World News

Saturday, November 26, 2011

The NWO aka; Council Of Foreign Affairs Blew It , REVEALED Their Plans To Start World War 3!

New post on Political Vel Craft

The NWO aka; Council Of Foreign Affairs Blew It , REVEALED Their Plans To Start World War 3!

Engaging In Constructive Murder For Rothschild Private Central Banking Scheme! This guy General Wesley Clark revealed 2007 that US planned to take out 7 countries in 5 years INCLUDING Iran, Now november 14th 2011 he was on CNN saying how IRAN must be invaded. CNN blew it by showing this video cause now it is [...]

NMA Blog: 2012 Chevy Volt Review

2012 Chevy Volt Review

Posted: 24 Nov 2011 07:00 AM PST

By Eric Peters, Automotive Columnist

Ok, I have changed my mind about the Chevy Volt. Well, some of my mind… .

It is, no doubt about it, a brilliant piece of engineering. Where a Toyota Prius can be coaxed to roll along on electric power alone at up to about 25 MPH for a few brief moments before the batteries run low and the gas engine steps in, the Volt can run full-tilt on just its batteries/electric motor all the way up to its top speed of 101 MPH — and for several miles at speeds in the 60-70 MPH range before the gas engine kicks back on to feed the batteries. It's also not tied to an electric outlet — as the Nissan Leaf is — because it carries its own recharging system around with it. You can plug it in — or fill it up. Either way, you keep on moving.

It looks nice, has a really neat interior — and it's not even slow.

Too bad it doesn't make much economic sense.

At least, not that I can figure out.

WHAT IT IS

The Volt sedan is a new type of hybrid in which the electric side of the powertain is dominant vs. the reverse in older hybrids like the Prius, which mostly rely on their gasoline-burning engines to move them. The Volt does have a gas engine, and it does directly assist in moving the vehicle under high-load conditions, but it is mostly there to extend the Volt's range on battery power alone by keeping the battery charged up. You can also plug the Volt into a household outlet to recharge the batteries without using any gas at all — and when the batteries are topped off, it can run on stored electrical power for an honest 15-20-something miles in combined city-highway driving and perhaps twice that far under ideal (for an electric car) conditions; that is, just poking along at speeds of 50 MPH or less.

That's pretty impressive.

Base price is $39,145.

The mid-sized, four-passenger Volt's main — and only direct — competitor is the $35,200-$37,250 Nissan Leaf electric car.

WHAT'S NEW

Chevy has de-contented the Volt slightly for its second year in production, putting the formerly standard GPS navigation and premium Bose audio on the options list. This has allowed the MSRP to be reduced by about $2k relative to last year in a bid to make the car more affordable.

WHAT'S GOOD

Has the potential to use much less gas than a standard car, or even a standard hybrid car.

Gives you decent acceleration — and very good handling (much better than Prius).

Goes much farther on a tank/full charge than the all-electric Leaf, which has a maximum range of about 73 miles before its batteries exhaust themselves and have to be recharged.

WHAT'S NOT SO GOOD

In real-word driving, you may be using the gas engine more than you'd like — and burning more gas than you'd expect.

Even with a $7,500 federal tax incentive, the Volt is still an expensive car — in the same range as a new BMW 1 Series. I don't understand the concept of a $32k "economy" car. And if it's a "technology" car — or a technology luxury car — then who cares about its fuel economy?

Hard-to-define cost to feed it electricity.

UNDER THE HOOD

Unlike the Nissan Leaf — which is a pure electric car that runs only on battery power — the Volt is a semi-electric car. It still has a conventional 1.4 liter gasoline-burning engine under its hood, but its main job is to feed electricity to the electric motor which does most of the actual work of propelling the car — and also to keep the 16 kWh lithium-ion battery pack topped-off. It only indirectly (and infrequently) works to turn the car's wheels. Because it carries around what amounts to its own onboard generator, the Volt's radius of action is as unlimited as any other car's — provided, of course, you don't let the gas tank (which holds about 8.2 gallons of fuel) run dry.

