On Jan 12, 2:45 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.tomrush.com./video_remember.html
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Ron Paul told Iowa voters on Friday that he would not launch a
preemptive strike on Iran because "they don't threaten our national
security."
"If some other country thought they had to go to war with them, that
is their business," he said, adding there is no proof Iran is building
a nuclear weapon.
A recent IAEA report said that Iran's pursuit of nuclear technology
over several years could be consistent with the building of a bomb.
And Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta gave Iran "about a year, perhaps
a little less" before it could have a nuclear weapon.
There exists NO credible report that says a single word in the
positive that Iran is or has pursued a Nuke. If there is, please post
it.
On Jan 13, 10:17 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The point being, is that you believe those facts about CNN and Dash,
> (along with her CNN compatriot and husband, "Jeremy"....Just as you
> believed that Newt Gingrich tried to divorce his wife while she was
> hospitalized with cancer; just as you believed that Gingrich had a fair,
> impartial Congressional ethics hearing; just as you believed that Paul
> opposed Iran having a nuclear weapon; the list is endless of faulty
> beliefs that you and other Ron Paul supporters "believe" in, which turns
> out not to be at all accurate or truthful.
>
> On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:13 AM, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > You didn't even get your Wiki article right PlainOl, go back and re-read
> > it.
>
> > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 11:03 AM, plainolamerican <
> > plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> >> misinformed
> >> ---
> >> again, what I've written are facts:
> >> she is an anti-RP jew, married to a jewish supporter of an 'important'
> >> US warmonger who wants the US to police the world
>
> >> facts, keith, nothing but facts
>
> >> On Jan 13, 7:18 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > "Some don't forget" what?
>
> >> > That ABC is purportedly a Jewish network? That Dana Bash allegedly
> >> showed
> >> > some type of bias against Ron Paul? That Dana Bash is married to Jeremy
> >> > Bash?
>
> >> > More clear cut examples of Ron Paul supporters who continue to stay
> >> > misinformed, continue to stay focused on misinformation, but
> >> nevertheless
> >> > continue to spread their misinformed views on others, treating their
> >> > misinformation as somehow being gospel, and clinging to the
> >> misinformation
> >> > as the truth.
>
> >> > On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 12:13 PM, plainolamerican <
> >> plainolameri...@gmail.com
>
> >> > > wrote:
> >> > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's candidacy,
> >> > > called
> >> > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
> >> > > ---
> >> > > as they should ... she's another jew who is flagrantly anti-RP.
> >> > > Bash said during a CNN report that she was worried that the Ron Paul
> >> > > campaign continuing into the summer, and that he could "hurt whomever
> >> > > the Republican nominee is." Revolution PAC alleged this showed bias
> >> > > against Paul.
>
> >> > > Bash's father is a producer for the jewish network ABC and her husband
> >> > > is Jeremy B. Bash, the Chief of Staff to Leon Panetta, the Secretary
> >> > > of Defense.
>
> >> > > some don't forget
>
> >> > > On Jan 12, 7:34 am, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > *Ron Paul continues assault on the media*
> >> > > > **
> >> > > > Dyland Stableford
> >> > > > 01.11.2011
>
> >>http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/ron-paul-continues-assault-media-...
>
> >> > > > Fresh off his second place finish in the New Hampshire primary, Ron
> >> Paul
> >> > > > still found reasons to criticize the media's coverage of his
> >> presidential
> >> > > > campaign.
>
> >> > > > "You know, it's pretty amazing how sometimes if you're in second
> >> place,
> >> > > > they talk about the first and the third place," Paul told
> >> supporters at a
> >> > > > campaign stop in West Columbia, S.C. on Wednesday. "But last night
> >> was a
> >> > > > little different--they had a little harder time avoiding the real
> >> > > > conversation."
>
> >> > > > And during another speech in New Hampshire late Tuesday, the
> >> 76-year-old
> >> > > > Texas Republican zinged the media even more.
>
> >> > > > "There was one other acknowledgment I wanted to make," Paul said
> >> after
> >> > > > thanking his family and assorted campaign staffers. "I wanted to
> >> thank
> >> > > the
> >> > > > Union Leader for not endorsing me."
>
> >> > > > He continued:
>
> >> > > > We don't always get the coverage or the interest shown on
> >> what--what is
> >> > > > going on, because if they did, they wouldn't--they wouldn't be
> >> ignoring
> >> > > so
> >> > > > much of what we're doing. But, you know, I find it sort of
> >> fascinating
> >> > > when
> >> > > > they finally get around--and this is different people, it could be
> >> in the
> >> > > > media, could be our opponents, or whatever--but I sort of have to
> >> chuckle
> >> > > > when they describe you and me as being "dangerous." That's one
> >> thing they
> >> > > > are telling the truth, because we are dangerous to the status quo
> >> of this
> >> > > > country.
