Saturday, August 11, 2012

**JP** Birthday or Independence Day

Birthday or Independence Day?

 

While 14 August is just around the corner, kindly allow me to share a thought with your readers once again as I have been doing so for the past many years. Should we celebrate 14 August as our Independence Day or the Birthday of Pakistan?  Pakistan did not exist as a country before August 14, 1947 and as such was never ruled by the British or any other foreign power. It was, therefore, not liberated or granted independence by anyone.  It was created as an independent and free country right from its very inception.  It was India that was ruled by the British and given independence by  them. Pakistan took its birth at 2359 hrs on the night 14/15 August 1947 one minute before India was given independence at 2400

hrs the same night.  As the date changes after midnight, therefore, Bharat became independent on 15th August whereas Pakistan came into being on the night of 14th August 1947. Had India been liberated before Pakistan was created, it would have been up to the Indian Constituent Assembly to agree or not to carve Pakistan out of mother India.   Pakistan was, therefore, created a minute before India was liberated. As Pakistan was born free we should celebrate its Birth Day and not its Independence Day. 

 

Col. Riaz Jafri (Retd)

**JP** Gandi Siasat

سیاست یا سیاستدانوں پہ اعتبار کیسا؟
عمران خان نے ایک ٹاک شو میں یہ بات کہی تھی کہ "اللہ مجھے شیخ رشید جیسا سیاستدان کبھی نہ بنائے"اور پھر اس کے جواب میں شیخ رشیدنے کہا تھا "عمران ایک معمولی سا کپتان تھا اور اب یہ تانگے کی سواری ہے" مگر آج 2012میں ان کے جذبات دیکھ کرا ور سن کر ہنسی آتی ہے عمران خان کہتا ہے "شیخ رشید جیسے باوقار سیاستدان بہت کم پید ا ہوتے ہےں" اورجواب میں شیخ صاحب فرماتے ہیں "عمران خان امید کی کرن ہیں"سیاست رے سیاست تیری کونسی کل سیدھی؟

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

When A Nation Bans Guns…



felinity1 posted: "After Australia banned virtully all firearms, the incidence of armed robberies, gun murders,  gun assaults, and home invasions skyrocketed.  This video reveals the terrible subsequent reality in the Land Down Under -- and ends with a warning to Amer"
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Fellowship of the Minds

When A Nation Bans Guns…

by felinity1
Image
After Australia banned virtully all firearms, the incidence of armed robberies, gun murders,  gun assaults, and home invasions skyrocketed.  This video reveals the terrible subsequent reality in the Land Down Under -- and ends with a warning to Americans.  
 
 
Only days ago, the White House confirmed that Obama wants a ban on guns.  I hope and pray that Americans will show more moxie: We won't let what happened in Australia happen HERE! 
 
Resistace to tyranny -- including abuse of the Executive Branch and the Second Amendment-- is obedience to God!  God bless, protect and strengthen America!
felinity1 | August 10, 2012 at 1:27 pm | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-gnq

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/when-a-nation-bans-guns/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Revisionist History 101: What Secularists Don't Want You To Know:

I remain curious in SEEING what these 'Christian principles and
tenets' might be.
----
let me go first ... !!!
first ... they think that the principles that were adopted were
christian principles, which in many cases is a faulty presumption.

Examples:

Religious freedom - Nothing unique to christians. Didn't the Romans
allow the jews to practice their religion?
Is that what the christians are offering muslims today in America?

Sovereign authority of God, not sovereignty of the state - Thousands
of government have given authority to a god.
They are demanding that non-believers submit to a mythical authority.

Sanctity of life - They are still trying to outlaw abortion, stem cell
research, suicide, etc.

All men are sinners - Pushing their mythical religious guilt onto
others. Very protestant.

All men created equal - christians, like jews and muzzies, don't
consider non-believers equal.

Judicial, legislative, and executive branches - Not unique to
christianity. Can still produce terrible decisions.

Church protected from state control (& taxation), but church to
influence the state. - Oh, like the religious state of israel? No
thanks.

Republican form of government and warnings against kings but in favor
of Godly rulers. - It's not the government job to promote those they
see as godly. Finding honest men is better than finding religious myth
believers.

Importance of governing self and family as first level of governance.
- Yet they endorse intervention in the middle east.

Fair trial with witnesses. - not unique to christianity nor cited in
decision.

