Thursday, January 12, 2012

Re: Unhappy Muslims

Folks like PlainOl and Bruce don't get it.....
 


 
On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 12:28 PM, plainolamerican <plainolamerican@gmail.com> wrote:
the USA is not concerned about how happy myth believers are

their happiness is their problem

On Jan 11, 10:36 am, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The Muslims are not happy!
>
> They're not happy in Gaza .
>
> They're not happy in Egypt .
>
> They're not happy in Libya .
>
> They're not happy in Morocco .
>
> They're not happy in Iran .
>
> They're not happy in Iraq .
>
> They're not happy in Yemen .
>
> They're not happy in Afghanistan .
>
> They're not happy in Pakistan .
>
> They're not happy in Syria .
>
> They're not happy in Lebanon .
>
> ****
>
> *So, where are they happy?*
>
> *
>
> *They're happy in Australia .
>
> They're happy in England .
>
> They're happy in France .
>
> They're happy in Italy .
>
> They're happy in Germany .
>
> They're happy in Sweden .
>
> They're happy in the USA .****
>
>  ****
>
> They're happy in Canada . ****
>
>  ****
>
> They're happy in Norway .
>
> They're happy in every country that is not Muslim.
>
> *And who do they blame?*
>
> *
>
> *Not Islam.
>
> Not their leadership.
>
> Not themselves.
>
> THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN!
>
> AND THEY WANT TO CHANGE THEM TO BE LIKE THE COUNTRY
> ****
>
> THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY.
>
> *Excuse me, but*
>
> ******
>
> How dumb can you get ?****
>
>   [image: Yahoo!
> Groups]<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMGxqZzE4BF9TAzk3NDc2NTkwBGdycEl...>
>  .
>
> __,_._,___

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Gingrich Cancels Event in Face of Ron Paul Protesters

not really ...
RP is a current Member of the U.S. House of Representatives and serves
on the House Committees on Foreign Affairs and Financial Services, and
on the Joint Economic Committee, as well as chairman of the Financial
Services Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy and Technology.

Newt has been out of the government for over 12 years living in
disgrace.

On Jan 10, 2:10 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As is Paul,  for equally good reason.
>
> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 2:08 PM, plainolamerican
> <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> > Newt is political history for a good reason.
>
> > On Jan 9, 10:28 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Typical of crackpot Ron Paul supporters:
>
> > > MANCHESTER, N.H. –Republican presidential hopeful Newt Gingrich canceled
> > an
> > > appearance at his New Hampshire campaign headquarters after protesters
> > > swarmed the entrance.
>
> > > About 40 protesters showed up Monday evening carrying placards reading
> > "Ron
> > > Paul" and "Occupy." One played speeches by presidential candidate Ron
> > Paul
> > > from a loud speaker.
>
> > > Gingrich spokesman R.C. Hammond says the former House Speaker's  private
> > > security detail decided to cancel the event because of security concerns
> > > regarding the entrance and exit to the building.
>
> > > About 75 supporters and volunteers had crammed into the Manchester office
> > > to see Gingrich the night before the New Hampshire primary. The Gingrich
> > > campaign volunteered to transport them to his next event Monday night,
> > set
> > > at a bar in Concord, N.H., to watch a college football game.
>
> > > Read more:
> >http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2012/01/09/gingrich-cancels-event-in-...
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Obama breaking our immigration law again

WASHINGTON — The Obama administration wants to more quickly reunite
Americans with their illegal immigrant spouses and children in a move
long sought by advocates but panned by Republicans as a way to push
unpopular policies around Congress.

Currently, many illegal immigrants must leave the country before they
can ask the federal government to waive a three- to 10-year ban on
legally coming back to the U.S. The length of the ban depends on how
long they have lived in the U.S. without permission.

Today, the Obama administration proposed changing the rule to let
children and spouses ask the government to decide on the waiver
request before they head to their home country to seek a visa to
return here legally.

The illegal immigrants would still have to go abroad to finish the
visa process, but getting a provisional waiver approved in advance
would reduce the time they are out of the country from months to days
or weeks, said Alejandro Mayorkas, director of U.S. Citizenship and
Immigration Services.

The purpose is "to minimize the extent to which bureaucratic delays
separate Americans from their families for long periods of time,"
Mayorkas told reporters.

It currently takes about six months for the government to issue a
waiver, Mayorkas said.

