Then as any reasonable citizen that has asked for and never received a
full copy of your "new constitution" (so I can "easily understand" it)
and as a citizen of reasonable temperament speaking to the creator of
a "government document" I would like to ask why you are so "
adversarial" every time someone asks for a copy....
You sir are in violation of your own document.... get a rope!!!!
On May 28, 1:56 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear plainolamerican: Well said! "What do you call a heavy chain on
> the bottom of the ocean with a thousand lawyers attached? Answer: A
> GOOD START!" My new constitution will castrate the entire profession
> known as lawyers! That screwed-up profession dominates the House,
> Senate, the Executive Office and the Justice Department. But no
> more! My New Constitution will limit the number of lawyers (or any
> other profession for that matter) working in government to be no more
> than 20%. And my New Constitution will mandate that no lawyer, ever
> again, can be employed by any business (such as banks and big
> corporations) where they try to force relationships to be
> adversarial. And my N. Const. will strike down any supposed contract
> that isn't easily understood by people of average background. And it
> will mandate that those harmed by any business get quick and
> reasonable amends without requiring that anyone get a lawyer and sue
> anyone. In short. I eliminate 75% of the reasons lawyers find work!
> Lastly, if even one lawyer seeks to go into public office when there
> are already 20% of those in that same branch who are lawyers, never
> again will any public-connected funding be available for sending any
> person to any God Damned law school! Are you listening, Tico? Ha,
> ha, HA! — NoEinstein —
>
> On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > petition
> > ---
> > oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> > no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> > freedom
>
> > On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > > > at specific times or
>
> ...
>
> read more »
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Tuesday, May 29, 2012
Re: An Open Letter to Ron Paul
Dear plainolamerican: Well said! "What do you call a heavy chain on
the bottom of the ocean with a thousand lawyers attached? Answer: A
GOOD START!" My new constitution will castrate the entire profession
known as lawyers! That screwed-up profession dominates the House,
Senate, the Executive Office and the Justice Department. But no
more! My New Constitution will limit the number of lawyers (or any
other profession for that matter) working in government to be no more
than 20%. And my New Constitution will mandate that no lawyer, ever
again, can be employed by any business (such as banks and big
corporations) where they try to force relationships to be
adversarial. And my N. Const. will strike down any supposed contract
that isn't easily understood by people of average background. And it
will mandate that those harmed by any business get quick and
reasonable amends without requiring that anyone get a lawyer and sue
anyone. In short. I eliminate 75% of the reasons lawyers find work!
Lastly, if even one lawyer seeks to go into public office when there
are already 20% of those in that same branch who are lawyers, never
again will any public-connected funding be available for sending any
person to any God Damned law school! Are you listening, Tico? Ha,
ha, HA! — NoEinstein —
On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> petition
> ---
> oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> freedom
>
> On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > > at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> > > > > > associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > > > pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
> > > > > > holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter's right to privacy
> > > > > > by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
> > > > > > person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
> > > > > > factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
> > > > > > as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
> > > > > > actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
> > > > > > all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium's
> > > > > > programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
> > > > > > shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
> > > > > > business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
the bottom of the ocean with a thousand lawyers attached? Answer: A
GOOD START!" My new constitution will castrate the entire profession
known as lawyers! That screwed-up profession dominates the House,
Senate, the Executive Office and the Justice Department. But no
more! My New Constitution will limit the number of lawyers (or any
other profession for that matter) working in government to be no more
than 20%. And my New Constitution will mandate that no lawyer, ever
again, can be employed by any business (such as banks and big
corporations) where they try to force relationships to be
adversarial. And my N. Const. will strike down any supposed contract
that isn't easily understood by people of average background. And it
will mandate that those harmed by any business get quick and
reasonable amends without requiring that anyone get a lawyer and sue
anyone. In short. I eliminate 75% of the reasons lawyers find work!
