World News

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Re: [Politics_CurrentEvents_Group] They Don't Like Black People -- Jay Rockefeller edition

Most journalists you see on NBC NPR etc live in 3 or 4 adjacent zip codes inside DC

DC is 55% black

These zip codes look like this

How can they have any credibility when they smear people as racist?

On Fri, Jan 7, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Carl Spitzer <cwsiv@lote:

>

Black people are just plantation drones to the globalists to help keep
the communist party in power.

CWSIV
>

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (2)

Recent Activity:

New Members 1

Visit Your Group

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

.

__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: {Tea Party Patriots} the debt limit

China and the Federal Reserve

and the taxpayer is the collateral

On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 8:02 AM, lbiglee75 <leroysail.com> wrote:

I would like to know the answer to this question of who is the lender
when they increase the debt ceiling? Maybe if the lender will put the
brakes on the run away train of lending we might begin to solve the
problem.Folks look in the mirror the lender is on the other side.

On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 4:09 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:
> if no one will lend to you you can't spend
>
> On Sat, Jan 8, 2011 at 1:46 AM, Lee Poteet <l55pmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Amen, Fritz. Very well said. But if we don't overspend we won't have to
>> borrow.
>>
>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 1:59 PM, Fritz <fjmehr@usa.net> wrote:
>>>
>>> I think there are two reasons, Bruce. First, a repudiation of the
>>> national debt would seriously jeopardize our financial standing in the world
>>> and make it impossible to borrow money. That would put the US in the same
>>> boat as Greece, Italy, Ireland, etc. Second, the national debt is only a
>>> symptom of the problem we have. The problem is SPENDING. So rather than
>>> spending time on financing schemes that would take the government off the
>>> hook for past sins, we must concentrate on the real problem and decide how
>>> to reduce federal spending. First reports suggest that Republicans of the
>>> 112th Congress are poised to do just that. They will need all the support
>>> they can get.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Fritz
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________
>>>
>>> From: tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
>>> [mailto:tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Bruce Majors
>>> Sent: Wednesday, January 05, 2011 10:01 AM
>>> To: DefeatLibs
>>> Subject: {Tea Party Patriots} the debt limit
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Why don't tea partiers begin discussing repudiating and renegotiating the
>>> national debt? Why should we continue to guarantee or pay our drunken
>>> layabout thieving cousin's credit card bills? Why shouldn't we just
>>> repudiate federal debt so no one will lend to the FedGov and many will sue
>>> it and force it to try to raise taxes -- or privatize and sell off minerals,
>>> lands, and buildings?
>>>
>>> --
>>> This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current
>>> administration from transforming this country into something not intended by
>>> the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be
>>> deleted.
>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en
>>>
>>> For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit
>>> http://www.teapartypatriots.org.
>>>
>>> --
>>> This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current
>>> administration from transforming this country into something not intended by
>>> the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be
>>> deleted.
>>>
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en
>>>
>>> For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit
>>> http://www.teapartypatriots.org.
>>
>> --
>> This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current
>> administration from transforming this country into something not intended by
>> the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be
>> deleted.
>>
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en
>>
>> For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit
>> http://www.teapartypatriots.org.
>

> --

> This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current
> administration from transforming this country into something not intended by
> the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be
> deleted.
>
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
> To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en
>
> For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit
> http://www.teapartypatriots.org.
>

--
This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current administration from transforming this country into something not intended by the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be deleted.

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en

For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit http://www.teapartypatriots.org.

Obama Wants Internet ID for Americans

[[ What's next? A big byte tax? ]]

Obama Wants Internet ID for Americans

Scotty Starnes | January 8, 2011 at 5:00 AM | Tags: Barack Obama, digital IDs, Google, internet ID, internet identification, Obama, President Obama, spying on Americans, trusted identity, wiretapping the internet | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-42W

Just whatever you do...don't ask Illegal immigrants for identification. Identification is only for Americans.