The waiver shift is the latest move by President Barack Obama to make
changes to immigration policy without congressional action.
Congressional Republicans repeatedly have criticized the
administration for policy changes they describe as providing "backdoor
amnesty" to illegal immigrants.

The proposal also comes as Obama gears up for a re-election contest in
which the support of Hispanic voters could prove a determining factor
in a number of states. The administration hopes to change the rule
later this year after taking public comments.

Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, today accused the president of putting the
interests of illegal immigrants ahead of those of Americans.

"It seems President Obama plays by his own rules to push unpopular
policies on the American people," the House Judiciary Committee chair
said in a statement.

Immigrants who do not have criminal records and who have only violated
immigration laws can win a waiver if they can prove their absence
would cause an extreme hardship for their American spouse or parent.
The government received about 23,000 hardship applications in 2011 and
more than 70 percent were approved.
RELATED COVERAGE:


• More than 80 N.J. Indonesian Christians receive temporary reprieve
from deportation

• Immigrant advocates to stick to Essex County officials on condition
of immigrant detainees

• Essex County freeholders award controversial immigration detention
contract

• Portuguese man facing prison sentence to appeal decision of N.J.
judge to deport him

• Arrests of illegal immigrants along U.S. border down for 6th
straight year

About 75 percent of the applications were filed by Mexicans, according
to U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services.

Immigrant advocates have long complained about the current system,
which can split up families for months or years. And since there's no
guarantee a person will win a waiver to return, many immigrant
families refuse to take the risk of going abroad to apply for one.

Laura Barajas, a 42-year-old stay-at-home mom in Orange County,
Calif., is due to travel to Ciudad Juarez in two weeks to try to get
her papers. She and her U.S. citizen husband are trying to stay
positive, but she is afraid to leave him and their two young children
behind.

"I don't want to be separated for a long time from my children," said
Barajas, who came to the U.S. illegally to find work, then met her
future husband and stayed. "I'm not going to risk taking them to a
place that I don't even know after 18 years."

Pro-immigration activists and lawyers embraced the change, saying it
would keep families together and encourage more people now in the
United States illegally to emerge from the shadows and apply for
visas. Some said it could even save lives.

Rep. Jared Polis, D-Colo., recalled the case of Tania Nava Palacios,
who went to Ciudad Juarez — a hotbed for drug-fueled violence — with
her American husband and son in pursuit of a waiver. Drug cartel
members killed her husband last year, his office said in a statement.

Kelly Alfaro, of Washington state, said her husband, Guillermo, waited
in Mexico for eight months last year after he had his visa interview
in Ciudad Juarez.

"I was terrified for his safety because I know how dangerous it is
there and I had no way of knowing how long he would have to stay in
Mexico," she said.

Democratic lawmakers welcomed the Obama administration's move to
change the immigration system by rulemaking after efforts at a
legislative overhaul failed.

"Has it taken a while? Yes. Is it happening? Yes," said Rep. Luis
Gutierrez, D-Ill., who has encouraged such changes. "Am I looking
forward to telling people to vote for him? Absolutely."

Immigration has become a difficult issue for Obama ahead of the
November election. As a presidential candidate, he pledged to change
what many consider to be a broken immigration system.

To that end, Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano announced
plans last year to review some 300,000 pending deportation cases in an
effort to target criminal illegal immigrants, repeat immigration law
violators and those who pose a national security or public safety
threat.

Napolitano said the DHS would delay indefinitely the cases of many
illegal immigrants who have no criminal record and those who have been
arrested for only minor traffic violations or other misdemeanors. A
pilot program is under way to begin reviewing the case.

Immigration and Customs Enforcement Director John Morton also issued a
memo in June outlining how immigration authorities could use
discretion in deciding which illegal immigrants to arrest and put into
deportation proceedings.

Congressional Republicans have decried the policy changes, arguing
that the Obama administration is circumventing Congress.

Several attempts at an immigration law overhaul have failed in recent
years, including the so-called DREAM Act, which would have allowed for
some young illegal immigrants brought to the U.S. as children to earn
legal status if they went to college or joined the military.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Department of Homeland Security to spy on American journalists and bloggers

Department of Homeland Security to spy on American journalists and
bloggers
---
as they should

DHS should have all the tools they need to find the bad guys.

