Wednesday, October 5, 2011

**JP** Fw: Re: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis



--- On Mon, 3/10/11, Gulpari Nazish Mehsud <gulpari.mehsud@gmail.com> wrote:

From: Gulpari Nazish Mehsud <gulpari.mehsud@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis
To: pakistanipress@googlegroups.com, mailto@yahoo.com
Date: Monday, 3 October, 2011, 7:18 PM

Pakistan Government should take notice of the public statements of Ms. Marvi Sirmed ... She is a senior officer for UN in Pakistan, she appears on TV channels to question if Pakistan should exist as independent country, she openly supports future US and Indian attacks on Pakistan and supports Indian hegemony over Pakistan, secession of Balochistan, etc...Question is: does she represent United Nations offices in Pakistan when she makes these assertions? Where is Ministry of Information & Broadcasting? What is the job description of PID? Why do thse departments exist if their job does not include protecting Pakistan against these soft and indirect attacks? Would a UN employee like this one stay for a single day on the soil of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Russia if she used such a language there?
 
gulpari mehsud, islamabad
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:10 PM
Subject: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis

How our Pakistani citizens are happy on Indian Afghanistan new secutiry pact
 
Marvi Sirmed
marvisirmed Marvi Sirmed 
Aah! RT @AbasDaiyar: The Strategic Agreement with India includes Indian commitment to assist and train the Afghan National Security Forces.
 
Marvi Sirmed
marvisirmed Marvi Sirmed 
So Indians made it to the security sector partnership in Afghanistan. Good move. #Pakistan, what's next?
 
 
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pakistani Press" group.
To post to this group, send email to pakistanipress@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pakistanipress+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pakistanipress?hl=en?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pakistani Press" group.
To post to this group, send email to pakistanipress@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pakistanipress+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pakistanipress?hl=en?hl=en

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

Obama: Banks Don’t Have ‘Inherent Right’ to ‘Certain Amount of Profit’




New post on Scotty Starnes's Blog

Obama: Banks Don't Have 'Inherent Right' to 'Certain Amount of Profit'

by Scotty Starnes

Spoken like a true Marxist/Socialist/Communist. Obama believes the government can regulate how much a business can earn and his regulations are showing his disdain for the free market.

(CNSNews.com) - President Obama suggested on Monday that the nation's banks should "take a little bit less of a profit" rather than raise fees on customers.

In an interview with ABC's George Stephanopoulos, Obama was asked if the government can stop banks from imposing a new debit card fee on their customers.

"Well, you can stop it because ... if you say to the banks, 'You don't have some inherent right just to -- you know, get a certain amount of profit if your customers are being mistreated. That you have to treat them fairly and transparently.' And -- and my hope is is that you're going to see a bunch of the banks, who say to themselves, 'You know what? This is actually not good business practice.'

This coming from a man who has never worked in the free market or ran a business. The banks are doing this because of Obama's regulations.

"Banks can make money," Obama said. "They can succeed the old-fashioned way, by earning it -- by lending to small businesses, by lending to consumers. By making sure that-- you know, we are building the economy together."

These are the "fat-cats" Obama pretends to hate as he accepts their money and bails them out.

Obama advocated "protections" (regulations) that Republicans want to roll back. However, as a direct result of those regulations, the nation's major banks are considering a plan to charge customers a $5 monthly service fee for debit card transactions. A provision in the Dodd-Frank Act cut the amount banks could charge merchants for debit card swipes, so the banks may shift the burden onto consumers.

Continue reading>>>

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://scottystarnes.wordpress.com/2011/10/04/obama-banks-dont-have-inherent-right-to-certain-amount-of-profit/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Judiciary Chair Calls Special Prosecutor: U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Faces Perjury Investigation.




New post on Political Vel Craft

Judiciary Chair Calls Special Prosecutor: U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder Faces Perjury Investigation.

by Volubrjotr

House GOP calls for special prosecutor to probe Holder on perjury allegation House Republicans aren't buying the "dog ate my security briefings" excuse from Eric Holder.  In a letter to President Obama today, House Judiciary Chair Lamar Smith (R-TX) requested a special prosecutor to investigate the Attorney General for perjury, explaining in detail how false Holder's May 3rd testimony that [...]

