Re: A VERY POWERFUL CARTOON....

Travis,

Now tell us how you REALLY feel.....don't hold back!!

On Apr 16, 9:34 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I wil give you a partial answer.  Governments are scared as hell of the
> little muzzieshits.  You mock their pedophile prophet, MoHAMhead, or their
> book of shit, the KORAP, and they try ti kill you.  Muzzieshits like to
> blow up things like buildings full of good honest people.  They demand that
> everything be their way and only their way when no one but idiotic, insane
> muzzieshits would ever want anything to do with that shariashit.  And
> muzzieshits love to kill each other for no reason at all.  In essence,
> Islamoshit makes no sense itself.  It is just a garbage state.  Rotten,
> stinking, filthy garbage that needs to be eleminated from this planet by
> any and all means necessary.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Bear Bear <thatbear...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Got this one from my mom of all people. WE don't have muslims praying in
> > the streets here yet. Just in the public schools.
>
> > **
>
> >    **
>
> >  **
>
> >      A VERY POWERFUL CARTOON....
>
> > **
> >                      *A very  powerful cartoon.....please keep it  going*.
> > This should  be posted in every school in the Canada and the USA
>
> > [image: Description: cid:94ECEE59A8424E918AE9A27AD9A4BCF7@computer]*
> > Only 31  words -- Think about it!*
> >      *
> > Isn't  life strange?  I never met one Veteran who enlisted to fight for
> > Socialism!
> > 86% will send this on.*
>
> > If  Muslims can pray on Madison Avenue, why are  Christians banned from
> > praying in public and from  erecting religious displays on their holy  days?
>
> > What  happened to our National Day of Prayer?
> > Muslims  are allowed to block off Madison Ave. , in N.Y.C.,  and pray in
> > the middle of the street! And, it's a  monthly ritual!
>
> > Tell me, again, whose  country is this?
> >                                 Ours or the Muslims?
>
> > I was  asked to send this on if I agree, or delete if I  don't.
>
> > It is said  that 86% of Americans & Canadians believe in  God.
>
> > Therefore, I have a very hard time  understanding why there is such a
> > problem in  having 'In God! We Trust' on our money and having  'God' in the
> > Pledge of Allegiance or the Lord's prayer said in our schools or public
> > meetings.
>
> > I  believe it's time we stand up for what we  believe!
>
> > If you agree, pass this on; if  not, delete.
>
> > Thank  you
>
> > ****
> > **
> > ****
> > ****
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
>
>
>  ATT000~111.JPG
> 19KViewDownload
>
>  Mail122.jpg
> 165KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: What Would Reagan Do?

What would Reagan do??

Plant and sell more Poppy products so he could lay more minefields
aimed at civilians while arming the future enemies of the US..... His
policy on this is still killing people.

On Apr 16, 6:53 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> What Would Reagan Do?Posted by David Boaz
> Peggy Noonan, who once worked with Ronald Reagan to shape his words, has some useful advice for today s Republicans in Saturday s Wall Street Journal:Finally, in foreign affairs the Republican candidates staked out dangerous ground. They want to show they re strong on defense. Fine, we should have a strong defense, the best in the world. But that is different from having an aggressive foreign policy stance, and every one of the GOP candidates, with the exceptions of Ron Paul and Jon Huntsman, was aggressive. This is how their debates sounded: We should bomb Iran Thursday. No, stupid, we should bomb Iran on Wednesday. How could you be so foolish? You know we do all our bombings on Monday. You re wrong, we send in the destroyers and arm the insurgents on Monday.There was no room for discretion, prudence, nuance, to use unjustly maligned terms. There was no room for an expressed bias toward not-fighting. But grown-ups really do have a bias toward not-fighting.They are allowing the GOP to be painted as the war party. They are ceding all non-war ground to the president, who can come forward as the sober, constrained, non-bellicose contender. Do they want that? Are they under the impression America is hungry for another war? Really? After the past 11 years?The GOP used to be derided by Democrats as the John Wayne party: It loved shoot- em-ups. Actually, John Wayne didn t ride into town itching for a fight, and he didn t ride in shooting off his mouth, either. He was laconic, observant. He rode in hoping for peace, but if something broke out he was ready. He had a gun, it was loaded, and he knew how to use it if he had to.But he didn t want to have to. Which was part of his character s power. The GOP should go back to being John Wayne.When Ronald Reagan s speechwriter tells you you need to be less trigger-happy and more like John Wayne, you probably need to recalibrate.http://www.cato-at-liberty.org/what-would-reagan-do/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Tennessee Decides It is Not Backward Enough: "Stupid is as Stupid Does"