CBSNews.com reports:

STANFORD, Calif. - President Obama is planning to hand the U.S. Commerce Department authority over a forthcoming cybersecurity effort to create an Internet ID for Americans, a White House official said here today.

More laws through regulations. Who'd a thunk it?

It's "the absolute perfect spot in the U.S. government" to centralize efforts toward creating an "identity ecosystem" for the Internet, White House Cybersecurity Coordinator Howard Schmidt said.

That news, first reported by CNET, effectively pushes the department to the forefront of the issue, beating out other potential candidates including the National Security Agency and the Department of Homeland Security. The move also is likely to please privacy and civil liberties groups that have raised concerns in the past over the dual roles of police and intelligence agencies.

The announcement came at an event today at the Stanford Institute for Economic Policy Research, where U.S. Commerce Secretary Gary Locke and Schmidt spoke.

The Obama administration is currently drafting what it's calling the National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace, which Locke said will be released by the president in the next few months. (An early version was publicly released last summer.)

"We are not talking about a national ID card," Locke said at the Stanford event. "We are not talking about a government-controlled system. What we are talking about is enhancing online security and privacy and reducing and perhaps even eliminating the need to memorize a dozen passwords, through creation and use of more trusted digital identities."

The Commerce Department will be setting up a national program office to work on this project, Locke said.

Details about the "trusted identity" project are unusually scarce. Last year's announcement referenced a possible forthcoming smart card or digital certificate that would prove that online users are who they say they are. These digital IDs would be offered to consumers by online vendors for financial transactions.

Schmidt stressed today that anonymity and pseudonymity will remain possible on the Internet. "I don't have to get a credential if I don't want to," he said. There's no chance that "a centralized database will emerge," and "we need the private sector to lead the implementation of this," he said.

This coming from an administration that wants to make wiretapping the internet easier and that is tied to Google. Google admitted to stealing people's passwords, emails and IP addresses. Remember, this isn't about identification. It's about spying on Americans.

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

Due to Political Correctness, the words "Mother" and "Father" are removed from Passports

Scotty Starnes | January 8, 2011 at 6:15 AM | Tags: father, gay agenda, gender neutral, mother, parent one, parent two, political correctness, State Department, U.S. Passport | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-42Z

Bowing down to the gay agenda through political correctness.

Fox News reports:

The words "mother" and "father" will be removed from U.S. passport applications and replaced with gender neutral terminology, the State Department says.

"The words in the old form were 'mother' and 'father,'" said Brenda Sprague, deputy assistant Secretary of State for Passport Services. "They are now 'parent one' and 'parent two.'"

A statement on the State Department website noted: "These improvements are being made to provide a gender neutral description of a child's parents and in recognition of different types of families." The statement didn't note if it was for child applications only.

The State Department said the new passport applications, not yet available to the public, will be available online soon.

Sprague said the decision to remove the traditional parenting names was not an act of political correctness.

"We find that with changes in medical science and reproductive technology that we are confronting situations now that we would not have anticipated 10 or 15 years ago," she said.

How else are children produced other than by a mother and father? It takes an egg from the woman and the sperm from a man to create a child. It's all about political correctness and this is the reason people are against the gay agenda. Changing the meanings of words is all about being politically correct.

Gay rights groups are applauding the decision.

"Changing the term mother and father to the more global term of parent allows many different types of families to be able to go and apply for a passport for their child without feeling like the government doesn't recognize their family," said Jennifer Chrisler, executive director of Family Equality Council.

Her organization lobbied the government for several years to remove the words from passport applications.

"Our government needs to recognize that the family structure is changing," Chrisler said. "The best thing that we can do is support people who are raising kids in loving, stable families."

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

The ugly truth: Ten members of Congress who couldn’t get laid in a whorehouse with a fistful of fifties

http://www.ihatethemedia.com/the-ugly-truth-ten-members-of-congress-who-couldn%e2%80%99t-get-laid-in-a-whorehouse-with-a-fistful-of-fifties?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ihatethemedia+%28I+Hate+the+Media%29