Read more of this post

Comment    See all comments

Unsubscribe or change your email settings at Manage Subscriptions.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser:
http://politicalvelcraft.org/2011/10/04/judiciary-chair-calls-special-prosecutor-u-s-attorney-general-eric-holder-faces-perjury-investigation/

Thanks for flying with WordPress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Cult of Reagan, and Other Neocon Follies

And that's why the Obama Administration calls them green
jobs. We are wasting all our greenbacks on them.

On Oct 4, 6:52 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Green jobs, by Obamas example, cost 23 million apiece, pay 10 to 45 dollars
> an hour and last 10 to 11 months... a real bargain.
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 10:22 AM, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > "Green Jobs"?
>
> > Okay.......
>
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:18 PM, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com
> > > wrote:
>
> >> not $$ ... effectiveness
>
> >> Israel is the largest recipient of U.S. foreign military
> >> assistance.Over the past decade, the U.S. has given more than $17
> >> billion in military aid to this country of 7,746,000 people.
>
> >> If military aid were cut off to Israel, the tax money could be spent
> >> in the United States to provide 364,000 low-income households with
> >> affordable housing vouchers, or to retrain 498,000 workers for green
> >> jobs, or to provide access to primary health care services for 24
> >> million uninsured Americans.
> >> Money saved could aid the U.S. military, which is closing military
> >> bases, freezing pay raises for service members, and cutting the
> >> defense budget.
> >> Military aid is given predominantly to Middle Eastern countries,
> >> particularly Egypt, Jordan, Israel and Saudi-Arabia, neither of which
> >> is a developing country.
>
> >> On Oct 3, 8:15 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > It is not just Israel that has working spynets in the US. It is
> >> > EVERYONE!!! They need them, the US and its policies can not be
> >> > trusted.
> >> > ----
> >> > wanna narrow this down a bit?
>
> >> > *Everyone*  is as narrow as it gets, and no, Israel is not the best nor
> >> the
> >> > biggest lobby in Washington. That would be:
>
> >> > US Chamber of Commerce<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000019798&year=2011>
> >> > $770,655,680American Medical
> >> > Assn<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000068&year=2011>
> >> > $252,037,500General
> >> > Electric<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000125&year=2011>
> >> > $251,940,000AARP<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000023726&year=2011>
> >> > $207,432,064Pharmaceutical Rsrch & Mfrs of
> >> > America<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000504&year=2011>
> >> > $204,433,920American Hospital
> >> > Assn<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000116&year=2011>
> >> > $203,648,736Blue Cross/Blue
> >> > Shield<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000109&year=2011>
> >> > $169,655,236National Assn of
> >> > Realtors<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000062&year=2011>
> >> > $166,150,553Northrop
> >> > Grumman<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000170&year=2011>
> >> > $164,845,253Exxon
> >> > Mobil<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000129&year=2011>
> >> > $163,512,742Verizon
> >> > Communications<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000079&year=2011>
> >> > $158,014,841Edison Electric
> >> > Institute<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000297&year=2011>
> >> > $154,005,999Business
> >> > Roundtable<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000032202&year=2011>
> >> > $150,550,000Boeing
> >> > Co<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000100&year=2011>
> >> > $147,884,310Lockheed
> >> > Martin<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000104&year=2011>
> >> > $142,374,763AT&T
> >> > Inc<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000076&year=2011>
> >> > $126,449,336Southern
> >> > Co<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000168&year=2011>
> >> > $124,130,694General
> >> > Motors<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000155&year=2011>
> >> > $121,899,170PG&E
> >> > Corp<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000290&year=2011>
> >> > $119,190,000Pfizer
> >> > Inc<
> >>http://www.opensecrets.org/lobby/clientsum.php?id=D000000138&year=2011>
> >> > $114,757,268
>
> >> > Israel doesn't even make the top 20 in lobbying...the top ten are:
>
> >> > United Arab Emirates$10,914,002United
> >> Kingdom$6,105,200Japan$4,231,656Iraq
> >> > $3,708,368Turkey$3,524,632Morocco$3,337,392Saudi Arabia$3,308,285South
> >> Korea
> >> > $2,941,004Netherlands$2,694,604Equatorial Guinea$2,408,168
>
> >> > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 1:46 PM, plainolamerican
> >> > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> > > It is not just Israel that has working spynets in the US. It is
> >> > > EVERYONE!!! They need them, the US and its policies can not be
> >> > > trusted.
> >> > > ----
> >> > > wanna narrow this down a bit?
>
> >> > > It is not just Israel
> >> > > ---
> >> > > no, israel just happens to be the largest, most effective lobby in DC
> >> > > a lobby that can destroy any voice in opposition to israel
>
