Wednesday, May 26, 2010

Analysis: Turkey's Iran standoff role irks allies

Analysis: Turkey's Iran standoff role irks allies

By SELCAN HACAOGLU (AP) 

ANKARA, Turkey — Turkey's attempts to mediate Iran's nuclear standoff with the West have evolved into an aggressive effort to forestall new U.N. sanctions. The assertive campaign is placing Turkey in opposition to longtime allies Israel and the United States.

It also raises the question of whether NATO's only Muslim member is becoming less of a bridge between East and West than a powerful international advocate for its neighbors in the Middle East.

Turkey and Brazil reached a deal in Tehran a week ago under which Iran would ship much of its low-enriched uranium to Turkey, but it failed to ease concerns in the West that Tehran will continue to enrich uranium to higher levels with the aim of building a nuclear weapon. The U.S. introduced a resolution last week calling for a series of economic and trade restrictions after winning support from China and Russia.

That prompted Turkey, a temporary member of the Security Council, to send letters to 26 countries, speaking against sanctions and seeking support for the envisaged swap deal.

"Turkey wants to prevent the escalation of tensions with Iran to avoid suffering from it economically," said Nihat Ali Ozcan of the Economic Policy Research Institute in Ankara. "It is also seeking to raise its profile in the Muslim world but its loyalty is at risk in the eyes of the West."

The Obama administration says it appreciates Ankara's efforts and its ability to be an effective interlocutor with Tehran. But officials say they were unhappy with the timing of the deal and Ankara's claim that it met U.S. and U.N. Security Council demands.

The administration's swift response a day later announcing that Security Council powers had reached a deal on new sanctions was intended as a message to Turkey and Brazil as much as to Iran. While Turkey has been eager to portray its mediation as a sign of its growing power on the world stage, its diplomacy could not persuade Security Council members including, China and Russia, to hold off on sanctions against Iran.

For Israel, the nuclear swap deal comes at a time when diplomatic relations with Turkey are at a historic low.

While Israeli foreign ministry officials declined comment on just how the swap deal would affect the Israeli-Turkish diplomatic relations beyond admitting that "it is a factor," government ministers have been direct in their assessment that the deal is a bad one.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, speaking Tuesday before Israel's parliament, described the nuclear swap deal between Brazil, Turkey, and Iran as "a transparent Iranian trick meant to distract world public opinion from sanctions by the Security Council against Iran. We know this is an empty proposal because Iran keeps in its hands enough uranium to make nuclear weapons, it continues to enrich uranium in its possession to a high percentage, and it reserves the right, according to its proposal, to take back the kilograms of uranium it transferred to Turkey at any time."

The Turkish government's involvement comes as another bitter twist in a relationship that has soured in the last 18 months over such events as Israel's offensive in Gaza and deputy foreign minister Danny Ayalon's diplomatic snubbing of Turkey's ambassador during a meeting in January of this year.

According to Alon Liel, a former Israeli ambassador to Turkey, the relationship between Israel and Turkey has reached such a low point that Turkey's involvement in the Iranian swap deal is unlikely to affect the diplomatic relationship between the two countries — because it can't get any worse.

"The crisis is so severe that I don't think this agreement will change anything," he said.

Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan's Islamic-rooted Justice and Development Party came to power in 2002 in a landslide victory and, despite the country's traditional alliance with the West, has expanded relations with Muslim countries, lifting entry visas with Syria and Libya, while criticizing its ally and friend Israel for what it says is excessive use of power against Palestinians — and earning respect in the broader Muslim world.

Israel had long supplied and upgraded Turkey's military equipment while Turkey allowed its pilots to train over the larger Turkish air space.

Erdogan walked off the stage last year after berating Israel's President Shimon Peres at an international gathering in Davos, Switzerland, over the war in Gaza. He quickly became a hero in the Muslim world with protesters chanting his name in street demonstrations.

That applause was meaningful for a nation whose ancestors held the seat of the Caliphate, the spiritual leader of world's Muslims, for four centuries during the Ottoman Empire.

