Thursday, July 19, 2012

Remember the good ol’ days?



New post on Fellowship of the Minds

Remember the good ol' days?

by DCG

~ These were our parents ~
What in God's name have we let happen?


I guess we are the last generation to see, or even remember
anything like these ! Whatever happened? 

Political correctness (or "re-education") happened, 
Lack of God's name happened, 
Lack of personal responsibility happened, 
Lack of personal integrity and honesty happened, 
Lack of respect and loyalty to our country happened, 
Lack of being an American happened. 

Did all of these things die along with common sense??
I for one am still proud to be an American! 

h/t Kelly

DCG

DCG | July 18, 2012 at 3:18 am | Categories: 2012 Election, Inspirational, Military, United States | URL: http://wp.me/pKuKY-fL6

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/remember-the-good-ol-days/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Zimmerman shooting not a hate crime

Guten Abend From Köln John,
 
First,  to infer or insinuate that I am somehow a racist, is rather insulting.   I am far from it. 
 
I am a realist.  You Sir, are a dreamer.  To suggest that there are forty percent of Blacks who are imprisoned illegally of who are innocent is not only far fetched and not supported by any evidence,  it shows your total disregard for truth, and reality.   I will admit that there are some laws which have been passed, although with the bes of intentions, did in fact turn out to be discriminatory.  The Federal Crack laws,  which have now been modified, were for years discriminatory toward blacks.  There are others that I could list,  and I will also admit that young black males between the ages of 15 and 30 are more than likely discriminated against because of their race. 
 
Having said that,  there is not doubt, that the crimes committed in the United States are committed predominately by Blacks, period.   Look at the "Black-On-Black"  homicide rates!   We can all point to statistics and I also will admit that most crime stems from poverty and lack of education,  but still, the bottom line is that the predominance of crime in the United States is committed by Black Americans.
 
Now, to your point about Zimmerman,  I think I can sum it up thusly:  "WHAT IN THE HELL ARE YOU TALKING ABOUT"? 
 
We have discussed here in the Group months ago, how the first thing that the mainstream media wanted to gloss over, and something that you now want to gloss over, was the fact that Zimmerman was treated by paramedics at the scene of the incident.  Ergo, the explanation as to why the lack of blood when Zimmerman exited the police cruiser:
 
 
Uhm.....The laws of gravity dictate why blood will run down in a vertical fashion, from one's head if it's cut or has an abrasion.
 
I don't really know what your point is, or what it is that you think you have established or proven here,  but as others have pointed out,  Zimmerman had as much right to be out in HIS neighborhood,  as did Travyon Martin.   I suspect that Trayvon Martin didn't know that Zimmerman was armed, and got "Thuggish".   Which is the case in a whole lotta crimes these days in Florida:
 
 
 

 
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 8:52 PM, NoEinstein <noeinstein@bellsouth.net> wrote:
Dear Tico:  I'm an architect.  Having decorative entries into
apartment complexes is NOT the same as having a gated community.
Those must have continually closed gates that will preclude everyone—
on foot or in vehicles.  These days, card readers take the place of
24-7 guards.  But the gate must be functioning as always being closed
before one can make the errant claim that the complex was
"gated" (ha!).  The fact that Martin could walk through proves what
I've just stated.  — J. A. A. —