On Jan 10, 4:09 pm, Travis <baconl...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  ** **
>
> ** **
>   New post on *Bare Naked Islam* ****
>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> <http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/author/barenakedislam/>****
>  *Department of Homeland Security to spy on American journalists
> and bloggers*<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
> by *barenakedislam*<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/author/barenakedislam/>
> ****
>  Department of Homeland Security to spy on American journalists and bloggers
> ****
>
> *Posted:* January 10, 2012 | *Author:*
> barenakedislam<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/author/barenakedislam/>
> | *Filed under:*
> EnemyWithin-American<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/category/enemywithin-american/>
> |*1* Comment »<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
> [image: Description:http://barenakedislam.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/aps11.jpg?w=198&h=300]<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>Funny
> how only Russia Today and the right wing blogosphere seem to be reporting
> this. How long before they shut down and/or jail writers who don't tow the
> Obama Regime party line?****
>
> *RUSSIA TODAY<http://rt.com/usa/news/homeland-security-journalists-monitoring-321/>
> *(H/T al-Kidya)* Freedom of speech might allow journalists to get away with
> a lot in America, but the Department of Homeland Security is on the ready
> to make sure that the government is keeping dibs on who is saying what.*****
>
> Under the National Operations Center (NOC)'s Media Monitoring Initiative
> that came out of DHS headquarters in November, Washington has the written
> permission to retain data on users of social media and online networking
> platforms.****
>
> *Specifically, the DHS announced the NCO and its Office of Operations
> Coordination and Planning (OPS) can collect personal information from news
> anchors, journalists, reporters or anyone who may use **"traditional and/or
> social media in real time to keep their audience situationally aware and
> informed."*****
>
> [image: Description:http://barenakedislam.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/spying-on-us-citize...]<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
> According to the Department of Homeland Security's own definition of
> personal identifiable information, or PII, such data could consist of any
> intellect *"that permits the identity of an individual to be directly or
> indirectly inferred, including any information which is linked or linkable
> to that individual." *Previously established guidelines within the
> administration say that data could only be collected under authorization
> set forth by written code, but the new provisions in the NOC's write-up
> means that any reporter, whether someone along the lines of Walter Cronkite
> or a budding blogger, can be victimized by the agency.****
>
> Also included in the roster of those subjected to the spying are government
> officials, domestic or not, who make public statements, private sector
> employees that do the same and *"persons known to have been involved in
> major crimes of Homeland Security interest,"* which to itself opens up the
> possibilities even wider.****
>
> [image: Description:http://barenakedislam.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/4454563372_f3b8feab...]<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
> The department says that they will only scour publically-made info
> available while retaining data, but it doesn't help but raise suspicion as
> to why the government is going out of their way to spend time, money and
> resources on watching over those that helped bring news to the masses.****
>
> The development out of the DHS comes at the same time that U.S. District
> Judge Liam O'Grady denied pleas from supporters of WikiLeaks who had tried
> to prevent account information pertaining to their Twitter accounts from
> being provided to federal prosecutors. Jacob Applebaum and others advocates
> of Julian Assange's whistleblower site were fighting to keep the government
> from subpoenaing information on their personal accounts that were collected
> from Twitter.****
>
> Last month the Boston Police Department and the Suffolk Massachusetts
> District Attorney subpoenaed Twitter over details pertaining to recent
> tweets involving the Occupy Boston protests.****
>
> [image: Description:http://barenakedislam.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/obamashreddingconst...]<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
> *The website Fast Company reports that the intel collected by the
> Department of Homeland Security under the NOC Monitoring Initiative has
> been happening since as early as 2010 and the data is being shared with
> both private sector businesses and international third parties.*****
>
> | URL: *http://wp.me/peHnV-EJH*<http://wp.me/peHnV-EJH> ****
>
> *Comment*<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
>    *See all comments*<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> Unsubscribe or change your email settings at *Manage
> Subscriptions*<http://subscribe.wordpress.com/?key=c26562d16088107e3662d40e669e3226&...>.
> ****
>
> *Trouble clicking?* Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
> *http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...
> *<http://barenakedislam.wordpress.com/2012/01/10/department-of-homeland...>
> ****
>
> ** **
>
> ** **
>
> Thanks for flying with WordPress.com <http://wordpress.com/> ****
>
> ****
>
>  image004.jpg
> 145KViewDownload
>
>  image001.jpg
> 14KViewDownload
>
>  image002.jpg
> 64KViewDownload
>
>  image003.jpg
> 105KViewDownload

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Wow! Kudos, Dean!


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.