The government also hosted shunned Hamas political leaders and mediated between Israel and Syria, which demands the full withdrawal of Israeli troops from the Golan Heights as a condition for peace. It has sent soldiers to Afghanistan and Lebanon but placed them under strict orders not to fight with fellow Muslims.

Despite all the rhetoric, Turkey is far from a break with the West. It has vast interests intricately woven into NATO and the European Union. Turkey has a customs union agreement with its top trading partner, Europe, and wants to become part of the EU.

But there is no doubt that the tone in Turkey's foreign policy is changing.

Although the United States has been its chief ally since the Cold War, Turkey opposed the U.S. invasion of Iraq through Turkish soil, triggering tensions with Washington.

Until the late 1990s, Turkish relations with Iran were tense, with its secular, westernized government accusing Tehran of trying to export its radical Islamic regime to this predominantly Muslim but secular country. Today, Turkey wants to build deeper trade ties with Iran.

"Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Khamenei, is hoping that Erdogan would confront the West on his behalf," said Meir Javedanfar, an Israel-based Middle East analyst and co-author of "The Nuclear Sphinx of Tehran — Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and The State of Iran.

Turkey's enthusiasm for European Union membership has eroded in the face of European skepticism about admitting a large Muslim country. And it resents pressure from the West to reckon with the uglier aspects of its past, by making peace with Armenians and acknowledge that mass killings of Armenians at the turn of the century were genocide — a claim strongly denied by Turkey. Some other thorny EU demands are granting more rights to minority Kurds and withdrawing Turkish troops from Cyprus, which was divided into Turkish and Greek sectors after Turkish troops invaded it in the wake of coup seeking to unite the island with Greece in 1974.

Associated Press Writers Desmond Butler in Washington and Karoun Demirjian in Jerusalem contributed to this report.

Lebanese Prime Minister Saad Hariri, left, meets with Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan, in Istanbul, Turkey, Saturday, May 22, 2010. (AP Photo/Tolga Bozoglu, Pool)

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hmIfrQuYXHTDQ5ni_t3dGYgr9NXQD9FU3KGO0

Study: Parenthood Does Not Make for Active Churchgoers

Study: Parenthood Does Not Make for Active Churchgoers

By Audrey Barrick|Christian Post Reporter

A new study debunks the common assumption that once a couple hits parenthood, they'll put Sunday church services back on their calendar.

  • church
    (Photo: AP Images / Pablo Martinez Monsivais)
    Hazel Lilly, right, walks with her 14 month-old granddaughter London Jackson, left, outside Allen Chapel AME Church in Washington, Sunday, April 4, 2010.

While children do act as a catalyst for millions of parents to return to the pews or become more active in the church, it is not the normative experience.

According to the Barna Group, half of parents in the U.S. said having children did not influence their connection to a church or change their involvement. And among parents who are Christian, 47 percent said the presence of children was unrelated to their church life.

Only 17 percent of parents said having a child helped them reconnect with church after a long period of not attending.

New commitments were even rarer. Only 5 percent said becoming parents helped them become active in a church for the first time

"Many religious workers assume that parenthood motivates people to return to their spiritual traditions and to church attendance," said David Kinnaman, president of the Barna Group. "This perspective is especially common when it comes to justifying the frequent disengagement among young adults. Sometimes faith leaders go so far as to simply wait for parenthood to occur, when they figure the 'real work' of ministry can begin."

But he noted that more young women are delaying having children. Thus, it is important to help shape young people's beliefs and habits before they become parents, he said.

"Parenthood might help to clarify and enhance people's pursuit of spirituality, but usually it does not fundamentally alter a parent's spiritual trajectory. Getting people to transition from church involvement based upon religious inertia to activity driven by a sense of engagement is exceedingly difficult – and relatively rare."

According to the study, only 20 percent of parents said they were already active and became even more involved in church after having children.

Meanwhile, 4 percent became less involved in church.

Younger parents – under the age of 35 – were more likely than average to say parenthood helped them return to church. And parents with children under the age of five were more likely than average to say that they reconnected with church. Parents of teens were likely to say that having children had no impact on them.