who, will want
to hire graduates of Tennessee's educational system?
---
Aladdin Industries makers of the famous Stanley thermos bottles,
headquartered in Nashville

Alcoa, Inc. the world's largest producer of aluminum, based in Alcoa,
TN

AutoZone based in Memphis

B

Bush Brothers & Co. makers of Bush's Baked Beans, headquartered in
Knoxville

C

Chattanooga Bakery Inc. makers of Moon Pie snacks based in Chattanooga

Church of God international headquarters in Clevland, TN

Cracker Barrel Old Country Store based in Lebanon

Crye-Leike Realtors the nations 10th largest real estate company,
based in Memphis

D

Dollar General Stores based outside of Nashville

E

Elo TouchSystems, Inc. The inventors of the touchscreen. Company was
founded in Oak Ridge, TN, now headquartered in Menlo Park, CA

F

FedEx Corp. based in Memphis

First Horizon National Corp. based in Memphis

First Tennessee Bank based in Memphis

G

George A Dickel Company makers of Tennessee Whiskey based in Tullahoma

Gibson USA makers of Gibson guitars, headquartered in Nashville

Goodys Family Clothing headquartered in Knoxville

H

Hospital Corp. of America based in Nashville

I

IdleAire Technologies Corp. based in Knoxville

J

Jack Daniels Distillery makers of Tennessee Whiskey based in Lynchburg

JFG Coffee based in Knoxville

K

Krystal Hamburger Company small, square, hot, and headquartered in
Chattanooga

L

Louisiana Pacific based in Nashville

M

MasterCraft based in Vonore

Mayfield Dairy Farms makers of the best tasting ice cream in the
world, headquartered in Athens, TN

McKee Foods makers of Little Debbie snacks based in Collegedale

N

O

O'Charleys based in Nashville

P

Perkins Restaurant and Bakery based in Memphis

Pilot Corp. based in Knoxville

Purity Dairies makers of dairy products, great taste, pure and simple,
headquartered in Nashville

Q

R

Ruby Tuesday based in Maryville

S

Saint Jude Children's Research Hospital located in Memphis

Shoney's Restaurant headquartered in Nashville, Tenn., and owns,
operates and franchises more than 291 restaurants in 19 states.

Smoky Mountain Knife Works the world's largest knife showplace
headquarters in Sevierville

Standard Candy Co. makers of the Goo Goo Cluster, based in Nashville

Sun Records famous rock and roll record maker started in Memphis,
headquartered in Nashville

T

Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA) nations largest public power company,
headquarters in Knoxville

