Wednesday, May 23, 2012

Halal food vendors threaten infidels with lawsuit in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn



New post on Creeping Sharia

Halal food vendors threaten infidels with lawsuit in Bay Ridge, Brooklyn

by creeping

Read our 2010 post on how things are creeping in Bay Ridge, aka Little 'Palestine' then check out today's story via Bay Ridge beef battle continues as Halal food vendors threaten lawsuit  - NY Daily News. The beef in Bay Ridge between Halal food vendors and restaurant owners complaining that they are losing money because of [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://creepingsharia.wordpress.com/2012/05/22/halal-food-vendors-threaten-infidels-with-lawsuit-in-bay-ridge-brooklyn/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

China Wages Soft Take-Over of United States



New post on Fellowship of the Minds

China Wages Soft Take-Over of United States

by sage_brush

We all know the experience of being forced to buy "Made in China" products, because there is no alternative.  We can expect the squeeze to be even greater, as the Chinese government oozes into every facet of our economy and way of life.  To add to the outrage of our glorious leader selling our natural gas and oil to China [see Eowyn's article here] the communists are farther entrenched here than the SRM is reporting. But why?  Why is all the attention directed towards the Middle East, but none toward the Far East?  And why is the "red" carpet being rolled out for them? 

Take a look at these developments -

(CNN) -- China's Dalian Wanda Group and AMC Entertainment announced Monday a $2.6 billion deal to take over the U.S. theater group, forming the world's largest cinema chain, according to a new release on the deal.

The move is the latest in a raft of deals between U.S. entertainment companies and Chinese firms, linking the world's largest theater market with the world's fastest growing.

"This acquisition will help make Wanda a truly global cinema owner, with theatres and technology that enhance the movie-going experience for audiences in the world's two largest movie markets," said Wang Jianlin, chairman and president of Wanda.

Wanda, a private company that previously operated solely in China, generates $16.7 billion in annual revenue from its commercial development and entertainment businesses, the company said. The group owns 86 theaters with 730 screens in China.

"As the film and exhibition business continues its global expansion, the time has never been more opportune to welcome the enthusiastic support of our new owners. . .

[cnn.com]

______________________________________________

WASHINGTON – Chinese officials are not amused with U.S. plans to collaborate with Asian allies to develop a ballistic missile shield to protect Asia, according to a report in Joseph Farah's G2 Bulletin.

The Chinese claim that such a system will have a negative impact on global and regional strategic stability "and go against the security needs of the countries in the Asia-Pacific region," according to Luo Zhaohu, Asian affairs chief for the Chinese Foreign Ministry.

"The Chinese government always insists that countries should start by maintaining global strategic stability and promoting strategic mutual trust between major powers to handle the issue of missile defense prudently," Luo said without elaborating.

The Obama administration has been in discussions since March with officials from Australia, Japan and South Korea over an anti-missile system for the region.

It would be based on a U.S. "phased adaptive approach" to deploy a combination of land- and sea-based missile interceptors in the region. The "phased adaptive approach" is similar to the anti-missile system which the United States wants to deploy in Europe against a possible missile attack from Iran.

[wnd.com]

_______________________________________________

(Reuters) - China can now bypass Wall Street when buying U.S. government debt and go straight to the U.S. Treasury, in what is the Treasury's first-ever direct relationship with a foreign government, according to documents viewed by Reuters.

The relationship means the People's Bank of China buys U.S. debt using a different method than any other central bank in the world.

The other central banks, including the Bank of Japan, which has a large appetite for Treasuries, place orders for U.S. debt with major Wall Street banks designated by the government as primary dealers. Those dealers then bid on their behalf at Treasury auctions.

China, which holds $1.17 trillion in U.S. Treasuries, still buys some Treasuries through primary dealers, but since June 2011, that route hasn't been necessary.

The documents viewed by Reuters show the U.S. Treasury Department has given the People's Bank of China a direct computer link to its auction system, which the Chinese first used to buy two-year notes in late June 2011.

China can now participate in auctions without placing bids through primary dealers. If it wants to sell, however, it still has to go through the market.

The change was not announced publicly or in any message to primary dealers.

