Friday, August 31, 2012

Democrats refuse to cancel Jumah Jihad at the DNC

http://atlasshrugs2000.typepad.com/atlas_shrugs/democrats_new_leadership_slash_and_burn/

Wednesday, August 29, 2012

Democrats refuse to cancel Jumah Jihad at the DNC

Once again the Demcorats prove that they are the party of the enemy, the traitor, the jihad. Despite public outcry, the jihadist Jumah will tale place at the DNC. The event has in its crosshairs the Patriot Act, the NYPD, the National Defense Authorization Act, and anti-Shariah sentiment.

"I will stand with them should the political winds shift in an ugly direction." Barack Hussein Obama, page 261, The Audacity of Hope

A couple of weeks back, I posted about the Jumah jihad at the DNC, an event led by an imam who urged the overthrow of the "filthy" U.S. government and who was named an unindicted co-conspirator in the World Trade center bombings. Obama's DNC lists the assembly as an "official function." The group is hardly "mainstream," being represented by Siraj Wahhaj, who will be the "Grand Imam" for the gathering.

Wahhaj and the co-leader of the Charlotte event, Jibril Hough, are both heavily involved in the separatist American Islamist movement. Many of the participants in the "Jumah at the DNC" will most likely represent radical networks that have long-time, but little-known, operations in the Charlotte region.

Eyewitness News asked Hough about his views on several topics, including the war on terror.

"American troops are actually the insurgents. It's not the people who live there. The people who live there are defending their country," Hough said.

Hough does not consider himself to be a supremacist, but believes Muslims have not received the credit they deserve.

"This is a fact: Muslims have visited America prior to Columbus. It was a Muslim who guided Columbus on his voyage to the new world," Hough said.

He insisted he is not a radical, and said his beliefs are shared by mainstream Muslims.

At a speech in 1995, Siraj Wahhaj informed the world that it was his "duty and our duty as Muslims to replace the U.S. Constitution with the Quran."

Looks like Obama is engaging in his own holy war.

News of the jihad Jumah has sent shock waves through the American street. The revelations about the supremacist and jihadist agenda ought to have sent shock waves through Democrat leadership. Clearly this treasonous gathering should be given no sanction by one of the nation's two political parties.

But, once again, the Democrats side with those who are vowing to destroy our country. They are incapable of doing the fundamental right thing. The Democrats would rather spit in the eye of fallen soldier, 3,000 victims of September 11th and Major Hasan's Fort Hood jihad, and every 911 family member than insult the jihadist constituency, which is clearly their base.

Bad enough, it was going to be jihad CENTCOM at the DNC (channelling Anwar Awlaki, no doubt), but President Obama turned down a chance to have Timothy Cardinal Dolan deliver a prayer at the Democratic National Convention after Dolan told Democrats he would be "grateful" to deliver a blessing in Charlotte.

Dolan — considered the top Catholic official in the nation, as head of the Archdiocese of New York and president of the Conference of Catholic Bishops — tipped off Democrats a few weeks ago that he had agreed to deliver the prime-time benediction at the Republican convention in Tampa next week, Dolan's spokesman Joseph Zwilling told The Post.

"He wanted to make sure that they knew that this was not a partisan act on his part and that he would be just as happy and grateful to accept an invitation from the Democrats as he would to have received one from the Republicans," said Zwilling.

That, too, struck the heart of most Americans, and after huge public pressure, the DNC reluctantly did an about-face and accepted Cardinal Timothy Dolan's offer. Dolan will deliver the closing prayer at the Democratic National Convention, despite his disagreement with the Obama administration over birth control mandates.

Posted by Pamela Geller on Wednesday, August 29, 2012 at 05:54 PM in Democrats' New Leadership: Slash and Burn, Leftist MEDIA JIHAD aligned with Terror Force | Permalink

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Here's a Bloody Mary Topped With Chiles, Tater Tots, Steak, Toast, Eggs, Bacon, and a Beef Straw

http://eater.com/archives/2012/08/30/heres-a-bloody-mary-topped-with-chiles-tater-tots-steak-toast.php

Gun Lobby Loves 3D-Printed Weapons

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2012/08/3d-weapons/

Gun Lobby Loves 3D-Printed Weapons

By Robert Beckhusen
Email Author
August 10, 2012 |

A .22-caliber pistol manufactured partly with 3D-printed plastics. Photo courtesy of Michael Guslick

Designing gadgets with desktop 3D printers is nothing new. But until now, no one has ever used an at-home thermoplastic machine to help build a pistol. For one of the nation's gun lobbies, it's about time.

The firearm in question is a .22-caliber rifle developed by Wisconsin engineer and amateur gunsmith Michael Guslick. Using his Stratasys 3D printing machine and blueprints downloaded from the internet, Guslick successfully printed the lower receiver — or frame — of an AR-15 rifle and turned it into a gun. He also shared the results on his blog.

"People have been making firearms at home since before America was a country," Dudley Brown, executive vice president of the National Association for Gun Rights, tells Danger Room. "And not only does it not make it dangerous, it makes America safer. It's where most of the innovation came from. John Moses Browning built guns out of his basement. We're still using them."

Neither Brown nor the NAGR condone building firearms illegally. But at-home plastic gun manufacturing raises some thorny legal and regulatory questions, and has some worried it could undermine attempts to keep America's guns under control. Managing the flow of solid weapons is one thing. How do you control a digital pattern that people can use to print guns in their living rooms?