>
> >> > > > The media hasn't exactly been ignoring Paul. On Sunday, Paul was
> >> forced
> >> > > to cut
> >> > > > a campaign visit to a New Hampshire diner short after a mob of more
> >> than
> >> > > > 100 reporters descended on the breakfast stop.
>
> >> > > > "We ask the press, at all upcoming events over the next day and a
> >> half,
> >> > > to
> >> > > > be respectful of both Dr. Paul and of New Hampshire voters, who are
> >> > > > entitled to examine their candidates in a safe and responsible
> >> > > atmosphere,"
> >> > > > Jesse Benton, Paul's campaign manager, said in a statement.
>
> >> > > > Later the same day, CNN's Dana Bash asked Paul about cutting out
> >> early
> >> > > from
> >> > > > the morning's event. Paul blamed the press, and walked off, cutting
> >> the
> >> > > > interview with CNN short. "This is junk," Benton said. "We're
> >> stopping."
>
> >> > > > On Tuesday, Revolution PAC, a super PAC supporting Paul's candidacy,
> >> > > called
> >> > > > on CNN to remove Bash from covering the campaign.
>
> >> > > > CrazyUncleRon.1.jpg
> >> > > > 36KViewDownload
>
> >> > > --
> >> > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> >> --
> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> >> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
  Poll: Gingrich Surging in South Carolina Wednesday, January 11, 2012 10:45 PM The InsiderAdvantage poll of South Carolina likely Republican primary voters shows Newt Gingrich surging, coming within a statistical tie of Mitt Romney. The poll of 726 registered voters was completed Wednesday night and offered the following results: Romney -- 23 percent Gingrich -- 21 percent Santorum -- 14 percent Paul -- 13 percent Huntsman -- 7 percent Perry -- 5 percent Dear Conservative: In 1964, Ronald Reagan told conservatives that this was a time for choosing. Faced with a radical, progressive President who would weaken America abroad and at home, they could either fight to preserve America as the last, best hope on earth, or consign their children to a thousand years of darkness. This year is another such time for choosing. We can either nominate a timid Massachusetts moderate Republican to take on a secular socialist who threatens to turn us into a nation like the decrepit Republics of Western Europe, or we can nominate a bold Reagan conservative who will take the fight to Barack Obama in the Fall. Will you join me?  There's no more time for talking about stopping Mitt Romney. We're going to do it next week in South Carolina or he's almost certain to be the Republican nominee, whether conservatives like us want it or not. It's up to you, right now. I was the architect of the biggest GOP victory in 40 years in 1994. I can do it again this year and beat Barack Obama, but not if I don't defeat Mitt Romney and the Republican Establishment next week in South Carolina. Your gift of at least $30 today will help unite conservative voters and win the South Carolina Republican Primary. As you know, South Carolina is the key to the Republican nomination. For the last 28 years, the winner of South Carolina has gone on to become the Republican nominee. This year will be no different. As Speaker of the House, I forced Bill Clinton to accept welfare reform, four straight balanced budgets, and extensive tax cuts. Since then, Republicans have governed like moderates. My 21st Century Contract with America is the boldest, most conservative plan put forward. We will get America back on the path to job creation and economic growth with conservative principles. If that's the kind of President you want in the Oval Office, then I need your help today because the mainstream media and Republican establishment absolutely cannot wait to nominate Mitt Romney. You can have a conservative nominee for President if you want one, but you have to stand up and fight for it. Not next week or next month, but right now. I hope you will stand with me today. Sincerely, Newt Gingrich P.S. We must not waste this opportunity in 2012 to transform government by nominating a Massachusetts moderate. We can only do it if conservatives are united. Please donate today and take a stand with my campaign. Join the fight!  Contributions to Newt 2012 are not tax deductible for federal income tax purposes. The maximum an individual may contribute to Newt 2012 is $2,500 for the primary election and an additional $2,500 for the general election. Couples may contribute up to $5,000 for each election; joint contributions require the signature of both spouses. Federal multicandidate PACs may contribute up to $5,000 for each election. By submitting your contribution, you agree that the first $2,500 of a contribution will be designated for the 2012 election, and any additional amount, up to $2,500 will be designated for the 2012 general election. Contributions from corporations, foreign nationals, and federal government contractors are prohibited. Contributions must be made from personal funds and may not be reimbursed by any other person. Federal law requires us to use our best efforts to obtain and report the name, mailing address, occupation, and name of employer for each individual whose contributions aggregate in excess of $200 in an election cycle.  Make sure to add campaign@newtgingrichforpresident.org to your safe senders list to ensure delivery to your inbox.  |