Lastly, if even one lawyer seeks to go into public office when there
are already 20% of those in that same branch who are lawyers, never
again will any public-connected funding be available for sending any
person to any God Damned law school! Are you listening, Tico? Ha,
ha, HA! — NoEinstein —
On May 24, 2:02 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> petition
> ---
> oh, like soldiers are people who protect our freedom?
>
> no offense, but we don't need lawyers or soldiers to protect our
> freedom
>
> On May 24, 10:58 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > First, Thank you for the compliment!!
>
> > Basically what I can take from your non-answer is a quote from Pelosi,
> > "you must pass the ..... to find out what is in it."
>
> > Lawyers like me are the people that protect your "right" to
> > petition ...regardless of how ridiculous the petition...
>
> > On May 24, 8:55 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > Dear Tico: Every sentence is a "book" in and of itself. Realize that
> > > lawyers, like you claim to be, will be excluded from screwing-up the
> > > USA like they have done for too long. A judge or justice violating
> > > even a sentence of my Constitution can be fired on-the-spot by any
> > > prudent citizen. Working for government means being a SERVANT of the
> > > people. Servants who screw up can be fired; and it doesn't take a
> > > court decision or the next election to make that firing final. Come
> > > back to the USA and get a government job, and I will take great pride
> > > in firing you as soon as you fail to respect the civil rights of me or
> > > anyone. You terse comments on this group show you have little respect
> > > for others. How did you turn out so badly? — John A. Armistead —
> > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > On May 13, 8:56 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > <<<That New Constitution of
> > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on!>>>
>
> > > > Since you have never seen fit to post your "New Constitution" and all
> > > > anyone can do is see bits and pieces out of context I'll reserve my
> > > > "hope" for more tangible things... like three wish genies and such.
>
> > > > On May 13, 5:00 am, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > Folks: Many of you may not realize that the present "thread", in reply
> > > > > to MJ's Limbaugh post, summarizes how—in just a single day—the
> > > > > hopefully-awake voters can forever correct our BROKEN government;
> > > > > broken media; and too-often two-faced businesses (Which are only doing
> > > > > the same 'wrongs' that their competitors do.) that cause 80% of
> > > > > American's to feel our government is headed in the wrong direction.
> > > > > If 80% of us don't like government, then why do we keep "doing
> > > > > business" with them? FIRE their asses and put in place a founding-
> > > > > father-approved government that will benefit the VAST majority of
> > > > > Americans, not just the 'criminal' simple majority that has divided
> > > > > this country down-the-aisle for over two centuries! Disallow ALL
> > > > > group influences, so that government can finally be reined-in to the
> > > > > benefit of us all! The solution is to FREE capitalism and to get
> > > > > government off of our backs. Do that, and there will be enough
> > > > > charitable people willing to assure that no truly needy person will
> > > > > lack having their survival necessities met. In other words: Improve
> > > > > the dog-eat-dog world out there, and nice people will, once again,
> > > > > start caring to help their neighbors, rather than saying... "Let
> > > > > government do it." Folks, government is KILLING this country! ***
> > > > > Tell your friends and relatives what I say. That New Constitution of
> > > > > mine is your and their best hope. Pass it on! — John A. Armistead —
> > > > > Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > On Apr 15, 9:43 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Dear MJ: Sorry for the delay in replying; I've gotten out of the
> > > > > > habit of looking toward this group. As you know, Amendment 10
> > > > > > empowers the States, or the Citizens, to handle public issues not
> > > > > > spelled out in the Constitution as being specifically delegated to the
> > > > > > Federal Government, nor prohibited being handled by the States.
> > > > > > Nothing in my New Constitution changes that Amendment.
>
> > > > > > Since the present Constitution requires that the States uphold and
> > > > > > sware alligance to the Constitution, the ratification of "a" (or my)
> > > > > > New Constitution will require that the States continue to do so. The
> > > > > > only amendment that I even slightly diminished is Amendment 1.