[reuters.com]

_____________________________________________

So is this a Chinese/communist takeover? Or is it something far more subtle?  I'll go with subtle. Communism is never subtle.   This is a NWO, One World Government takeover.  With the way things look right now - following  the advent of "Arab Spring,"  the formerly independent nations of the Middle East are now firmly in the grasp of international bankers.  Only China could be termed "non-compliant."  Only China is outside of the tentacles of the Central Bankers - but not for long apparently. 

The Chinese will soon be part of what we are part of -

The facility, being built at Utah's Camp Williams, was the focus of an extensive recent Wired article written by NSA expert James Bamford.

Under construction by U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contractors with top-secret clearances since January, the controversial, heavily fortified $2 billion Utah Data Center is slated to be up and running by September 2013. Its purpose will be "to intercept, decipher, analyze, and store vast swaths of the world's communications as they zap down from satellites and zip through the underground and undersea cables of international, foreign, and domestic networks," according to Bamford.

Flowing through its servers and routers and stored in near-bottomless databases will be all forms of communication, including the complete contents of private emails, cell phone calls, and Google searches, as well as all sorts of personal data trails—parking receipts, travel itineraries, bookstore purchases, and other digital "pocket litter." It is, in some measure, the realization of the "total information awareness" program created during the first term of the Bush administration—an effort that was killed by Congress in 2003 after it caused an outcry over its potential for invading Americans' privacy.  [wired.com]

 

As the Reuter's article stated - China is being allowed, for now, to buy US treasuries directly, without going through a "broker" (central bank.)  But,  [and it's a HUGE but] they can only buy independently - if they want to sell - they have to go through the broker!  Gotcha!  As Gollum would say, very tricksy. The Chinese'  overall greed, lust for power,  and overweening desire to spread their culture  will lead them right into the jaws of the beast, while simultaneously destroying our economy.  It's a two-fer.

 

sage

 

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/05/22/china-wages-soft-take-over-of-united-states/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?

<Grin>!   You're an ass Plain Ol!
 
Good thoughtful post Michael.  Waters is right on, despite Plain Ol's naivete's on Islam!  (And I say that with all due respect Plain Ol!) 
 
 
 


 
On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 8:03 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
At one point, Waters paused his set and began telling the audience
about
Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year old Brazilian national who was shot
*8-times* by British police several years ago
---
just sing, monkey!

