Re: Perry’s Faith-Based Foreign Policy Directive

yep ... it's complicated yet clear ... jewish influence on our
politicians is widespread
--------------------------------------------
Ya think?

Yet I keep hearing its the right who march in lockstep with the
Zionists.

Oooops!

I saw this on day 1, when Rahm Emanuel was named COS.

There's a reason Wiki deleted Rahm's dad, and steered to Rahm.

And I support the POTUS on this one.

On Sep 22, 12:31 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Who just stood in front of the UN and said the US will veto any bid
> for Palestinian statehood?
> ---
> On May 19, 2011, Obama made a foreign policy speech in which he called
> for a return to the pre-1967 Israeli borders with mutually agreed land
> swaps. Obama was criticized by many on the right in the U.S. for the
> proposal.
> The Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, a Republican think
> tank, reports that Obama has imposed a virtual arms embargo on Israel.
> Obama blocked all major Israeli weapons requests, including key
> projects and upgrades, linking arms sales to progress in the peace
> process. At the same time, Obama approved $10 billion in arms sales to
> Arab states, including fighters, missiles, helicopters, and fast
> attack craft. Israel did not protest, despite reports that its
> qualitative military edge was being eroded.
>
> According to a classified U.S. State Departmment cable from October
> 31, 2008, released during the United States diplomatic cables leak,
> the U.S. embassies in Israel, Jordan, Lebanon, Egypt, and Saudi
> Arabia, as well as the CIA and Defense Intelligence Agency, were
> directed by the Bush administration to conduct espionage operations
> against Israel, targeting all aspects of Israel's political system,
> society, communications infrastructure, and military. Diplomats and
> spies were asked to gather intelligence on planned Israeli military
> operations, military units, equipment, maintenance levels, training,
> morale, operational readiness, tactics, techniques and procedures for
> conventional and unconventional counterinsurgency and counterterrorist
> operations, and Israeli assessment on the impact of reserve duty in
> the occupied territories on its military readiness. Information was
> also sought on government plans, potential ways Israeli politicians
> could be influenced, how politicians decide to launch military
> strikes, the attitude of politicians towards the U.S, the official and
> personal phone numbers, fax numbers, and e-mail addresses of military
> and civilian leaders, Israeli military, intelligence, and civilian
> communications infrastructure, and coded means of producing passports
> and government ID badges.
>
> which political party does US support to Israel come from?
>
> yep ... it's complicated yet clear ... jewish influence on our
> politicians is widespread
>
> ---
> Ron Paul:
> Madame Speaker, I strongly oppose H. Res. 34, which was rushed to the
> floor with almost no prior notice and without consideration by the
> House Foreign Affairs Committee. The resolution clearly takes one side
> in a conflict that has nothing to do with the United States or US
> interests. I am concerned that the weapons currently being used by
> Israel against the Palestinians in Gaza are made in America and paid
> for by American taxpayers. What will adopting this resolution do to
> the perception of the United States in the Muslim and Arab world? What
> kind of blowback might we see from this? What moral responsibility do
> we have for the violence in Israel and Gaza after having provided so
> much military support to one side?
>
> As an opponent of all violence, I am appalled by the practice of
> lobbing homemade rockets into Israel from Gaza. I am only grateful
> that, because of the primitive nature of these weapons, there have
> been so few casualties among innocent Israelis. But I am also appalled
> by the longstanding Israeli blockade of Gaza — a cruel act of war —
> and the tremendous loss of life that has resulted from the latest
> Israeli attack that started last month.
>
> There are now an estimated 700 dead Palestinians, most of whom are
> civilians. Many innocent children are among the dead. While the
> shooting of rockets into Israel is inexcusable, the violent actions of
> some people in Gaza does not justify killing Palestinians on this
> scale. Such collective punishment is immoral. At the very least, the
> US Congress should not be loudly proclaiming its support for the
> Israeli government's actions in Gaza.
>
> Madame Speaker, this resolution will do nothing to reduce the fighting
> and bloodshed in the Middle East. The resolution in fact will lead the
> US to become further involved in this conflict, promising "vigorous
> support and unwavering commitment to the welfare, security, and
> survival of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state." Is it really in
> the interest of the United States to guarantee the survival of any
> foreign country? I believe it would be better to focus on the security
> and survival of the United States, the Constitution of which my
> colleagues and I swore to defend just this week at the beginning of
> the 111th Congress. I urge my colleagues to reject this resolution.
>