> > > > > > Therein, I deny freedom of speech to those in the professional media
> > > > > > who had gotten to use (abuse) their power by talking about their
> > > > > > personal political ideals, while the non-professional man-on-the-
> > > > > > street doesn't get a similar voice. When Rush Limbaugh, David
> > > > > > Letterman, or Oprah can use their celebrity to sway voters, that
> > > > > > corrupts our Representative Republic.
>
> > > > > > Don't worry that I have stopped fair news coverage. In the early days
> > > > > > of television, events were covered LIVE, as these happened. But now,
> > > > > > the 24-7, 365 day a year programs have biased reporters telling you
> > > > > > what has happened and saying such things as such-and-such candidate
> > > > > > has no chance of getting the nomination. Such statements, whether
> > > > > > 'fair and balanced' or not, are effectively wagging the dog. Even
> > > > > > reading news with a raised eyebrow is getting to have an influence
> > > > > > that no free society can allow! If the people are allowed to see the
> > > > > > daily events as they happen, they are perfectly capable of making up
> > > > > > their own minds how to vote on election day. The entire new Amendment
> > > > > > 1 follows. John A. Armistead, Author and Patriot
>
> > > > > > "1st Amendment: No law shall be made regarding the establishment of
> > > > > > peaceable religion or prohibiting the free exercise thereof, but
> > > > > > government, its campaigns, processes, slogans, and disbursements shall
> > > > > > be secular. No law nor private or civil action shall abridge: *** the
> > > > > > freedom of speech of those Citizens who don't work for the media; the
> > > > > > freedom of a fair and pro-democracy press or other medium; the right
> > > > > > of People to peaceably assemble; and the right of any Citizen or group
> > > > > > to petition government or any of its branches or departments for
> > > > > > redress of grievances. Citizens so petitioning government shall
> > > > > > receive appropriate, relevant, timely, comprehensive, helpful and just
> > > > > > responses from proper authorities who have thoroughly read,
> > > > > > understood, and addressed each salient aspect of the grievances or
> > > > > > requests for directions or clarifications. Failure to so respond to a
> > > > > > rightful petition for redress of a grievance shall, on a single
> > > > > > provable instance, terminate the apt one's employment, especially
> > > > > > those in management or public office—including judges and justices—who
> > > > > > ignore, frustrate or give the run-around to any competent Citizen who
> > > > > > has been diligent in having a grievance properly addressed, or in
> > > > > > having his or her civil rights fully upheld. No judge or justice
> > > > > > shall presume that by performing the above required duties, that they
> > > > > > in any way might be compromising their objectivity or fairness in
> > > > > > court; justice be not "blind", but well informed. Freedom of the
> > > > > > press or other medium mandates that there be reasonable truthfulness
> > > > > > in reporting. Wanton distortion of the truth, or deliberate omission
> > > > > > of the truth—except in cases of obvious fiction or satire—is
> > > > > > prohibited. Stating or implying that a particular news medium has a
> > > > > > collective voice (we) or position on any issue is prohibited, as for
> > > > > > example via: anonymous editorials; regularly occurring accompanying
> > > > > > comments; commentary programs financed by, or ideologically screened
> > > > > > by, the same news medium; editorials named as being authored by
> > > > > > management; editorial comments by others that are in any way
> > > > > > ideologically censored, omitted or screened; or by comments occurring
> > > > > > at specific times or designated locations that most would come to
> > > > > > associate with the management of such medium, even if such are
> > > > > > innocuous. No medium shall be a forum for promoting the ideology of
> > > > > > its management or owners, nor shall they employ anyone who uses such
> > > > > > job to hawk their personal political preferences—at risk of loss of
> > > > > > license or closure of the business. Flagrantly editing news to
> > > > > > promote the ideology of management is a felony. No medium shall
> > > > > > analyze, assess, summarize, or make subjective judgments about any
> > > > > > pending election or referendum, nor badger a candidate or office-
> > > > > > holder with acrid questions, nor violate the latter's right to privacy
> > > > > > by intentionally revealing non criminal interpersonal dealings. Any
> > > > > > person(s) who does the latter is committing a felony. However,
> > > > > > factual, thorough coverage of the candidates or referenda issues—on an
> > > > > > as occurs basis—is allowed, provided there are no comments nor
> > > > > > actions, as above, and provided the same unbiased coverage is given to
> > > > > > all of the candidates or to all of the referenda issues. No medium's
> > > > > > programs or formats, nor the status of any of its associated employees
> > > > > > shall unduly influence any election or governmental process, or the
> > > > > > business shall be closed. It shall be a 10 year felony to repress
> > > > > > truthful news reporting in any medium by threatening legal action. No
> > > > > > medium can be sued for libel for presenting material
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Monday, May 28, 2012
**JP** Fw: [sadqayyarasolallah] Allah per eman
--- On Mon, 28/5/12, Babar Awan <babarawan400@yahoo.com> wrote:
|
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197
“Yes We Can-nabis”
WordPress.com
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Re: GREAT SPEECH!!!!!!
