World News

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: That would be "the pot calling the kettle black". If Trump
was a socialist he would be a Democrat and pro Obama. When one's
ideology has failed, like yours has, blame the opposition for your own
socialist-communist traits. You, like Mark, are very screwed-up in
the head. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 19, 12:50 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> *John,
>
> I cannot belive you call me -- a voluntaryist/anarchist -- a socialist,
> yet you cannot see that Donald Trump is a full-blown socialist. Pay
> attention!*
>
> http://www.americablog.com/2009/02/donald-trump-is-socialist.htmlhttp://www.cnbc.com/id/27177659/Feels_Like_Socialism_%E2%80%A6_But_I_...http://pollinsider.com/2011/04/05/meet-donald-trump-democrat-donor-ab...
>
> On 04/18/2011 08:48 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Folks: The following essay contains the first two articles of my New
> > Constitution. I'm copying it, below, so those looking in the present
> > post can find it. Hope you readers are having a great Spring!
>
> > Can Donald Trump ï¿½Fixï¿½ the Thin Ice that the USA is skating on?
>
> > The contrast is striking between the potential presidential candidacy
> > of The Donald and every other might-be candidate mentioned. For one
> > thing, if The Donald says he can fix somethingï¿½like our broke economyï¿½
> > you can damn-well take him seriously! Some of you may recall that a
> > certain new ice skating rink in New Yorkï¿½s Central Park started
> > leaking water and couldnï¿½t be used. That work had been done by three
> > or four labor unions with each one pointing the fingers at the other.
> > After millions of dollars had been wasted on attempted patches, The
> > Donald took over the entire job and had happy skaters out on that ice
> > before long.
>
> > Every day when I realize how much labor unions of all kinds are
> > effectively screwing the US economy and preventing our having a really
> > ï¿½freeï¿½ free enterprise system, I think of The Donald. He has been
> > able to find considerable success working in the morass of labor
> > unions and government regulations that are found in NYC. That man
> > THRIVES on being able to get the disparate powers-that-be to get the
> > job done! Part of the secret is his charisma. But most of it is
> > because he is a trustworthy man-of-his-word. He makes sure that all
> > those involved in a project realize just what their responsibilities
> > are, and what they are expected to do if there are any glitches. In
> > short, The Donald is one of the top businessmen in the country of all
> > time. His executive experience probably exceeds that of the governors
> > of most states. Under him people do their jobs and do them well.
> > Just having The Donald as the head man improves the quality of
> > projects, because itï¿½s an honor just to be associated with one of his
> > projects!
>
> > Obviously, Donald Trump is politically conservative. But he doesnï¿½t
> > owe-his-soul to the Republican Party like most of his would-be rivals
> > do even without realizing that they do. The USA has been hamstrung
> > trying to avoid looking like a colonialist aggressor every time we
> > ï¿½invadeï¿½ other nations to help the oppressed. The reason oil fields
> > get set on fire is because those people suppose we are thereï¿½ just for
> > their oil. By destroying the oil, they believe we will simply go
> > away. The blind-leading-the-blind in our government think that the
> > USA has the financial wherewithal to finance long wars, and will have
> > enough wherewithal remaining to rebuild the busted infrastructure of
> > the invaded countries; train the new armies; and care for those ï¿½poorï¿½
> > people till they are back on their feet. All of that is being done
> > like forced charity from the big-hearted American People whose
> > standards of living keep dropping, because of the explosion in the
> > size and the over-control of our government. If The Donald can get us
> > trillions of dollars worth of oil to repay the American Taxpayers for
> > our sacrifices, Iï¿½ll vote for him!
>
> > Some good news is that Republicans now have trillions of dollars in
> > ï¿½possibleï¿½ budget cuts that might save this country. The bad news is
> > that those takes-too-long-to-happen cuts will still leave the never-
> > should-have-been-there-in-the-first-place entitlement programs being
> > run by government. After the nearly 15 years that Iï¿½ve spent penning
> > and polishing my New Constitution, I have better than average ideas
> > how to fix our government, fast. The following 5 things arenï¿½t
> > written into the New Constitution, but are of fundamental importance:
>
> > 1. Get our government out of the entitlement business! Privatize
> > Social Security; Medicare; Medicaid; and Unemployment Insurance, etc.
> > Like the Republicans are now planning to do, protect those now in
> > programs from being hurt who are close to retirement. But unlike
> > Republicans, once and forever, get the USA out of managing the
> > entitlement business! If government pulls any of the strings, things
> > will start getting bad again, soon.
