Tuesday, March 20, 2012

Re: Will Comcast Make This The Last St. Patrick's Day Parade To Exclude Gays?

Since when did Gays, Lesbians and Transgender folks get banned from marching in the St. Paddy's Day parade?
 
Once again,  more militant secular spin lies and prevaricate hogwash from again, the militant, homosexual agenda!
 
The only restriction, against ANYONE or ANY GROUP,  is that this is a family parade, and there will be no nekkidness,  there will be no fornication,  there will be no one dressed in assless chaps,  or nekkid Statues of Liberty.
 
That pretty much eliminates TommyTomTomForNews from marching,  probably PlainOl too.
 


 
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
an embarrassment
in a state where we now have marriage rights
---
Irish and African-American lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and
queer (LGBTQ) communities have a lot in common when it comes to being
excluded from the iconic institutions in their communities.

For LGBTQ African Americans, it's the Black Church, and for LGBTQ
Irish Americans, it's the St. Patrick's Day Parade.

Unlike the Black Church, however, that has and continues to throw the
Bible at its LGBTQ community to justify their exclusionary practices,
the St. Patrick's Day parade committee uses the First Amendment,
debating that they are constitutionally guaranteed freedoms of
religion, speech and association, and the tenet separating church and
state.

In 1994 Boston's St. Patrick's Day parade was canceled over this
issue. The state's highest court ruled that the parade organizers
could not ban members of the LGBTQ community from marching. But in a
counter lawsuit, parade officials won, accusing LGBTQ Irish-Americans
of violating their rights to free speech under the First Amendment.