Boortz never actually gave his speech.... It was what he "would" have
said... He is the author of the piece.
On May 28, 9:19 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmmmm........Maybe that's the reason that I like him......The "Followers
> are almost extinct" part.......
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Boortz is a muzzy hating zionist warmonger who supports an aggressive
> > interventionist policy in the middle east for israel.
> > His followers are almost extinct and his show is aired on borrowed
> > time.
>
> > On May 27, 9:12 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Neal Boortz is a Texan, a lawyer, a Texas Aggie (Texas A&M) graduate,
> > > and now a nationally syndicated talk show host from Atlanta . His
> > > commencement address to the graduates of a recent Texas A&M class is
> > > far different from what either the students or the faculty expected.
> > > Whether you agree or disagree, his views are certainly thought
> > > provoking.
>
> > > "I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august
> > > occasion. It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to
> > > impress you; you'll have enough smoke blown up your bloomers today.
> > > And you can bet your tassels I'm not here to impress the faculty and
> > > administration. You may not like much of what I have to say, and
> > > that's fine. You will remember it though. Especially after about 10
> > > years out there in the real world. This, it goes without saying, does
> > > not apply to those of you who will seek your careers and your fortunes
> > > as government employees.
>
> > > This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old
> > > saying that those who can – do. Those who can't – teach. That sounds
> > > deliciously insensitive. But there is often raw truth in
> > > insensitivity, just as you often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in
> > > compassion. Say good-bye to your faculty because now you are getting
> > > ready to go out there and do. These folks behind me are going to stay
> > > right here and teach.
>
> > > By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma
> > > doesn't mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed
> > > me my private pilot's license many years ago, he said, "Here, this is
> > > your ticket to learn." The same can be said for your diploma. Believe
> > > me, the learning has just begun.
>
> > > Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact,
> > > you are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much.
> > > You feel so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a
> > > compassionate and caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just
> > > so extraordinarily special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any
> > > to be a liberal; as good a time as any to know absolutely everything.
> > > You have plenty of time, starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in.
>
> > > Over the next few years, as you begin to feel the cold breath of
> > > reality down your neck, things are going to start changing pretty
> > > fast… Including your own assessment of just how much you really know.
>
> > > So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality:
> > > Pay attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words
> > > and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then,
> > > compare the words of the left to the words and phrases you hear from
> > > those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives.
>
> > > From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I
> > > think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups — The
> > > Blacks, the Poor, the Rich, the Disadvantaged, the Less Fortunate.
> > > From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left
> > > you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.
>
> > > That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are
> > > pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics.
> > > Conservatives think — and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their
> > > identity is centered on the individual.
>
> > > Liberals feel that their favored groups have enforceable rights to the
> > > property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives, I
> > > among them I might add, think that individuals have the right to
> > > protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses.