Total output of the combined system (gas engine, electric motor and batteries) is a claimed 149 hp — enough to propel the 3,781 lb. Volt to 60 MPH in just over 9 seconds flat. That's about a second faster than a Toyota Prius, by the way.

Fuel economy is harder to define.

Chevy (and EPA) gives you two separate figures, one for MPGs — which covers the gas engine. And one for MPG"e" — which (ostensibly) measures how many miles you can travel per kilowatt-hour.

The first is easy — and kind of disappointing: 37 MPG for the 1.4 liter gas engine in combined city/highway driving. I only got 30.2 MPG.But even 37 MPG is not particularly impressive. (I'll get into this more below).

The second measure of "fuel" efficiency — that MPG"e" thing — is completely inscrutable. I tried to find out exactly (or even roughly) how much it costs in terms of a utility bill to plug the Volt in for the appx. 10 hours it takes (on 110V household current; if you have a 240 V outlet, that goes down to four hours) to replenish the batteries. But how do you separate out the draw from the Volt and all your other household stuff — everything from the washing machine to the night light? I have no idea.

All I can tell you for sure is this:

When they dropped the Volt off for my week-long evaluation, it had a full tank (about 8.2 gallons) and 4,100 miles on the odometer. The computer display said I had a range of 270 miles. As I type this, at the end of my week, the Volt now has has 4306 miles on it — with an indicated 42 miles to empty.

This is not good. In fact, it sucks.

My math says — confirming what the Volt's computer display tells me — I have averaged about 32.2 MPGs overall. Not terrible. But for about $22k, you could buy a new VW Jetta TDI and get 42 on the highway, 30 in city driving (so about 35 MPG average) or within the margin of error — and have $10,000 left in your pocket (and not stiffed your fellow taxpayers for another $7,500).

Granted, the Volt can theoretically travel much farther on just its electric reserves (not requiring the gas engine to come on at all). But as Chevy tells you right there in the owner's manual — and as my week long test drive revealed — "electric range is maximized at 50 MPH and below." So, if you drive faster — or accelerate harder — the batteries get depleted faster.

And once they get depleted beyond a certain point, the gas engine kicks in to feed power to the electric motors — and you are now burning gas, just like a conventional car.

And a fair amount of it, too.

EPA and Chevy's quoted 37 MPG when the gas engine is running is not much of an improvement over what you'd get in any of several 2012 model year non-hybrid cars, not just the VW Jetta diesel. For example, a 2012 Hyundai Accent sedan rates 40 MPG on the highway and 30 in city driving — so about 35 MPG combined.

And the Hyundai only costs $12k — that's $20k less than the Volt.

And it burns regular unleaded.

The Volt wants premium only.

ON THE ROAD

There's no faulting how the Volt drives.

It accelerates smartly and there is no noticeable segue between electric drive and electric-drive assisted by the gas engine. It just … goes.

And it corners, too.

To date, every hybrid I have driven feels too heavy because it is too heavy. There is the sensation of carrying a pallet of bricks in the trunk — which is pretty much exactly it, except the bricks are batteries. Several hundred pounds of them. The Volt has them too, but the battery pack is distributed more evenly, front to back — and the car's center of gravity is lower. The result is a car that doesn't feel oafish when driven slightly — or even a lot — faster than recommended speeds through the curves.

Beyond that, Chevy has just done a brilliant job making it feel normal.

There's no weirdness, no whirring. No too-light steering or strange anything. The Future Boy dash layout takes a few moments to absorb and you'll probably need to read the manual to understand some of the functions and displays — but other than peripheral stuff you'll quickly figure out, you just get in the thing and drive.

There is a bit more noise from the gas engine, when it's running, than I expected to hear. But other than this, I find no fault with the Volt's operation.

It's the economics of this car that bother me.

AT THE CURB

They did a good job on the skin, too.

This is no son-of-Aztek B sci-fi movie prop. It looks sleek and expensive — which of course, it is.

