Obama's Savvy Plan to Circumvent Religious Groups' Freak Out Over Contraception

Obama's Savvy Plan to Circumvent Religious Groups' Freak Out Over Contraception
Today, the White House did the right thing for women, public health
and human rights. Despite deep concerns, including my own, based on
what transpired in the past under health reform, the White House has
decided on a plan to address the birth control mandate that will
enable women to get contraceptive coverage directly through their
insurance plans without having to buy a rider or a second plan, and
without having to negotiate with or through religious entities or
administrations that are hostile to primary reproductive health care,
including but not limited to contraception.

Under this plan, every insurance company will be obligated to provide
contraceptive coverage. Administration officials stated that a woman's
insurance company "will be required to reach out directly and offer
her contraceptive care free of charge. The religious institutions
will not have to pay for it."

Moreover, women will not have to opt in or out; contraceptive care
will be part of the basic package of benefits offered to everyone.
Contraceptive care will simply be "part of the bundle of services that
all insurance companies are required to offer," said a White House
official.

"We are actually more comfortable having the insurance industry offer
and market this to women than religious institutions," said the White
House official because they "understand how contraception works" to
prevent unintended pregnancy and reduce health care costs. "This makes
sense financially."

The way it works is this: Insurers will create policy not including
contraceptive coverage in the contract for religious organizations
that object. Second, the same insurance company must simultaneously
offer contraceptive coverage to all employees, and can not charge an
additional premium. This provides free contraceptive coverage to
women. The reason this works for insurance companies is because
offering contraception is cost-neutral and cost-effective; companies
realize the tremendous cost benefits of spacing pregnancies, and
limiting unintended pregnancies, planned pregnancies and health
benefits of contraception.

White House officials, speaking on background, said that the
accommodation--which they stress is not a compromise--fulfills two
principals. One is that all women will have access to the health care
they need no matter where they work; their access to contraceptive
services is guaranteed. "No longer will they have to struggle to pay
for it," said the White House official. At the same time, "we are
able to respect the beliefs of religious institutions." These are two
principals, the official said, "that the White House holds dear."

The rule will be applied to all but the original institutions that
were exempted—those for which religious inculcation is their primary
purpose—and will not be expanded to include other entities such as
hospitals, clinics, or social service organizations.

It most certainly will not, according to White House officials, exempt
private employers. The Bishops had made clear earlier this week that
their ultimate goal was to get rid of contraceptive coverage in health
reform entirely.

The White House said that they plan to publish the final rule as soon
as possible, and that it would go into effect on August 1, 2012, the
original date, removing the one-year grace period from the original
plan.

A White House official described the plan as providing "seamless
coverage" to women for contraceptive care and crafted to allay
concerns about privacy and confidentiality in accessing such coverage.

White House spokespeople pointed to support from two sides of the debate.

On one hand, Sister Carol Keehan of the Catholic Health Association
applauded the policy, although I could not find her statement at this
time.

And in a statement, Cecile Richards, president of Planned Parenthood
Federation of America said:

"We believe the compliance mechanism does not compromise a woman's
ability to access these critical birth control benefits.

"However we will be vigilant in holding the administration and the
institutions accountable for a rigorous, fair and consistent
implementation of the policy, which does not compromise the essential
principles of access to care.

"The individual rights and liberties of all women and all employees in
accessing basic preventive health care is our fundamental concern.

"Planned Parenthood continues to believe that those institutions who
serve the broad public, employ the broad public, and receive taxpayer
dollars, should be required to follow the same rules as everyone else,
including providing birth control coverage and information.

"As a trusted health care provider to one in five women, Planned
Parenthood's priority is increasing access to preventive health care.
This birth control coverage benefit does just that.

"The birth control benefit underscores the fact that birth control is
basic health care, and is fundamental to improving women's health and
the health of their families.

More:
http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/782375/obama%27s_savvy_plan_to_circumvent_religious_groups%27_freak_out_over_contraception/#paragraph2

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

From Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: Stop the Right Wing Blunt Threat to Basic Women's Health Care

From Senator Kirsten Gillibrand: Stop the Right Wing Threat to basic
Women's health care

Your boss shouldn't decide what kind of health care you use. That's just wrong.

Incredibly, that's exactly what Sen. Roy Blunt's (R-Missouri) brand
new amendment would allow. He wants Congress to totally scrap
President Obama's guarantee of access to affordable birth control and
let any employer or any health plan refuse coverage of birth control –
even as President Obama has found a reasonable, respectful solution
that exempts religious institutions and guarantees women contraception
coverage.

It looks like Blunt's amendment is coming up for a vote next week, and
we must stop it.