>
> > > In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at
> > > your diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on
> > > them. Not the name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or
> > > sorority, but your name. Your group identity is going away. Your
> > > recognition and appreciation of your individual identity starts now.
>
> > > If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself
> > > to be a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can and
> > > apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open
> > > arms. They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed
> > > an individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign
> > > on to the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.
>
> > > Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your
> > > eyes. You're going to actually get a full time job!
>
> > > You're also going to get a lifelong work partner. This partner isn't
> > > going to help you do your job. This partner is just going to sit back
> > > and wait for payday. This partner doesn't want to share in your
> > > effort, but in your earnings.
>
> > > Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent; an agent representing
> > > a strange and diverse group of people; an agent for every teenager
> > > with an illegitimate child; an agent for a research scientist who
> > > wanted to make some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys
> > > grind their teeth. An agent for some poor demented hippie who
> > > considers herself to be a meaningful and talented artist, but who just
> > > can't manage to sell any of her artwork on the open market.
>
> > > Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any,
> > > job skills, but who wanted a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn
> > > dictators in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign
> > > aid. An agent for multi-million dollar companies who want someone else
> > > to pay for their overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who
> > > wants to use the unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal
> > > enrichment and benefit.
>
> > > That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive
> > > government. Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power
> > > this agent has. Power that you do not have. A power that no individual
> > > has, or will have. This agent has the legal power to use force, deadly
> > > force to accomplish its goals.
>
> > > You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to
> > > you, introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill
> > > out, and move right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton
> > > gorilla. It will sleep anywhere it wants to.
>
> > > Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become
> > > successful it will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm
> > > sorry, there just isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder,
> > > and you can't decrease its share of your income. That power rests with
> > > him, not you.
>
> > > So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be
> > > clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong
> > > to fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise
> > > government for government is inherently evil. Yes, a necessary evil,
> > > but dangerous nonetheless, somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that
> > > in the proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can
> > > be fatal.
>
> > > Now let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds
> > > at this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon
> > > as possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but
> > > they fail miserably out there in the real world.
>
> > > First is that favorite buzz word of the media and academia: Diversity!
> > > You have been taught that the real value of any group of people – be
> > > it a social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever –
> > > is based on diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because
> > > diversity is based not on an individuals abilities or character, but
> > > on a person's identity and status as a member of a group. Yes, it's
> > > that liberal group identity thing again.
>
> > > Within the great diversity movement group identification – be it
> > > racial, gender based, or some other minority status – means more than
> > > the individuals integrity, character or other qualifications.
>
> > > Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere
> > > where diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual
> > > achievement and excellence actually count. No matter what your
> > > professors have taught you over the last four years, you are about to
> > > learn that diversity is absolutely no replacement for excellence,
> > > ability, and individual hard work. From this day on every single time
> > > you hear the word "diversity" you can rest assured that there is
> > > someone close by who is determined to rob you of every vestige of
> > > individuality you possess.
>
> > > We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We
> > > have witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last
> > > few decades, usually emanating from college campuses.
>
> > > You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place
> > > to live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The
> > > right to an education. You
>
> ...
>
> read more »
>
> Plain.Ol's.HangOut..jpg
> 35KViewDownload
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
said... He is the author of the piece.
On May 28, 9:19 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmmmm........Maybe that's the reason that I like him......The "Followers
> are almost extinct" part.......
>
> On Mon, May 28, 2012 at 10:11 AM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > wrote:
> > Boortz is a muzzy hating zionist warmonger who supports an aggressive
> > interventionist policy in the middle east for israel.
> > His followers are almost extinct and his show is aired on borrowed
> > time.
>
> > On May 27, 9:12 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Neal Boortz is a Texan, a lawyer, a Texas Aggie (Texas A&M) graduate,
> > > and now a nationally syndicated talk show host from Atlanta . His
> > > commencement address to the graduates of a recent Texas A&M class is
> > > far different from what either the students or the faculty expected.