Notably, attendees of large churches were more likely than were those attending smaller congregations to increase their level of church involvement. The Barna Group speculates larger churches may be more attentive to the needs of families.

Findings are based on a nationwide tracking study, called OmniPoll. Telephone interviews were conducted on a random sample of 670 parents, age 18 and older, from across the U.S., Jan. 26-Feb. 10.

http://www.christianpost.com/article/20100524/study-having-kids-does-not-make-parents-active-churchgoers/index.html



Who's invited to White House Jewish bash?

Who's invited to White House Jewish bash?

White House refuses to divulge guest list for Thursday's East Room event marking Jewish Heritage Month, but those with knowledge of list say its an eclectic, interesting one

Associated Press

Published: 05.25.10, 14:51 / Israel Jewish Scene

In politics, as elsewhere, it's a sport that's almost as popular as people-watching: Guest-list watching.

 

And this week, it's the Jewish community in Washington and beyond that's buzzing over who'll be on the list when Barack and Michelle Obama host the first-ever White House reception marking Jewish Heritage Month.

 

The White House won't divulge the guest list for Thursday afternoon's event in the East Room. But those with knowledge of the list say it's an eclectic and interesting one - and markedly different from past Jewish-themed events like the president's annual Hanukkah party.
Jewish Contribution

White House to celebrate Jewish Americans / Associated Press

US President Obama, first lady to hold reception in recognition of Jewish American Heritage Month. Guests to include community leaders, Olympians, members of Congress, business leaders, scholars, athletes, military veterans and astronauts
Full Story

 

Where that event brings established Jewish community leaders to the White House, Thursday's reception is meant to honor American Jews who have made contributions in the arts, music, sports, the space program and other fields.

 

The most prominent guest on the list, according to several people familiar with it: former baseball great Sandy Koufax, the left-handed Hall of Fame pitcher for the Dodgers who famously refused to pitch in a World Series game on Yom Kippur, the holiest day in Judaism. (Koufax, now 74, could not be reached to confirm his plans.)

 

Names also mentioned by members of the Jewish community: Olympic swimmer Dara Torres, author Judy Blume, and a young woman who was wounded in a 1999 shooting at a Los Angeles Jewish center, Mindy Finkelstein.

 

But the list also includes a number of younger Jewish activists involved in interesting initiatives. One of them, Shawn Landres, heads Jumpstart, which he calls a "thinkubator for sustainable Jewish innovation." He's traveling to Washington from Los Angeles.

 

"There's been excitement about this, people posting on Facebook and talking about who's coming," says Landres.

 

"In the past," he adds, "when there were Jewish events at the White House, they tended to go to the same well of people - big Jewish organizations, the usual suspects. What I've noticed here is a commitment to go beyond that. The administration is trying to engage the Jewish community in different ways."

 

Obama's 'charm offensive'?

Of course, it's no secret that tensions have surfaced between the administration and some elements of the Jewish community over its policy toward Israel, particularly regarding construction of Jewish settlements in east Jerusalem.

 

So it's tempting to see this week's reception as another step in what many have called Obama's current "charm offensive" toward American Jewish leaders, including: A meeting last week between the president and Jewish congressional leaders; gatherings of top White House officials and rabbis; addresses by Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton and National Security Adviser James L. Jones to major Jewish groups; and a private lunch early this month between the president and Noble laureate Eli Wiesel.

 

But though Thursday's event certainly can't hurt, officials point out that plans have been under way for several months. And the pressure actually began years ago.

 

"Listen, I've been trying to get the White House to put on this event for five years," says Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz of Florida, the congresswoman who spearheaded the campaign to establish Jewish Heritage Month in the first place. "I really don't think it has anything to do with the current outreach efforts."

 

"I'm really excited about the event," adds Schultz, who will attend along with many other Jewish members of Congress. "This is a way to demonstrate that President Obama is committed to the Jewish community. But also it's a way to educate Americans about the contributions of American Jews, to breed tolerance and understanding."

 

Washington Jewish leader William Daroff adds that it wasn't so long ago that Jews in the United States were restricted in many ways: where they could live, what colleges they could attend, and what professions they could aspire to.

