Thursday, February 23, 2012

Re: **JP** CHALLENGE 2012

BITTER GOURD


From: Waqar Shafi <waqar.shafi@gmail.com>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2012 1:47 PM
Subject: **JP** CHALLENGE 2012


WOH KON SA FRUIT HAY JO KACHA HO TU MEETA.
OR
PUK JAYEE TU KARWA HOTA HY…
 


--
Regards.,
 
WAQAR SHAFI
I. T. PROFESSIONAL
KARACHI-PAKISTAN.
Email Me: waqar.shafi@gmail.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197


**JP** Letter to Editor - Senators oh Senators

Dear Join Pakistan

 

LETTER TO EDITOR

February 23rd, 2012

 

Senators oh Senators

 

What is 360 millions between the friends that a spate of letters have appeared in the press on ‘Senators blackmailing the government for voting for the 20th amendment’?! Don’t we all know that these funds are for the developments to be carried out by the Senators in their --  their -- well  -- their respective Senates.  So what if they do not have their Senates to spend the funds on, do the MNAs and the MPAs spend all the money they get on the development of their constituencies?.  How naïve we can be?  Why don’t we accept it once for all that the people we elect (MNAs and MPAs) and the people in turn they elect (Senators) are there not to care for your and my health but to look after their own honourable selves and their most honourable and prodigious scions. Who says it promotes corruption at the legislative bodies level? This is pure democracy in the land of the pure. As simple as that !

 

Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)

Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)
30 Westridge 1
Rawalpindi 46000
Pakistan
Tel: (051) 5158033
E.mail: jafri@rifiela.com

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Re: DOMA ruled unconstitutional in California case

Keith... No worry. This court has a 90% overturn rate. It would have
been better for the Gay cause had they found it constitutional. The
odds would then be with them.

On Feb 22, 5:06 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Well, here's another Judge who should be impeached, for legislating from
> the Bench.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > DOMA ruled unconstitutional in California case
> > Ken Williams - SDGLN Editor in Chief
>
> > SAN FRANCISCO – The Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) violates the U.S.
> > Constitution's equal protections clause, a federal judge ruled today
> > in an important test case in California that could have national
> > implications.
>
> > Lambda Legal just tweeted the breaking news.
>
> > District Judge Jeffery White, an appointee by President George W. Bush
> > in 2002, ruled that DOMA violates the rights of Karen Golinski, who
> > was denied spousal health benefits by her employer, the Ninth Circuit
> > Court of Appeals in San Francisco.
>
> > Lambda Legal is representing Golinski in the case Golinski v. United
> > States Office of Personnel Management.
>
> > In January 2008, Chief Judge Alex Kozinksi of the Ninth Circuit ruled
> > that the decision to deny benefits to Golinski violated the Ninth
> > Circuit's own employment policies prohibiting sexual orientation
> > discrimination. However, the federal Office of Personnel Management
> > (OPM) argued that DOMA prevented health-care coverage for gay and
> > lesbian spouses of federal employees, and ordered the insurer of
> > Golinski's wife, Amy Cunninghis, to deny coverage.
>
> > Lambda Legal sued the federal government and OPM on Jan. 20, 2010.
>
> > More:
>
> >http://www.sdgln.com/news/2012/02/22/breaking-news-doma-ruled-unconst...
>
> > --
> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > Have a great day,
> > Tommy
>
> > --
> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > Have a great day,
> > Tommy
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: New Baseline for discussion

If I invent it, build it, bring it to market and sell it... I can sell
at whatever price the market will pay. As the market goes up so does
my price..as it goes down so does my price.... It is 100% my decision
based on market pressures only.

On Feb 22, 9:15 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> on this we agree
>
> On Feb 22, 4:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > *"I typically adjust the rates I charge people depending on their ability
> > to pay."
>
> > *There's absolutely nothing wrong with this procedure.  I have also done
> > this very same act;  it's a part of the free market.  Such a procedure ties
> > into the whole, "Supply & Demand"  aspect of the market.
>
> > Have you noticed that the price of NFL tickets have come down?  The price
> > of televisions?  Stereos, computers,  electronics in general?
>
> > Economics 101.
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:22 PM, plainolamerican
> > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > >  Should there be any limit to what the "seller" can make?
> > > ----
> > > no .. the market will set the value
>
> > > I typically adjust the rates I charge people depending on their
> > > ability to pay.
> > > ---
> > > a choice you make
>
> > > On Feb 22, 2:58 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > On Feb 22, 3:55 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > On Feb 20, 2:08 pm, JDR <jdrwarh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > I am interested in what discussion may come from the following
> > > > > > economic scenarios:
> > > > > > First, a good or service is offered, which is purchased by a
> > > > > > consumer.  What is an acceptable amount of "profit" that should be
> > > > > > made?  Should there be any limit to what the "seller" can make?
>
> > > > I typically adjust the rates I charge people depending on their
> > > > ability to pay.
>
> > > --
> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: New Baseline for discussion

on this we agree

On Feb 22, 4:04 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> *"I typically adjust the rates I charge people depending on their ability
> to pay."
>
> *There's absolutely nothing wrong with this procedure.  I have also done
> this very same act;  it's a part of the free market.  Such a procedure ties
> into the whole, "Supply & Demand"  aspect of the market.
>
> Have you noticed that the price of NFL tickets have come down?  The price
> of televisions?  Stereos, computers,  electronics in general?
>
> Economics 101.
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 4:22 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >  Should there be any limit to what the "seller" can make?
> > ----
> > no .. the market will set the value
>
> > I typically adjust the rates I charge people depending on their
> > ability to pay.
> > ---
> > a choice you make
>
> > On Feb 22, 2:58 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Feb 22, 3:55 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Feb 20, 2:08 pm, JDR <jdrwarh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I am interested in what discussion may come from the following
> > > > > economic scenarios:
> > > > > First, a good or service is offered, which is purchased by a
> > > > > consumer.  What is an acceptable amount of "profit" that should be
> > > > > made?  Should there be any limit to what the "seller" can make?
>
> > > I typically adjust the rates I charge people depending on their
> > > ability to pay.
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.