Inside, it's nice also. As nice as any current $30k-ish luxury car, in fact — which is what the Volt is, in my opinion, at least. You have before you all the bells and whistles, except digitized and LCD-displayed. My tester had the optional premium audio rig ($495) with DVD player and 30 GB music storage hard drive plus GPS ($1,995) as well as the Premium Trim Package ($1,395) which includes heated leather seats and a leather-wrapped steering wheel. Total tab: $43,030 (plus $850 destination charge.

About $44k — which would also buy you a well-padded 2012 Cadillac CTS or any one of several other really nice luxury sedans. The Volt is very nice, too. But is that what we're after here? Nice? I thought the whole point of the exercise was to, you know, save people some money. How does a $44k Volt (or even a $32k Volt) do that, exactly?

Now, the Nissan Leaf is not a cheap date either, but at $35k to start and around $28k after-subsidy, it's at least somewhat snicker proof. Plus it doesn't use any gas, ever. I have no idea how much it costs to feed the thing electricity — for the same reason that figuring out how much it costs to charge up the Volt is as impenetrable an enigma as the success of Carrot Top. But at least you don't burn gas. In the Volt, you do — premium, don't forget. And you pay about as much for the privilege as you would to slide behind the wheel of many a new luxury sedan.

Does it make any sense to you?

THE REST

Volt does have a few things over the Leaf. You can take it farther than the other end of your subdivision without having to keep a tow truck driver on speed dial. That's one. It has some balls — well, one ball, at least.

That's two.

It's also a plausible all-season car because even if it's 15 degrees outside, the gas IC engine will work just as it would in any other car — while the Leaf's all-electric systems will probably suffer badly in extremes of temperature, cold and hot. The Leaf may work fine as an in-city commuter or fleet vehicle.

But the Volt is the real car of the two.

It also has more user-friendly rear seats (bucket style) that have a full four inches more legroom (34.1 inches vs. 31.1 for the Leaf), though the Nissan has more headroom — as well as much more total cargo space (24 cubic feet vs. 10.6 cubic feet).

Still, all that extra room's not much good if the car can't be used for more than short hops (best case, 30 miles or so out and 30 or so back, before the batteries croak).

THE BOTTOM LINE

The only hitch is The Math.

I can come up with several reasons to buy the Volt. But "to save money" isn't one of them. Thirty-two-thousand bucks is a lot of money to spend on a car. If this thing costs $20k — then, ok. I can see it. A $5,000 or so price premium over a current-year economy sedan for something that can (maybe) burn significantly less fuel could work. The break-even point might even arrive before you send in the last payment. But when you can buy something like a Nissan Versa — brand new — for about $10k… and many other cars that are really appealing for not much more than that — and drive home with $15 or $20k more in your pocket… well, who gives a damn about the Volt's potential? It would literally have to cost you nothing to operate for probably five or six years before it reached economic break-even with a car like the Versa.

I wish Chevy had skipped some of the nice but not necessary (in an ostensibly economy-minded car) features and figured out a way to bring this car to the showroom for $10k less. Then I'd cheer. As it is, I am clapping with one hand in appreciation of the formidable technology it boasts, but shaking my head at the economic illiteracy it represents.

Comments?
www.epautos.com

Are You A NMA Member? If not, read about the benefits and then join!

2012 Chevy Volt Review

Fwd: [LA-F] Who, What, Why: How dangerous is tear gas?

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Mario LAF
Date: Friday, November 25, 2011
Subject: [LA-F] Who, What, Why: How dangerous is tear gas?
To: Libertarian Alliance Forum <libertarian-alliance-forum@yahoogroups.com>

25 November 2011 Last updated at 11:18

Who, What, Why: How dangerous is tear gas?

</mail/u/0/s/?view=att&th=133dc293bd5db5d2&attid=0.1.1&disp=emb&zw>

Protesters in Cairo have reported severe symptoms after inhaling tear gas used by police. Just how dangerous is tear gas?

Doctors and activists in and around Tahrir Square have claimed a new type of tear gas is being used by police, due to the extreme reactions being reported.