 

"We've come a long way, and Jewish Heritage Month is there to celebrate that progress," says Daroff, director of the Washington Office of the Jewish Federations of North America.

 

But while May was declared Jewish Heritage Month in 2006, set into law by President George W. Bush, this is the first time the White House has agreed to hold a reception to mark it.

 

"I don't ascribe a motive," Schultz says. "Presidents are very busy."

 

'Unique event'

Asked why Obama had decided to hold the reception, White House spokesman Matt Lehrich told The Associated Press that the Obamas wanted to celebrate Jewish Americans' contributions to the nation's history and culture. "The reception also offers a chance to foster partnership, collaboration, and education in the spirit of Jewish American Heritage Month," Lehrich said.

 

Daroff himself isn't on the guest list, and he says that's logical. "This event is less about those of us in the Beltway," he says, "and more about the folks out there living the Jewish experience, and breaking down barriers."

 

So who else is invited? "This could be interesting, seeing what the mix looks like," says Abraham Foxman, national director of the Anti-Defamation League, who said he's not on the list.

 

Or, put another way: "Adam Sandler could write a whole new Hanukkah song after this party," quips Steve Rabinowitz, a Washington public relations executive, referring to the popular song pointing out famous Jewish Americans.

 

Someone who probably wouldn't make the song is Rabbi Marc Schneier of New York. He leads two Orthodox congregations and spoke at the 2008 Democratic convention.

 

But he believes he was invited because of his outreach work to the Muslim community, as president of the Foundation for Ethnic Understanding. He's also has been active in furthering ties with the black community.

 

"Our work is very much in concert with President Obama's agenda," says Schneier.

 

A past guest at the White House Hanukkah party, Schneier says this event has a whole different feel to it. "This is quite unique," he says. "It's more exotic than the usual White House event."

 

Daroff agrees. "Listen, anytime there's a first in Washington, it's a big deal," he says.

http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3894009,00.html

‘We will destroy Israel-bound ships’

'We will destroy Israel-bound ships'
Photo by: AP

'We will destroy Israel-bound ships'

By ASSOCIATED PRESS AND JPOST.COM STAFF
05/26/2010 00:04

Nasrallah threatens retribution if Israel imposes sea blockade in war.

BEIRUT — If Israel imposes a sea blockade on Lebanon in a future war between them, Hizbullah would attack Israeli ships in the Mediterranean, the organization's leader, Hassan Nasrallah warned Tuesday.

Nasrallah said his Iranian-backed group now had the capacity to inflict as much harm on Israel as it inflicted on Lebanon in 2006, and is capable of destroying any military or commercial ships heading to Israeli ports.

In the 2nd Lebanon War in 2006 Israel imposed a sea and air embargo on Lebanon to prevent Hizbullah from being resupplied with weapons.

"In any future war, if you blockade our coasts and ports, all the military, civil and commercial ships heading to ports in occupied Palestine along the Mediterranean will come under Hizbullah rocket attack," Nasrallah said.

Addressing supporters through a video link at a huge rally south of Beirut, Nasrallah repeated past threats that his group would rocket Tel Aviv airport and other strategic targets if Israel's military strikes Lebanese infrastructure as it did in 2006.

He added: "We are capable of targeting, striking and destroying your ships as they head to any port on the coast of occupied Palestine from north to south."

The anniversary coincides with rising tensions in the region over Israeli claims that Hizbullah has acquired Scud missiles from Syria and Iran. Syria has denied supplying the group with weapons, and Nasrallah refused to confirm or deny those claims.

http://www.jpost.com/MiddleEast/Article.aspx?id=176476
==========


Nasrallah threatens to hit ships

Hezbollah leader threatens to target any vessel heading towards Israel in future war; Shiite group now able to inflict as much damage as that caused by Israel in Lebanon during 2006 war, he says

Reuters and Ynet

Latest Update: 05.25.10, 23:41 / Israel News

Lebanese rhetoric escalating: Hezbollah Chief Hassan Nasrallah said on Tuesday the Shiite group would attack all military, civilian and commercial ships heading towards Israel's Mediterranean ports in any future war.