On Apr 16, 10:39 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tennessee Decides It is Not Backward Enough
>
> In the beginning, there was light. But then we became dim bulbs.
>
> ***
>
> The other day, I saw two articles highlighted, separately, in the same
> publication. One mentioned that cases of dementia are destined to grow
> dramatically in America in coming years. The other explained how the
> state of Tennessee is intent on making students more stupid.
>
> Tennessee has now passed a law permitting teachers to present students
> with alternatives to well-known scientific principles. The bill easily
> passed both houses of the legislature, and the governor let it become
> law without his signature.
>
> Presumably he realized that he was in a difficult position—but aren't
> we all? Louisiana has a similar law, and who knows what state will be
> next.
>
> Why worry about our older citizens losing their minds on the one hand,
> while we're rotting the minds of our children, voluntarily? Per Slate:
>
> The new law bars schools and administrators from prohibiting teachers
> from "helping students understand, analyze, critique, and review in an
> objective manner the scientific strengths and scientific weaknesses of
> existing scientific theories covered in the course being taught." But,
> as the effort's critics have been quick to point out, the only
> examples the legislation gives of "controversial" theories are
> "biological evolution, the chemical origins of life, global warming,
> and human cloning."
>
> …The law's supporters, including the Knoxville-based Center for Faith
> and Science International, argue that it promotes critical thinking
> skills. But opponents, who include the American Association for the
> Advancement of Science, Tennessee Education Association, the American
> Civil Liberties Union, and the National Association of Biology
> Teachers, argue that the new rules are essentially allowing teachers
> to depict evolution and global warming as scientifically controversial
> subjects, when the actual controversy surrounding them comes from the
> political and religious spheres, not from scientists.
>
> Probably, soon, challenges to the earth being round…will get a good airing.
>
> Not just an airing—America specializes in repackaging, artfully, the
> most improbable scenarios. Just as George W. Bush became a
> "compassionate conservative" and making life even harder for poor
> mothers with small children became "welfare reform," one
> Christian-preferring God planning the world, warts and all, for the
> rest of us, gets labeled "intelligent design."
>
> Keep in mind that Tennessee is the state that in 1925 held the
> infamous Scopes Trial—in which a high school science teacher was
> convicted of violating a law prohibiting the teaching of evolution.
> (The conviction was overturned, but only on a technicality.)
>
> With almost no national conversation on these kinds of big steps
> backwards, it is worth asking: in the near-century since the Scopes
> trial, really, how much have we progressed? And who, oh who, will want
> to hire graduates of Tennessee's educational system?
>
> More:http://www.businessinsider.com/tennessee-decides-it-is-not-backward-e...
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Why President Obama (probably) won’t endorse gay marriage this year

If he wins the election he will have NO REASON to do so... It is
completely against everything he learned in grade school in Indonesia.