One medical volunteer at a field hospital on the edge of the square said he saw people suffering problems with their nervous system and epileptic fits. Others said people were coughing up blood and collapsing.

This has led some to suggest the Egyptian security forces have been using stronger forms of the gas.

The chemical compound used in most tear gas canisters is o-chlorobenzylidene malononitrile, known as CS, and is often used as a means of crowd control by military and police units to force people to disperse quickly.

There are other, stronger chemical structures - one is called CN, which was a precursor of CS. And then there is CR, which is known to be a particularly potent version that is six times more powerful than CS. CR is rarely used and it's banned in the US because it can cause cancer.

The answer

Typical symptoms are a burning and streaming of the eyes, constricted breathing and skin irritation
Persistent exposure in a confined area can increase the severity of symptoms
So can exposure while running
Death is rare but possible if breathing restricted by restraint

But so far there is no evidence that anything other than CS gas has been used, says the BBC's Jon Leyne in Cairo.

"None of the cans we saw had evidence they were the more poisonous CR or CN gas. Indeed, of the many journalists and human rights activists investigating the issue, none has come up with a used canister of CR or CN gas."

So how dangerous is CS spray and what could be the reason why symptoms appear to be so severe?

Experts agree that typical effects of common forms of tear gas are a burning, watery sensation in the eyes, difficulty breathing, chest pain, excessive saliva and skin irritation. Heavy exposure can also induce vomiting.

Symptoms begin 20 to 30 seconds after exposure but ease about 10 minutes later once the person has escaped to fresh air, says Neil Gibson, an analyst with IHS Jane's, an intelligence and security publication.

Is tear gas legal in warfare?

The use of tear gas in war is prohibited under the Chemical Weapons Convention
Egypt is one of only a handful of countries not to have signed the Convention

Different types of tear gas with different compounds have their own toxicological effects and levels, says Mr Gibson. "The effects differ mostly in high dosage, but in lower concentrations they are similar."

Authorities use tear gas, namely the CS version, because "it means avoiding the use of something more physical or live rounds [of ammunition]," says Alastair Hay, professor of environmental toxicology at the University of Leeds.

Death is rare but not impossible, he says. It is often the result of a combination of tear gas and other factors such as restraint in police custody where breathing can be further restricted.

"Generally, deaths from exposure to riot control agents are minimal - that's why most countries have them as something to resort to."

But repeated use of tear gas in narrow spaces, such as Mohammed Mahmoud Street near Tahrir Square where many protests have taken place, means people are exposed to it in a smaller space for longer. That has led to more severe problems.

Also, the strain caused by physical exertion such as a running makes someone coming in contact with tear gas more susceptible to more severe symptoms, says Mr Hay. Breathing becomes more restricted, which could lead to violent coughing that produces blood.

Repeated or prolonged exposure is dangerous, says Steve Wright of Leeds Metropolitan University, who has researched technologies related to policing.

Not only is CS harmful, but people could also be hurt by being hit with a canister, says Mr Wright. Tear gas canisters work much like hand grenades in that a pin is pulled, which triggers an ignition that sends the chemical into the air. Tear gas can also be fired from a gun.

Reports of expired tear gas canisters picked up by protesters in Egypt led to theories that it could be more toxic.

But Mr Wright says if enough time has elapsed that the chemicals have broken down inside the can, then it makes the canister less effective.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/magazine-15887186

--
Mario Huet
Libertarian Alliance Forum
List Administrator

**********************************************
Words cannot picture her; but all men know
That solemn sketch the pure sad artist wrought
**********************************************
James Thomson, The City of Dreadful Night

[PresidentBarakObama] It's About Time!