On May 22, 12:57 pm, "MJ" <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> ""If we stand at the top of the slope and give our governments, and
> particularly our police, too much power, it's a very long and dangerous
> slippery slope to the bottom," Waters said.
> "The crowd went berserk, roaring with approval.
> "It certainly gives one hope that the message is sinking in; most folks, it
> seems, have a conceptual understanding that governments are corrupt and
> abusive… but at the end of the day, they'll still fall in line behind the
> political system."
>
> How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
> By Simon Black
> May 21, 2012
> Los Angeles, USA
>
> I had the privilege of seeing Roger Waters perform 'The Wall' to a live
> crowd of over 40,000 fans at the LA Coliseum on Saturday night– the second
> time I've seen the show on this tour.
>
> It was an amazing production– I wholeheartedly recommend the experience as
> it's something that no DVD or album recording could possibly reproduce.
>
> At one point, Waters paused his set and began telling the audience about
> Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year old Brazilian national who was shot
> *8-times* by British police several years ago at a south London tube station
> after being mistakenly identified as a terrorist.
>
> The police, adhering to the 'shoot first, ask questions later' model of
> peace enforcement, have never been held accountable for taking the life of
> an innocent man at point blank range.
>
> "If we stand at the top of the slope and give our governments, and
> particularly our police, too much power, it's a very long and dangerous
> slippery slope to the bottom," Waters said.
>
> http://vimeo.com/42561312
>
> The crowd went berserk, roaring with approval.
>
> It certainly gives one hope that the message is sinking in; most folks, it
> seems, have a conceptual understanding that governments are corrupt and
> abusive… but at the end of the day, they'll still fall in line behind the
> political system.
>
> An entire lifetime of programming, starting practically at birth, reinforces
> that government and police are the 'good guys'. It's a difficult inclination
> to break.
>
> The stories that we all hear on an almost daily basis about corruption and
> abuse of power are appalling indeed. But most people think that they're just
> aberrations in an otherwise good system… and that it's just not going to
> happen to them.
>
> Until it does.
>
> George Reby is a great example. The New Jersey resident was driving on I-40
> in Tennessee when he was stopped for speeding. The officer then asked him if
> he was carrying large amounts of cash.
>
> Reby said that he had about $20,000, upon which the officer asked if he
> could search the vehicle.
>
> Reby consented, saying later, "I certainly didn't feel like I was doing
> anything wrong…"
>
> You can probably tell where this is going… the officer promptly confiscated
> the cash, claiming that it might be used for drug trafficking. Reby
> explained that he was on his way to buy a car he'd found on eBay (and even
> showed him the eBay ad), and showed that the source of funds were legitimate
>
> It didn't matter. He had his money stolen in the most insidious way…by a
> thuggish, criminal agent of the government (who was sporting a rather
> menacing neck tattoo).
>
> At least a real criminal knows what he's doing is wrong; he knows that he's
> committing an immoral act by shooting or robbing someone. The police, on the
> other hand, think their actions are legitimate, that they're just 'doing
> their job.'
>
> This is intellectually dishonest and morally reprehensible. Everyone
> involved, including the officer himself, agreed that Reby committed no
> crime… that it's perfectly legal to carry cash.
>
> Yet citizens like Reby are routinely relieved of their hard-earned savings,
> and then have to spend thousands of dollars fighting to get it back.
>
> As it turns out, police have a huge incentive to steal; they get a healthy
> cut of the proceeds from any asset seizure, and the funds go to pay for new
> toys like those whiz bang Camaro hot rod police cruisers.
>
> You can check out Reby's disgraceful story here:
>
> http://youtu.be/TSIrfP81-ms
>
> It goes to show that this idea of "I've done nothing wrong, I've got nothing
> to hide, so I have nothing to fear…" is completely bogus.
>
> People who are completely innocent of any wrongdoing can still have their
> lives turned upside down by a corrupt government that has an incentive to
> plunder its citizens.
>
> Yet every time we turn around, they've managed to award themselves more
> power, more authority.
>
> From the NDAA which authorizes the military detention of US citizens on US
> soil, to President Obama's executive order authorizing government
> confiscation of practically everything, to the UK's new plan to monitor all
> mobile, phone, email, and text messages going in, out, or through the
> country.
>
> From Rome to the Ottoman Empire, history is full of examples of failing,
> insolvent governments that resort to similar tactics of desperately
> pillaging the wealth and freedoms of their citizens. The conclusions we can
> draw from this are simple:
>
> 1) The trend for failing states is to grant themselves more power.
> 1) Power, once granted, is almost impossible to take back.
> 2) More power means more abuse of power.
> 3) It can (and does) happen to anyone.
>
> Putting any faith in an insolvent government to do the right thing is
> absurd… and it behooves everyone to safeguard important assets and interests
> by diversifying internationally.
>
> http://www.sovereignman.com/expat/how-can-you-have-any-pudding-if-you...
>
>  ape.gif
> 46KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** mind it please


gulf men kaam karne waale isse zaroor parhen.ye har us ghareeb ul watan ki kahani he jo zyda arsa pardes guzarte hen.

 
never cry in front of others.............
don't give them the pleasure of  knowing
how much they hurt you.

Tuesday, May 22, 2012

Re: How can you have any pudding if you don’t eat your meat?

At one point, Waters paused his set and began telling the audience
about
Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year old Brazilian national who was shot
*8-times* by British police several years ago
---
just sing, monkey!

