Thursday, February 9, 2012

Military Coup Could Oust Obama & NYC Bloomberg!




New post on Political Vel Craft

Military Coup Could Oust Obama & NYC Bloomberg!

by Volubrjotr

Former White House speechwriter John L. Perry has courted controversy by suggesting that the U.S. Military, upholding their oath to defend the Constitution against domestic enemies, could stage a bloodless coup to oust President Obama. In an article originally posted on the Newsmax website, Perry wrote, "There is a remote, although gaining, possibility America's military [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/09/military-coup-could-oust-obama/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: pray for Obamacare

Ya don't gotta go to chrch to pray, amico. :-)

On Feb 9, 9:21 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Studies show prayer helps people heal faster and stay healthier.
>
> Does that mean the federal government can mandate that atheists and
> agnostics go to Church?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Why Pelosi is retiring

I think insider trading and Steve Kroft are bigger reasons. Thats old
stuff.

When is an amendment named for you, a bad thing? When it fixes what
YOU have been doing! The Pelosi Amendment.

Ouch!

On Feb 8, 10:24 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  ** **
>
>   ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
> THE FACTS ARE IN........****
>
>  ****
>
> As a result of a Judicial Watch filing under the Freedom of Information
> Act, the USAF
> released documents detailing House Speaker Pelosi's use of United States
> Air Force****
>
> aircraft between March 2009 and June 2010. The data are published in the
> Judicial****
>
> Watch *Verdict *of December 2010, Volume 16, Issue 12.
>
> Here are the main highlights revealed by the USAF. Keep in mind that all
> the data below
> relate to United States Air Force aircraft used by one woman over a sixteen
> month period.
> Several of these flights included Ms Pelosi's guests such as grown
> children, grandchildren,****
>
> various in-laws, friends, and hangers-on. Over 95% of the trips were
> between the west****
>
> coast and Washington , DC or what we might call a commute between home and
> the office.****
>
>  ****
>
> READ it and WEEP!!
> *Total trips:  *85 trips over a 68 week period or 1.25 average trips per
> week.
> *Total mileage: *206,264 miles or 2,427 average miles per trip
> *Total flying time: *428.6 hours or an average of 5 hrs per trip
> *Cost to the taxpayers:  *$2,100,744.59 or $27,715.00 per trip or
> $1,285,162.00 per year
> *Cost of in flight food and alcohol: *$101,429.14 or $1,193.00 per trip or
> $62,051.00 per year.
>
> On one junket to Baghdad, according to the Air Force report, she had the
> aircraft bar
> stocked with Johnny Walker Red Scotch, Grey Goose Vodka, E&J Brandy,
> Bailey's Irish Creme, Maker's Mark Whiskey, Courvoisier Cognac, Bacardi
> Rum, Jim Beam Whiskey, Beefeater Gin, Dewars Scotch, Bombay Sapphire
> Gin, Jack Daniels Whiskey, Corona Beer and several varieties of wine.
> This was obviously a very important *"gubment bidness" *trip.
>
> Evidence generally speaks for itself, and in Ms. Pelosi's case it speaks
> the language of abuse and (evidently) a serious familial drinking problem,
> for in a single year she and her spawn drank an****
>
> amount in excess of the net income of the average employed American! When
> she said, "... If the
> stimulus doesn't pass, five hundred million people might lose their
> jobs...", I thought she was unintentionally revealing her ignorance. I'm
> now more inclined to think she was pickled.
>
> *Even though she can no longer abuse the USAF, she can either fly on her
> broom, or fly
> Southwest Airlines, where bags fly free.*****
>
> *If you are an AMERICAN citizen it is YOUR DUTY to PASS THIS ON!!*****
>
>  ****
>
> .****
>
> ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
>  ****
>
> ** **
>
>  ****
>
> ****
>
>  image0021.jpg
> 19KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Court: CA Gay Marriage Ban Is Unconstitutional

Clinton campaigned on it and delivered. White House lawyers WROTE the
operative Section 3.

Surprise!!!!

On Feb 9, 8:58 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Really?
> Congress makes Legislation. Barr, a Republican, was DOMA's champion/initiator.
> Regard$,
> --MJ
> "Conservatives: "Social Security is a no-good, rotten, immoral, fraudulent Ponzi scheme destroying our country ... but we have to save it."" -- Jacob HornbergerAt 08:50 AM 2/9/2012, you wrote:Presiudent Clinton is a DEMOCRAT.
> On Feb 7, 4:41 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > Barr is a Republican (even if he pretends/pretended to be a Libertarian).
> >
> > At 04:39 PM 2/7/2012, you wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > >Government has no business in the marriage issue.
> > >--------------------------------------------
> >
> > >You'll get no argument from me.  A dem gave us DOMA, and n now they
> > >all spout about how terrible it is, and do NOTHING about it.
> >
> > >And yes, there are rights attached to marriage, from taxes to
> > >hospitals to death.
> >
> > >--
> > >Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > >For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> >
> > >* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > >* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > >* Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
> >
> > - Show quoted text -
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Spam is Spam is Spam Tommy tom tom

Amen

On Feb 8, 4:37 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I do not mind multiple posts about a subject that bring forth
> differing points of view... I welcome them.
>
> However several posts in one day all spewing the same identical
> information on the same identical subject with absolutely no change in
> content from one multi posting day to the next is SPAM!!!
>
> Tommy, we have had this discussion before. It will stop now or I will
> stop it permanently.
>
> Mark, the Costa Rican Moderator.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.