> On Sep 22, 9:04 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Who just stood in front of the UN and said the US will veto any bid
> > for Palestinian statehood?
>
> > However, I not only don't like Perry's reasoning, I think it borders
> > on illegal.  "Borders"
>
> > But then, would you rather him not tell us?
>
> > Try and sort that out.  I'm not sure I can
>
> > On Sep 21, 3:36 pm, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > the idea that a US President's religious convictions will compel him
> > > to support a foreign government, regardless of whether that support
> > > serves specifically American interests, is appalling – and dangerous.
> > > ---
> > > and very unAmerican
> > > Perry, like Bachmann, is a zionist and should be seen as the enemy.
>
> > > otoh - Ron Paul:
> > > - would not stop Israel from defending her interests in any way she
> > > saw fit - but without US support
> > > - has also been criticized for wanting to "end foreign aid to Israel."
> > > He had in fact called for an end to all foreign aid in general.
> > > - will not allow American lives to be sacrificed for Israeli interests
>
> > > Interviewer: [...]"Why do you think that so many US officials,
> > > Congress, Senate, show overwhelming support to involving the US over
> > > there?"
>
> > > Ron Paul: [...] "It's been going on for more than 50 years, because
> > > there has been a pretty strong case made for the Jewish people being
> > > treated quite badly, and emotionally there was an argument for having
> > > a place they can call their homeland, and people bought into this. But
> > > even then there was no justification for us to be using our money for
> > > doing that.
>
> > > On Sep 21, 1:43 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
> > > > Perry's Faith-Based Foreign Policy DirectiveGod says: 'Put Israel first'byJustin Raimondo, September 21, 2011
> > > > If Rick Perry makes it to the White House, what will American foreign policy in the Middle East look like? We got a clear indication of that, recently, whenhe stated:"As a Christian I have a clear directive to support Israel, from my perspective its pretty easy both as an American and a Christian. I am going to stand with Israel."
> > > > Earlier, inan interviewwith theWeekly Standard, he was even more emphatic, averring that "My faith requires me to support Israel."
> > > > What kind of faith requires knee-jerk support for a foreign country? Apparently, Perry is a follower of a Protestant brand of Christianity known as "dispensationalism," which holds that the End Times are approaching – and thatone of the signsof the imminent apocalypse is the gathering of the Jews in the land of Israel, as supposedly foretold in the Bible. Some dispensationalists equate this with the founding of the Israeli state, in 1947, and the subsequent migration of many Jews to that country. According to dispensationalist theology, this phenomenon prefigures the start of an earth-shattering war, one that will pit Israel against the Forces of Darkness, herald the rise of the Anti-Christ, and ignite a battle that will take place on the field of Armageddon – after which Christ will return to earth and the faithful will be "raptured" up into Heaven.
> > > > Now, I don't intend to disparage anyone's religious beliefs, nor do I want to engage in the kind of snickering that usually accompanies commentary on this subject: everyone is entitled to their own faith, and, aside from that, there is something a little unsavory about the smugness and self-righteousness that is usually attached to discussions of the impact of Christian fundamentalism on American politics. There isno religious testfor holding office in these United States, and it seems to me that some liberals have been trying their best to establish one – a test ofirreligion– in order to marginalize millions of Americans. This kind of intolerance is mirrored, on the right, by some – like GOP presidential aspirantHerman Cain, for example – who have raised questions about the ability of religious Muslims to have their voices heard, or even to hold office.
> > > > However, the idea that a US President's religious convictions will compel him to support a foreign government, regardless of whether that support serves specifically American interests, is appalling – anddangerous. And we can see how dangerous it is by looking at Governor Perry's attacks on the Obama administration for supposedly not kowtowing to Tel Aviv with sufficient obeisance. At a press conference held in New York City, where heappearedwith an Israeli government official, Perrydeclared:"It is time to change our policy of appeasement toward the Palestinians to strengthen our ties to the nation of Israel, and in the process establish a robust American position in the Middle East characterized by a new firmness and a new resolve."What, exactly, does this "policy of appeasement" consist of? The Obama administration isdeterminedto veto the Palestinian statehood proposal being advanced in the UN Security Council, and hasmade it clearthat the US government stands behind the Israelis in their attempt to grab as much land – via theconstructionof "settlements" – as they can, all of it funded
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Biggest Losers in Palestine Veto? The American People