I am absolutely dumbfounded that we're still debating whether women
have a right to basic health care. But we've seen it all before.

That's why I joined with Barbara Boxer and several colleagues to start
One Million Strong for Women to push back against the attacks on
women.

An overwhelming grassroots movement is the only way to stop right-wing
efforts to deny women affordable birth control. The best way we can
stop this bill – and others like it – is to join together.

Click here to stand up for guaranteed access to affordable birth
control – and join our new project to find One Million Strong for
Women.

Mitt Romney says he'd repeal the new guarantee for affordable
contraception on "day one" of his hypothetical presidency. Now we have
Blunt's new bill bringing this issue to the here and now.

Putting CEOs in charge of health care decisions is patently offensive.
But that's what the vocal minority that's hijacked this debate wants
to see.

Think about that. They want to do away with birth control coverage. I
can't think of a better example of why it's so important for us to get
organized and get ready to stand strong against the right-wing's "war
on women."

Click here to stand up for guaranteed access to affordable birth
control – and join our new project to find One Million Strong for
Women.

http://www.democratsenators.org/o/44/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=369&track=OMFW_KEG_201202_2&tag=OMFW_KEG_201202_2

It's appalling that some people think that anyone except a woman and
her doctor should make health care decisions for her.

That's why we have to stand up to right-wing bullying on this issue.
We can't let the radical few make health care decisions for millions
and millions of women.

I hope you'll take action right away.

Sincerely,

Kirsten Gillibrand

Sign Up Here:

http://www.democratsenators.org/o/44/p/dia/action/public/?action_KEY=369&track=OMFW_KEG_201202_2&tag=OMFW_KEG_201202_2

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

1400 Years of Inbreeding . . . Very Enlightening!!

See short article and short video.  

 

Anyone have any evidence to the contrary on this issue?

 
http://a12iggymom.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/1400-years-of-inbreeding-very-enlightening/

1400 Years of Inbreeding..Very Enlightening!!    A huge Muslim problem:  Inbreeding By  Bryan Fischer Nicolai Sennels is a Danish psychologist  who has done extensive research into a  little-known problem in the Muslim world: the disastrous results of Muslim inbreeding brought about by the marriage of first-cousins. This practice, which has been prohibited in the  Judeo-Christian tradition since the days of  Moses, was sanctioned by Muhammad and has been  going on now for 50 generations (1,400 years) in the Muslim world. This  practice of inbreeding will never go away in the Muslim world, since Muhammad is the ultimate example and authority  on all matters, including marriage. The  massive inbreeding in Muslim  culture may well have done virtually  irreversible damage to the Muslim gene pool, including extensive damage to its intelligence, sanity, and health. According to Sennels, close to half of  all Muslims in the world are inbred. In  Pakistan, the numbers approach 70%. Even in England , more than half of Pakistani immigrants are married to their  first cousins, and in Denmark the number of  inbred Pakistani immigrants is around  40%. The numbers are equally  devastating in other important Muslim countries: 67% in Saudi Arabia,  64% in Jordan, and Kuwait, 63%  in Sudan, 60% in Iraq, and 54% in the United  Arab Emirates and Qatar. According to the BBC, this Pakistani, Muslim-inspired inbreeding is thought to explain the probability that a British  Pakistani family is more than 13 times as  likely to have children with recessive genetic  disorders. While Pakistanis are responsible for three percent of the births in the UK, they account for 33% of  children with genetic birth defects. The  risk of what are called  autosomal recessive disorders such as cystic  fibrosis and spinal muscular atrophy is 18 times higher and the risk of death due to malformations is 10 times higher Other negative consequences of inbreeding  include a 100 percent increase in the risk of  stillbirths and a 50% increase in the possibility that a child will die during labor. Lowered intellectual capacity is another devastating  consequence of Muslim marriage patterns.  According to Sennels, research  shows that children of consanguineous marriages lose 10-16 points off their  IQ and that social abilities develop much  slower in inbred babies. The risk of having an  IQ lower than 70, the official demarcation for  being classified as "retarded," increases by an astonishing 400 percent among children of cousin marriages. (Similar effects were seen in the  Pharaonic dynasties in ancient Egypt and in  the British royal family, where inbreeding was the norm for a significant period of  time.) In Denmark, non-Western immigrants are  more than 300 percent  more likely to  fail the intelligence test required for entrance into the Danish army. Sennels  says that "the ability to enjoy and produce knowledge and abstract thinking is simply lower in the Islamic world."  He  points out that the Arab world translates just  330 books every year, about 20% of what  Greece alone does. In the last  1,200 years of  Islam, just 100,000 books have been translated into Arabic, about what Spain does in a single  year. Seven out of 10 Turks have never even  read  a book. Sennels points  out the difficulties this creates for Muslims seeking to succeed in the West. "A lower IQ, together with a religion that denounces critical thinking, surely  makes it harder for many Muslims to have  success in our high-tech knowledge societies." Only nine Muslims  have ever won the Nobel Prize, and five of those were for the "Peace Prize." According to Nature magazine,  Muslim countries produce just 10 percent of  the world average when it comes to scientific  research (measured by articles per million inhabitants). In Denmark,  Sennels' native country, Muslim children are grossly overrepresented among children with special needs.   One-third of the budget for Danish schools is  consumed by special education, and anywhere  from 51% to 70% of retarded children with physical handicaps in Copenhagen have an immigrant background. Learning ability is severely affected as well.  Studies  indicated that 64% of school  children with Arabic parents are still illiterate after 10 years in the Danish school system. The immigrant drop-out rate in Danish high schools is twice that of  the native-born. Mental illness is also a product. The closer the blood  relative, the higher the risk of schizophrenic  illness. The increased risk of insanity may  explain why more than 40% of patients in Denmark's biggest ward for clinically insane criminals have an  immigrant background. The U.S. is not immune. According to  Sennels,  "One study based on 300,000 Americans shows  that the majority of Muslims in the USA have a  lower income, are less educated, and have worse jobs than the population as a whole." Sennels concludes: There is no doubt that the wide spread tradition of first  cousin marriages among Muslims has harmed the  gene pool among Muslims. Because Muslims'  religious beliefs prohibit marrying non-Muslims and  thus prevents them from adding fresh genetic material  to their population, the genetic damage done  to their gene pool since their prophet allowed  first cousin marriages 1,400 years ago are most likely massive. (This has produced) overwhelming direct  and indirect human and societal  consequences. Bottom line: Islam  is not simply a benign and morally equivalent alternative to the Judeo-Christian tradition. As Sennels points out, the first and biggest victims of Islam are  Muslims. Simple Judeo- Christian compassion for  Muslims and a common-sense desire to protect  Western civilization from the ravages of Islam dictate a vigorous opposition to the spread of this dark and  dangerous religion. These stark realities must  be taken into account when we establish public  polices dealing with immigration from Muslim countries and the building of mosques in the U.S. Let's hope North Americans wake up before a blind naivete  about the reality of Islam destroys what  remains of our Judeo-Christian culture and our domestic tranquility.  AND SHE DOESN'T EVEN REFERENCE THE PROBLEMS OF BREADING WITH GOATS! Steve