On Apr 16, 8:36 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Most Democrats agreed that raising the issue in the context of the
> election might be counterproductive even for the gay rights movement
> itself."
>
> Nice excuse!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Friday, April 13, 2012 10:40:56 AM UTC-4, Tommy News wrote:
> > Why Obama (probably) won't endorse gay marriage this year
>
> > The at-times-uneasy relationship between President Obama and the gay
> > community hit another bump in the road this week when the White House
> > declined to push through an executive order banning government
> > contractors from discriminating against employees based on sexual
> > orientation or gender identity.
> > And while that move raised eyebrows, it's not the major sticking point
> > between the GLBT community and Obama. That, of course, is gay
> > marriage.
>
> > Salon's Steve Kornacki this week points out that, while most of the
> > Democratic Party's class of potential 2016 presidential contenders
> > supports gay marriage, Obama has still, despite indications that he
> > may change his position at some point, declined to jump on board. Such
> > a move that would make him first major-party presidential nominee to
> > do so but would hardly make him a trailblazer in Democratic politics.
> > But gay marriage advocates shouldn't hold their breath.
>
> > According to Fix interviews with more than half-dozen Democratic
> > strategists, basically nobody in Obama's party is expecting him to
> > make the switch before the election. And even supporters of gay rights
> > suggest the timing might be wrong.
>
> > While many may see it as the right thing to do, they say pulling such
> > a switch would be too difficult this close to an election.
>
> > "I don't expect him to change his position at this point," said
> > Democratic strategist Joe Trippi. "On the one hand, it would be a
> > welcome surprise for many, and on the other hand, be seen as
> > politically motivated and polarizing to others because of the timing."
>
> > Most Democrats agreed that raising the issue in the context of the
> > election might be counterproductive even for the gay rights movement
> > itself.
>
> > "Speaking as a gay person, he should do what he believes is best for
> > the country," said former Obama adviser Steve Hildebrand. "If
> > endorsing gay marriage is best, then that is what he should do. I
> > would encourage him to do what he believes is best for the country and
> > to not let politics play a part if that is possible."
>
> > Obama, of course, has made inroads — significant ones — with the GLBT
> > community, most notably ending the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
> > policy for gays in the military and speaking out against California's
> > Proposition 8, which overturned the state's gay marriage law.
>
> > He has also spoken out against a federal amendment defining marriage
> > as between a man and a woman — the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
>
> > Given what the president has already done, it's not clear that taking
> > it a step further would be at all beneficial. Indeed, it may hurt.
>
> > "It would give (Mitt) Romney an issue to try to blunt his serious
> > flip-flopping problem, and the president has already shown his strong
> > commitment to equality for LGBT Americans in ending don't ask, don't
> > tell, passing hate crimes bill, speaking out against DOMA and state
> > level anti-gay marriage legislation," said a Democratic strategist.
>
> > Despite all of that, gay marriage is very much a sticking point for
> > many in the gay community. And given the plenty of big-name Democrats
> > have jumped on-board, the pressure on Obama to follow suit is growing
> > by the day.
>
> > While there has not been a large-scale rebuke of the president by gay
> > marriage supporters, there is some indication that the issue could be
> > coming to a head.
>
> > The newly named chairman of the Democratic National Convention, Los
> > Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, has said gay marriage may be voted
> > on as part of the party's platform this year — a move that would
> > really force the issue.
>
> > Either way, the issue is picking up steam. Several states have moved
> > to allow gay marriage in recent months, and polling, for the first
> > time, shows a majority of Americans support such laws.
>
> > That might suggest Obama would be well-served to support the law.
>
> > But even if you set aside the idea that such a move would look
> > transparently political, backing gay marriage doesn't gain Obama much.
> > He's already got many supporters in the gay community thanks to the
> > things he has done, and backing gay marriage really only risks
> > alienating independent voters and firing up a conservative base that
> > isn't quite raring to go right now.
>
> > Opposition to gay marriage, after all, is much more strident than
> > support, and make no mistake: Social conservatives would be up in arms
> > if Obama started pushing gay marriage.
>
> > "Right now the far right is not motivated to support Romney," said one
> > Democratic strategist who worked on Obama's 2008 campaign. "Supporting
> > gay marriage in an election year would do wonders for motivating the
> > right-wing Republican base, and that's not something I can imagine the
> > president doing."
>
> > For his part, Obama hasn't said much on the issue in recent months,
> > and his campaign doesn't appear anxious to make gay rights a key issue
> > in the looming campaign.
>
> > Campaign spokesman Ben LaBolt said Obama will decide when the time is
> > right.
>
> > "The President and the President alone will come to a decision,"
> > LaBolt said in a statement. "From allowing hospital visitation rights
> > for gay partners to repealing 'Don't Ask, Don't Tell,' President Obama
> > has done more to advance equal rights for gays and lesbians than any
> > other President — a record we intend to highlight."
>
> > More Here:
>
> >http://www.gallup.com/poll/147662/first-time-majority-americans-favor...
>
> > --
> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > Have a great day,
> > Tommy
>
> > --
> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > Have a great day,
> > Tommy
>
> On Friday, April 13, 2012 10:40:56 AM UTC-4, Tommy News wrote:
>
> > Why Obama (probably) won't endorse gay marriage this year
>
> > The at-times-uneasy relationship between President Obama and the gay
> > community hit another bump in the road this week when the White House
> > declined to push through an executive order banning government
> > contractors from discriminating against employees based on sexual
> > orientation or gender identity.
> > And while that move raised eyebrows, it's not the major sticking point
> > between the GLBT community and Obama. That, of course, is gay
> > marriage.
>
> > Salon's Steve Kornacki this week points out that, while most of the
> > Democratic Party's class of potential 2016 presidential contenders
> > supports gay marriage, Obama has still, despite indications that he
> > may change his position at some point, declined to jump on board. Such
> > a move that would make him first major-party presidential nominee to
> > do so but would hardly make him a trailblazer in Democratic politics.
> > But gay marriage advocates shouldn't hold their breath.
>
> > According to Fix interviews with more than half-dozen Democratic
> > strategists, basically nobody in Obama's party is expecting him to
> > make the switch before the election. And even supporters of gay rights
> > suggest the timing might be wrong.
>
> > While many may see it as the right thing to do, they say pulling such
> > a switch would be too difficult this close to an election.
>
> > "I don't expect him to change his position at this point," said
> > Democratic strategist Joe Trippi. "On the one hand, it would be a
> > welcome surprise for many, and on the other hand, be seen as
> > politically motivated and polarizing to others because of the timing."
>
> > Most Democrats agreed that raising the issue in the context of the
> > election might be counterproductive even for the gay rights movement
> > itself.
>
> > "Speaking as a gay person, he should do what he believes is best for
> > the country," said former Obama adviser Steve Hildebrand. "If
> > endorsing gay marriage is best, then that is what he should do. I
> > would encourage him to do what he believes is best for the country and
> > to not let politics play a part if that is possible."
>
> > Obama, of course, has made inroads — significant ones — with the GLBT
> > community, most notably ending the military's "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"
> > policy for gays in the military and speaking out against California's
> > Proposition 8, which overturned the state's gay marriage law.
>
> > He has also spoken out against a federal amendment defining marriage
> > as between a man and a woman — the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA).
>
> > Given what the president has already done, it's not clear that taking
> > it a step further would be at all beneficial. Indeed, it may hurt.
>
> > "It would give (Mitt) Romney an issue to try to blunt his serious
> > flip-flopping problem, and the president has already shown his strong
> > commitment to equality for LGBT Americans in ending don't ask, don't
> > tell, passing hate crimes bill, speaking out against DOMA and state
> > level anti-gay marriage legislation," said a Democratic strategist.
>
> > Despite all of that, gay marriage is very much a sticking point for
> > many in the gay community. And given the plenty of big-name Democrats
> > have jumped on-board, the pressure on Obama to follow suit is growing
> > by the day.
>
> > While there has not been a large-scale rebuke of the president by gay
> > marriage supporters, there is some indication that the issue could be
> > coming to a head.
>
> > The newly named chairman of the Democratic National Convention, Los
> > Angeles Mayor Antonio Villaraigosa, has said
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: ‘Lincoln’s Marxists’