So much for republicans being the Zionistas, eh? Maybe Rahm should
have been a clue.

"Palestine", wants to be recognized as a state, while refusing to
recognize Israel as a state. Okey dokey.

Bravo Mr President

On Sep 24, 5:51 am, Moe <coates...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The biggest threat is the undermining of the representatives in the
> Congress when it comes to decisions that affect the policies of the
> United States. I was surprised to see a clip with Wolf Blitzer and
> Netanyahu discussing the fact that during the speech of Netanyahu
> before the Congress various Israeli politicians were sitting together
> with American representatives to influence their voting. Blitzer asked
> Netanyahu if this was correct and how would an Israeli react if Joe
> Walsh sat in the parliament of Israel to assure that Israel walk the
> line to American interest. Netanyahu said in a joking manner that he
> has no control over the politicians in Israel. Netanyahu has gone so
> far as to threaten various politicians about their re-election if they
> did not pull the Israeli line. It is clear to everyone who can think,
> Israel can do what it wants to disrupt the balance in the region. For
> any mistake made then the USA will be called to bail Israel out. This
> means US Taxpayers and members of the US Armed Forces will pay the
> bill. This payment will be in the form of taxpayer's money and lives.
> United States pays Israel 3.5 Billion Dollars per year in support.
> They pay Palestine 500 million dollars a year.  America does not have
> this money.  We should be investing in the USA. Look at the increased
> costs due to securing the American interests on a worldwide basis.
> American taxpayers cover the increased costs and the host countries
> pay their part. After Obama took office, USA has reduced threats. Due
> to recent actions by Israel, the threat level has increased for all of
> America´s allies in addition to that of the US.
>
> Israel is looking at Iran. Israel might take action to destroy these
> plants. They have asked or oppressed the US for F-18s and the armament
> to destroy the nuclear plants in Iran. Israel has received addition
> armaments and cooperation from the United States to the level where
> the interest of the United States are in question. Look at the case of
> F-15 plans that Israel received from the United States. After USA
> terminated the project, Israel then sold the plans to China. China
> then had a great technological leap forward with their efforts to gain
> American military expertise. Look at the spying cases of Jewish
> Americans and the attempts to free the convicted individuals by
> putting pressure on Congress members.
> If you look at the Israeli population in Israel, 800.000 of their
> register citizens are living in the United States. How many of
> Israel's citizens are living else where due to the daily risk. The
> amount of money made is tremendous for selling homes to Israelis in
> who have USA, as their first address. Another case is the cheaper
> access to the American market for medical devices and software
> products. This costs the average American not only his job but also
> increase taxes for services he is not getting. What is it costing us
> for a government that has more interest in appeasing Israel and not
> supporting the infrastructure of the United States? How many American
> lives will be spend for any of the foolish steps that Israel might
> take in the region? What are the additional costs to Europe and the
> United States due to the Israeli failed action with the Turkish aid
> ships? What is the cost of an American Congress that is more
> interested in supporting Israel's follies than that of support the
> interests of the American people?
>
> On Sep 23, 2:26 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
>
>
> > Biggest Losers in Palestine Veto? The American PeoplebyPhilip Giraldi, September 22, 2011
> > If the Palestinian application for United Nations full membership actually takes place Friday and the United States uses its Security Council veto to stop the process, it will be the final step in a predictable and preventable tragedy playing out. Some are arguing that Washington might actually abstain, thereby gaining considerable favorable sentiment from much of the world and also sending a signal to Israel that there are limits to the bilateral relationship. But it is far more likely that President Barack Obama, who has stated over and over that he will protect Israel in international forums, will not flinch when he calls on Susan Rice to cast the fatal vote. Any expectation that the president might hesitate either because it is the right thing to do or because it benefits the United States is fanciful, particularly with a presidential election looming in 2012.