On Mar 19, 10:37 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Will Comcast Make This The Last St. Patrick's Day Parade To Exclude Gays?
>
> -by Michelangelo Signorile
>
> It's 2012, and in the state of New York gays and lesbians have full
> civil rights, including marriage equality. Moreover, gays are no
> longer banned in the U.S. military. But they are still banned from
> Fifth Avenue's annual St. Patrick's Day Parade in an embarrassing
> throwback for everyone involved.
>
> It's frankly appalling that NBC, and now its parent company Comcast,
> still sells the broadcast rights (on its local affiliate, WNBC) to the
> intolerant bunch that runs the parade (in 2007 that amount was
> $300,000) and then helps the organizers sell advertising to major
> companies. More than that, one of NBC's top executives, a man who aids
> the organizers in getting those ad dollars, was chosen as this year's
> Grand Marshal.
>
> As David Mixner notes, most New York politicians who support equality
> won't march in the parade because of this bigotry. Last year, the
> Irish Foreign Minister condemned the parade, and the President of
> Ireland declined an invitation to be Grand Marshal. But Francis X.
> Comerford, Chief Revenue Officer and President of Commercial
> Operations for the NBC Owned Television Stations, has no problem
> leading the parade as Grand Marshal.
>
> Groups like the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation (GLAAD)
> have criticized NBC for its relationship with the parade since the
> early '90s. Other groups have protested the parade annually, sometimes
> resulting in arrests, and this year the group Irish Queers will be
> demonstrating once again. For years it's all been to no avail.
>
> But with Comcast now in charge after the controversial merger with NBC
> was finalized, 2012 could be the last year in which gays are excluded
> -- or the last year in which NBC is involved in the parade.
>
> There are a few reasons for this. One of them has to do with the terms
> of the merger itself, in which Brian Roberts, chairman and CEO of
> Comcast, testified before the House Judiciary Committee, where he
> vowed to adhere to diversity in every aspect of the company's business
> dealings. From the company's own blog:
>
> Diversity: A few members of the Committee raised questions about
> diversity at Comcast (and NBCU). Brian reiterated the company's
> commitment to promoting diversity in everything the company does. To
> me, as Comcast's Chief Diversity Officer, this means, among other
> things, diversity in our workforce, in our programming lineup, in our
> supplier base, and in our community investments (philanthropy) -- and
> having results we can be proud of.
> Furthermore, the actual approval letter from the FCC states that
> Comcast must adhere to diversity rules for seven years or the merger
> could be undone:
>
> Protecting Diversity, Localism, Broadcast and Other Public Interest
> Concerns. The Commission is also imposing conditions and accepting
> voluntary commitments concerning a numbers of other public interest
> issues, including diversity, localism, and broadcasting, among others.
> Sure, it's debatable whether selling the broadcast rights to a parade
> that admittedly excludes a minority group violates the FCC's diversity
> rules. But it's certainly something that LGBT activists would argue,
> bringing a lot of attention to the issue. Comcast may not want that
> fight now.
>
> And that brings me to the other reasons. Comcast prides itself on its
> outreach to the gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT)
> community. Just take a look at this page, where the company touts its
> 95-percent score on the Human Rights Campaign's Corporate Equality
> Index and brags of programming that reaches out to LGBT people.
> Comcast also sponsors the annual GLAAD Media Awards and, as the
> company describes, "partners with various LGBT community centers
> across the country that provide a range of services for the LGBT
> community."
>
> It's a different time than when the Ancient Order of the Hibernians
> began excluding gays from the St. Patrick's Day Parade in the early
> '90s. Netroots activism gets things done very quickly today. HRC, in
> part responding to pressure from other activists, lowered Target's and
> Best Buy's CEI score after the retail chains gave money to a political
> action committee that backed an anti-gay candidate. GLAAD withdrew its
> support of the failed AT&T/T-Mobile merger after grassroots activists
> mobilized on the Web and raised concerns.
>
> Already, GLAAD is calling for the parade to be dropped moving forward
> if gays are not included. "The idea that a group of LGBT people aren't
> allowed to participate in a parade in the middle of New York City in
> the year 2012 is completely out of touch with a majority of Americans
> and it is frankly indefensible," GLAAD spokesperson Herndon Graddick
> said in a statement. "GLAAD will be requesting to meet with WNBC to
> ensure that, if such discriminatory practices remain in place, the
> event isn't one associated with such an important and inclusive media
> outlet that should represent the full diversity of New York City."
>
> When LGBT activists have organized online and focused on companies
> that have supported homophobia -- companies that pride themselves on
> being pro-gay -- they've been enormously successful. Microsoft
> reversed course pronto in 2005 after it went neutral on a gay rights
> bill in the state of Washington, and that's just one example.
>
> The truth is, most LGBT activists weren't focused on the St. Patrick's
> Day Parade all these years, with bigger fish to fry. But many are now
> looking at this as unfinished business -- as I said, an embarrassment
> in a state where we now have marriage rights -- and they are also
> seeing Comcast as a company that is vulnerable. If Comcast doesn't
> want a battle on its hands, a battle it will ultimately lose, after
> much PR erosion, it will make sure that March 18, 2012 is the
> beginning of the end of the ban on gays in the St. Patrick's Day
> Parade.
>
> More:http://www.huffingtonpost.com/michelangelo-signorile/will-comcast-mak...
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Was that Missouri or Russia where Ron Paul's supporters were arrested?

how anyone who believes in small government and fiscal conservatism
can be opposed to Ron Paul.
---
those who support an interventionist policy and israel

On Mar 19, 2:26 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Was that Missouri or Russia where Ron Paul's supporters were arrested?Published: Sunday, March 18, 2012, 7:11 PM     Updated: Sunday, March 18, 2012, 8:03 PM
> By Paul Mulshine/The Star Ledger
> You might have seen those articles about how a number of Ron Paul supporterswere arrestedduring what seemed to be a routine floor fight at a caucus in Missouri.
> That sounds like the sort of thing you might expect in Russia.
> Apparently this writer at theTea Party Advocacy Tracking Hubthought so:"While the GOP may been a bit hard nosed in trying to stick to the ground rules, the actual Caucasus was not the time for the attendees to change the rules."The plural of "caucus" is "caucuses" (no capital letters).The Caucasusis a mountain chain in Russia.
> Which is where this sort of thing usually occurs. So if this was a Freudian slip, the writer certainly slipped in the right direction.
> But as always with these tea-party types, I find myself asking how anyone who believes in small government and fiscal conservatism can be opposed to Ron Paul.
> In this case, TPATH seems to have gone out of its way to provide a justification for banning video recordings at  political events.
> On the other hand, maybe this guy really does believe we're in Russia.http://blog.nj.com/njv_paul_mulshine/2012/03/was_that_missouri_or_russia_wh.html

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Department of Homeland Security plans to build a high-risk virus research center in the heart of America

The Department of Homeland Security
(DHS) is set to begin construction on a new high-risk bio-weapons
research
facility on the campus of Kansas State University in Manhattan
---
great idea!

