World News

Thursday, April 5, 2012

] Rush predicts Obama's response to Supremes

----------

Rush predicts Obama's response to Supremes

If health care gets tossed, Limbaugh doesn't expect pretty picture

Published: 2 hours ago
<http://www.wnd.com/files/2012/01/Joe-Kovacs_avatar.jpg>by Joe KovacsEmail | Archive

If the U.S. Supreme Court tosses out Obamacare, radio giant Rush Limbaugh predicts President Obama will blame Republican justices, whose homes might become the target of political protest.

"Obama's gonna make tracks for the first microphone and camera and he's going to say something like this," Limbaugh said this afternoon.

"'For 60 to 75 years, we have been struggling to achieve fairness and justice for all people in this country, not just the privileged few. We've recognized that the way health care has existed in this country is emblematic of the injustice and the discrimination that has defined this country since its beginning. And look what happened. Republican judges just took away your health care. Republican judges just decided you were about to get too big a piece of the pie. Republican judges determined that you're not important enough to have health care.' And then he'll throw in, 'We've seen similar struggles since the days of Jim Crow' or throw in some identifier, throw in some code word. And then he'll relate the loss of health care to civil-rights battles that have occurred. And he'll do this in his best professorial voice. And he in the process will be lighting another fuse."

Once Obama finishes his assault on the GOP-appointed members of the bench, he says leftist "sycophants will hit the trail and we will hear slogans like 'We shall overcome the court.'

"Then his buddies at the Daily Beast will start writing columns that the judges who voted to overturn it need to be impeached. Where they live will be discovered and publicized. And just as the Democrats sent Occupy people and union people up to the homes of the executives at AIG, so too might they do this to various judges, justices and so forth.

While Limbaugh said every event may not occur, he added. "I guarantee you there will be, with all the rest of this, a defiance [of] 'Why do we have to listen to them anyway? … Why? They keep their health care. They didn't get rid of their own, but they just got rid of yours,' and it's off to the races for the 2012 presidential election. That's what's going to happen."

Yesterday, Limbaugh said President Obama was threatening Supreme Court justices with his comments about his signature health-care law.

Obama had said: "I think the American people understand and I think the justices should understand that, in the absence of an individual mandate, you cannot have a mechanism to ensure that people with pre-existing conditions can actually get health care."

"Obama's put a bounty out on the Supreme Court, figuratively speaking, since bounties are in the news lately. There's no question," said Limbaugh. "This is a message to the conservative justices: Anthony Kennedy, look what you will be taking away if you strike down my law. Look at the people you will be hurting if you strike down my law."

http://www.wnd.com/2012/04/rush-predicts-obamas-response-to-supremes/

FREE Emoticons for your email - by IncrediMail
</mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=1367f0112cde8414&attid=0.1&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1>
Click Here!
</mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=1367f0112cde8414&attid=0.2&disp=emb&zw&atsh=1>
<http://www2l.incredimail.com/gcontent/stamps/new2011/pixel.gif?upn=603982181986837650>

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM! Please visit: www.operationshoebox.com
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=12603557/grpspId=1705303296/msgId=376232/stime=1333570636/nc1=3848614/nc2=5758219/nc3=4836037>
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Like lambs to the slaughter…er, I mean, Jews to the gas chambers

New post on Bare Naked Islam

Like lambs to the slaughter…er, I mean, Jews to the gas chambers

by barenakedislam

A majority of self-hating American Jews Jewish schmucks still are backing Barack Hussein Obama for President 2012.

The Blaze There's no question that Barack Hussein Obama fails miserably in every aspect of his support for the Israeli state and the Jewish people. (At least among Christians)

But, despite allegations that he has lost favor among American Jews, a new poll from the Public Religion Research Institute seems to indicate that Obama is poised to, once again, capture the majority of this cohort come November.

In September, we reported that the president was beginning to ramp up his outreach to Jewish donors and supporters. With strategist Dick Morris, among others, warning about an Obama-Jewish implosion, this tactic made perfect political sense. In the months that followed, the president reiterated — at least rhetorically — his support for Israel, even going on to claim that he's "done more for the security of the state of Israel than any previous administration."