>
> > 2. Inform China and our other creditors that the USA will not be
> > paying them any interest on their loans. We will repay the principal,
> > but only when doing so wonï¿½t jeopardize our recovery.
>
> > 3. Bring home 90% of US troops within 90 days. Leave 10% of the
> > troops in bases around the world to serve as a front guard in case
> > redeployment is necessary.
>
> > 4. Stop wasting billions and billions of dollars on political
> > campaigns! That money is going into the pockets of the media. Those
> > media rascals salivate over the ad money they generate by ï¿½talking upï¿½
> > how ï¿½closeï¿½ the elections are going to be. Britt Hume, though a
> > conservative, keeps pumping air into Obama by talking about the money
> > Obama can spend (waste!) to get re elected. Barack Obama is a cash
> > cow for the media. Thatï¿½s why no one in the media will call the
> > majority of Democrats CROOKS!
>
> > 5. ï¿½Fat catsï¿½ should stop being wimps! Government has become no-
> > longer-legal STEALING from the supposed rich to give to the poor. The
> > Democrats talk about how Republicans are wanting to give tax breaks to
> > the wealthy while denying women medical screenings. Republicans
> > should be talking about how ï¿½Democrats are criminals for seeking
> > stolen benefits for themselves and other criminals!ï¿½
>
> > Be it known:
>
> > 1. The Constitution does NOT allow political parties! Those are
> > quasi governmental bodies which get to decide who our candidates for
> > public office can be, and decide who ï¿½the leadersï¿½ in Congress are.
> > Because our country was conceived as a Representative Republic, such
> > fact tacitly mandates that each representative shall have identical
> > power! Seniority nor party affiliation can give more power to ANYONE!
>
> > 2. The US Senate is an UNCONSTITUTIONAL oligarchy of elitists who
> > effectively have been running-the-USA-into-the-ground since the birth
> > of this nation. Senators arenï¿½t determined by having a parity of the
> > population which they each serve. Though the Senate was begrudgingly
> > included in the ï¿½wordsï¿½ of the Constitution, it has never been within
> > the SPIRIT of the Constitution!
>
> > 3. The principle of FAIR representation makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to
> > allow the State of Iowa to have more ï¿½powerï¿½ in determining who our
> > candidates for President can be. And by the same general reasoning,
> > it makes the entire primary system UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because the
> > states with earlier-dated primaries always have the most influence in
> > determining who can run.
>
> > 4. Political party conventions are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, because those
> > are ï¿½governedï¿½ by the unsanctioned and UNCONSTITUTIONAL rules of the
> > UNCONSTITUTIONAL political parties!
>
> > 5. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow any
> > individual or group to have more influence on the outcome of an
> > election or referenda than one-person-one vote. That criminalizes
> > entertainment or media celebrities who use their influence to garner
> > votes for any candidate. And it makes any groupï¿½such as labor unionsï¿½
> > who seek more ï¿½powerï¿½ than could ever be manifested by just their
> > membersï¿½ votes, criminals. Labor unions and other unconstitutional
> > group influences, effectively, have been blackmailing candidates by
> > implyingï¿½ ï¿½You vote for ï¿½usï¿½ or you wonï¿½t get elected.ï¿½ Since the
> > latter is a SUBVERSION of the Constitution that shifts the par of
> > power away from individuals and toward specific groups, the leaders of
> > such groups are guilty of TREASON!
>
> > 6. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to give equal
> > time to discuss any socialist idea! Since socialism and communism
> > arenï¿½t fair, then it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow democrats to
> > represent anyone in Congress!
>
> > 7. Because socialism and communism are UNCONSTITUTIONAL, it is
> > similarly UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow a ï¿½Presidentï¿½, like Barack Obamaï¿½
> > who has been masquerading as presidentï¿½to remain in the White House!
> > And it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for our taxpayer-financed Secret Service to
> > give that socialist-communist bastard protection, when they should be
> > arresting Obama and everyone on his White House staff for TREASON!
>
> > 8. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to allow the
> > US Supreme Court to decide any issue in lieu of citizen-approved
> > legislation! And it is UNCONSTITUTIONAL for any President to nominate
> > justices who share socialist-communist idealsï¿½like both of Barack
> > Obamaï¿½s nominees do.