Ilana categorically opposes foreign aid handouts to Israel. Israel
ought to stop sacrificing its sovereignty and cease being a US
satellite state. Independence, she observes, means cutting the Gordian
Knot once and for all.

On Apr 16, 9:28 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> 'Lincoln's Marxists'written by Ilana Mercer on04.12.12TAWE (The Ass With Ears, Obama) likes to repeatin fact he said it yesterday againa quote he attributes to "Republican Abraham Lincoln":"The government should do for people only what they cannot do better by themselves and no more."
> Left-liberals like TAWE should be reaffirmed in their love of Lincoln.
> A new book,Lincoln's Marxists, reviewed inChronicles Magazine, provides insight into the radical (Marxist) revolutionaries, orRadical Republicans, with whomAbraham Lincolnsurrounded himself. Writes Clyde Wilson:
> "The early German settlers of America were peaceful and pious farmers, escaping militarism and religious strife. Not so the immigrants of the 1850s, who were militarized advocates of violent social revolution, prototypes of later European communists and fascists. Revolutionaries and socialists on both side of the Atlantic enthusiastically embraced Lincoln's war as a continuation of the French Revolution and of their own failed revolution of 1848.
> This is documented by [Al] Benson and [Walter Donald] Kennedy in full chapter and verse. The Forty-Eighters furnished at least four Union generals, several of whom were intimates ofKarl Marx[emphasis added] and Friedrich Engels, and a host of colonels and Republican party activists.
> The later-coming Germans may have made possible Lincoln's election in 1860 by tipping the demographic balance in previously Democratic states.Marx, who knew even less about America than he did about everything else,described the conflict with the kind of grand abstractions that appeal to people of that ilk, even celebrating the rich corporation lawyer Lincoln as a hero of the working class.
> The Forty-Eighters did not dominate Lincoln's party, but they were a very strong element within it. Nor did they necessarily have a complete picture, but recognized that the Union cause was a step in their Marxist directionan unappealable centralization of power combined with the violent destruction of reactionary elements.
> Since that time, their ideas have triumphed completely. Marx's description of the war of 1861-65 as a defensive effort against violent reactionaries engaged in a wicked rebellion to spread slavery is now the mainstream p.c. interpretation, in the schools and media, of America's central event." (Chronicles, April 2012, p. 27)http://barelyablog.com/?p=50238

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.