Note that Guslick didn't manufacture the entire weapon using the printer. The rest of the rifle is assembled from commercial off-the-shelf parts. Guslick provided a photo of an earlier pistol model — seen above — to Danger Room, which shows a printed thermoplastic lower receiver, and a commercially bought metal upper receiver, barrel, grip and magazine. And of course, Guslick didn't manufacture the ammo either. But as metal and ceramic materials become available for low-end printers, it could become possible to one day print an entire gun.

Legally, however, Guslick did print a firearm. Well, maybe. Under the Gun Control Act of 1968, the receiver is what determines whether or not a gun is a gun. No receiver, no gun. For the nation's gun lobbies — pro- and anti-gun — that may present a problem.

Michael Guslick's printed AR-15 rifle: Photo courtesy of Michael Guslick

"The laws were written assuming people could make their own guns … the law still does regulate and restrict that," Daniel Vice, senior attorney at the Washington-based Brady Center to Prevent Gun Violence, tells Danger Room. Guslick likely didn't violate any laws surrounding the manufacturing of the gun without a license, as it's only for personal use. If he attempted to sell the pistol, or opened up a factory producing the weapons, he'd need authorization from the government.

But Vice said the weapon could possibly be illegal under the Undetectable Firearms Act of 1988, which bans the possession and manufacturing of firearms that can pass undetected through airport security. But U.S. law is unclear whether this would apply to a gun with metal parts. The Glock pistol, for example, uses plastic parts.

The National Rifle Association did not comment by press time. A representative from the Second Amendment Foundation would not speak on the record, either.

There are also questions about the weapons' practicality, at least for now. Given another decade or two, they could become easier to build. One current problem is that an upper receiver — where the gun's chamber is located — made of thermoplastics could melt when experiencing the heat given off by a gas-powered rifle. Building a plastic weapon at home also isn't like pressing a button, and requires a bit of technical know-how. Brown also doesn't think criminals would bother trying to make them.

"Some [firearms] are legal to make and some aren't, and it doesn't change America," Brown says. "[Aurora shooting suspect James] Holmes legally bought his AR-15. So it's not like crooks are worried about getting a hold of firearms."

But beyond that, there's nothing technically stopping anyone from making one, or at least the receiver. One hobbyist built an AR-15 magazine. "On a technical level, this is absolutely boring, this is old news," Guslick says, surprised by the media attention he's received. But, he says, "On a legal level, this is kind of a curiosity."

He added that he's not worried about whether his gun breaks the law. "I don't think it does, legally. There are commercially manufactured lowers which are pure polymer, no metal at all. So if it was an issue we would have heard about it on a commercial basis long ago."

Is He Or Isn’t He (Part Two) The Duck Test

Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on actjonesboroar

Is He Or Isn't He (Part Two) The Duck Test

by burkasrugly

Fellow infidels,

The James Whitcomb Riley (1849-1916), the Hoosier poet, may have been the first to pen the following lines "When I see a bird that walks like a duck and swims like a duck and quacks like a duck. I call that bird a duck."

In 1964 Cardinal Richard Cushing made a similar reference to the Communist dictator of Cuba, Fidel Castro. This was when Castro was still trying to pass himself off as a freedom fighter, instead of the Communist monster he really was.

Someone has humorously called this saying the Duck Test. Actually it is a very
sound form of inductive reasoning. If any person consistently displays a certain
set of behaviors there is a high probability those actions and values will define
that individual. Think about this question in relation to the controversy swirling
about whether President Obama is a Muslim ?

Mr. Obama has consistently in words and deeds sided with the Muslim world. In fact, he usually approves of the Muslim Brotherhood which has openly sworn to destroy this country. The Brotherhood would replace our Constitutional Republic with the capricious of a cruel and inhumane Sharia Law.

If it looks a duck, swims like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then it probably is a duck. There is a high probability that Obama has feathers and webbed feet. Be sure to tune into the Democratic National Convention next week to see if 20,000 ducks (uh Muslims) show up to back the magnificent Great One's play.

In hoc signo,

Constantine

COURAGE, the virtue without which all the others are meaningless.

burkasrugly | August 31, 2012 at 1:04 am | Tags: Barack Obama Muslim, Sharia Law | Categories: Radical Islam | URL: http://wp.me/p1t1Gt-Gs

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://actjonesboroar.wordpress.com/2012/08/31/is-he-or-isnt-he-part-two-the-duck-test/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com

“Obamanation”-On Canvas

Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Fellowship of the Minds

"Obamanation"-On Canvas

by Terry

Artist Jon McNaughton has produced a new painting, titled "Obamanation," that shows more than 60 symbols he believes best depict the failures of the Obama administration.

Go to this LINKto see the painting. As you drag your Pointer across each figure on the screen, it gives a description and reason for that particular item being in the painting.

This is AWESOME!

~Terry

Terry | August 30, 2012 at 7:02 pm | Tags: Afghanistan, Barack Obama, big government, Democrats, Eric Holder, government, Islam, Jon McNaughton, Left, Muslims, national debt, Obama administration, Osama bin Laden, tyranny, United States, White House | Categories: 2012 Election, Agenda 21, Art, Christian Persecution, Conservatives, Inspirational, Islam, Liberals/Democrats, Military, New World Order, Obama, Religion, Republican Party, The Powers That Be, Uncategorized, United States, US Presidents | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-gQM

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/08/30/obamanation-on-canvas/

Thanks for flying with

WordPress.com