> > Washington's attempts to "mediate" the situation have really been limited to pressuring the Palestinians to back off. Sending National Security Council officialDennis Ross, "Israel's lawyer," to Ramallah to talk around the Palestinian leadership should, if anything, indicate to the Palestinians that Washington is, as it always has been, firmly in the Israeli corner. So let us assume that Palestine will feel compelled to seek full U.N. membership as the world's 194th nation and that Washington will then veto the application. The first question then has to be whether the entire process had any meaning at all or it was just kabuki, a stylized show played out to an appreciative audience with a predictable ending. The short answer is that the Palestinians will certainly be on the losing end as they have been for more than 60 years but the real losers will be the United States and Israel.
> > The mainstream media has echoed Israeli and American arguments that Palestinian statehood is meaningless without a negotiated settlement of issues on the ground. But Israel has made it clear that it has no desire to negotiate anything while it continues to occupy the West Bank, so the Palestinian choice is to accept the status quo, in which it is powerless and voiceless, or attempt to line up the international community more solidly behind it and shift the playing field.
> > Israel has been working hard to stop the process, or, at worst, to mitigate its impact by having a number of important nations, mostly in Europe, either abstain on the vote or vote no. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu made a glad-handtourof European capitals earlier this year with that express purpose, and he received positive signals from the Italians, the Dutch, the Poles, and the Germans, though it is by no means clear how they will vote. It was for Israel a top national priority, which it has conveyed clearly to its friends in the United States.
> > Washington, at the urging of Israel, also joined in the effort, starting withwarningslate last year to Latin American nations that recognizing Palestine as a state would be "unacceptable." More recently, the State Department and the White House have repeatedly expressed their desire that the Palestinians shelve their plans to seek a U.N. seat, and they have been assiduously working both in front of the TV cameras in New York and Washington and behind the scenes to convince the Palestinian leadership to cease and desist. The dialogue has been given some teeth by Congress, which is determined tocut all aidto Palestine if the U.N. action goes through. One congressmen, Joe Walsh of Illinois, is preparing amotionthat will provide congressional support for an Israeli annexation of much of the West Bank if the Palestinians proceed. Walsh describes Palestinian statehood as "absolutely outrageous."
> > So Israel sees the Palestinian plan as a major threat and the United States appears to be on board, but many would reasonably observe that Israel often cries wolf and greatly exaggerates what it perceives as threats against it. Is that true in this case, making it just another instance where Tel Aviv is adopting an extreme position in hopes that Washington will deliver the goods? It may not be. Israel sees danger precisely because the Palestinian bid will do a couple of things that call into question some significant aspects of the status quo. First of all, since it will certainly pass with a huge majority in the General Assembly if the Palestinians opt to go that route, it will provide overwhelming international confirmation of Palestinian rights with the U.S. and Israel standing on the wrong side on the issue. It will also severely undermine Israel's moral position, such as it is, and emphasize the illegality of the Israeli occupation of parts of the West Bank. The process is already illegal in the eyes of the rest of the world, including the United States, but it will be even less tenable if a convincing majority of the world's countries recognize Palestine as a state with defined borders and a national identity.
> > Second, recognition of statehood carries with it recognition that the state exists within defined space, in this case the 1967 borders. This has enormous significance because those borders include many areas being colonized by the Israelis, as well as East Jerusalem. It means that any Israeli settlement that is on the other side of that border is considered completely illegal and that Israel is therefore a rogue state that is occupying and settling lands belonging to a neighboring state 44 years after the cessation of hostilities. Even theNew York Timesin anarticleon Sept. 10 regarding the recent unrest in Egypt, noting that Islamic groups were not involved, conceded that criticism of Israel has a basis in the widespread popular perception that "Muslims, Arabs, and indeed many around the globe believe Israel is unjustly occupying Palestinian territories, and they are furious at Israel for it." The rejection of Palestinian statehood and the debate surrounding it will only heighten that sentiment.
> > If the Palestinians are in the United Nations as a full member or even with limited rights, they will have access to the International Criminal Court in The Hague, where they can take legal steps against Israel and against individual Israelis. Even though Israel doesn't recognize the legitimacy of the court, when it reaches the point where no senior Israeli government official, present or
>
> ...
>
> read more »- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Ron Paul and the Booing Teocons