Some conservative Jews, though, have maintained that the man who was able to secure 78 percent of the Jewish vote in 2008 is a "train wreck" and a "con man." There was even a film, produced by the Emergency Committee for Israel, attacking Obama's record on Israel. And earlier this month, we reported that some major 2008 donors have been giving monies to Republican contender Mitt Romney (not a good sign for the president by any measure).

But despite the challenges, it hasn't been all bad for Obama when it comes to relating to Jewish Americans. After all, The Jewish Forward added him to their list of the year's most influential…Jews (our reporting on this can be found here). New York Magazine even wondered back in September if he's the first Jewish president. Now, a PRRI poll is claiming that the president is poised, despite criticism, to capture the majority of Jewish voters this November.

The Jewish Forward has more: For President Obama and the Jews, it's starting to look like 2008 all over again.

A new survey of Jews shows 62% plan to vote for the president, roughly similar to where he stood at this time four years ago when he went on to garner nearly 80% of the Jewish vote in November. About 30% of those surveyed in the new Public Religion Research Institute poll said they planned to vote for a Republican, with 17% naming GOP frontrunner Mitt Romney and the rest split between the other three candidates.

Even more importantly, just 7% of Jews who voted for Obama in 2008 now prefer a Republican candidate, indicating Obama does not face a significant fracturing of his Jewish base of support.

All-in-all, the poll found that Jewish Americans are still majority liberal, inclined to support Democrats and very focused on social and economic issues. Israel, at least according to the research, is not a "deciding factor" when it comes to how American Jews vote.

barenakedislam | April 4, 2012 at 4:47 pm | Categories: ISLAMOBAMA | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-GDm

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/04/04/like-lambs-to-the-slaughter-er-i-mean-jews-to-the-gas-chambers/

THANK A MUSLIM DAY

New post on Bare Naked Islam

THANK A MUSLIM DAY

by barenakedislam

One of the many ways the presence of more than two million Muslims in America has changed our way of life. Be sure to convey your appreciation the next time you run into a Muslim in your neck of the woods.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3VNHL4RrJOk

barenakedislam | April 4, 2012 at 2:23 pm | Categories: Islam in America | URL: http://wp.me/p276zM-GD9

Comment

See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://barenakedislam.com/2012/04/04/thank-a-muslim-day/

Re: Mitt Romney Donated to Hate Group NOM, NOM Implodes in Race-Bating Scandal

Well Hello Euwe!

What I meant to say, was "fruitfully multiplied".........

On another subject: Have you changed your voter registration/Party Affiliation to where you can vote for our next President yet?

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:24 PM, euwe <machgielis@gmail.com> wrote:

fruitfully
---------
fruitily?

On Apr 4, 1:23 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Mark!
>
> Kind of like Rush Limbaugh, who after the the far left extremists' hate
> filled attacks against him, his sponsors have fruitfully, and
> listenership has gained double digits; the "National Organization For
> Marriage"; ("NOM") is stronger than ever!
>

> http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.7980587/k.BF50/...

>
> Americans see through the hate, virulent spin and Anti-American rhetoric
> by far left media, and the hate groups that Tom belongs to.......Other than
> Tom and his hate filled compatriots.
>

> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:28 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > So now you are trying to silence these people because they have an
> > opposing viewpoint??
>
> > That is indeed the worst kind of hate speech... censorship and the
> > denial to post your opinions to the public.
>
> > On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Mitt Romney Donates to Hate Group NOM
>
> > > NOM's Implosion: The Ripple Effect
>
> > > By now, most people have heard about the National Organization for
> > > Marriage's explosive documents that lay out a disturbing strategy of
> > > divisive race-baiting and using children as political pawns. NOM's
> > > internal memos, made public through an investigation in Maine into the
> > > anti-gay organization's attempts to circumvent campaign finance and
> > > disclosure laws, show a shocking and cynical plan to drive a wedge
> > > between people of color and the LGBT community, as well as use
> > > incendiary claims of "protecting children" against gay people. The
> > > fallout from NOM's bigoted $20 million dollar 'Strategy for Victory'
> > > has come fast and furious, shining a spotlight on the anti-equality
> > > movement's plan to divide our country using race, religion, and bias.
>
> > > (Image/CNN: Maggie Gallagher, the former president and co-founder of
> > > the National Organization for Marriage, was the face of NOM when the
> > > controversial internal memos were circulated)
>
> > > As discussion of NOM's divisive strategy spreads further, it appears
> > > that the organization may actually have the exact opposite effect on
> > > the public discourse around equality as their plan intended-- they are
> > > bringing communities together in solidarity against bigotry. By having
> > > their wedge-based plan exposed for all to see, and in such stark
> > > terms, NOM has stirred a sense of commonality among the very minority
> > > groups they sought to divide. Being demonized for crass political
> > > expediency, it turns out, is something that many groups can relate to.
>
> > > "This memo only reveals the limits of a cynical agenda," NAACP
> > > President and CEO Benjamin Jealous said of the memos. "The truth is
> > > that no group, no matter how well-funded, can drive an artificial
> > > wedge between our communities. People of color understand what it is
> > > like to be the target of discrimination. No public relations strategy
> > > will make us forget that."
>
> > > Sharon Lettman-Hicks, Executive Director and CEO of the National Black
> > > Justice Coalition, also blasted NOM, saying, "These documents expose
> > > NOM for what it really is—a hate group determined to use African
> > > American faith leaders as pawns to push their damaging agenda and as
> > > mouthpieces to amplify that hatred."
>
> > > NOM's exposed strategy has had the effect of forever linking them, and
> > > the entire anti-equality movement, to blatant bigotry. Eric Rodriguez,
> > > Vice President of Policy for the National Council of La Raza laid out
> > > the galvanizing effect of the NOM scandal:
>
> > > "Even by Washington standards, the National Organization for
> > > Marriage's unmasked strategy to drive a wedge between Blacks and
> > > Latinos and the LGBT community is stunningly cynical... Fortunately,
> > > this truly offensive idea has completely backfired. The documents
> > > reveal an organization rife with bigotry, willing to do anything to
> > > advance intolerance in our society. If anyone wondered if Black, LGBT,
> > > and Latino leaders have woken up to realize that we have common
> > > enemies that seek to divide us, these revelations and reactions from
> > > civil rights leaders this week show that we have and are ready to work
> > > together to defeat those enemies."
>
> > > Yet the ripple effect, and the long term consequences of having
> > > documented proof of NOM's race-baiting and bigoted goals, still isn't
> > > over. In fact, the ever-growing NOM scandal has begun to drag down
> > > political figures that support them as well.
>
> > > Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner has been facing outrage
> > > from all sides after appointing NOM's co-founder and former Chairman
> > > Dr. Robert George to the United States Commission on International
> > > Religious Freedom (USCIRF). While Boehner is still sticking by Dr.
> > > George, the increasing pushback from not just the LGBT community but
> > > communities of faith as well are making things uncomfortable for the
> > > Speaker. This comes on the heels of Boehner tripling the
> > > taxpayer-funded budget for defending DOMA in court from $500,000 to
> > > $1.5 million. These extreme stances, and support of race-baiting
> > > organizations like NOM, have given political opponents and equality
> > > advocates, like Nancy Pelosi and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, even
> > > more of a target, further weakening the embattled top Republican in
> > > congress.
>
> > > And Speaker Boehner is by far the only top GOP political figure
> > > entangled by NOM's ever-widening scandal. Presumptive GOP presidential
> > > nominee Mitt Romney is also seeing his connections with the
> > > organization examined and criticized. New information released by the
> > > Human Rights Campaign (HRC) reveals that Romney secretly donated money
> > > to NOM-- some $10,000 in 2008. "It's clear now that Romney was a major
> > > financial donor to Prop. 8," said Fred Sainz, HRC's vice president for
> > > communications. This large donation, as well as Romney's own
> > > flip-flopping statements on basic equality for LGBT people, has real
> > > ramifications in the general election, where a majority of voters of
> > > every stripe find such divisive culture war issues distasteful. While
> > > Romney is sure to try to move away from the extreme stances he's taken
> > > in the GOP primary, this much older donation to NOM (especially in
> > > light of the organization's horrendous tactics), are sure to follow
> > > him as he tries to sell himself as "moderate."
>
> > > The pressure to distance the GOP from NOM is even coming from within
> > > the party faithful itself. Head of the Log Cabin Republicans R. Clarke
> > > Cooper blasted the organization in a recent article the Washington
> > > Times, saying, "Putting aside NOM's callous disregard for LGBT
> > > families, my party, the Republican party, cannot afford to be
> > > associated with an organization that arrogantly seeks to manipulate
> > > African American and Latino voters... Crude identity politics has no
> > > place in today's conservative movement."
>
> > > The fallout from NOM's internal memo's is far from over. Poll after
> > > poll shows that Americans' views on LGBT people and their
> > > relationships are rapidly evolving, with the majority now support full
> > > marriage equality. Having the cynical and divisive plan of a major
> > > player in the anti-equality game like NOM spotlighted helps in every
> > > fight we have as we push for progress even beyond marriage equality--
> > > from bullying protection to employment anti-discrimination laws.
> > > Having the anti-equality movement crippled by their own words only
> > > moves us faster towards full equality as organizations like NOM
> > > delegitimize their own cause and strengthen the resolve of fair-minded
> > > Americans disgusted by such divisive and bigoted tactics.
>
> > > More:http://chicago.gopride.com/entertainment/column/index.cfm/col/994
>
> > > --
> > > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > > Have a great day,
> > > Tommy
>
> > > --
> > > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > > Have a great day,
> > > Tommy
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.

> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/

> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Mitt Romney Donated to Hate Group NOM, NOM Implodes in Race-Bating Scandal

fruitfully
---------
fruitily?

On Apr 4, 1:23 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Mark!
>
> Kind of like Rush Limbaugh, who after the the far left extremists' hate
> filled attacks against him, his sponsors have fruitfully, and
> listenership has gained double digits; the "National Organization For
> Marriage"; ("NOM") is stronger than ever!
>
> http://www.nationformarriage.org/site/c.omL2KeN0LzH/b.7980587/k.BF50/...
>
> Americans see through the hate, virulent spin and Anti-American rhetoric
> by far left media, and the hate groups that Tom belongs to.......Other than
> Tom and his hate filled compatriots.
>
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:28 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > So now you are trying to silence these people because they have an
> > opposing viewpoint??
>
> > That is indeed the worst kind of hate speech... censorship and the
> > denial to post your opinions to the public.
>
> > On Apr 4, 10:51 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Mitt Romney Donates to Hate Group NOM
>
> > > NOM's Implosion: The Ripple Effect
>
> > > By now, most people have heard about the National Organization for
> > > Marriage's explosive documents that lay out a disturbing strategy of
> > > divisive race-baiting and using children as political pawns. NOM's
> > > internal memos, made public through an investigation in Maine into the
> > > anti-gay organization's attempts to circumvent campaign finance and
> > > disclosure laws, show a shocking and cynical plan to drive a wedge
> > > between people of color and the LGBT community, as well as use
> > > incendiary claims of "protecting children" against gay people. The
> > > fallout from NOM's bigoted $20 million dollar 'Strategy for Victory'
> > > has come fast and furious, shining a spotlight on the anti-equality
> > > movement's plan to divide our country using race, religion, and bias.
>
> > > (Image/CNN: Maggie Gallagher, the former president and co-founder of
> > > the National Organization for Marriage, was the face of NOM when the
> > > controversial internal memos were circulated)
>
> > > As discussion of NOM's divisive strategy spreads further, it appears
> > > that the organization may actually have the exact opposite effect on
> > > the public discourse around equality as their plan intended-- they are
> > > bringing communities together in solidarity against bigotry. By having
> > > their wedge-based plan exposed for all to see, and in such stark
> > > terms, NOM has stirred a sense of commonality among the very minority
> > > groups they sought to divide. Being demonized for crass political
> > > expediency, it turns out, is something that many groups can relate to.
>
> > > "This memo only reveals the limits of a cynical agenda," NAACP
> > > President and CEO Benjamin Jealous said of the memos. "The truth is
> > > that no group, no matter how well-funded, can drive an artificial
> > > wedge between our communities. People of color understand what it is
> > > like to be the target of discrimination. No public relations strategy
> > > will make us forget that."
>
> > > Sharon Lettman-Hicks, Executive Director and CEO of the National Black
> > > Justice Coalition, also blasted NOM, saying, "These documents expose
> > > NOM for what it really is—a hate group determined to use African
> > > American faith leaders as pawns to push their damaging agenda and as
> > > mouthpieces to amplify that hatred."
>
> > > NOM's exposed strategy has had the effect of forever linking them, and
> > > the entire anti-equality movement, to blatant bigotry. Eric Rodriguez,
> > > Vice President of Policy for the National Council of La Raza laid out
> > > the galvanizing effect of the NOM scandal:
>
> > > "Even by Washington standards, the National Organization for
> > > Marriage's unmasked strategy to drive a wedge between Blacks and
> > > Latinos and the LGBT community is stunningly cynical... Fortunately,
> > > this truly offensive idea has completely backfired. The documents
> > > reveal an organization rife with bigotry, willing to do anything to