 

"If you (Israel) put our coasts under siege in any future war, I say all military, civilian and commercial ships heading to Palestine's coasts on the Mediterranean will be under the fire of the Islamic resistance fighters," he said via a video-link.

 

Hezbollah

Nasrallah questions Shoah / Roee Nahmias

Hezbollah leader says victory over Israel should be taught in same way Jewish State imparts memory of Holocaust, 'whether it happened or not'; Israelis fear Hezbollah, Nasrallah adds in televised address
Full Story

"(As for) those ships which will go to any port on the Palestinian coast from north to the south, (I say) we are capable of hitting it and are determined to go into this..if they besiege our coasts," he said.

 

"When the world will witness how these ships will be destroyed in Palestine's regional water nobody will dare to go there just as they will block (others) from coming to our coasts," he told thousands of supporters.

 

Earlier this year Nasrallah threatened to hit Israel's Ben Gurion airport if the Jewish state struck Beirut's international airport in any future conflict.

 

Hezbollah marks IDF pullout

Nasrallah added that Hezbollah now had the capability to inflict as much harm on Israel as it did in Lebanon during the 2006 war.

 

The Hezbollah leader made the remarks during the keynote event marking the 10th anniversary of the IDF withdrawal from southern Lebanon, being held in the group's Dahiya stronghold in Beirut.

 

"We were the ones who forced upon the enemy the scenario, timing, and terms of its defeat and escape from Lebanon in 2000," he said, adding that the "victory" created a new equation in the region.

 

Nasrallah claimed that concerns and confusion are growing in Israel and that officials admit that the Jewish State is facing major challenges. This is why Israel "goes from one drill to the next," he said, adding that its main vulnerability and strategic problem is the Israeli fear of war and its results.


Nasrallah opened his speech by expressing his appreciation for Lebanese killed in clashes with Israel, mostly focusing on his predecessor Abbas Musawi and on top commander Imad Mugniyah, who were both assassinated by Israel.

 

In a speech last week, Hezbollah's secretary-general urged followers to impart the legacy of Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon similarly to "what Israel does with the Holocaust, whether it indeed happened or not."




Photo: AFP

Nasrallah warns Israel 



http://www.ynetnews.com/articles/0,7340,L-3894246,00.html

Joint Military Exercise “Baltic Host 2010” to Take Place in the Baltic States

Joint Military Exercise "Baltic Host 2010" to Take Place in the Baltic States
From 31 May to 4 June, the Baltic States military exercise "Baltic Host 2010" will take place simultaneously in the capitals of the Baltic States – Riga, Tallinn and Vilnius.

The goal of the exercise "Baltic Host 2010" is to develop action plans by the Baltic States defence sectors together with other state institutions for due and adequate simultaneous reception, staging and onward movement of allied and support units over the territory of all the Baltic States. This year the focus will be placed on cooperation between the defence sector and civil institutions during the Host Nation Support (HNS) operations.

Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, US European Command (EUCOM) and Naval Striking and Support Force NATO, as well as for the first time – Denmark, Poland, Norway and Germany, will participate in the exercise. Latvia will be represented by participants of the National Armed Forces, the Ministry of Defence and State Administrative Institutions Subordinate to the Ministry of Defence, the Security Police, Emergency Medical Assistance Service, Ministry of Transport, State Police, State Border Guard and State Fire and Rescue Service – a total of around 160 people.

The execution of the training task, providing HNS allied forces, will be monitored according to a previously developed scenario that will be based on fictional events. The scenario is based on a pre-crisis situation in a specific region, and the general activities are targeted towards achieving the adjustment and elimination of the circumstances provoking the crisis situation.

In the Baltic States such military exercise was organised for the first time in 2009 in Tartu, Estonia. All participants acknowledged the "Baltic Host 2009" exercise to be very successful and agreed on the fact that it should be established as a permanent training cycle organised in the Baltic States annually.

Host Nation Support is the civilian and military support that the host nation provides during periods of peace, crisis or war for the allied forces and organisations that are located on the state's territory, are carrying out operations in it or are crossing it. 
 
http://www.defpro.com/news/details/15488/