Ron Paul and the Booing Teocons
by Szandor Blestman
September 21, 2011

The mainstream media tried to ignore him. They thought they could keep his message from getting out to the public. When they couldn't keep his message hidden any longer as his supporters got the word out and more and more people saw the signs waving and went to the web to sate their interests, they denounced him. They called him crazy, just like his ideas and his supporters. They claimed his ideas could never work. They claimed he was just too radical and was unelectable. All their attacks have missed their marks or backfired. The message of liberty resonates in the spirit of the common folk. Freedom has worked in the past and it can work again in the future. Our nation was built upon these principles and it became a great nation because of them, not in spite of them. The principles that have brought this nation down, that have steered us to this point in history, to the brink of economic disaster and societal collapse, are the principles of collectivism that have been slowly forced upon us by the established power and political elite, particularly in the last century or so.

Yet the established powers don't want to give up their collectivist ideals. Perhaps this is because their powers stem from those ideals. They seem almost childlike in their fear as they scramble to make excuses for their failed policies. They do all they can to make the ideas of liberty, the ideas expressed by Ron Paul, seem irrelevant. Even as their tricks become more obvious to those watching, the establishment and their media lapdogs continue to try to frame the debate in a way that favors their collectivist, corporatist, crony capitalist point of view. They just don't seem able to innovate. They seem to be almost panicking as more and more people catch on and turn away from their influence to try to find a better way.

The establishment is not going to give in easily. They have already tried to infiltrate the Tea Party to make it seem as if the grassroots movement isn't so populist as one might think. At a Republican debate sponsored by the Tea Party, Ron Paul was booed by the very movement his 2008 candidacy started. What's more, he was booed while answering a question that had been well established. Once again a candidate questioned Ron Paul's assertion that the foreign policy of the United States federal government led to the attacks on 9/11. As Dr. Paul tried to explain the concept of blowback and why meddling in the affairs of others can lead to feelings of resentment a chorus of boos cascaded from the crowd. This makes one wonder if the crowd was full of plants or if there are really that many people involved with the Republican Party and the Tea Party movement who simply haven't been paying attention for the last few years.

It was Rick Santorum who challenged Ron Paul on this issue, and I was hoping to see another lambasting like was given to Rudolph Giuliani in a 2008 debate. After all, the ex senator seems to require an education on the subject. He could have used a reading list as Dr. Paul gave to Mr. Giuliani to show just where the idea of blowback comes from. It should be understood that it wasn't Ron Paul that claimed US foreign policy caused 9/11, he is merely repeating the opinions of certain CIA operatives and foreign policy experts. Booing and jeering the messenger will not alter those facts. Trying to make it sound as if Ron Paul dreamed up the idea of blowback on his own will not make that concept any less dangerous. We as a nation don't need a president who closes his eyes to reality in an effort to gain political popularity. We don't need media outlets who obfuscate the truth for political and financial gain. We need a president who understands reality and tells it like it is, one who will offer real solutions to real problems.

They continue to question Dr. Paul's sanity and the validity of his ideas, but it seems to me that it is their ideas that are crazy. It's crazy to bomb people into oblivion and expect them to be thankful. It's crazy to occupy their lands and lay claim to their natural resources and expect them to be welcoming. It's crazy to send soldiers to foreign lands, have them shoot up the place, torture and kill without accountability and expect the people of that land to be less than resentful. It is beyond me how those who continue to make excuses for these occupations cannot see how such behavior makes enemies, not friends. It is beyond me how they can truly believe these wars are anything less than the strong bullying the weak.