On Jul 17, 9:04 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Geoffrey, as far as I know Zimmerman never left public land.. he had every
> right to ask someone what they were doing in his "gated"..not open to the
> public.. neighborhood... I do it all the time.. funny, they don't attack me.
>
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:16 PM, geoffrey theist <gtheist...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> > keith zimmerman didn't know about any jewelry. law enforcement 911 advised
> > him to cease and desist. if i had a gun and some teenager didn't i feel i
> > could back him down without killing him. but i'm older than zimmerman and
> > hopefully wiser i would have let the cops do their job and observed and
> > informed.
>
> > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 11:58 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> I'm not sure how John came to the conclusions that he has come to.
> >> There is nothing as of yet on the record that establishes such a scenario,
> >> and all of Armistead's "theories"  are just that,  "speculative theory".
>
> >> What we do know, is that Trayvon Martin was a young black male, dressed
> >> in dark, non-descript clothing, (save for the dark "Hoodie" that he was
> >> sporting) and at the time that he was shot, was found with jewelry that was
> >> not his; in a neighborhood which had been having frequent home
> >> invasions/burglaries.
>
> >> We know that law enforcement looked at this case for a month,  and could
> >> not come up with any conclusive evidence that this was in fact anything
> >> more than a tragic scenario but nevertheless, a tragic scenario that was
> >> self defense.  We then had numerous race baiters flock to the scene in
> >> Central Florida,  their sole purpose was to stir up trouble, and "race
> >> bait".  We have seen mainstream media even attempt to modify the actual
> >> recordings of Zimmerman, and portray Martin as some sweet cherub teenager
> >> who was non-threatening, when in fact,  Mr. Martin was a thug who had been
> >> suspended from his school for drugs; whose moniker was "No_Limit_Nigga"  on
> >> Twitter;  who had unaccountable jewelry on his person at the time of the
> >> incident.
>
> >> On the other hand,  contrary to the media hype,  Mr. Zimmerman is far
> >> from "White";  Mr Zimmerman and his wife tutored underprivileged black
> >> youths at their home;  and there is nothing whatsoever to date that would
> >> suggest that Mr. Zimmerman shot this man because he is a racist, or under
> >> the scenario that John Armistead has surmised and attempted to portray.
>
> >> I think a more likely scenario, is that after being told not to pursue
> >> Martin by law enforcement,  Martin circled around,  and confronted
> >> Zimmerman.   Martin asked him,  "Are you followimg me?"  and when Zimmerman
> >> replied, "No",  Martin said something to the effect of,  "Well you got me
> >> now", when Martin attacked him, and they tumbled to the ground.
>
> >> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:23 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >>> Einstein... I guess Zimmerman is afraid of his Grandfather... a proud
> >>> BLACK man... Zimmerman thinks his Grandfather is a thief and all the
> >>> other negatives that you have implied...
>
> >>> The race card does NOT fly when you need it to, does it?
>
> >>> Poor Martin was shot after he elevated a tense VERBAL confrontation
> >>> into a physical one..Why would any reasonable person do this??.... if
> >>> I were 5'7" and weighed in at a chubby 190 and was attacked physically
> >>> by a 6'1" physically fit individual I would fear for my well being
> >>> just as Zimmerman did... thus a legal shooting.
>
> >>> On Jul 17, 10:03 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> >>> > OK, Bruce:  What you are saying is that Zimmerman PROFILED anyone
> >>> > wearing a hoodie as being a crook who could be shot on sight with
> >>> > impunity.  If 80% of teenage males are slender, then 80% of those,
> >>> > regardless of their race, can be tried, convicted, and executed by the
> >>> > shooter without any formal auspices being stated.  Committing unarmed
> >>> > robbery isn't a capital crime.  But shooting someone to death when
> >>> > one's life isn't in danger can be a capital crime.  To wit: Once there
> >>> > was a case where a neighborhood was having a lot of break-ins.  A home-
> >>> > owner rigged a shotgun to automatically shoot and kill anyone breaking
> >>> > through his window.  That man is now serving life in prison.  Learn to
> >>> > think, Bruce.  People who do so seldom get labeled as bigots.  — J. A.
> >>> > Armistead —
>
> >>> > On Jul 16, 6:57 pm, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >>> > > Someone had been breaking into houses s in the neighborhood,
> >>> including
> >>> > > houses with women and children in them.
>
> >>> > > The person doing it had been seen and he looked more like Trayon
> >>> than he
> >>> > > did some frail white guy
>
> >>> > > I have also heard trayvon n had jewelry on him at the time he was
> >>> shot in
> >>> > > his backpackOn Monday, July 16, 2012, NoEinstein wrote:
> >>> > > > Bruce:  If when Zimmerman was standing five feet from Martin, and
> >>> > > > before any "defensive" blows were exchanged, Zimmerman had realized
> >>> > > > that Martin was a frail white guy, he never would have PRESSED his
> >>> > > > latent hatred for the blacks he had automatically assumed wear
> >>> > > > hoodies.  Martin, sensing the hatred in Zimmerman's look and tone