On Mar 19, 3:49 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> They ought to build it between the Russell and Dierksen Senate Office
> buildings.
>
> **
>            New post on *ACGR's "News with Attitude"*
> <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/author/amcogore/>  The Department of Homeland
> Security plans to build a high-risk virus research center in the heart
> of America <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/02-916/>by
> Harold<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/author/amcogore/>
>
> J. D. Heyes, Natural News 3/16/2012 The Department of Homeland Security
> (DHS) is set to begin construction on a new high-risk bio-weapons research
> facility on the campus of Kansas State University in Manhattan, though
> critics say the decision is fraught with risk because of the potential for
> damage from nearby earthquake fault lines. In a [...]
>
> Read more of this post <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/02-916/>
>  *Harold <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/author/amcogore/>* | March 19, 2012 at
> 6:57 am | Categories: Corruption
> <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=22388>, Criminal
> Activity <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=398859>,
> DHS<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=418542>,
> Environment <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=184>,
> Executive<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=53796>,
> Food/Water <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=5098476>,
> Government<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=2311>,
> Health <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=337>,
> Legislative<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=217843>,
> NeoConservatives <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=152793>, Police
> State<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=1955>,
> Progressives <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=182563>,
> Propaganda<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=13722>,
> Property Rights <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=6928>,
> Sovereignty<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=69462>,
> States Rights <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=280753>, U.S.
> Constitution<http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/?cat=51155>| URL:http://wp.me/pmtmV-7Ex
>
>   Comment <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/02-916/#respond>    See
> all comments <http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/02-916/#comments>
>
>   Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage
> Subscriptions<https://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=7f89380f46003915c34c2cdd2b126a38...>.
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/02-916/
>     Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/>

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

The Department of Homeland Security plans to build a high-risk virus research center in the heart of America

They ought to build it between the Russell and Dierksen Senate Office buildings.

New post on ACGR's "News with Attitude"

The Department of Homeland Security plans to build a high-risk virus research center in the heart of America

by Harold

J. D. Heyes, Natural News 3/16/2012 The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) is set to begin construction on a new high-risk bio-weapons research facility on the campus of Kansas State University in Manhattan, though critics say the decision is fraught with risk because of the potential for damage from nearby earthquake fault lines. In a [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://a4cgr.wordpress.com/2012/03/19/02-916/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Most Hated Family In America: Phelps

Hey Tommytomtom,

I like the Phelps family..... I like that they stand up and
unashamedly shout their beliefs to the world. I like that they are
ever so consistent in their message.

This is so rare a thing in this day and age. They are the embodiment
of the rights guaranteed by the first amendment.

On Mar 19, 8:11 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From Jim
>
> The Most Hated Family in America
>
> The  Most Hated Family in America is a TV documentary written and presented
> by  the BBC's Louis Theroux about the family at the heart of the Westboro
> Baptist  Church. At the heart of the documentary is the Westboro Baptist
> Church (WBC),  headed by Fred Phelps and based in Topeka, Kansas. It runs the
> website  GodHatesFags.com, and GodHatesAmerica.com, and other websites
> expressing  condemnation of LGBT, Roman Catholics, Muslims, Jews,
> Sweden, Ireland,
> Canada,  The Netherlands, and other groups.
> The organization is monitored by the Anti-Defamation League,  and
> classified as a hate group by the Southern Poverty Law Center. The group has
> achieved national notice because of its picketing of funeral
> processions of U.S.
> soldiers killed in action in Iraq and Afghanistan.
> The church bases its work around the belief expressed by its  best known
> slogan and the address of its primary website, "God hates fags", and
> expresses the opinion, based on its Biblical interpretation, that nearly every
> tragedy in the world is God's punishment for homosexuality – specifically
> society's increasing tolerance and acceptance of gay, lesbian, and bisexual
> people. It maintains that God hates homosexuals above all other kinds of  "
> sinners" and that homosexuality should be a capital crime. Louis Theroux stated
>  that the Phelpses are the most extreme people he has ever met.
>
> _Watch the full documentary  now_
> (http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-most-hated-family-in-america/)
>
> http://topdocumentaryfilms.com/the-most-hated-family-in-america/
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.