 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Why wasn't Obama in contempt of court?

 

http://www.wnd.com/2012/02/why-wasnt-obama-in-contempt-of-court/

WND EXCLUSIVE

Why wasn't Obama in contempt of court?

Diana West risks 'birther' label by analyzing evidence in hearing BHO 'boycotted'

Published: 14 hours ago
by Diana WestEmail | Archive
Diana West is the author of "The Death of the Grown-up: How America's Arrested Development Is Bringing Down Western Civilization," and blogs at
 

One thing I've learned while researching my new, nearly finished book is that both history and news, history's so-called rough draft, are not written by the "victors" as much as they are censored, twisted and reconfigured by what I can best describe as "the mob."

I'm not referring to the Mafia. What I'm talking about is a mob-like amalgam of sharp elbows and big mouths who dictate acceptable topics, their narrative flow and an approved range of opinion – the consensus-makers. Defying consensus, breaking what amount to Mafia-like vows of "omerta" – silence – and delving into the verboten, is the worst possible crime of anti-mobness, punishable by eternal hooting and marginalization.

 
 

Few transgress. Which explains the news blackout on an extraordinary chain of recent events that took place in and around a Georgia courtroom and pertained to challenges to President Obama's eligibility to be a presidential candidate in Georgia in 2012. In the end, the president defeated the challenge. He will be on the Georgia primary ballot come March. But therein lies an amazing tale.

Already I can feel the chill hiss of "birther" at the mere mention of these events, all because I haven't included the mob-requisite catcalls that are "supposed" to go along with such accounts. But there's nothing to mock here.

If you want to fully understand the issue of constitutional eligibility, get Jerome Corsi's best-selling "Where's the Birth Certificate?" and get his e-book sequel, "Where's the Real Birth Certificate?" free.

Last month, after Administrative Law Judge Michael Malihi denied motions by President Obama's lawyer Michael Jablonski both to dismiss proceedings against the president and to quash a subpoena, three attorneys made history. For the first time, attorneys were permitted to enter evidence into the court record challenging Barack Obama's constitutional eligibility to be president.