> >>> > > > probably asked two questions: "Why are you following me?"  And "By
> >>> > > > what "authority" are you doing that?".  When (I'll bet) Zimmerman
> >>> > > > PATTED the loaded gun in his pocket as being his authority, without
> >>> > > > ever mentioning that he was just doing "routine" apartment
> >>> security,
> >>> > > > Martin knew his life was being threatened by a LUNATIC.  He did the
> >>> > > > only thing he could to defend himself—knock Zimmerman down and
> >>> punch
> >>> > > > him.
>
> >>> > > > All of the injuries to Zimmerman's head were short lacerations.
> >>>  If,
> >>> > > > as Zimmerman purports, his head was pounded against the pavement,
> >>> at
> >>> > > > least part of his head injuries would have been abrasions.
> >>> > > > Lacerations could be caused by bits of broken glass.  But the
> >>> instant
> >>> > > > the first laceration was made, his blood would have not only coated
> >>> > > > the pavement, but would have been smeared on the back of his head.
> >>> > > > The police photo I saw made soon after the police arrived showed
> >>> blood
> >>> > > > trailing VERTICALLY from each of those short lacerations.  The only
> >>> > > > way the blood would have flowed vertically would be if Zimmerman
> >>> was
> >>> > > > STANDING and had self-inflicted ALL of those lacerations with
> >>> (likely)
> >>> > > > just his fingernails.  Other than for that punch in the nose,
> >>> > > > Zimmerman's life was never threatened.  The only justice in this
> >>> case
> >>> > > > is to throw Zimmerman in jail and to throw away the key!!!!!  — J.
> >>> A.
> >>> > > > Armistead —
>
> >>> > > > On Jul 15, 10:51 am, Bruce Majors <majors.br...@gmail.com<javascript:;>>
> >>> > > > wrote:
> >>> > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> >>> > > > > F
> >>> > > > > Date: Saturday, July 14, 2012
> >>> > > > > Subject: [T
> >>> > > > > **
>
> >>> > > > > Well, what a surprise.
>
> >>>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/13/FBI-no-racist-moti..
> >>> .<
>
> >>>http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2012/07/13/FBI-no-racist-moti..
> >>> .>
> >>> > > > >   Reply to sender <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> >>> > > > > '
>
> >>> pswici...@yahoo.com?subject\x3dRe%3A%20FBI%3A%20Zimmerman%20shooting%20not%20a%20hat­<http://pswici...@yahoo.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20FBI%3A%20Zimmerman%20shooting%20not%20a%20h­at>
> >>> > > > ­e%20crime');>|
> >>> > > > > Reply
> >>> > > > > to group <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> >>> > > > > '
>
> >>> The_Fair_Fo...@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dRe%3A%20FBI%3A%20Zimmerman%20shooting%20not%20a­<http://The_Fair_Fo...@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dRe%3A%20FBI%3A%20Zimmerman%20shooting%20not%2­0a>
> >>> > > > ­%20hate%20crime');>|
> >>> > > > > Reply
> >>> > > > > via web post<
>
> >>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Fair_Forum/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJyaXIxaj..
> >>> .>|
> >>> > > > > Start
> >>> > > > > a New Topic<
>
> >>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Fair_Forum/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmMmtpOW..
> >>> .>
> >>> > > > > Messages in this
> >>> > > > > topic<
>
> >>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Fair_Forum/message/70909;_ylc=X3oDM..
> >>> .>(
> >>> > > > > 1)
> >>> > > > >  Recent Activity:
>
> >>> > > > >  Visit Your Group<
>
> >>>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/The_Fair_Forum;_ylc=X3oDMTJmZXJsZGUxBF9..
> >>> .>
> >>> > > > >  .....the forum for free & fair debate, Everyone welcome. Hate
> >>> Obama's
> >>> > > > > health care plan, tell us!
> >>> > > > >  [image: Yahoo!
> >>> > > > > Groups]<
>
> >>>http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcmo0cjM2BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl..
> >>> .>
> >>> > > > > Switch to: Text-Only <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> >>> > > > > '
>
> >>> The_Fair_Forum-traditio...@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional<http://The_­Fair_Forum-traditio...@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dChange+Delivery+Format:+Traditional>
> >>> ')
> >>> > > > ;>,
> >>> > > > > Daily Digest <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> >>> > > > > '
>
> >>> The_Fair_Forum-dig...@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest<http://The_Fair_Forum-di­g...@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dEmail+Delivery:+Digest>
> >>> ')
> >>> > > > ;>•
> >>> > > > > Unsubscribe <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml',
> >>> > > > > '
> >>> The_Fair_Forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com?subject\x3dUnsubscribe')<http://The_Fair_Forum-unsubscr...@yahoogroups.com?subject%5Cx3dUnsubscribe')>
> >>> ;>
> >>> > > > • Terms
> >>> > > > > of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/>
> >>> > > > >    .
>
> >>> > > > > __,_._,___
>
> >>> > > > --
> >>> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> > > > For options & help seehttp://
> >>> groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >>> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >>> --
> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >>> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >>> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >  --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> *
> *
> *
> *