> > > Whether you agree or disagree, his views are certainly thought
> > > provoking.
>
> > > "I am honored by the invitation to address you on this august
> > > occasion. It's about time. Be warned, however, that I am not here to
> > > impress you; you'll have enough smoke blown up your bloomers today.
> > > And you can bet your tassels I'm not here to impress the faculty and
> > > administration. You may not like much of what I have to say, and
> > > that's fine. You will remember it though. Especially after about 10
> > > years out there in the real world. This, it goes without saying, does
> > > not apply to those of you who will seek your careers and your fortunes
> > > as government employees.
>
> > > This gowned gaggle behind me is your faculty. You've heard the old
> > > saying that those who can – do. Those who can't – teach. That sounds
> > > deliciously insensitive. But there is often raw truth in
> > > insensitivity, just as you often find feel-good falsehoods and lies in
> > > compassion. Say good-bye to your faculty because now you are getting
> > > ready to go out there and do. These folks behind me are going to stay
> > > right here and teach.
>
> > > By the way, just because you are leaving this place with a diploma
> > > doesn't mean the learning is over. When an FAA flight examiner handed
> > > me my private pilot's license many years ago, he said, "Here, this is
> > > your ticket to learn." The same can be said for your diploma. Believe
> > > me, the learning has just begun.
>
> > > Now, I realize that most of you consider yourselves Liberals. In fact,
> > > you are probably very proud of your liberal views. You care so much.
> > > You feel so much. You want to help so much. After all, you're a
> > > compassionate and caring person, aren't you now? Well, isn't that just
> > > so extraordinarily special. Now, at this age, is as good a time as any
> > > to be a liberal; as good a time as any to know absolutely everything.
> > > You have plenty of time, starting tomorrow, for the truth to set in.
>
> > > Over the next few years, as you begin to feel the cold breath of
> > > reality down your neck, things are going to start changing pretty
> > > fast… Including your own assessment of just how much you really know.
>
> > > So here are the first assignments for your initial class in reality:
> > > Pay attention to the news, read newspapers, and listen to the words
> > > and phrases that proud Liberals use to promote their causes. Then,
> > > compare the words of the left to the words and phrases you hear from
> > > those evil, heartless, greedy conservatives.
>
> > > From the Left you will hear "I feel." From the Right you will hear "I
> > > think." From the Liberals you will hear references to groups — The
> > > Blacks, the Poor, the Rich, the Disadvantaged, the Less Fortunate.
> > > From the Right you will hear references to individuals. On the Left
> > > you hear talk of group rights; on the Right, individual rights.
>
> > > That about sums it up, really: Liberals feel. Liberals care. They are
> > > pack animals whose identity is tied up in group dynamics.
> > > Conservatives think — and, setting aside the theocracy crowd, their
> > > identity is centered on the individual.
>
> > > Liberals feel that their favored groups have enforceable rights to the
> > > property and services of productive individuals. Conservatives, I
> > > among them I might add, think that individuals have the right to
> > > protect their lives and their property from the plunder of the masses.
>
> > > In college you developed a group mentality, but if you look closely at
> > > your diplomas you will see that they have your individual names on
> > > them. Not the name of your school mascot, or of your fraternity or
> > > sorority, but your name. Your group identity is going away. Your
> > > recognition and appreciation of your individual identity starts now.
>
> > > If, by the time you reach the age of 30, you do not consider yourself
> > > to be a conservative, rush right back here as quickly as you can and
> > > apply for a faculty position. These people will welcome you with open
> > > arms. They will welcome you, that is, so long as you haven't developed
> > > an individual identity. Once again you will have to be willing to sign
> > > on to the group mentality you embraced during the past four years.
>
> > > Something is going to happen soon that is going to really open your
> > > eyes. You're going to actually get a full time job!