On May 22, 12:57 pm, "MJ" <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> ""If we stand at the top of the slope and give our governments, and
> particularly our police, too much power, it's a very long and dangerous
> slippery slope to the bottom," Waters said.
> "The crowd went berserk, roaring with approval.
> "It certainly gives one hope that the message is sinking in; most folks, it
> seems, have a conceptual understanding that governments are corrupt and
> abusive… but at the end of the day, they'll still fall in line behind the
> political system."
>
> How can you have any pudding if you don't eat your meat?
> By Simon Black
> May 21, 2012
> Los Angeles, USA
>
> I had the privilege of seeing Roger Waters perform 'The Wall' to a live
> crowd of over 40,000 fans at the LA Coliseum on Saturday night– the second
> time I've seen the show on this tour.
>
> It was an amazing production– I wholeheartedly recommend the experience as
> it's something that no DVD or album recording could possibly reproduce.
>
> At one point, Waters paused his set and began telling the audience about
> Jean Charles de Menezes, a 27-year old Brazilian national who was shot
> *8-times* by British police several years ago at a south London tube station
> after being mistakenly identified as a terrorist.
>
> The police, adhering to the 'shoot first, ask questions later' model of
> peace enforcement, have never been held accountable for taking the life of
> an innocent man at point blank range.
>
> "If we stand at the top of the slope and give our governments, and
> particularly our police, too much power, it's a very long and dangerous
> slippery slope to the bottom," Waters said.
>
> http://vimeo.com/42561312
>
> The crowd went berserk, roaring with approval.
>
> It certainly gives one hope that the message is sinking in; most folks, it
> seems, have a conceptual understanding that governments are corrupt and
> abusive… but at the end of the day, they'll still fall in line behind the
> political system.
>
> An entire lifetime of programming, starting practically at birth, reinforces
> that government and police are the 'good guys'. It's a difficult inclination
> to break.
>
> The stories that we all hear on an almost daily basis about corruption and
> abuse of power are appalling indeed. But most people think that they're just
> aberrations in an otherwise good system… and that it's just not going to
> happen to them.
>
> Until it does.
>
> George Reby is a great example. The New Jersey resident was driving on I-40
> in Tennessee when he was stopped for speeding. The officer then asked him if
> he was carrying large amounts of cash.
>
> Reby said that he had about $20,000, upon which the officer asked if he
> could search the vehicle.
>
> Reby consented, saying later, "I certainly didn't feel like I was doing
> anything wrong…"
>
> You can probably tell where this is going… the officer promptly confiscated
> the cash, claiming that it might be used for drug trafficking. Reby
> explained that he was on his way to buy a car he'd found on eBay (and even
> showed him the eBay ad), and showed that the source of funds were legitimate
>
> It didn't matter. He had his money stolen in the most insidious way…by a
> thuggish, criminal agent of the government (who was sporting a rather
> menacing neck tattoo).
>
> At least a real criminal knows what he's doing is wrong; he knows that he's
> committing an immoral act by shooting or robbing someone. The police, on the
> other hand, think their actions are legitimate, that they're just 'doing
> their job.'
>
> This is intellectually dishonest and morally reprehensible. Everyone
> involved, including the officer himself, agreed that Reby committed no
> crime… that it's perfectly legal to carry cash.
>
> Yet citizens like Reby are routinely relieved of their hard-earned savings,
> and then have to spend thousands of dollars fighting to get it back.
>
> As it turns out, police have a huge incentive to steal; they get a healthy
> cut of the proceeds from any asset seizure, and the funds go to pay for new
> toys like those whiz bang Camaro hot rod police cruisers.
>
> You can check out Reby's disgraceful story here:
>
> http://youtu.be/TSIrfP81-ms
>
> It goes to show that this idea of "I've done nothing wrong, I've got nothing
> to hide, so I have nothing to fear…" is completely bogus.
>
> People who are completely innocent of any wrongdoing can still have their
> lives turned upside down by a corrupt government that has an incentive to
> plunder its citizens.
>
> Yet every time we turn around, they've managed to award themselves more
> power, more authority.
>
> From the NDAA which authorizes the military detention of US citizens on US
> soil, to President Obama's executive order authorizing government
> confiscation of practically everything, to the UK's new plan to monitor all
> mobile, phone, email, and text messages going in, out, or through the
> country.
>
> From Rome to the Ottoman Empire, history is full of examples of failing,
> insolvent governments that resort to similar tactics of desperately
> pillaging the wealth and freedoms of their citizens. The conclusions we can
> draw from this are simple:
>
> 1) The trend for failing states is to grant themselves more power.
> 1) Power, once granted, is almost impossible to take back.
> 2) More power means more abuse of power.
> 3) It can (and does) happen to anyone.
>
> Putting any faith in an insolvent government to do the right thing is
> absurd… and it behooves everyone to safeguard important assets and interests
> by diversifying internationally.
>
> http://www.sovereignman.com/expat/how-can-you-have-any-pudding-if-you...
>
>  ape.gif
> 46KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.