>
> > 9. The principle of fairness makes it UNCONSTITUTIONAL to continue to
> > use the now-outmoded Electoral College System for determining who our
> > President and Vice President can be. There shall be ONLY a single,
> > national popular vote tally! If such had been used in 2008, Hillary
> > Rodham Clinton would now be President. As it is, she will be fighting-
> > for-her-life for accepting bribes from Obama for ï¿½her supportï¿½ in
> > exchange forï¿½ ï¿½vice presidentï¿½ or ï¿½Secretary of Stateï¿½. Hillaryï¿½s
> > glowing endorsement of Obama at that UNCONSTITUTIONAL 2008
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Jonathan: For you, anything 'right' of anarchy is socialist. I
suggest you write your one paragraph constitution banning government.
Unless you are from the stone ages, you won't survive very long on
your own. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 18, 11:53 pm, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
wrote:
> But John, you're the one who has written a socialist constitution.
>
> On 04/18/2011 08:31 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Jonathan: Mainly he's done that by attacking the capitalist system
> > that made this country great; and by supposing that government should
> > control everything (with him in charge). The fact that you even ask
> > that question confirms my initial gut reaction that you are a
> > socialist-communist, like 95% of Democrats are. The remaining 5% are
> > just stupid. You're in both of those groups. ï¿½ J. A. Armistead ï¿½
> > Patriot
> > On Apr 18, 3:03 pm, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > wrote:
> >> John,
>
> >> That you own stock in a company that routinely downgrades websites based
> >> on "link relevance" over "content relevance" says much about your
> >> credibility regarding the understanding of what freedom of expression means.
>
> >> That you believe Obama "has caused more economic and social harm to the
> >> USA than any other person who ever lived, including Hitler" seems
> >> ludicrous. Just how has he (as an individual) been able to pull off this
> >> tremendous task?
>
> >> On 04/17/2011 09:05 AM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> >>> Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> >>> Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> >>> World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> >>> naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> >>> noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> >>> TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> >>> someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> >>> Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> >>> their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> >>> committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> >>> resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> >>> more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> >>> ever lived, including Hitler.
> >>> Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> >>> in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> >>> tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> >>> giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> >>> Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> >>> you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> >>> screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> >>> better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> >>> time, Mark. You need it! ï¿½ J. A. Armistead ï¿½ Patriot
> >>> On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>> Einstein,
> >>>> Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> >>>> your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> >>>> message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> >>>> originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> >>>> Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> >>>> responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
> >>>> On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>> Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> >>>>> those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> >>>>> are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> >>>>> nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> >>>>> capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> >>>>> feel.
> >>>>> Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> >>>>> is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> >>>>> that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> >>>>> UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> >>>>> Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> >>>>> butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> >>>>> then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> >>>>> now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> >>>>> 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> >>>>> with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> >>>>> of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> >>>>> But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> >>>>> a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> >>>>> country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> >>>>> along by talking-up my document on the NET. ï¿½ John A. Armistead ï¿½
> >>>>> Patriot
> >>>>> On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Kï¿½ln<keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>> Hey John!
> >>>>>> I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> >>>>>> already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> >>>>>> maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> >>>>>> even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
> >>>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
> >>>>>>> Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> >>>>>>> explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> >>>>>>> processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> >>>>>>> or otherwise stupid. ï¿½ John A. Armistead ï¿½ Patriot
> >>>>>>> On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> >>>>>>>> present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> >>>>>>>> (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> >>>>>>>> and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> >>>>>>>> my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! ï¿½ John
> >>>>>>>> A. Armistead ï¿½ Patriot
> >>>>>>>> Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> >>>>>>>> Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B.& N.). I'm thrilled that
> >>>>>>>> the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> >>>>>>>> our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> >>>>>>>> the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> >>>>>>>> turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> >>>>>>>> business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> >>>>>>>> doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein<noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> >>>>>>>>> there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> >>>>>>>>> damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> >>>>>>>>> millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> >>>>>>>>> citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! ï¿½ J. A. A.
> >>>>>>>>> ï¿½
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark<markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
> >>>>>>>>>> On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley<
> >>>>>>>>>> jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>>>> So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> >>>>>>> differs
> >>>>>>>>>>> from yours. How fascist of you!
> >>>>>>>>>>> On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> >>>>>>>>>>> can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> >>>>>>>>>>> The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> >>>>>>> great
> >>>>>>>>>>> Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
> >>>>>>>>>>> celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> >>>>>>>>>>> What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> >>>>>>>>>>> have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> >>>>>>>>>>> street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>> candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> >>>>>>> their
> >>>>>>>>>>> network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> >>>>>>> game
> >>>>>>>>>>> with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> >>>>>>>>>>> polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> >>>>>>>>>>> People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> >>>>>>> candidate
> >>>>>>>>>>> say, should rally behind my New Constitutionï¿½a document for the
> >>>>>>>>>>> people! ï¿½ J. A. A. ï¿½
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley<jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>> <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>> John,
> >>>>>>>>>>> You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> >>>>>>>>>>> instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
> >>>>>>>>>>> That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> >>>>>>>>>>> opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean
> >>>>>>> when
> >>>>>>>>>>> you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> >>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>> 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> >>>>>>>>>>> celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more
> >>>>>>> influence
> >>>>>>>>>>> at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course,
> >>>>>>> that
> >>>>>>>>>>> shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> >>>>>>> democracy."
> >>>>>>>>>>> Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means
> >>>>>>> and why
> >>>>>>>>>>> someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your
> >>>>>>> world.
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Dear Mark: Your being in Gaza... does that mean you are Jewish? Rush
Limbaugh is the number one conservative radio talk-show host in
America. He isn't screwing-up anything, because he doesn't have the
balls to actually lead the revolution that's needed to take back this
country from the socialist-communists. If you aren't an American,
then I can't see why you care about what I do to save this country.
Your oblique protections of Barack Obama show you to be pro left. If
I'm wrong, then say anything to suggest that you are pro right.
Mostly you are con anything that has a chance to succeed. — John A.
Armistead — Patriot
>
On Apr 18, 11:49 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Having been IN Gaza just a couple of months ago on assignment I would
> say that I have a much better grasp of what is happening in the real
> world. Who is Rush Limbaugh and why would I take a Gringos word for
> anything ?? They have a really bad habit of screwing up everything to
> meet their own idea of what and who people should be.
>
> As far as doing any walking.... you have NO clue. Again I ask... What
> has Gaddafi done that is a clear and present danger to the US in the
> last ten years ??
>
> On Apr 18, 9:37 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Mark: Instead of straddling so many fences, why don't you watch
> > the news and think about what is going on in the world. I simply
> > don't have the time to walk you through the relevancy of the turmoil
> > that's everywhere. Listen to Rush Limbaugh. He has the world
> > situation pegged fairly well. — J. A. A. —
>
> > On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Einstein,
>
> > > Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> > > give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> > > there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
>
> > > Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> > > considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
>
> > > Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> > > about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> > > (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> > > clear and present danger??
>
> > > On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> > > > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> > > > World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> > > > naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> > > > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > > > TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> > > > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> > > > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> > > > their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > > > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > > > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> > > > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> > > > ever lived, including Hitler.
>
> > > > Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> > > > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> > > > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> > > > giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> > > > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> > > > you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> > > > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > > > better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> > > > time, Mark. You need it! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Einstein,
>
> > > > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > > > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > > > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > > > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>
> > > > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > > > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > > > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > > > > > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> > > > > > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > > > > > feel.
>
> > > > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > > > > > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > > > > > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > > > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> > > > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > > > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > > > > > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> > > > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > > > > > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > > > > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > > > > > But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> > > > > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > > > > > country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> > > > > > along by talking-up my document on the NET. — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > Patriot
>
> > > > > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Hey John!
>
> > > > > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> > > > > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > > > > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > > > > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > > > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > > > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > > > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > > > > > > or otherwise stupid. — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> > > > > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> > > > > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! — John
> > > > > > > > > A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm thrilled that
> > > > > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> > > > > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> > > > > > > > > turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> > > > > > > > > doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> > > > > > > > > > millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > > > > > > citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — J. A. A.
> > > > > > > > > > —
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> > > > > > > > differs
> > > > > > > > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > > > > > > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > > > > > > > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> > > > > > > > great
> > > > > > > > > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
> > > > > > > > > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > > > > > > > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > > > > > > > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > > > > > > > > > > street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> > > > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> > > > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > > > network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> > > > > > > > game
> > > > > > > > > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > > > > > > > > > > polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

JP Middle East Jobs

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Mark: The fact that you masquerade under the name the Annointed (sic)
One, shows you've got mental problems. Aren't you even a citizen of
the USA? Don't you like anything about anything? Keith implied that
you were anxious to read my next "missive". Why is Keith, a lawyer,
having to speak for you monkeys? My guess is you could get-off most
criminal charges by pleading insanity. So far, most that you've said
supports the latter conclusion. — J. A. A. —
>
On Apr 18, 9:55 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Einstein,
>
> Gee what part of "I am not subject to the US Constitution" says that I
> give a rats ass about the Black in your White House !?!?! (To the Libs
> there.. do not Bitch if it is true)
>
> Do I not have to be a citizen or legal resident to be charged or even
> considered for a charge of treason regardless of my actions !?!?
>
> Gaddafi has done NOTHING to me or my country... why should I care
> about YOUR problem with him ?? By the way... what has he done
> (actually DONE) to your country in the last ten years that makes him a
> clear and present danger??
>
> On Apr 17, 10:05 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Dear Mark: I own Google stock. It's an American multinational
> > Corporation that's headquartered in Mountain View, California. Google
> > World shows the new complex quite well. In many ways you are very
> > naive. Your obvious desire to protect Barack Obama's neck from the
> > noose is tantamount to looking-the-other-way to those who commit
> > TREASON every day of their existence. Would you put on moderation
> > someone who proposes that Libyan President Kadafi should be killed?
> > Do you suppose it is Google's obligation to protect those who kill
> > their citizens? Hundreds, if not thousands, of Americans have
> > committed suicide because of the bad economy and the lack of jobs
> > resulting from Obama's socialist-capitalist policies. He has caused
> > more economic and social harm to the USA than any other person who
> > ever lived, including Hitler.
>
> > Treason is a recognized capital offense. Those in our government and
> > in our law enforcement who don't press to have that bastard arrested,
> > tried and hanged are themselves in violation of the Constitution for
> > giving aid and comfort to the enemy. Keith suggested that you,
> > Jonathan and MJ are anxious to read my next "missive". He's viewed
> > you all in a favorable light, before. As for me, I suspect you are so
> > screwed-up in the head that you are both for and against having a
> > better government. That means you have schizophrenia. Get some couch-
> > time, Mark. You need it! — J. A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > On Apr 16, 10:28 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > Einstein,
>
> > > Again, you mistake me for someone that is liable under the present, or
> > > your future, US Constitution. The message you received is the standard
> > > message sent to all new or moderated members, get used to it. It
> > > originates from outside the US and is also not liable under US law.
> > > Isn't the internet grand when the originating country has the
> > > responsibility for what is or is not allowed under their law(s).
>
> > > On Apr 16, 7:11 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Keith: I sensed that there was a common thread of "reasoning" in
> > > > those you name. My last missive, as you say, was explaining why Jews
> > > > are causing a lot of problems and expense while seeming to be such
> > > > nice people. Israel should become a training place for successful
> > > > capitalism. Only the latter can start to heal the deep wounds Muslims
> > > > feel.
>
> > > > Today, when I posted: "Can The Donald 'Fix' the Thin Ice that the USA
> > > > is skating on?" There was a message (Mark's responsibility?) saying
> > > > that moderators must approve what I say. Of course that in
> > > > UNCONSTITUTIONAL by both the present Constitution, and by my New
> > > > Constitution, which requires that Mark be fired from his job. If you
> > > > butterfly conservatives are starting to understand what I'm saying,
> > > > then you should like to know that about 85% of my New Constitution has
> > > > now been copied and pasted for interested citizens to read. The last
> > > > 15% relates to problems with government which I have batted heads
> > > > with, first hand. Once people begin showing appreciation for the 85%
> > > > of my non-Stalinesk document, the remainder will become available.
> > > > But NOT on this forum. The full document will be presented as part of
> > > > a book containing my many essays and detailed rational for why this
> > > > country needs a New Constitution Now. You guys can help speed things
> > > > along by talking-up my document on the NET. — John A. Armistead —
> > > > Patriot
>
> > > > On Apr 16, 4:17 pm, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > Hey John!
>
> > > > > I am atwitter with excitement and anticipation! Jonathan, Mark and MJ are
> > > > > already chomping at the bit to sling complimentary praise and one of them
> > > > > maybe even will write a haiku in your honor! Sugarshack Literal Truth might
> > > > > even have an orgasm in anticipation of reading your next missive!
>
> > > > > On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:21 AM, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net>wrote:
>
> > > > > > Stay tuned, People! Tomorrow I will write you another essay
> > > > > > explaining why the "ritual" of most of our political-governmental
> > > > > > processes are either unconstitutional, wasteful of economic resources,
> > > > > > or otherwise stupid. — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > On Apr 14, 10:44 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > Like me, the readers must be busy with spring buying and fix-up. The
> > > > > > > present discussions will affect the fortunes and the liberty
> > > > > > > (happiness) of your grandchildren. There won't be any more fortunes
> > > > > > > and little liberty if the US economy goes down-the-tubes. By adapting
> > > > > > > my New Constitution, the survival of the USA will be assured! — John
> > > > > > > A. Armistead — Patriot
>
> > > > > > > Those interested are invited to read my book: "The Shortest Distance;
> > > > > > > Harmony Through Prosperity" (Amazon and B. & N.). I'm thrilled that
> > > > > > > the word 'prosperity' is being mentioned more and more as a cure for
> > > > > > > our ailing economy (Capitalism over socialism). That book explains
> > > > > > > the 'build-up' to my writing the New Constitution. Simple things can
> > > > > > > turn this country around! And none of them involving conducting...
> > > > > > > business-as-usual in Washington! Trust me, Folks! I know what I am
> > > > > > > doing. 99.5% of those in Washington are clueless!
>
> > > > > > > On Apr 11, 2:36 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > Mark: If you could, and would, read my document with an open mind,
> > > > > > > > there is nothing injurious to ordinary citizens. Stalin didn't give a
> > > > > > > > damn about ordinary citizens (or soldiers). He killed them by the
> > > > > > > > millions. Are you saying that my New Constitution will harm ordinary
> > > > > > > > citizens? Ha, ha, HA! Then you can't read, for sure! — J. A. A.
> > > > > > > > —
>
> > > > > > > > On Apr 10, 7:25 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > I prefer to call it what it is.... Stalinesque.
>
> > > > > > > > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Jonathan Ashley <
>
> > > > > > > > > jonathanashle...@lavabit.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > > > > So you are trying to eliminate celebrities who have an opinion that
> > > > > > differs
> > > > > > > > > > from yours. How fascist of you!
>
> > > > > > > > > > On 04/10/2011 01:53 PM, NoEinstein wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > No, Jonathan! Celebrities in the media and in entertainment simply
> > > > > > > > > > can't voice their opinions or political preferences in any MEDIUM.
> > > > > > > > > > The man-on-the-street doesn't get hours a week to talk about how
> > > > > > great
> > > > > > > > > > Barack Obama is, the way Oprah Winfrey did. Barbara Walters, a
> > > > > > > > > > celebrity, made no bones about the fact she supported Barack Obama.
> > > > > > > > > > What in our "Constitution" gives high-paid celebrities the right to
> > > > > > > > > > have more influence on the outcome of elections than the man on the
> > > > > > > > > > street? As soon as Jay Leno or David Letterman make one joke about
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > candidate for public office, they will immediately be fired or
> > > > > > their
> > > > > > > > > > network closed. Politics is NOT about entertainment, nor is it a
> > > > > > game
> > > > > > > > > > with 24-7 play-by-play coverage with commentary and prove-nothing
> > > > > > > > > > polls. Those who would like our government to be run the way the
> > > > > > > > > > People say, rather than the way those who publicly endorse a
> > > > > > candidate
> > > > > > > > > > say, should rally behind my New Constitution—a document for the
> > > > > > > > > > people! — J. A. A. —
>
> > > > > > > > > > On Apr 9, 1:01 am, Jonathan Ashley <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > <jonathanashle...@lavabit.com>
> > > > > > > > > > wrote:
>
> > > > > > > > > > John,
>
> > > > > > > > > > You have once again shown that you have no interest in freedom, but
> > > > > > > > > > instead want to dictate what others can and cannot do.
>
> > > > > > > > > > That you believe celebrities should have less right to voice their
> > > > > > > > > > opinions smacks of fascism. Or am I misinterpreting what you mean
> > > > > > when
> > > > > > > > > > you state, "Entertainment celebrities, like media celebrities, have
> > > > > > a
> > > > > > > > > > 'following' which would be cesseptable (sic) to vote like the
> > > > > > > > > > celebrities vote. The (sic) means celebrities would have more
> > > > > > influence
> > > > > > > > > > at the poles (sic) than the man-on-the-street (sic). Of course,
> > > > > > that
> > > > > > > > > > shift of power runs counter to principles of fair play and
> > > > > > democracy."
>
> > > > > > > > > > Please explain to the world what "principles of fair play" means
> > > > > > and why
> > > > > > > > > > someone who is a celebrity will not be allowed to "play" in your
> > > > > > world.
>
> > > > > > > > > > And,
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Wednesday, April 20, 2011

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

**JP** Middle East Jobs

Re: Wringing-the-Neck of Empty Ritual.

JP Middle East Jobs