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Tom Wagner
Date: Friday, November 25, 2011
Subject: [PresidentBarakObama] It's About Time!
To: PresidentBarakObama@yahoogroups.com

Las Vegas charities ask the needy for IDs before giveaways. (It's about Time!)
LAS VEGAS (Reuters) - Some Las Vegas charities giving away toys and turkeys this season have started asking families to show state identification cards to get a slice of holiday cheer.
The charities say the controversial move to require Social Security or state identification cards, or birth certificates, was needed to prevent fraud born of desperation in a state at the center of the country's financial crisis.
"If you would take a look at the number of kids that got toys (at charities during Christmas) in this valley, it would exceed the number of kids in the valley," said Major Robert Lloyd, director of the Salvation Army of Clark County.
"We're really anxious to preserve the magic of Christmas for children, but we need to screen the adults," Lloyd said, adding that some families were either "double dipping" or coming in from out of state to get donations.
Charities cited instances of parents reselling donated bicycles blocks from a charity that gave them away, or families getting several holiday turkeys. Some adults, they said, were showing up for handouts with children from other families.
These are some of the issues Las Vegas-area nonprofit organizations said they were trying to avoid as they geared up for the holiday season in a state especially hard hit by the bursting of the housing bubble.
Unemployment in the state was the highest in the nation in October at 13.4 percent, and Nevada continued to have the country's highest state foreclosure rate.
Critics of the ID policy say undocumented immigrants, as well as some homeless people who may be less likely to have identification on hand, may be left out in the cold.
The critics, fearing the rules could have an exclusionary effect, noted immigration laws such as one passed in Alabama that they said could unintentionally limit city parks or pools to those who can prove they are legally in the United States.
But the nonprofits said charities must adopt such practices in response to the unexpected results of an ailing economy, and that overall giving still outweighed any unintended consequences.
CHANGE HIT AS RECESSION KICKED IN
Fuilala Riley, chief operations officer for HELP of Southern Nevada, one of the key nonprofits involved in holiday season giveaways, said she and other colleagues started noticing a change in the crowds seeking help about four years ago, just as the recession kicked in.
She said charities began seeing cars arriving for giveaways with license plates from neighboring California, and "hundreds of families" came with larger than usual numbers of children.
"There is so much more need than ever before," Riley said. "Unfortunately ... people are desperate and are doing things they wouldn't normally do."
Her agency started asking families for Social Security cards and birth certificates for their children about four years ago to prove they were related. The Nevada ID was added this year. The goal was "to circumvent what we saw as fraud," she said.
But the policy has come under criticism, especially after a an e-mail sent to members of a local chapter of the American Immigration Lawyers Association detailed information on the holiday giveaways, including the ID policy.
"I've never seen nonprofits asking for papers to give out a turkey. Am I over-reacting?" one association member wrote to her colleagues, adding she was appalled by the requirement.
Peter Ashman, a former head of the chapter, said he had called the county representative who circulated this season's charity information and requirements, and was told the ID rule was the policy of the charity groups, not the county.
"She hadn't thought about the consequences of the policy," he said of the representative. A county spokesman confirmed the policy had been decided by the charities.
The nonprofits involved -- the Salvation Army, HELP of Southern Nevada and Lutheran Social Services -- said they could be flexible if a needy family or person came to their doorsteps without identification during the holiday season.
They said they would help those who had lost their IDs, a common problem among the homeless, to obtain replacements.
Shortly before Thanksgiving, Riley was working the phones to find holiday deals for the several thousand families she had been expecting to serve in a Thanksgiving give-away.
She argued down a nickel or a dime off the prices of turkeys at area Wal-Marts or Costcos. "I got them down to 74 cents a pound!" she said.
(Reporting by Timothy Pratt; Editing by Cynthia Johnston)
It's about Time!!!

__._,_.___
Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic
Messages in this topic (1)
Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group
MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use
.
__,_._,___

RE: JP Why "No" to Imran Khan....