> >> > > the US and its policies can not be trusted.
> >> > > ---
> >> > > but somehow the israelis can trust the US to protect them?
>
> >> > > On Oct 3, 2:06 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > > Painol,
>
> >> > > > It is not just Israel that has working spynets in the US. It is
> >> > > > EVERYONE!!! They need them, the US and its policies can not be
> >> > > > trusted.
>
> >> > > > On Oct 3, 10:57 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > I cannot think of any time in our history, where we "intervened"
> >> and
> >> > > > > there
> >> > > > > wasn't an argument for the protection of our sovereignty,
> >> including
> >> > > > > Viet
> >> > > > > Nam
> >> > > > > ---
> >> > > > > are you implying that communism was a direct threat to our
> >> > > > > sovereignty?
> >> > > > > if so, then wouldn't you say that socialism is a direct threat?
>
> >> > > > > You may in fact disagree with the logic,  (and like most
> >> > > > > Moonbats, not comprehend the Truman Doctrine
> >> > > > > ----
> >> > > > > Truman:
> >> > > > > I believe that we must assist free peoples to work out their own
> >> > > > > destinies in their own way.
> >> > > > > Speech to a joint session of the US Congress (12 March 1947),
> >> > > > > outlining what became known as The Truman Doctrine.
>
> >> > > > > All the president is, is a glorified public relations man who
> >> spends
> >> > > > > his time flattering, kissing, and kicking people to get them to do
> >> > > > > what they are supposed to do anyway.
>
> >> > > > >     Had ten minutes conversation with Henry Morgenthau about
> >> Jewish
> >> > > > > ship in Palistine. Told him I would talk to Gen[eral] Marshall
> >> about
> >> > > > > it. He'd no business, whatever to call me. The Jews have no sense
> >> of
> >> > > > > proportion nor do they have any judgement on world affairs. Henry
> >> > > > > brought a thousand Jews to New York on a supposedly temporary
> >> basis
> >> > > > > and they stayed. When the country went backward — and Republican
> >> in
> >> > > > > the election of 1946, this incident loomed large on the DP
> >> [Displaced
> >> > > > > Person] program. The Jews, I find are very, very selfish. They
> >> care
> >> > > > > not how many Estonians, Latvians, Finns, Poles, Yugoslavs or
> >> Greeks
> >> > > > > get murdered or mistreated as DP as long as the Jews get special
> >> > > > > treatment. Yet when they have power, physical, financial or
> >> political
> >> > > > > neither Hitler nor Stalin has anything on them for cruelty or
> >> > > > > mistreatment to the under dog. Put an underdog on top and it makes
> >> no
> >> > > > > difference whether his name is Russian, Jewish, Negro, Management,
> >> > > > > Labor, Mormon, Baptist he goes haywire. I've found very, very few
> >> who
> >> > > > > remember their past condition when prosperity comes.
>
> >> > > > > On Oct 3, 11:08 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > Hey PlainOl',
>
> >> > > > > > Israel is a conundrum, and not a good example of other hot spots
> >> in
> >> > > the
> >> > > > > > world, albeit they are right in the middle of several issues.
>
> >> > > > > > To the point, if any Nation does any act that would threaten the
> >> > > sovereignty
> >> > > > > > of the United States, then I think we have the right to
> >> intervene.
> >> > >  Thus,
> >> > > > > > when there are those who are not identified with a Nation-State,
> >> but
> >> > > are
> >> > > > > > devout on seeing Islam return to its glory of the 11th and 12th
> >> > > centuries,
> >> > > > > > then yes, I think we have every right to intervene. So was the
> >> case
> >> > > with
> >> > > > > > Afghanistan in 2001, Iraq (which we believed was a potential
> >> threat
> >> > > in
> >> > > > > > 2003)  and Pakistan just last year, when we violated Pakistan's
> >> > > soveriegnty
> >> > > > > > to go in and emasculate Osama bin Laden.
>
> >> > > > > > I cannot think of any time in our history, where we "intervened"
> >> and
> >> > > there
> >> > > > > > wasn't an argument for the protection of our sovereignty,
> >> including
> >> > > Viet
> >> > > > > > Nam,  and Iraq.  You may in fact disagree with the logic,  (and
> >> like
> >> > > most
> >> > > > > > Moonbats, not comprehend the Truman Doctrine with the case of
> >> Viet
> >> > > Nam)
> >> > > > > > and/or be intent on revising contemporary history, but again, I
> >> can
> >> > > think of
> >> > > > > > no incidents.  (Maybe the Spanish American War....)
>
> >> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 5:04 PM, plainolamerican
> >> > > > > > <plainolameri...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
> >> > > > > > > would we as a Nation have a right to interfere
> >> > > > > > > ---
> >> > > > > > > yes ... even to the extent of dismantling their government, if
> >> > > > > > > necessary
> >> > > > > > > but, remember, this is not about controlling resources or
> >> > > protecting
> >> > > > > > > one foreign government from another
>
> >> > > > > > > backatcha:
> >> > > > > > > If the US stops providing military support to israel and their
> >> > > enemies
> >> > > > > > > attack them should we interfere?
> >> > > > > > > remember, israel has spied on us, killed our soldiers,
> >> corrupted
> >> > > our
> >> > > > > > > politicians and promotes socialism in our nation
>
> >> > > > > > > On Oct 3, 9:50 am, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com>
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** Fw: RE: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis



--- On Tue, 4/10/11, Azhar Masood <joseel1011@hotmail.com> wrote:

From: Azhar Masood <joseel1011@hotmail.com>
Subject: RE: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis
To: "PAKISTAN GOOGLE PRESS" <pakistanipress@googlegroups.com>
Date: Tuesday, 4 October, 2011, 10:02 AM

Initially Indian intelligence agency RAW trained Afghan intelligence outfit RAMA.Now a military arrangement through the CIA. Its a  serious development.Are we sleeping over these developments. There is  no question of Baluchistan's secession.Baluch nationalists  operate only in Punjgur, Turbat and Pasni.They can be controlled politically.Let us  bring Baluch nationalists into mainstream politics of Pakistan. That is  the answer.

After US withdrawal from Afghanistan  Indian influence will be minimised.



From: gulpari.mehsud@gmail.com
To: pakistanipress@googlegroups.com; haroon7152@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis
Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 00:18:57 +0500

Pakistan Government should take notice of the public statements of Ms. Marvi Sirmed ... She is a senior officer for UN in Pakistan, she appears on TV channels to question if Pakistan should exist as independent country, she openly supports future US and Indian attacks on Pakistan and supports Indian hegemony over Pakistan, secession of Balochistan, etc...Question is: does she represent United Nations offices in Pakistan when she makes these assertions? Where is Ministry of Information & Broadcasting? What is the job description of PID? Why do thse departments exist if their job does not include protecting Pakistan against these soft and indirect attacks? Would a UN employee like this one stay for a single day on the soil of Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Iran, Russia if she used such a language there?
 
gulpari mehsud, islamabad
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 11:10 PM
Subject: Pakistani Press look at these partriotic Pakistanis

How our Pakistani citizens are happy on Indian Afghanistan new secutiry pact
 
Marvi Sirmed
marvisirmed Marvi Sirmed 
Aah! RT @AbasDaiyar: The Strategic Agreement with India includes Indian commitment to assist and train the Afghan National Security Forces.
 
Marvi Sirmed
marvisirmed Marvi Sirmed 
So Indians made it to the security sector partnership in Afghanistan. Good move. #Pakistan, what's next?
 
 

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pakistani Press" group.
To post to this group, send email to pakistanipress@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pakistanipress+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pakistanipress?hl=en?hl=en

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pakistani Press" group.
To post to this group, send email to pakistanipress@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pakistanipress+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pakistanipress?hl=en?hl=en
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Pakistani Press" group.
To post to this group, send email to pakistanipress@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
pakistanipress+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/pakistanipress?hl=en?hl=en

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197