Private property rights. - not uniquely christian

--------------------------------------

Justice Brewer was the author of the unanimous opinion of the Court in
Church of the Holy Trinity v. United States (143 U.S. 457, 36 L.Ed.
226, 12 S. Ct. 511 February 29, 1892), which addressed a dispute over
an employment contract between an Anglican priest and the titular
church. Justice Brewer's statement in that opinion, "These, and many
other matters which might be noticed, add a volume of unofficial
declarations to the mass of organic utterances that this is a
Christian nation" is often incorrectly cited as part of the
controlling ruling in the matter, which is not the case. Indeed,
Justice Brewer's book, The United States: A Christian Nation,
published in 1905,contained the following passage:

But in what sense can [the United States] be called a Christian
nation? Not in the sense that Christianity is the established religion
or the people are compelled in any manner to support it. On the
contrary, the Constitution specifically provides that 'congress shall
make no law respecting an establishment of religion or prohibiting the
free exercise thereof.' Neither is it Christian in the sense that all
its citizens are either in fact or in name Christians. On the
contrary, all religions have free scope within its borders. Numbers of
our people profess other religions, and many reject all. [...] Nor is
it Christian in the sense that a profession of Christianity is a
condition of holding office or otherwise engaging in public service,
or essential to recognition either politically or socially. In fact,
the government as a legal organization is independent of all
religions.

On Aug 10, 1:20 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> I remain curious in SEEING what these 'Christian principles and tenets' might be.
> I am especially interested in primary source materials where <insert Founder> claims <book/chapter/verse> applies to <article/section/clause> and similar.
> The DoI, for instance, impugns the Divine Rights of Kings -- which is the biblically based Government.
> Regard$,
> --MJ
> The United States of America have exhibited, perhaps, the first example of governments erected on the simple principles of nature; and if men are now sufficiently enlightened to disabuse themselves of artifice, imposture, hypocrisy, and superstition, they will consider this event as an era in their history. Although the detail of the formation of the American governments is at present little known or regarded either in Europe or in America, it may hereafter become an object of curiosity. It will never be pretended that any persons employed in that service had interviews with the gods, or were in any degree under the influence of Heaven, more than those at work upon ships or houses, or laboring in merchandise or agriculture; it will forever be acknowledged that these governments were contrived merely by the use of reason and the senses....
>   -- John Adams, "A Defence of the Constitutions of Government of the United States of America" [1787-1788];At 01:58 PM 8/10/2012, you wrote:As much as you and your secularist friends hate to hear,  it must really suck, to see the truth Plain Ol.....That this Nation was, and still is founded upon Christian principles and tenets.  No matter whether you like it, or don't like it,  this, is your heritage.
>
> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:03 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:the German government of the 1920s enthusiastically supported andpromoted Barnes's views as exonerating their country, while thepostwar West German government accepted national responsibility forthe Holocaust, solicited forgiveness and paid reparations to Jewishsurvivors.On Aug 10, 10:03 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:> Ever read Harry Elmer Barnes?>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 9:51 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:>>>>>>>> > Here's a short video of one of the "Churches"  in the heart of D.C.;> > worth a watch.....This should fit the bill of MJ's definition of> > "revisionist history":>> >http://stg.do/Iwpc>> > --> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum>> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.--Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum* Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Author: Obama Would Have a Trouble Getting a Security Clearance for an Entry-Level Government Job Due to His Association with Communist Mentor Frank Marshall Davis



Scotty Starnes posted: " Those Obama associate with would scare most but the media has covered up most of this information to keep the masses uninformed. From DC: Author Paul Kengor wants you to know just how radical Frank Marshal Davis — a man many consider to have bee"
Respond to this post by replying above this line

New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Author: Obama Would Have a Trouble Getting a Security Clearance for an Entry-Level Government Job Due to His Association with Communist Mentor Frank Marshall Davis

by Scotty Starnes

Those Obama associate with would scare most but the media has covered up most of this information to keep the masses uninformed.

From DC:

Author Paul Kengor wants you to know just how radical Frank Marshal Davis — a man many consider to have been a mentor to President Barack Obama during his teenage years — was.

"Obama's mentor was considered so radical, and such a potential pro-Soviet threat, that the federal government placed him on the Security Index," Kengor told The Daily Caller in an interview about his new book on Davis, simply titled "The Communist."

"That meant that if a war broke out between the United States and the Soviet Union, Frank Marshall Davis could be placed under immediate arrest. Think about that. Obama had that sort of influence. And The Washington Post will focus on whether Mitt Romney was bullying in high school? With the kind of influence that Obama had, Obama would have trouble getting a security clearance for an entry-level government job."

Obama refers to Davis in his memoir, "Dreams From My Father," simply as "Frank" and never elaborates on his radical history. Kengor believes this is because Obama wanted to avoid the political liability of being associated with Davis' politics. But if Obama was concerned about protecting his future political prospects while writing his memoir, why would he include details of his drug use?

"On matters like cocaine, he grew up in an era when that was going on," Kengor, who is a professor at Grove City College, argued.

"To do cocaine was certainly not the norm, but it wasn't unheard of. In short, he rightly saw his adolescent association with Davis — a literal card-carrying communist — as a greater political liability than cocaine use."

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/author-obama-would-have-a-trouble-getting-a-security-clearance-for-an-entry-level-government-job-due-to-his-association-with-communist-mentor-frank-marshall-davis/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.