He is capable to do wot he wants to do but he will do wot others are doing. We must change ourselves rather than depending upon our leaders only. It seems to me that only a blood revolution can bring change in our country. We must revise our values into strong values, embrace those values and should start practicing them individually rather than waiting for others. Coz individuality turns into nation…

Shafiya

Shafiya Chaudhry

Manager HR & Operation

Believing in Peoples’ Own Potential

Awaz Foundation Pakistan: Centre for Development Services

Striving for Securing the Future of Marginalized Communities in Pakistan

H. No. 2440/N/8A, D-Block,
Shamasabad Colony, Multan – Pakistan
P.O. Box No: 141, Post Code: 60000-Multan GPO
Ph # +92-061-4784606/333-6123450, Fax: +92-61-4577409

Mail: info@awazcds.org.pk or zia@awazcds.org.pk or mzr.awazcds@yahoo.com

Established in 1995

Registered with Registrar Joint Stock Companies as not for profit, non governmental organization# RM/123/S/02, and Exempt from Tax under Section 2(36) of Income Tax Ordinance 2001 # CIT (LEGAL)/RTO-MN/542. AwazCDS-Pakistan is certified from Pakistan Centre for Philanthropy and IMCP. For more information please visit: www.awazcds.org.pk

The information contained in this message and any attachments is intended solely for the use of the person(s) to whom the message is addressed. The information may be confidential and, if you are not the intended recipient, you must not copy, distribute or take any action in relation to it. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender and delete it. AwazCDS-Pakistan accepts no liability for loss or damage caused by software viruses and you are advised to carry out a virus check on any attachments contained in this message. Internet communications are not secure and therefore AwazCDS-Pakistan does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of AwazCDS-Pakistan, unless otherwise specifically stated. If the content of this email or any attachment with this is to become contractually binding, it must be made in writing & signed by a duly authorised representative of AwazCDS-Pakistan.

P please consider the environment before printing this e-mail

From: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com [mailto:joinpakistan@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Irshad Ghori
Sent: Thursday, November 24, 2011 5:15 AM
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Subject: FW: **JP** Why "No" to Imran Khan....

Well guys I read your conversation..this is no doubt imran is a honest and patriot personality, but the team which he run are all same old faces..PML Q personalities and other political parties person are joining PTI which is doubtful and not good for PTI….imran must keep a criteria to choose any person…and his past must clean and clear…

From: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com [mailto:joinpakistan@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of Khalid Javed
Sent: Wednesday, November 23, 2011 2:48 PM
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: **JP** Why "No" to Imran Khan....

Question:

Has Imran a well qualified team to run the country?

Answer:

No, but have others? So, why not give him a chance. At least he is honest and committed to Pakistan.

Khalid Javed

On Wed, Nov 23, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Muhammad Haris Haneef <haris_2003@hotmail.com> wrote:

Imran khan is educated and has skills to lead ... those who criticize him , they can ask him straight away about shaukat khanam ,about poicies and whatever it is. He is always ready to asnwer. not like nawaz and zardari who send their puppets to answer the question .. He is the only one who leads the party right from the front .

Muhammad Haris Haneef

Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2011 02:38:23 -0800
From: aapka10@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: **JP** Why "No" to Imran Khan....
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com

has Imran well qualified and skillful team to run a country successfully?

From: Mansoor Rahim <mnf132@hotmail.com>
To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2011 10:55 AM
Subject: RE: **JP** Why "No" to Imran Khan....

W Salam

Well first of all we knows that Imran is having qualities of a great leader, and as a great leader he will choose only right politicians. He already has a commission in his party, who are collecting records of right and wrong politicians.

Secondly I am disagree with your "NO" as other political parties have been failed to produce quality work to develope this beautiful country.

MY VOICE IS 'YES' FOR PTI AND IMRAN KHAN

thank you all

Mansoor Rahim Zahid

Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2011 15:51:18 -0800
From: unbarry@yahoo.com
Subject: **JP** Why "No" to Imran Khan....
To:

assalam o alaikum.

It seems that Imran Khan is captured by the people of vested interests. He started his political career as a 'Muslim Hero" then suddenly he becomes "liberal". It seems that he is not clear about what he want to b? Then how can he lead us?

Secondly, his party is joining by the old, cunning and bad reputed politicians of Q-League, their presence have raised some doubts in our minds regarding the party policy and the ruling policy of our country under these ministers.

Imran needs to review his vision and mission seriously because ruling the country is not a joke......

Regards

U N Barry

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

You are subscribed to email updates from National Motorists Association Blog To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now.	Email delivery powered by Google
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610