-by Arthur Goldwag
No, all Republicans aren't racists--there are any number of reasons
that a principled person might oppose Obama that have nothing whatever
to do with race. But as the contest for the Republican nomination
tightens, the clamor of racial, McCarthyist and conspiratorial dog
whistles--what I have come to call "the New Hate"--has become as
deafening to those who can hear them as the blare of vuvuzelas at a
World Cup soccer match.
"Nobody even knows what's going on in Libya," the born-again birther
Donald Trump (who brags of his "great relationship with the blacks")
complained back in April. "[Obama] said he has no control over
[gasoline] prices, which he does if he gets on the phone or gets off
his basketball court or whatever he is doing." Back in November, Rush
Limbaugh coined the word "uppity-ism" to describe what he saw as
Michelle Obama's overweening sense of entitlement. "There's no
question in my mind," he opined to his radio audience just a few weeks
ago, "That [Michelle and Barack Obama] view [the presidency]... as an
opportunity to live high on the hog without having it cost them a
dime. And if they justify it by thinking, we deserve this, we're owed
this because of what was done to our ancestors, who knows."
Ron Paul has long-standing ties to the John Birch Society and has been
a frequent guest on Alex Jones's 9/11 denialist radio show; he has
delivered thoughtful speeches about the great wrong that was done to
the South in the Civil War, has had documented associations with white
supremacists, and has allowed racist and homophobic writings to be
published over his byline. For all that (maybe it's precisely because
of that), his presidential campaign has been relatively free of
hate-mongering.
The same can't be said of the Republican front runners. During an
interview with Forbes in 2010, Newt Gingrich talked about Dinesh
D'Souza's book, The Roots of Obama's Rage.
"What if [Obama] is so outside our comprehension," he asked of our
Hawaiian-born president (whose Kansas-born mother was white), "that
only if you understand Kenyan, anti-colonial behavior, can you begin
to piece together [his actions]?....This is a person who is
fundamentally out of touch with how the world works, who happened to
have played a wonderful con, as a result of which he is now
president."
In South Carolina two weeks ago, Gingrich repeatedly called Obama "the
food stamp president."
Not to be undone, Mitt Romney--who had already accused Obama of
wanting to "make us a European style welfare state....where
government's role is to take from some and give to others"--kicked off
his Florida campaign by telling a rally that "it's time we had someone
in the White House who knows how to create jobs because he's had a
job."
Gingrich is nothing if not ecumenical in his hatreds. He has
fulminated against Shariah law in words that evoked Henry Ford's
attacks on the Jewish Kahal in the 1920s, and has been demonizing his
critics as Communists, traitors, and degenerates since he first
entered politics in the 1970s.
"The centerpiece of this campaign," Gingrich said during his victory
speech in South Carolina, "Is American exceptionalism versus the
radicalism of Saul Alinsky....The founding fathers of America are the
source from which we draw our understanding of America. [Obama] draws
his from Saul Alinsky, radical left-wingers and people who don't like
the classical America."
Some baffled pundits wondered if any of Gingrich's constituency even
knew who Alinsky was. In fact, Gingrich was taking a page out of Glenn
Beck's book, who invokes Alinsky's name almost as frequently as he
does George Soros's, another left wing Jew. And why woudn't he?
Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama are both on the record as Alinsky's
admirers. The mainstream media rushed to fill in the blanks about
Alinsky for their readers, but they overlooked the most important
thing. Alinksy dedicated his 1971 book, "Rules for Radicals" to
Lucifer--"the first radical known to man who rebelled against the
establishment and did it so effectively that he at least won his own
kingdom."
Alinsky was being facetious of course, but for millions of Americans
(hundreds of thousands of whom believe Barack Obama is the
Antichrist), the Prince of Darkness is no laughing matter. For that is
what this particular dog whistle is really about - the left's supposed
alliance with Satan. And if you don't believe me, just Google
"Alinksy" and "Lucifer" and see what comes up.
This is the power of the New Hate. What reels susceptible voters in
isn't the policy prescriptions that go with this or that expression of
it, but the narratives that justify them - horror stories about the
impending erasure of white Christian heartland values (and at their
most highly wrought, of white heartland Christians themselves). This
is how a serial adulterer can lay claim to the moral high ground--by
channeling a set of meta-stories whose antagonists are still lurking
in the darkest corners of the collective imagination. Gingrich and
other angry populists evoke the specters of Godless Dr. Frankensteins,
tinkering with human life in their sinister laboratories; of angry
black men and wandering Jews, thirsty for revenge; of predatory women
who've strayed from their husbands' kitchens, and gays who've emerged
from their closets, like vampires from their coffins, in search of new
blood. Peel back yet another layer and there are witches and devils
and changelings.
Heartfelt and sincere or cynical and opportunistic, the New Hate
poisons our political discourse and divides us even more than we are
already. But it operates most effectively beneath the threshold of
consciousness. Subject its premises to critical or historical
analysis, or merely expose them to the light of day, and they lose
much of their potency. Just ask Ron Paul.
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
