
--MJ
Modern nationalism and collectivism have, by the restriction of migration, perhaps come nearest to the "servile state." …Man can hardly be reduced more to a mere wheel in the clockwork of the national collectivist state that being deprived of his freedom to move.... Feeling that he belongs now to his nation, body and soul, he will be more easily subdued to the obedient state serf which nationalist and collectivist governments demand. -- Wilhelm Röpke
At 10:35 AM 4/30/2011, you wrote:
The Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control
immigration.
------------------------------------
Uhm, yes it does:
The Congress shall have Power ...
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, Article 1, section 8
Next
On Apr 30, 9:02 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> At 07:38 AM 4/30/2011, you wrote:Just another illegal alien waiting to be deported by Republitards.
> ----
> at it should ... our law says illegal aliens are to be deported
> they are criminals/parasites
> Actually, the Law of the Land provides no authority to the Congress to make such laws in the first place.
> Regard$,
> --MJThe Constitution does not authorize the federal government to control immigration. Nor does it say anything about illegal aliens. ... Sadly, lawmakers have repeatedly interpreted this silence as license for ill-conceived legislation. Congress began barring entry to the nation in 1875 with prostitutes and convicts. Soon, all sorts of people fell short of congressional glory: ex-convicts in 1882, along with Chinese citizens, lunatics, and idiots. Paupers, polygamists, and people suffering from infectious diseases or insanity made the list in 1891, while the illiterate were banned in 1917. -- Becky Akers
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Mark M. Kahle H.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment