Friday, January 14, 2011

Re: This so called "Political Forum" group is a pathetic group of evil Reich wing haters and liars.

We just call you a liar, air head, whore and quisling Tommy because those are objective descriptions.

If you aren't man enough to face up to what you are, or are to retarded to be self-aware, that's your problem.

You dirty little Obama felching cum dump.

On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 8:25 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
This so called "Political Forum" group is a pathetic group of evil
Reich wing haters and liars.


It is pathetic that Keithie Keith, Dickie Dick, Markie Mark, and
Brucie Girl continue their repeated relentless vicious personal
attacks against me and The President of The United States in this
hateful, vile Reich wing "Political Forum" group of cynics, liars,
haters, and un-American GOP fools who keep parroting out tired old
twisted pretzel glue Reich wing bumper sticker slogans like "Marxist"
"Moonbat" "Obamacare" "Nobama" and "Zero".

Are you also telling Brucie to stop calling Tommy vulgar, vile,
venemous, childish  names which deserve my retorts, Lil Keithe Keith,
or is Brucie allowed to use his profane, vulgar, and hate filled
insults against me, Keithie? Why do you do the same? Why have you
yourself gone behind my back and spread false hateful smear and lies
about me?

Keith, you should really change the name of this group from "Political
Forum" to "Right Wing Nut Pundits"! You are worse than Glenn Dreck and
Rush Fatblob combined.

You should be deeply ashamed of yourselves, all of you.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: This so called "Political Forum" group is a pathetic group of evil Reich wing haters and liars.

Now you've gone off the deep end, Tommy. "Yes, this group, just like Sarah Palin, and Rush Limbaugh, is responsible for the massacre.

On 1/14/2011 5:49 AM, Tommy News wrote:
Childish name calling directed at me is far from "constructive criticism".  The group claims to be "fair and balanced", but the members here personally, childishly, and viciously attack anyone who disagrees with their own far Reich wing extremist views. These people are the extremists who embody and spread the hatred like that which caused the massacre in Tucson. Yes, this group, just like Sarah Palin, and Rush Limbaugh, is responsible for the massacre.  Defending myself from those vicious personal insults and attacks is my right.  On 1/13/11, frankg <frankg2@gmail.com> wrote: 
Tommy, you really should learn to accept a little constructive criticism. Honestly, you can't come here posting nothing but extreme left wing rhetoric, use childish name calling, not post anything that could be considered original and relevant and then expect people to not be critical of you.  If you could point me to just ONE post of yours where you are not using hateful rhetoric, mean or childish name calling, etc., I'd love to see it. And I don't mean those posts of yours where you copy/paste the words of others, although even then you seem compelled to preface things with more of the same. You should heed President Obama's call for civil discourse.. you might find your time here a tab more pleasant. Just a thought...  On Jan 13, 9:40 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote: 
Keith, you should really change the name of this group from "Political Forum" to "Right Wing Nuts"! You are worse than Glenn Dreck and Rush Fatblob combined.  On 1/13/11, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:    
Tommy, 
 
I told you when you joined this group several months ago, that this was not a forum where one could come in and post far left extremist spin, and not expect to be challenged on his or her talking points.  That for the most part, the members of this forum are well thought, considerate and well read individuals, no matter what their political persuasion, which includes members with both left of center and right of center viewpoints.  We also have regular contributors who hold political viewpoints that could not be considered either "left" or "right"; but hold either extremely libertarian, or damn near anarchist ideologies.  I doubt very seriously if you are even aware of this important fact, or that you even realize that you have managed to pretty much piss everyone in this forum  off. 
 
You have in fact managed to insult everyone.  Never once posting anything of substance or thought,  you continue to post ridiculous, childish, usually pro-homosexual rants without any substance or foundation. 
 
This thread is an excellent example.  Although you didn't necessarily plagerize an article and claim that you wrote it, (which you have done on numerous occasions here in Political Forum) you did in fact post a missive that suggests we are all to be civil, yet you then immediately went on to childishly sling out nasty hateful barbs, and a quick review of your posts of just today, January 13, 2011, is a great demonstration of how all you do is post talking points that you pick up from the most far left extremist hate sites on the web, without ever substantiating any thought, theory, rationale, or ever attempting to explain why you support such beliefs. 
 
At one point in time, I found you amusing, as you are a great example of a Moonbat who doesn't have a clue about how or why you support any issue or policy. You are a prime example of most of the idiots who hold far left extremist points of view;  you are ill informed, and not really all that quick witted,  (e.g.; you damn sure are not funny!)  with your hateful barbs. 
 
Tommy, either have a nice, cold, refreshing cup of shut the hell up with your bitching of the membership of Political Forum, or be gone! Do not expect any sympathy from me! 
 
KeithInKöln 
 
-- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum 
 
* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. 
 -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy 
 -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum  * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. 
  

--
This is my life. I make the rules.

"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement."
- Étienne de la Boétie


Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Jurisdictionary was created by a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits by controlling judges and lawyers!

I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
Read the US Constitution

Re: Sarah Palin: The "Blood Libel" in Tucson mass shooting is on Her Own Hands, but is also on ours.

So, let me understand this. "Blood Libel" is a derogatory term but "Moose-woman" isn't?

Tommy, where do you find this crap?

On 1/14/2011 5:36 AM, Tommy News wrote:
From our friend Karl:  "What I don't understand about what Mr Neusner said (and I fully subscribe to his outrage about Moose-woman's use of such an outrageously derogatory term) is his statement that Moose-woman was "maligned in a gross and unfair way."  It was Moose-woman's organization which prepared the ad that had the "crosshairs map," it was Moose-woman's organization which, after the shooting of the Congresswoman, quickly removed the words "crosshairs map" from the crosshairs map, and it is the Moose-woman's organization and its lapdogs in the media (viz Rush Limbaugh's comment about killing all the liberals except two so that they can be used as museum pieces) which have been fomenting the violence which eventually erupted in Tucson.  Whether or not the nutcase in Tucson was or was not involved in "partisan politics," the fact is that he acted in a climate which has become terribly poisonous in sociopolitical terms, and that is a turd, if you will forgive me, which needs to be laid right on the front porch of Moose-woman and her cohorts.  No "gross and unfair" maligning has occurred.  I have said it before, and I will say it again -- Moose-woman needs to be hauled into court as an accessory and conspirator to murder and attempted murder."  On 1/12/11, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote: 
Sarah Palin: The "Blood Libel" in Tucson mass shooting is on Her Own Hands, but is also on ours.  In Palin's version of events, her controversial actions represented common cause with Rep. Gabrielle Giffords (D-Ariz.), who a few days before being critically wounded in the mass shooting had read the First Amendment on the House floor.  "Acts of monstrous criminality stand on their own," Palin said in the statement. "They begin and end with the criminals who commit them, not collectively with all the citizens of a state, not with those who listen to talk radio, not with maps of swing districts used by both sides of the aisle, not with law-abiding citizens who respectfully exercise their First Amendment rights at campaign rallies, not with those who proudly voted in the last election."  Palin's statement contained an instance of provocative religious imagery that might be missed by more secular voters who read her statement, but which likely will be recognized by the religious conservatives who constitute such an important part of her following.  Within hours of a tragedy unfolding, journalists and pundits should not manufacture a blood libel that serves only to incite the very hatred and violence they purport to condemn," she wrote. "That is reprehensible."  "Blood libel" is a phrase that refers to a centuries-old anti-Semitic slander - the false charge that Jews use the blood of Christian children for rituals - that has been used as an excuse for persecution. The phrase was first used in connection with response to the Arizona shootings in an opinion piece in Monday's Wall Street Journal and has been picked up by others on the right.  Palin's defensiveness was apparent in the indirect reference to criticism of a map on Palin's Web site during the midterm elections that showed districts of congressional Democrats she had targeted for defeat marked with crosshairs.  Giffords, whose district was one of those 20, had publicly complained that this was an invitation to violence.  Palin's statement comes as President Obama is headed to Tucson to speak at a service for the victims, and guarantees that her perspective will be part of the storyline of the day.  In its careful timing and deliberate language, it also represents a departure from her previous attention-getting Facebook posts and tweets, many of which were reflexive spasms to even small criticisms.  On Thanksgiving, for instance, as most of the nation was still sleepily digesting turkey dinners, she issued an angry blast at Obama and the media, recalling a gaffe the president made during the 2008 campaign. It was an apparent reaction to the fact that she herself had been ridiculed for a slip of the tongue in which she referred to North Korea as South Korea.  "The one-word slip occurred yesterday during one of my seven back-to-back interviews wherein I was privileged to speak to the American public about the important, world-changing issues before us," Palin wrote. "If the media had bothered to actually listen to all of my remarks on Glenn Beck's radio show, they would have noticed that I refer to South Korea as our ally throughout, that I corrected myself seconds after my slip-of-the-tongue, and that I made it abundantly clear that pressure should be put on China to restrict energy exports to the North Korean regime."  Those kinds of outbursts could be fatal in a presidential campaign, and stand as a stark contrast to the statement that Palin released Wednesday.  Source: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/12/AR2011011202145.html?hpid=topnews  Is Sarah Palin to Blame for the Tucson Shootings or Are We All?  The Washington Post and numerous other news agencies are discussing a potential connection between a graphic released by Sarah Palin's Take Back the 20 campaign and the Jan. 8 shooting of Arizona  Rep. Gabrielle Giffords. Giffords is in intensive care as a result of Jared Loughner's one-man rampage that left six people dead and 14 injured. The graphic in question was used in the 2010 midterm elections. It featured 20 crosshairs with each set meant to denote a seat up for re-election that was held by representatives who voted for health care reform. Crosshairs covered Giffords' district.  Almost immediately after the shooting, the media picked up the story of Palin's map and it targeting Giffords' congressional seat. At first, Palin did not address this part of the developing story in Tucson and instead extended condolences to Giffords' family and the families of the other victims via her Facebook page on Saturday afternoon, according to TMZ.  However, members of Palin's political action committee did offer commentary by suggesting that the markings were denoting a map location. But when messages were released by Palin promoting the graphic, she used the words "Don't Retreat -- Instead RELOAD."  A map is not reloaded. A gun is reloaded.  Because of this graphic and the word choices that followed its issue, are Palin and the tea party movement somehow responsible for the shooting of Giffords and innocent bystanders at her public meeting in Tucson?  The answer is "Yes." They are responsible. But they are only responsible to the extent that every American who engages in partisan politics is responsible. The level of American political discourse has trickled down from a creation point of heated debate with an air of respect to a cesspool of rhetoric best encapsulated in the phrase "You are either for us, or you are against us."  More: http://www.associatedcontent.com/article/6207326/is_sarah_palin_to_blame_for_the_tucson.html -- Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time. Have a great day, Tommy  
  

--
This is my life. I make the rules.

"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement."
- Étienne de la Boétie


Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Jurisdictionary was created by a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits by controlling judges and lawyers!

I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
Read the US Constitution

Re: Drowning in a Sea of Right Wing Extremism, Prejudice, and Bigotry

"Pellet gun" equates "far-Right anti-government militia"? Really? No self-respecting militia member would use a pellet gun.

The author of this piece was obviously stretching for a way - any way - to connect an alleged breaking of windows comment to the Tucson massacre.

On 1/14/2011 7:02 AM, Tommy News wrote:
Violent Extremists: "after Obama's health care plan passed through Congress, the windows of Rep. Giffords' office in Tucson were shattered by shots from a pellet gun, an attack possibly inspired by a far-Right anti-government militia leader's call on his blog to "send a message that [the Democrats] cannot fail to hear: break their windows."  Now, 20 people have been shot in Tucson and six are dead.  On 1/14/11, MJ <michaelj@america.net> wrote: 
  "Extremists", of course, is *anyone* outside the status quo.  The politcos and their lapdogs work diligently to maintain Boobus Americanus's conditioning.   Regard$, --MJ  If you want the government to intervene domestically you're a liberal, if you want the government to intervene abroad you're a conservative, if you want the government to intervene both domestically and abroad you're a moderate, and if you don't want the government to intervene either domestically or abroad you're an extremist.   -- Joseph Sobran   -- Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups. For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum  * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more. 
  

--
This is my life. I make the rules.

"It is incredible how as soon as a people becomes subject, it promptly falls into such complete forgetfulness of its freedom that it can hardly be roused to the point of regaining it, obeying so easily and so willingly that one is led to say, on beholding such a situation, that this people has not so much lost its liberty as won its enslavement."
- Étienne de la Boétie


Far too many good people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Jurisdictionary was created by a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits by controlling judges and lawyers!

I Refuse To Comply With The Unconstitutional Demands Of The Federal Government
Read the US Constitution

Needed CPAC Insurgency: Oust Keene, Khan, Norquist ....

CPAC should be interesting this year.

There are at least three fights going on where one group is saying another faction should not be there.

The Family Research Council and other anti-gay peeps have all pulled out because the homosexual GOProud ruffians beat them up and took their lunch money last year in the exhibitors hall.

The GOP incumbatocracy continues to be upset that Ron Paul won the straw poll last year; and Ron Paulista 20-somethings seem to be likely to stack the convention again.  Paul usually has a whole posse including Gary Johnson and Judge Napolitano.  And this year perhaps Rand Paul as well.

Now the enemies of Islamofascism, like blogger Pamela Gellar, whose work I usually like, seem to have it in for Norquist (who is also a GOProud supporter and perhaps a closet Paulista), Keene (who started CPAC), and this Moslem conservative, who appeared at Grover's Wednesday meeting recently and said all these reports of his associations with Jihadists are lies, mainly traced back to one writer (who apparently according to people there had written earlier smears on other people. including claiming that Norquist was gay -- Norquist wife was there and said if Grover was gay all women should marry a gay (man).)

I go to eat drink and see old friends!

There are a variety of fee schedules for students and others.  Sometimes one can buy a cheaper ticket through one of the factions, like Campaign for Liberty (on their website).


 

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/2011/01/cpac-scandal-david-keene-embroiled-in-embezzlement-of-400000-in-donor-funds.html

 

January 10, 2011

Needed CPAC Insurgency: Oust Keene, Khan, Norquist ....

CPAC's Suhail Khan addressing Muslim Brotherhood front the Islamic Society of North America (ISNA), co-conspirator in the largest Hamas funding terror trial:

"The early Muslims loved death, dying for the sake of almighty Allah, more than the oppressors loved life," said an impassioned Khan, who wiped away tears throughout his speech. "This must be the case when we are fighting."

He added: "What are our oppressors going to do with a people like us? We are prepared to give our lives for the cause of Islam."

I have long been aware of the stealth islamization of CPAC leadership, but held my events there in the hopes that we might snatch back leadership. David Keene has stacked the board with Islamic supremacists, and their chief diabolical Islamic apologist is none other than the infamous Grover Norquist. If the 10,000 CPAC attendees knew who and what was driving the bus, they would take to the Marriott like villagers with torches. Last year, mine was the only event that spoke to jihad and the war on the West.

And this year, CPAC 2011: Ground Zero Mosque

Last February I wrote that a number of people had questioned my choice of venue for AFDI's historical counter-jihad event I held. Many feel, and rightly so, that the American Conservative Union (ACU) – the political Right's largest and most influential grassroots umbrella organization and sponsor of the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) -- has abandoned conservative principles and morphed into some fleshy, ambiguous, compromised political machine doling out money and favors for cronies, when it is doing anything at all. (More on that here.)

There was a time I was asked to speak, or at least introduce, notables at CPAC. But once I started to criticize CPAC, Keene, and the jihadists on the ACU board like Grover Norquist and Suhail Kahn, those invites quickly stopped. And I lost my Newsmax gig: Norquist Nexis: Newsmax Nixes Atlas.

More on my coverage of Grover here: Grover Norquist's Jihad, American Thinker

Grover Norquist Hiss -- Atlas Shrugs

Pamela Geller, Frontpage Magazine Interview: Grover Norquist

Most Republicans cringe when they hear Grover's name; he is sleazy and they know it, but he has big money (from where?) and he spreads it around.

And David Keene, President of the ACU, is now suspected of embezzling $400,000 from CPAC. He must go.

Now this:  "Moderate Muslim" Suhail Khan's stealth jihadist ties and hair-raising jihadist statements Jihadwatch

NorquistKhan.jpg


Connections to Alamoudi, who is serving 23 years in prison for jihad finance activity, connections to Hamas-linked CAIR, connections to Hamas-linked ISNA -- and check out Khan's own words: "The early Muslims loved death, dying for the sake of almighty Allah, more than the oppressors loved life. This must be the case when we are fighting....What are our oppressors going to do with a people like us? We are prepared to give our lives for the cause of Islam."

You gonna strap on a suicide vest, there, Suhail?

This is a man who has exerted an extraordinarily negative influence upon conservatives, selling them a bill of goods about the Religion of Peace and about himself, and aiding the execrable Grover Norquist in opening the corridors of power to Islamic supremacists. He was also the relentlessly biased "moderator" of what amounted to a two-against-one debate I had at CPAC 2007 with Dinesh D'Souza -- they still ended up losing, not because I'm a great debater but because the facts weren't on their side. Yet though he was willing to tip that playing field with deceit and detours, he won't debate me one-on-one, and has ducked repeated invitations to do so.

What are you afraid of, Suhail? Being unmasked even more than you already have been?

"A GOP 'moderate Muslim' -- or not," by Paul Sperry in the New York Post, January 10:

Suhail Khan, a major Republican supporter of the Ground Zero mosque, has been lobbying GOP leaders on the Hill to back off their opposition. He's got their ear, mainly because he portrays himself as a moderate, patriotic Muslim. Yet newly surfaced videos contradict that.

Khan, a Bush administration vet who sits on the board of the American Conservative Union, assures skeptics that "Park 51 community center" imam Feisal Rauf is a "moderate." Fears over the mosque are overblown, he insists, fomented by "anti-Muslim bigotry." In a recent letter to fellow Republicans, he warned the party was "alienating millions of Arab-American and Muslim-American voters."

But Khan's assurances ring hollow against his own connections to radicals. While he strenuously denies such ties, evidence has emerged -- including exclusive video footage -- that exposes Khan comfortably in the company of known Islamic extremists. Consider:

* In June 2001, Khan personally accepted an award from the now-notorious Abdurahman Alamoudi, then head of the American Muslim Council.

* "We have with us a dear brother," Alamoudi said as he prepared to honor Khan with a plaque at the group's annual conference. "I'm really proud to be with Suhail Khan. Some of you saw him today in the White House, but inshallah [Allah willing], you will see him in better places in the White House, inshallah."

Khan thanked his patron, saying "Abdurahman Alamoudi has been very supportive of me. . . . I hope, inshallah, we can keep working together."

Just days earlier, Sen. Arlen Specter of the Judiciary Committee had cited a New York Post report documenting how Alamoudi had supported terrorists and "declared an interest in destroying America." By 2003, Alamoudi had been busted for plotting a terrorist attack; the top al Qaeda fundraiser is now serving 23 years in federal prison.

* In September 2001, four days before the 9/11 attacks, Khan spoke at the Islamic Society of North America's convention. Introducing him was Jamal Barzinji, whose offices and home were raided by federal agents after 9/11. "Barzinji is not only closely associated with PIJ [Palestinian Islamic Jihad], but also with Hamas," according to the search-warrant affidavit. (A lawyer for Barzinji, who has not been charged, says he is the victim of a government "witch hunt.")

At the event, Khan shared his experiences from "inside" the White House, and praised his late father, Mahboob Khan, for helping found ISNA -- which the government now says is a front for the radical Muslim Brotherhood and has raised money for jihad. The founding documents of the Brotherhood's operation in America (recently seized by the FBI) reveal that it is in this country to "destroy" the Constitution and replace it with Islamic law.

Khan's father also helped found the Muslim Community Association in Santa Clara, Calif. This Khan family mosque is listed in the Muslim Brotherhood's own documents as one of "our organizations." In the 1990s, according to the San Francisco Chronicle, it hosted Ayman al-Zawahiri -- now al Qaeda's No. 2 -- as he toured the US raising money.

Khan vowed in his speech to carry on his father's "legacy."

* Speaking at ISNA's 1999 conference, Khan exhorted Muslims to sacrifice their lives to "protect our fellow brothers and sisters" in "Palestine" and Iraq and those held in the US as terrorist suspects.

"The early Muslims loved death, dying for the sake of almighty Allah, more than the oppressors loved life," said an impassioned Khan, who wiped away tears throughout his speech. "This must be the case when we are fighting."

He added: "What are our oppressors going to do with a people like us? We are prepared to give our lives for the cause of Islam."

* More recently, in March 2008, Khan led a private Council on American-Islamic Relations workshop with Jihad Saleh Williams of the Congressional Muslim Staff Association on how to "jump-start" a career on the Hill....

The non-profit organization responsible for the largest annual conservative gathering in the U.S. is under investigation for embezzlement of hundreds of thousands of dollars in donor money over several years, WND reported December 15.

The American Conservative Union, headed by David Keene and best known for its organization of the Conservative Political Action Conference each year in the nation's capital, has been embroiled in controversies in recent years, but this one is shaking the foundations of the Washington institution.

The American Conservative Union reported to the Internal Revenue Service last month a "material diversion of the organization's assets" totaling over $400,000. The group has an annual operating budget of about $1.5 million.

While directors have been tight-lipped about the details, sources say Keene's ex-wife, Diana, was fired earlier this year as bookkeeper when the misappropriations were discovered.

He has got to go.

Washington Post: By Judy Sarasohn

The Carmen Group, which in the past year has made a play for business in Africa and hired strategically to make that happen, has scored a substantial lobbying client — the government of Algeria.

While it might not be in the Indian casino range, the fee is a healthy $25,000 a month, for a total of $300,000 for the one-year term of the contract, according to the Carmen Group's Foreign Agents Registration Act filing with the Justice Department. The shop also filed a lobby registration with Congress.

And for these fees, the Carmen Group says it will work to strengthen relations between the Algerian and U.S. governments and expand trade, through government relations and "strategic advice." The Carmen team will brief U.S. policymakers, "project an up-to-date image of Algeria" and promote congressional, public and media support for "Algeria's legitimate interests and policy goals," according to the FARA report. The shop will also promote contacts with U.S. business interests.

David Keene, a managing associate at Carmen and chairman of the American Conservative Union, is responsible for managing the firm's services for Algeria, according to the contract with Algeria. But also on the team: the aforementioned David Carmen, Gerald Carmen, John Ladd, Constance Berry Newman, William Outhier, Paul Marisa and Charles Williams.

CONSERVATIVE LEADER TO SPEAK ON 'ISLAMOPHOBIA' PANEL - TOP

(WASHINGTON, D.C., 6/26/07) - On Tuesday, July 17, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) will host a panel discussion at the National Press Club in Washington, D.C., entitled "Attacking Islam: Implications for Social Cohesion and U.S. Relations with the Muslim World."

The panel will address the increasing anti-Muslim rhetoric within the conservative movement in the United States, focusing on the negative impact of such views on religious tolerance in America and on relations with the Muslim world.

Presenters:

* David Keene, President, American Conservative Union * Parvez Ahmed, Chairman, Council on American-Islamic Relations

 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.