> > > advance intolerance in our society. If anyone wondered if Black, LGBT,
> > > and Latino leaders have woken up to realize that we have common
> > > enemies that seek to divide us, these revelations and reactions from
> > > civil rights leaders this week show that we have and are ready to work
> > > together to defeat those enemies."
>
> > > Yet the ripple effect, and the long term consequences of having
> > > documented proof of NOM's race-baiting and bigoted goals, still isn't
> > > over. In fact, the ever-growing NOM scandal has begun to drag down
> > > political figures that support them as well.
>
> > > Republican Speaker of the House John Boehner has been facing outrage
> > > from all sides after appointing NOM's co-founder and former Chairman
> > > Dr. Robert George to the United States Commission on International
> > > Religious Freedom (USCIRF). While Boehner is still sticking by Dr.
> > > George, the increasing pushback from not just the LGBT community but
> > > communities of faith as well are making things uncomfortable for the
> > > Speaker. This comes on the heels of Boehner tripling the
> > > taxpayer-funded budget for defending DOMA in court from $500,000 to
> > > $1.5 million. These extreme stances, and support of race-baiting
> > > organizations like NOM, have given political opponents and equality
> > > advocates, like Nancy Pelosi and Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer, even
> > > more of a target, further weakening the embattled top Republican in
> > > congress.
>
> > > And Speaker Boehner is by far the only top GOP political figure
> > > entangled by NOM's ever-widening scandal. Presumptive GOP presidential
> > > nominee Mitt Romney is also seeing his connections with the
> > > organization examined and criticized. New information released by the
> > > Human Rights Campaign (HRC) reveals that Romney secretly donated money
> > > to NOM-- some $10,000 in 2008. "It's clear now that Romney was a major
> > > financial donor to Prop. 8," said Fred Sainz, HRC's vice president for
> > > communications. This large donation, as well as Romney's own
> > > flip-flopping statements on basic equality for LGBT people, has real
> > > ramifications in the general election, where a majority of voters of
> > > every stripe find such divisive culture war issues distasteful. While
> > > Romney is sure to try to move away from the extreme stances he's taken
> > > in the GOP primary, this much older donation to NOM (especially in
> > > light of the organization's horrendous tactics), are sure to follow
> > > him as he tries to sell himself as "moderate."
>
> > > The pressure to distance the GOP from NOM is even coming from within
> > > the party faithful itself. Head of the Log Cabin Republicans R. Clarke
> > > Cooper blasted the organization in a recent article the Washington
> > > Times, saying, "Putting aside NOM's callous disregard for LGBT
> > > families, my party, the Republican party, cannot afford to be
> > > associated with an organization that arrogantly seeks to manipulate
> > > African American and Latino voters... Crude identity politics has no
> > > place in today's conservative movement."
>
> > > The fallout from NOM's internal memo's is far from over. Poll after
> > > poll shows that Americans' views on LGBT people and their
> > > relationships are rapidly evolving, with the majority now support full
> > > marriage equality. Having the cynical and divisive plan of a major
> > > player in the anti-equality game like NOM spotlighted helps in every
> > > fight we have as we push for progress even beyond marriage equality--
> > > from bullying protection to employment anti-discrimination laws.
> > > Having the anti-equality movement crippled by their own words only
> > > moves us faster towards full equality as organizations like NOM
> > > delegitimize their own cause and strengthen the resolve of fair-minded
> > > Americans disgusted by such divisive and bigoted tactics.
>
> > > More:http://chicago.gopride.com/entertainment/column/index.cfm/col/994
>
> > > --
> > > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > > Have a great day,
> > > Tommy
>
> > > --
> > > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > > Have a great day,
> > > Tommy
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.