Perhaps a few might truly be stuck in a World War II mindset. Perhaps they truly believe that the common folk of a nation are going to cheer our troops as they march in the streets as if they are the great liberators. But in World War II the American military was driving out occupying forces. It's different when you become the occupying force. Certainly, some of the common folk may benefit from the occupation and these people may want the forces to stay, but most will likely wish to simply be left alone and will resent the presence of foreign military forces.

The same can be said for the economic policies put in place by the collectivist powers that be. It is crazy to believe you can get out of debt by going deeper into debt. It is crazy to believe you can clear up a debt problem by spending more, or even by maintaining current levels of spending. It is crazy to believe that higher taxes on anyone will solve the problem when so much money is being wasted on interest payments and war. Somehow those who booed Ron Paul seem able to understand that there is too much spending, yet they don't seem able to understand the wastefulness of spending money on bombs, death and the destruction of war. Spending money on defense is not a bad idea, but spreading military force across the world is not defense, it is what empire does.

It is the very definition of crazy to keep trying the same thing and expecting different results. The policies that the establishment politicians keep advocating have been tried before and have failed. Their policies have led us to a place where we are less free, less innovative, less productive and less prosperous than ever before. They have led us to a place where we are trapped in fear and dependent upon them rather than independent and responsible for our own well being and flourishing in an atmosphere of tolerance and love. It has been a slow ride to get here, and could possibly be a slow ride getting back, but that ride won't even start unless we try doing something different or something that we know has worked in the past. That something is to start honoring the principles of individual freedom.

The establishment truly doesn't want the common folk thinking. They want to keep them reacting at an emotional level. They want to keep them believing the jingoistic flag waving that gives them the most control over the masses. They want to keep the common folk fearful of their shadows so that they will allow their freedoms to be trampled and violated without question. A thinking public is dangerous to the establishment who wish to maintain their power. An intelligent, thoughtful public will eventually see through their fallacious policies. An intelligent public will ask to be left alone and treated like adults to determine for themselves how to live their lives and spend their money rather than be babied and treated like idiots being told how to live their lives and spend their money from cradle to grave. An intelligent public will be able to look at Ron Paul's past, his voting record and his unwavering principles and determine for themselves that he is not the typical establishment politician. Naturally, the establishment does not want someone in power who they don't control, and so they will continue to pull out whatever tricks they can in order to keep the thinking public from flexing its muscle.