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Lunatic left bans smoking –– at home!

 






 

 

New post on Western Journalism

 

Lunatic left bans smoking –– at home!

by B. Christopher Agee

In a political environment that considers the term "illegal immigrant" racist (and some PC nutcases suggest scrapping the term "criminal" completely), one may wonder if any action is sufficiently heinous to warrant criminal action. Well, dear reader, there is one glaring misdeed universally vilified by those on the left – lighting up a cigarette.

A city that stands out for its excessive smoking regulations, even in one of the bluest of all blue states, has recently approved a measure banning smoking by citizens inside their own residences!

Santa Monica, Calif., city council members voted 4-2 to ban smoking for new tenants of any apartment or condominium. The city already banned smoking in just about every other conceivable situation, meaning officials really had only one place left to go in its mission to criminalize the use of a legal product.

Current residents may use an odd attempt at a grandfather clause by determining whether they want their home to be considered smoking or non-smoking, similar to designations at hotels that still offer smoking rooms. After that designation is made, smoking will be prohibited in those residences deemed non-smoking.

This is just the obvious trajectory such legislation would follow, given its roots when smoking bans first began popping up for restaurants and other public places over the past two decades.

Nonsmokers, and even some smokers, were supportive of limited restriction such as workplace bans. Government officials generally encroach into our personal liberties incrementally, though, so regulation became more and more intrusive. The overreach of government force has now made it a crime in an American city to smoke inside of one's own home.

Pro-abortion advocates love the line that government should "stay out of our bedrooms," as if the murder of millions of innocent unborn children does not affect the outside world. If that's their opinion, I am prepared to accept that, though I hear no outcry from the left about the government staying out of any room in which tobacco is being enjoyed.

As a former smoker, I understand the practice to be harmful to a user's health. I'll even grant critics the argument that some individuals are negatively affected by directly breathing second-hand smoke (though I believe the "proof" of widespread health risks to be wildly speculative and partisan.) The fact remains, though, that cigarettes are a legal product for those of a certain age, and use of such a product should be admitted, if not everywhere, at least in the purchaser's own home.

I'm glad I was able to quit an unhealthy habit and wish others trying to quit similar success. If a smoker were to move in the townhouse next door, however, my only duty would be to welcome him or her to the neighborhood – period. Where will the intrusion into our private lives end? If left unchecked, the end will likely come only with the complete downfall of this country and everything for which it once stood.

Once in every great while, there are groups successful in their opposition to such smoking bans, but those cases are far outweighed by legislation stifling the rights of individuals. Something tells me if someone suggested outlawing homosexual acts in a private residence simply because the individual found the activity objectionable, there would be considerable outrage on the left and rightly so! Replace a homosexual with a smoker, though, and those rights to personal privacy and liberty are less than irrelevant; they apparently do not exist.

Photo credit: hegarty_david (Creative Commons)

 

B. Christopher Agee | July 17, 2012 at 11:31 am | Tags: abortion | Categories: Commentary, Floyd Reports | URL: http://wp.me/py0Fe-fgK

Comment

   See all comments

 


 





--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Rock & Roll Band Names ( For Folks Your Age )


Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Pelosi Tells Democrats to Avoid DNC Convention (Run From Obama)




New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Pelosi Tells Democrats to Avoid DNC Convention (Run From Obama)

by Scotty Starnes

Run Dems...Run

You don't have to tell Democrats to stay away. Some made that decision months ago.

From Politico:

House minority leader Nancy Pelosi says Democratic members should stay home and campaign in their districts rather than go to the party's national convention in North Carolina. "I'm not encouraging anyone to go to the convention, having nothing to do with anything except I think they should stay home, campaign in their districts, use their financial and political resources to help them win their election," Pelosi said in an exclusive interview for POLITICO Live's "On Congress," a new weekly show to be streamed live on POLITICO's website and broadcast on NewsChannel 8 on Wednesdays.

Continue reading>>>

Scotty Starnes | July 18, 2012 at 2:35 PM | Tags: Charlotte, Democrats, DNC, Nancy Pelosi, President Obama | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-7v3

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/07/18/pelosi-tells-democrats-to-avoid-dnc-convention-run-from-obama/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.