Friday, January 20, 2012

**JP** Pakistan prime minister Gilani refuses to give in to court order





Pakistan's prime minister, Yusuf Raza Gilani, waves to supporters as he arrives at the supreme court in Islamabad. Photograph: T Mughal/EPA

Pakistan's prime minister, Yousaf Raza Gilani, has appeared before judges in a battle of wills between the government and the judiciary, and refused to accept court orders targeting the president.

The supreme court had called Gilani before it on contempt of court proceedings after the Islamabad government persistently ignored court orders to write to Swiss authorities and ask for a dormant money laundering case to be reopened against President Asif Ali Zardari.

It had been suggested that Gilani might apologise to the court, or even offer his resignation, but he came out fighting on behalf of the president.

"He has complete immunity inside and outside the country," Gilani told the court on Thursday, making clear he would not write the letter.

"In the constitution, there is complete immunity for the president. There is no doubt about it."

Gilani's tone was characteristically soft and polite as he said he could "never think of ridiculing or defaming the court", but the message was uncompromising.

The stakes are high. Gilani risks being convicted of contempt of court, which could mean jail and disqualification from office. Zardari, leader of the ruling Pakistan Peoples party, would also be barred from office if convicted of a crime.

Standing before the judges in a dark suit, Gilani pointed to other leaders of his coalition government, sitting in a row behind him, and said they were all present to show respect to the court.

In a move seemingly designed to show he was appearing humbly before the judges, Gilani drove the short distance from his official residence to the court with his lawyer, the legal heavyweight Aitzaz Ahsan, in the passenger seat.

In court, however, he reminded the judiciary they were proceeding against an elected leader. "I'm the longest serving democratically elected prime minister in the history of Pakistan," he said.

The supreme court, unable to reinitiate corruption cases against the president inside Pakistan, have pursued a case involving allegations of laundering $60m in Switzerland dating back to the 1990s when Zardari's wife, Benazir Bhutto, was prime minister. The Swiss authorities dropped the investigation and handed over the boxes of evidence, which then reportedly made their way to the Pakistani embassy in London, where a PPP loyalist is the ambassador.

Ahsan told the court that the prime minister found the order to write the letter asking for the case to be reopened impossible to perform because of bona fide legal advice he had received that the president was immune from prosecution.

"The letter shall be written the day that Asif Ali Zardari is no longer president," Ahsan told the court.

The supreme court has been trying to force the government to write to the Swiss authorities since 2009 only to be stone-walled, leading the judges to start contempt proceedings against the prime minister. The government had not explained to the court before Thursday why it would not write the letter. The case was adjourned until 1 February.

Pakistan's government is locked in a confrontation with the courts and the military, and many believe the judges are determined to find a way to dismiss the government, or at least Zardari. It is widely believed that the powerful military is supporting the court, directly or indirectly.

One possibility is that the court asks the military to take action to enforce its orders, but stop short of a coup – a scenario that would still almost certainly entail the toppling of the government. Imran Khan, the cricket turned politician, whose following has risen meteorically in recent months, on Thursday said that he would support the army in such a move.

"If today the Supreme Court finally decides to ask the army, people would be standing behind it," he told the Times.

The government is also facing allegations that its former US ambassador conspired with Washington against Pakistan's armed forces. The main accuser, the US businessman Mansoor Ijaz, failed to appear at a court hearing on Monday and is due to testify next week.

The PPP believes that if it is thrown out of office its best strategy is to go down fighting so that it can claim to be a martyr for democracy and victims of the Pakistani establishment.

It emerged on Thursday that Pakistan's former military ruler Pervez Musharraf, who had announced he would return by the end of January from exile in London and Dubai, was no longer coming. Musharraf's spokesman said that conditions were not right. The government has warned he faces outstanding arrest warrants, including over the death of a separatist leader in the western province of Baluchistan in 2006.


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

How Obama Manages a Crisis



New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

How Obama Manages a Crisis

by Scotty Starnes

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/how-obama-manages-a-crisis/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Six Democrats Want to Set Up “Reasonable Profits Board” To Dictate How Much Profits a Company Can Make

Should read "TRAITORCRATS" instead of democrats.