Georgia state law stipulates: "Every candidate for federal and state office … shall meet the constitutional and statutory qualifications for holding the office being sought." Plaintiff attorneys Van Irion and Mark Hatfield, who is also a Georgia state representative, argued that President Obama, an American citizen, fails to meet these qualifications because he is not a "natural born" citizen, the constitutional requirement for the presidency. This is due, they argued, to the uncontested fact that his father, Barack Obama Sr. of Kenya, was a British subject, not an American citizen. A third plaintiff attorney, Orly Taitz – object of an eternity's worth of "two-minute hates" within the media mob – introduced evidence that the 44th president of the United States has engaged in what appears to be identity fraud.

Such evidence, as gleaned from a partial list of exhibits introduced in the hearing and published at the American Thinker website, included affidavits from security professionals and other documentation attesting that Obama is using a Connecticut Social Security number (he never lived in Connecticut); that Obama's purported Social Security number was never issued to him; and that – my favorite – his Social Security number "does not pass E-Verify." Another affidavit from an Adobe Illustrator expert maintains that Obama's birth certificate, released last spring to much hype and ballyhoo, is a computer-generated forgery.

Frankly, I was unimpressed with the presidential defense in pre-hearing arguments. For example, Jablonski tried to deflect the Social Security issue – which, after all, raises serious questions of fraud – by pointing out that "nothing in the Constitution makes … participating in Social Security a prerequisite to serving as president." (So what's a little felonious fraud?) On the "citizenship issue," Jablonski declared the issue was "soundly rejected by 69,456,897 Americans in the 2008 elections, as it has been by every judicial body" since. Is he saying that a lot of votes or previous court actions nullify the legal merits of any new proceeding? I'm no lawyer, but that doesn't seem like much of a legal argument.

The day before the hearing, Jablonksi announced he and the president would "suspend further participation" in the proceedings; Brian Kemp, the Georgia secretary of state, retorted that Jablonski and his client would "do so at your own peril." On hearing day, the defense and defendant didn't just rest; they didn't show up, defying the subpoena summoning Jablonski and the president to court. (The Atlanta Journal-Constitution later styled the president's rejection of his subpoena as a boycott.) Contempt of court, anyone? How about just a headline?

Nope. Headlines could wait – at least until the story came out "right," which it did when both the judge and secretary of state ruled this month in favor of President Obama.

Obama's on the Georgia ballot; "birthers" lose again. The narrative is locked down.

This time around, though, it doesn't feel as if Obama really won.

.

<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=20337019/grpspId=1705809503/msgId=116854/stime=1328894024/nc1=5008815/nc2=4025291/nc3=5522129>

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

New Members 2

Visit Your Group
IF YOU DON'T STAND BEHIND OUR TROOPS, FEEL FREE TO STAND IN FRONT OF THEM! Please visit: www.operationshoebox.com
<http://l.yimg.com/a/i/us/yg/logo/us.gif>
Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
<http://geo.yahoo.com/serv?s=97359714/grpId=12603557/grpspId=1705303296/msgId=370904/stime=1328900312/nc1=5898817/nc2=3848614/nc3=5522124>
__,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: **JP** RESULTS OF ELECTION 2012

Agar PPP again will take 70 seats then .....................Hamari qoom ka Allah he hafiz hay

Thanks

From: Idrees Awan <idreesawan@yahoo.com>
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Sent: Friday, February 10, 2012 12:19 PM
Subject: Re: **JP** RESULTS OF ELECTION 2012