>
> > > You're also going to get a lifelong work partner. This partner isn't
> > > going to help you do your job. This partner is just going to sit back
> > > and wait for payday. This partner doesn't want to share in your
> > > effort, but in your earnings.
>
> > > Your new lifelong partner is actually an agent; an agent representing
> > > a strange and diverse group of people; an agent for every teenager
> > > with an illegitimate child; an agent for a research scientist who
> > > wanted to make some cash answering the age-old question of why monkeys
> > > grind their teeth. An agent for some poor demented hippie who
> > > considers herself to be a meaningful and talented artist, but who just
> > > can't manage to sell any of her artwork on the open market.
>
> > > Your new partner is an agent for every person with limited, if any,
> > > job skills, but who wanted a job at City Hall. An agent for tin-horn
> > > dictators in fancy military uniforms grasping for American foreign
> > > aid. An agent for multi-million dollar companies who want someone else
> > > to pay for their overseas advertising. An agent for everybody who
> > > wants to use the unimaginable power of this agent's for their personal
> > > enrichment and benefit.
>
> > > That agent is our wonderful, caring, compassionate, oppressive
> > > government. Believe me, you will be awed by the unimaginable power
> > > this agent has. Power that you do not have. A power that no individual
> > > has, or will have. This agent has the legal power to use force, deadly
> > > force to accomplish its goals.
>
> > > You have no choice here. Your new friend is just going to walk up to
> > > you, introduce itself rather gruffly, hand you a few forms to fill
> > > out, and move right on in. Say hello to your own personal one ton
> > > gorilla. It will sleep anywhere it wants to.
>
> > > Now, let me tell you, this agent is not cheap. As you become
> > > successful it will seize about 40% of everything you earn. And no, I'm
> > > sorry, there just isn't any way you can fire this agent of plunder,
> > > and you can't decrease its share of your income. That power rests with
> > > him, not you.
>
> > > So, here I am saying negative things to you about government. Well, be
> > > clear on this: It is not wrong to distrust government. It is not wrong
> > > to fear government. In certain cases it is not even wrong to despise
> > > government for government is inherently evil. Yes, a necessary evil,
> > > but dangerous nonetheless, somewhat like a drug. Just as a drug that
> > > in the proper dosage can save your life, an overdose of government can
> > > be fatal.
>
> > > Now let's address a few things that have been crammed into your minds
> > > at this university. There are some ideas you need to expunge as soon
> > > as possible. These ideas may work well in academic environment, but
> > > they fail miserably out there in the real world.
>
> > > First is that favorite buzz word of the media and academia: Diversity!
> > > You have been taught that the real value of any group of people – be
> > > it a social group, an employee group, a management group, whatever –
> > > is based on diversity. This is a favored liberal ideal because
> > > diversity is based not on an individuals abilities or character, but
> > > on a person's identity and status as a member of a group. Yes, it's
> > > that liberal group identity thing again.
>
> > > Within the great diversity movement group identification – be it
> > > racial, gender based, or some other minority status – means more than
> > > the individuals integrity, character or other qualifications.
>
> > > Brace yourself. You are about to move from this academic atmosphere
> > > where diversity rules, to a workplace and a culture where individual
> > > achievement and excellence actually count. No matter what your
> > > professors have taught you over the last four years, you are about to
> > > learn that diversity is absolutely no replacement for excellence,
> > > ability, and individual hard work. From this day on every single time
> > > you hear the word "diversity" you can rest assured that there is
> > > someone close by who is determined to rob you of every vestige of
> > > individuality you possess.
>
> > > We also need to address this thing you seem to have about "rights." We
> > > have witnessed an obscene explosion of so-called "rights" in the last
> > > few decades, usually emanating from college campuses.
>
> > > You know the mantra: You have the right to a job. The right to a place
> > > to live. The right to a living wage. The right to health care. The
> > > right to an education. You
>
> ...
>
> read more »
>
> Plain.Ol's.HangOut..jpg
> 35KViewDownload
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)