Saturday, June 2, 2012
Sowell: Holder’s Chutzpah re "right to vote threatened"
--------
Sowell: Holder's Chutzpah
By: Thomas Sowell – June 1, 2012 – Creators Syndicate
Attorney General Eric Holder recently told a group of black clergymen that the right to vote was being threatened by people who are seeking to block access to the ballot box by blacks and other minorities.
This is truly world-class chutzpah, by an Attorney General who stopped attorneys in his own Department of Justice from completing the prosecution of black thugs who stationed themselves outside a Philadelphia voting site to harass and intimidate white voters.
This may have seemed like a small episode to some at the time, but it was only the proverbial tip of the iceberg. The U.S. Attorney who was prosecuting that case -- J. Christian Adams -- resigned from the Department of Justice in protest, and wrote a book about a whole array of similar race-based decisions on voting rights by Eric Holder and his subordinates at the Department of Justice.
The book is titled "Injustice: Exposing the Racial Agenda of the Obama Justice Department." It names names, dates and places around the country where the Department of Justice stopped its own attorneys from pursuing cases of voter fraud and intimidation, when it was blacks who were accused of these crimes.
If Mr. Adams is lying, he has taken a huge risk in citing individuals by name and quoting them directly. Yet, despite the fact that most of those he accuses are lawyers, apparently no one has sued him. Moreover, Adams has also testified under oath before the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, on the racial double standard at the Department of Justice, when it comes to voting rights.
What Attorney General Holder has been complaining loudly about, and launching federal lawsuits about, are states that require photo identification to vote. Holder calls this blocking minority "access" to the voting booths.
Since millions of black Americans -- like millions of white Americans -- are confronted with demands for photo identification at airports, banks and innumerable other institutions, it is a little much to claim that requiring the same thing to vote is denying the right to vote. But Holder's chutzpah is up to the task.
Attorney General Holder claims that the states' requirement of photo identification for voting, in order to prevent voter fraud, is just a pretext for discriminating against blacks and other minorities. He apparently sees no voter fraud, hears no voter fraud and speaks no voter fraud.
Despite Holder's claim, a little experiment in his own home voting district showed how easy it is to commit voter fraud. An actor -- a white actor, at that -- went to a voting place where Eric Holder is registered to vote, and told them that he was Eric Holder.
The actor had no identification at all with him, either with or without a photo. He told the voting official that he had forgotten and left his identification in his car. Instead of telling him to go back to the car and get some identification, the official said that that was all right, and offered him the ballot.
The actor had the good sense not to actually take the ballot, which would have made him guilty of voter fraud -- and, being white, he would undoubtedly have been prosecuted by Eric Holder's Department of Justice.
But the actor had made his point. When a white man with no identification can go to a voting site, impersonate a black man who lives in that district, and get his ballot offered to him, then it is far too easy to commit voter fraud.
Does not Attorney General Eric Holder understand that? Of course he understands it! The man is not stupid, despite his other failings.
Holder's pooh-poohing of voter fraud dangers, and hyping the "threat" of denying minorities "access" to the voting booth, are completely consistent with his drive to (1) maximize the number of votes by black Democrats and (2) spread as much fear as possible among minorities that they are under siege, and that the Democrats are their only protection and salvation.
It is a political protection racket, with payoffs in votes.
Nor can Holder's boss, Barack Obama, be unaware of voter fraud. After all, he comes from Chicago, where voting officials refuse to discriminate against dead people.
---
Thomas Sowell is a senior fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305. His website is www.tsowell.com.
[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:
Visit Your Group
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: An Open Letter to Ron Paul
Dear Tico: Know this: Your socialist opinion about my New
Constitution isn't apt in the "NEW" USA where the promotion of
socialism in any medium, including this news group, is either a felony
or treason, depending on the severity. — J. A. A. —
On May 28, 5:20 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then as any reasonable citizen that has asked for and never received a
> full copy of your "new constitution" (so I can "easily understand" it)
> and as a citizen of reasonable temperament speaking to the creator of
> a "government document" I would like to ask why you are so "
> adversarial" every time someone asks for a copy....
>
> You sir are in violation of your own document.... get a rope!!!!