Dear Mansoor,   I feel it is the job of PTI to make efforts for fair elections and not the common people. Why can,t PTI go to suprime court with thse suggestions.   Regards   Idrees--- On Fri, 2/10/12, Mansoor Rahim <mnf132@hotmail.com> wrote: From: Mansoor Rahim <mnf132@hotmail.com> Subject: **JP** RESULTS OF ELECTION 2012 To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com Date: Friday, February 10, 2012, 12:56 PM BEFORE READING THIS EMAIL, PLEASE KOI GHEEBAT NAHIN KARE GA.  BECAUSE GHEEBAT IS GUNAH-E-KABEERA.  IT IS THE TIME FOR PRACTICAL WORK.  THANK YOU ALL *  NATIONAL ASSEMBLY RESULTS  OF ELECTION 2012/13 (FROM RESOURCES) A SOUND PREDICTION. PARTIES                    SEATS PPP                               70 PML-N                         58 PML-Q                         35 ANP                             22 MQM                            25 PTI                               24 Other parties Total      89 independents               35 TOTAL =>              358  *  ANOTHER WEEK GOVERMENT WILL BE FORMED BY ESTABLISHMENT.  (MAKHLOOT HAKUMAT IS ALWAYS GOOD FOR ESTABLISHMENT TO ENJOY POWER)*  ISSUES WILL REMAIN THE SAME (CORRUPTION, LOADSHEDDING, INFLATION, LAW AND ORDER ETC)  IT MEANS NO CHANGE  RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FREE & FAIR ELECTIONSl *  ELECTRONIC + PAPER VOTING  -   AVOID ONLY PAPER VOTING.*  LIST OF VOTERS SHOULD BE APRROVED FROM SUPREME COURT OF PAKISTAN.*  SOME OF VOTERS ARE REGISTERED IN TWO OR THREE PLACES WHICH SHOULD BE CORRECTED.*  ONLY NADRA VOTING LIST.  NO OTHER LIST.*  ELECTION COMMISSION IS NOT INDEPENDENT.  SO THEY SHOULD FACILITATE ONLY.*  UN, COMMON WEALTH ETC SHOULD APPOINT PRESIDING OFFICERS AND OTHER ELECTION STAFF, AS A LARGE NUMBER OF POLLING STAFF ALWAYS S SUPPORTING PPP, PMLS, MQM AND ANP PARTIES.*  ELECTION PROCESS SHOULD BE FOR WEEK - NOT FOR ONE DAY (PROVINCE WISE).  IT WILL HELP PTI TO FOCUS TOTALLY ON ONE PROVINCE.  IT SHOULD BE LIKE A TEST.*  WORKERS OF PARTIES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ENTER POLLING STATIONS, AS THEY ALWAYS OFFERS HANDSOME AMOUNT TO ELECTION STAFF, AND HARASSING VOTERS AS WELL.*  ONLY NEW AND VALID CNIC.-  NO OLD OR EXPIRED CNIC.  *  POLICE OFFICER AND OTHER STAFF SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO ENTER POLLING STATIONS.*  UN, COMMON WEALTH ETC OFFICERS WILL ISSUE CLEARANCE CERTIFICATES TO PRESIDING OFFICER AND OTHER POLLING STAFF BEFORE STARTING ELECTION PROCESS AT POLLING STATION.  AND OWTH SHOULD BE TAKEN ON QURAN BEFORE STARTING ELECTION PROCESS.  *  VEHICLES WHICH CARRIES PEOPLE FROM NEARBY AREAS TO POLLING STATIONS SHOULD DROP PEOPLE AT LEAST 200 YARDS FROM POLLING STATION.   BOUNDRIES SHOULD BE MADE.  NO VEHICLE TO BE PARK NEAR POLLING STATION.*  COMPLETE BODY SEARCH AT DROP ZONE AND BEFORE ENTERING POLLING STATION.*  ELECTRONIC VOTING PROCESS SHOULD BE AVAILABLE ONLINE.  SO EVERY PARTY CAN CHECK THEIR POSITIION.*  TIMING SHOULD BE FROM 8 TO 6,  NOT 8 TO 5.*  ENTIRE PROCESS SHOULD ALSO BE MONITOR BY SUPEREME COURTS AND HIGH COURTS. *  GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO WORK A ELECTION STAFF.*  VOTERS SHOULD NOT BE ALLOWED TO TAKE THEIR POCKET OR OTHER ITEMS.  I MEAN EVERYONE SHOULD ENTER WITH EMPTY POCKET. NO BAGS IN WOMEN STATIONS. THE OLD PARTIES ARE CHAMPIONS OF CORRUPTIONS AND THEY KNOWS WHAT TO DO ON THAT DAY.  WE CAN BLOCK THEM.  IMRAN KHAN AND PTI ARE REQUESTED TO FILE A CASE AGAINST THE ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN ON THEIR ELECTORIAL PROCESS.  THIS WILL BE OUR FIRST SLAP ON OLD CORRUPT PARTIES.  TIME IS RUNNING  I REQUEST MY ALL BROTHERS AND SISTERS TO JOIN HANDS FOR THE FREE & FAIR ELECTIONS.  BECAUSE ELECTIONS WILL BE THE TIME TO CHANGE. OTHERWISE READY FOR THE SAME FACES TO BE OUR UPCOMING LEADERS FOR NEXT FIVE YEARS.        YOUR BROTHERMansoor Rahim ZahidPTI Peshawar. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the GoogleGroups "JoinPakistan" group.You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.comFor more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=enYou can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com & on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the GoogleGroups "JoinPakistan" group.You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.comFor more options, visit this group athttp://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=enYou can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com & on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197