http://www.weeklyblitz.net/1818/ron-paul-and-the-booing-teocons

Re: **JP** FW: Column - Javed Ch

Dear Tahir Noor Sahib, Thanks for good wishes & appreciating my deeds, My brother I am a profassional and never care about any monitory rewards. It was my personal view poiunt or feeling in response of Javed Chauhdry colmn. I am mentally satisfied with my working and delivering the nation with my all God given abilities.     Regards,   Ch. Muhammad Hanif, Chief Scientist Four Brothers eed Corporation Pakistan, P-344, Al-Qureesh Housing Scheme, Phase-1, Sher Shah Road, Multan. Cell No. 0321-7122300 E-mail: ch.hanif@4bgroup.com; ch_haneef@yahoo.com Phone No. 061-4592358-9, Fax No. 061-4592357 --- On Sat, 27/8/11, Tahir Noor <tahir.nooratd@gmail.com> wrote: From: Tahir Noor <tahir.nooratd@gmail.com> Subject: Re: **JP** FW: Column - Javed Ch To: ch_haneef@yahoo.com Cc: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com Received: Saturday, 27 August, 2011, 4:02 AM Dear Hanif Sb. Assalam-o-Alaikum and congrats on your working. May Allah give you long life to serve this country. As far as reward is concers, we as a nation having no guts to appriciate the work of our peoples. Best Regards Tahir Noor On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 1:32 PM, Mohammad Haneef <ch_haneef@yahoo.com> wrote: Dear Chaudhry Sahib,  I have great honorr and well wisher of yours. Your services for the country in   print media are highly acknowldged worldwide. I am sorry to say that you have written in your column that Pakistan is importing cotton seed  of  valued thousands rupees yearly. Sir for your kind information import of cotton seed for commercial cultivation is not allowed in Pakistan. We can import seed of this crop in grams as germplasm for research purpose only not for commercial cultivation. We as a nation failed to reward due respect to our  researchers/ scientists, what to talk about the international level recognition.  I am a cotton breeder . During my carrier I served a lot as per my God given ability in cotton varietal development but got no acknowledgement please the attachment     Regards,   Ch. Muhammad Hanif, Chief Scientist Four Brothers eed Corporation Pakistan, P-344, Al-Qureesh Housing Scheme, Phase-1, Sher Shah Road, Multan. Cell No. 0321-7122300 E-mail: ch.hanif@4bgroup.com; ch_haneef@yahoo.com Phone No. 061-4592358-9, Fax No. 061-4592357 --- On Tue, 23/8/11, Rashid Ahmed <rashidahmed@jeraisy.com> wrote: From: Rashid Ahmed <rashidahmed@jeraisy.com> Subject: **JP** FW: Column - Javed Ch To: joinpakistan@googlegroups.com Received: Tuesday, 23 August, 2011, 4:49 AM       -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JoinPakistan" group. You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members. To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com & on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JoinPakistan" group. You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members. To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com & on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197 -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "JoinPakistan" group. You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members. To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com & on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** Dengue / Platelets with Tibb-e-Nabawi medicine

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Ukkashah Bin Mehsan Al-Asadi

To: Arshad kamal

Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2011 11:51 AM

Subject: Dengue / Platelets with Tibb-e-Nabawi medicine

 

Bhai Arshad Sahib, Assalam O Alaikum,

 

We refer to treatment for Dengue fever (Treating Dengue Fever with Tibb-e-Nabawi) which you had done in 2010, & now in 2011.

 

By providing the latest test reports (attached herewith), you have won my heart & now we have a clinical evidence for Tibb-e-Nabawi formulations. The patient was diagnosed with Dengue Fever on Sep. 4th, 2011 when his Platelet count was 211,000 and it dropped to 151,000 after 4 days on Sep. 8th, 2011, look how fast the damage occurs.

 

You gave the medicine (formula W, R & J) on Sep. 4th which took few days to ignite itself, & Masha'Allah that on Sep. 11th, Platelets had raised to 194,000 & after 10 days on Sep. 14th, they jumped to 284,000, ohhhh what a beauty.........

 

You have done a good job by prescribing Beetroot juice as well, as per the sayings of Prophet Muhammad Sallallaho Alaihe Wasallam, Beetroot soup with Barley is the best for weak patients.

 

Please try your best to approach maximum people around your neighborhood, & provide the divine cure to all of those Dengue patients in Lahore, we are already short of time, many people have died BUT you can save those who are on the death bed, it will be our investment for Aakhirat & we hope Maghfirah from our LORD.

 

For formula "W", we have replaced Olive Leaf with Kalonji as Olive leaf is not so common in Pakistan, it was your own esteem & enthusiasm that you went to Nathia Gali & collected Olive leaves from those wild forests, we need to preserve that treasure.

---

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Arshad kamal

To: Abu Abdul Wali

Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2011 5:47 PM

Subject: Dengue fever patient cure

Asslamo alaikum,

 

Bhai i am sending you a report of dengue fever patient. As he knew that he is suffering with dengue fever, he contact me.

and i started his treatment with formula W, R and J with beetroot juice. before using our medicine he told me that  he felt very hard pain in his all  body and behind the eyes. He felt 80% relax from pain just after taking one dose of tibbe nabawi medicine. and after some days he was in normal condition. Its all due to Tibbe Nabawi medicine.

 

Wasslam

Arshad Kamal

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: mustajab hassan <hassandilbar@gmail.com>
Date: 2011/9/22
Subject: scan
To: aaaplas@gmail.com
--
SALAM