New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Six Democrats Want to Set Up "Reasonable Profits Board" To Dictate How Much Profits a Company Can Make

by Scotty Starnes

Stop using the term Democrat. Start using the moniker Socialists, because that's what they are. Only Socialists believe the government can dictate how much profit one makes. In typical fashion, Democrats Socialist want to punish success.

Maxine Waters, the ethically challenged Socialist, let this Socialist scheme out back in 2009.

From The Hill:

Six House Democrats, led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio), want to set up a "Reasonable Profits Board" to control gas profits.

The Democrats, worried about higher gas prices, want to set up a board that would apply a "windfall profit tax" as high as 100 percent on the sale of oil and gas, according to their legislation. The bill provides no specific guidance for how the board would determine what constitutes a reasonable profit.

I'd like to create a board to show how the government, through gas taxes, collect more than these oil companies do. This bill proves that Democrats Socialists have no grasp of free market economics.

The Gas Price Spike Act, H.R. 3784, would apply a windfall tax on the sale of oil and gas that ranges from 50 percent to 100 percent on all surplus earnings exceeding "a reasonable profit." It would set up a Reasonable Profits Board made up of three presidential nominees that will serve three-year terms. Unlike other bills setting up advisory boards, the Reasonable Profits Board would not be made up of any nominees from Congress.

The commodities market sets prices. More supply equals cheaper prices. Maybe these Democrats Socialist should force Obama to end his illegal drilling moratorium and stop repealing permits to oil, natural gas and coal companies. Then again, Obama is a Democrat Socialist and wants energy prices to skyrocket.

...According to the bill, a windfall tax of 50 percent would be applied when the sale of oil or gas leads to a profit of between 100 percent and 102 percent of a reasonable profit. The windfall tax would jump to 75 percent when the profit is between 102 and 105 percent of a reasonable profit, and above that, the windfall tax would be 100 percent. The bill also specifies that the oil-and-gas companies, as the seller, would have to pay this tax.

Kucinich said these tax revenues would be used to fund alternative transportation programs when oil-and-gas prices spike.

"Gas prices continue to rise, creating a hardship for the American people," he said. "At the same time, oil companies are making record profits gouging their customers. This bill would tax only the excess profits and create forward-thinking transportation alternatives."

Like the Obama-backed Chevy Volt. Socialist are so regressive.

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2012/01/19/six-democrats-want-to-set-up-reasonable-profits-board-to-dictate-how-much-profits-a-company-can-make/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

LOL, Newt Gingrich Calls for a Commission to Study the Gold Standard


Wednesday, January 18, 2012
LOL, Newt Gingrich Calls for a Commission to Study the Gold Standard
Posted by Robert Wenzel at 3:15 PM

Is Ron Paul powerful or what?

Newt Gingrich said the following today:
Part of our approach ought to be to reestablish something Ronald Reagan did in 1981 and that is to have a Commission on Gold to look at the whole concept of how do we get back to hard money.

Of course, Gingrich is saying this because like Michelle Bachmann and others before, Gingrich is trying to grab Ron Paul votes.

Message to Newt:

Ron Paul already wrote the book on The Case for Gold, when he was on the Reagan commission. No need for a new commission just read the book. It comes in a pocket edition.


http://www.economicpolicyjournal.com/2012/01/lol-newt-gingrich-calls-for-commission.html

**JP** 248 IMMUNITY AGAINST ISLAMIC SHARIA AND CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN?

OUR MOTHER LAND PAKISTAN IS ISLAMIC AND DEMOCRATIC
COUNTRY. NO BODY HAS IMMUNITY BY ISLAM OR CONSTITUTION OF
PAKISTAN,NEITHER IN ISLAM OR CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN. 
I WISH HOPE AND REQUEST TO SUPREME COURT PAKISTAN PLEASE
DO NOT AVOID  ISLAMIC TEACHINGS.MORE THAN 180 MILLIONS PAKISTANIS WISH HOPE AND REQUEST WITH PRAY FOR YOUR LONG GOOD LIFE WITH SAFE AND SECURE IN FUTURE..INSHA  ALLAH.
DR MOHAMMED HASNAIN SIDDIQUI  AMRSH-LONDON  UK