>
Oh? How so? — J. A. A. —
>
> On May 28, 1:56 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Dear plainolamerican: Well said! "What do you call a heavy chain on
> > the bottom of the ocean with a thousand lawyers attached? Answer: A
> > GOOD START!" My new constitution will castrate the entire profession
> > known as lawyers! That screwed-up profession dominates the House,
> > Senate, the Executive Office and the Justice Department. But no
> > more! My New Constitution will limit the number of lawyers (or any
> > other profession for that matter) working in government to be no more
> > than 20%. And my New Constitution will mandate that no lawyer, ever
> > again, can be employed by any business (such as banks and big
> > corporations) where they try to force relationships to be
> > adversarial. And my N. Const. will strike down any supposed contract
> > that isn't easily understood by people of average background. And it
> > will mandate that those harmed by any business get quick and
> > reasonable amends without requiring that anyone get a lawyer and sue
> > anyone. In short. I eliminate 75% of the reasons lawyers find work!
> > Lastly, if even one lawyer seeks to go into public office when there
> > are already 20% of those in that same branch who are lawyers, never
> > again will any public-connected funding be available for sending any
> > person to any God Damned law school! Are you listening, Tico? Ha,
> > ha, HA! — NoEinstein —
>
> > On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > petition
> > > ---
> > > oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> > > no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> > > freedom
>
> > > On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > > > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > > > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > > > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Constitution isn't apt in the "NEW" USA where the promotion of
socialism in any medium, including this news group, is either a felony
or treason, depending on the severity. — J. A. A. —
On May 28, 5:20 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Then as any reasonable citizen that has asked for and never received a
> full copy of your "new constitution" (so I can "easily understand" it)
> and as a citizen of reasonable temperament speaking to the creator of
> a "government document" I would like to ask why you are so "
> adversarial" every time someone asks for a copy....
>
> You sir are in violation of your own document.... get a rope!!!!
>
Oh? How so? — J. A. A. —
>
> On May 28, 1:56 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > Dear plainolamerican: Well said! "What do you call a heavy chain on
> > the bottom of the ocean with a thousand lawyers attached? Answer: A
> > GOOD START!" My new constitution will castrate the entire profession
> > known as lawyers! That screwed-up profession dominates the House,
> > Senate, the Executive Office and the Justice Department. But no
> > more! My New Constitution will limit the number of lawyers (or any
> > other profession for that matter) working in government to be no more
> > than 20%. And my New Constitution will mandate that no lawyer, ever
> > again, can be employed by any business (such as banks and big
> > corporations) where they try to force relationships to be
> > adversarial. And my N. Const. will strike down any supposed contract
> > that isn't easily understood by people of average background. And it
> > will mandate that those harmed by any business get quick and
> > reasonable amends without requiring that anyone get a lawyer and sue
> > anyone. In short. I eliminate 75% of the reasons lawyers find work!
> > Lastly, if even one lawyer seeks to go into public office when there
> > are already 20% of those in that same branch who are lawyers, never
> > again will any public-connected funding be available for sending any
> > person to any God Damned law school! Are you listening, Tico? Ha,
> > ha, HA! — NoEinstein —
>
> > On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > petition
> > > ---
> > > oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> > > no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> > > freedom
>
> > > On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > > > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > > > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > > > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: An Open Letter to Ron Paul
Dear plainol...: My New Constitution will REQUIRE that ever single
public official respond appropriately to any "petition" of a single
law-abiding citizen, or be fired on-the-spot. That includes the
President and every member of the God Damned Supreme Court! To wit:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and *** the right of any Citizen or
group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not "blind", but well informed.
— John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> petition
> ---
> oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> freedom
>
> On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > > at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> > > > > > associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > > > pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
> > > > > > holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter's right to privacy
> > > > > > by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
> > > > > > person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
> > > > > > factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
> > > > > > as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
> > > > > > actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
> > > > > > all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium's
> > > > > > programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
> > > > > > shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
> > > > > > business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
public official respond appropriately to any "petition" of a single
law-abiding citizen, or be fired on-the-spot. That includes the
President and every member of the God Damned Supreme Court! To wit:
1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: the
freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
of People to peaceably assemble; and *** the right of any Citizen or
group to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
court; justice be not "blind", but well informed.
— John A. Armistead — Author and Patriot
On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> petition
> ---
> oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> freedom
>
> On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > > at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> > > > > > associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > > > pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
> > > > > > holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter's right to privacy
> > > > > > by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
> > > > > > person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
> > > > > > factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
> > > > > > as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
> > > > > > actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
> > > > > > all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium's
> > > > > > programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
> > > > > > shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
> > > > > > business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: An Open Letter to Ron Paul
On May 24, 11:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
Oh, so is THAT why you sling the s... so often? Ha, ha, HA! — J. A.
A. —
>
> Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > Author and Patriot
>
> > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> > > > > associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > > pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
> > > > > holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter's right to privacy
> > > > > by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
> > > > > person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
> > > > > factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
> > > > > as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
> > > > > actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
> > > > > all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium's
> > > > > programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
> > > > > shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
> > > > > business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
> > > > > others, but if a person is harmed by the medium's content, they shall
> > > > > be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
> > > > > respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
> > > > > medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall
> > > > > not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
> > > > > government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
> > > > > being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
Oh, so is THAT why you sling the s... so often? Ha, ha, HA! — J. A.
A. —
>
> Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > Author and Patriot
>
> > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> > > > > associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > > pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
> > > > > holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter's right to privacy
> > > > > by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
> > > > > person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
> > > > > factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
> > > > > as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
> > > > > actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
> > > > > all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium's
> > > > > programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
> > > > > shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
> > > > > business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material authored by
> > > > > others, but if a person is harmed by the medium's content, they shall
> > > > > be allowed to reply—without editing—in that medium. Each medium shall
> > > > > respond to breaking news without considering the response of any other
> > > > > medium. Injuries due to improper news coverage or non coverage shall
> > > > > not be excused by the media response. A medium reporting on
> > > > > government shall do so thoroughly, objectively, and with detachment—
> > > > > being neither laudatory nor critical by form, and
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
**JP** Re: Primnister of PPP...
Dr. Jamil Sb.,
Zara Mukhtashar Sa Tabsra,,, apnay Gaddhi Nasheen,,, Geelani Wazir-e-Azam Sb. kay baray maen mulaheza karen,,,,, neechay diya gaya ha,,,, itnay bhee jazbaati nah banen,,, ke mulka-o-quom ki halat aap say posheeda nahen ha,,, phir bhee Shah say zayada Shah kay wafadaar banany ki koshish nah karen.
Shukria
KhShaikh
From: Dr. Jamil <shahmir3rd@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: **JP** Shah Ky Kutty / Dog.,....
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Cc: khshaikh1999@gmail.com, aamir_bhatti@msn.com
Date: Wed, May 30, 2012 at 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: **JP** Shah Ky Kutty / Dog.,....
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Cc: khshaikh1999@gmail.com, aamir_bhatti@msn.com
| People elected them....people have accepted them...still the poor people of Pakistan know that their present plight is due to the Mula and Military... The wise and democratic people of Pakistan still remember Hathorra Groups, Whit Powder, Klashnikov the Big Black Coward Munafiqs and Ghaleez Mullas... In the begining I tried to be polite but later on brought my tone to your pitch...hope you understand... |
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Muhammad Shoaib Tanoli <shoaib.tanoli@gmail.com> wrote:
Primnister of PPP...
--
Regards
M Shoaib TaNoLi
Karachi Pakistan
Email@ shoaib.tanoli@gmail.com
Cell # +92-300-2591223Facebook :https://www.facebook.com/mtanoli
SKYPE: shoaib.tanoli2
پاکستان زندہ باد ۔ پاکستان پائندہ باد
Long Live Pakistan
Heaven on EarthPakistan is one of the biggest blessings of Allah for any Pakistani. Whatever we have today it's all because of Pakistan, otherwise, we would have nothing. Please be sincere to Pakistan.
Pakistan Zindabad!
ہم پاکستان ایک وطن ایک قوم
Dear Readers: My mails are my personal choice. The purpose of these mails is to establish contact with you, make you aware of different cultures ,disseminate knowledge and information. If these (mails) sound you unpleasant, please intimate .
IF YOU ARE NOT INTERESTED IN MY MAIL
PLEASE REPLY THIS E_,MAIL WITH THE SUBJECT.. UNSUBSCRIBE
E Mail: shoaib.tanoli@gmail.com
--
APPLY FOR RECEIVING DAILY E MAIL CLICK BELOW VEBSITE
http://groups.google.com/group/tanolimail/subscribe?note=1
Yahoo Messenger:
shoaib.tanoli@ymail.com
MSN : Messenger
shoaib.tanoli@hotmail.com
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)