Sunday, July 24, 2011

The Missing Martyrs


The Missing Martyrs
Why There Are So Few Muslim Terrorists
Charles Kurzman

ISBN13: 9780199766871ISBN10: 0199766878 Hardback, 256 pages
Jun 2011,  In Stock


Price:

$24.95 (02)


Description

Why are there so few Muslim terrorists? With more than a billion Muslims in the world--many of whom supposedly hate the West and ardently desire martyrdom--why don't we see terrorist attacks every day? Where are the missing martyrs?
In this startlingly counterintuitive book, a leading authority on Islamic movements demonstrates that terrorist groups are thoroughly marginal in the Muslim world. Charles Kurzman draws on government sources, public opinion surveys, election results, and in-depth interviews with Muslims in the Middle East and around the world. He finds that young Muslims are indeed angry with what they see as imperialism--and especially at Western support for local dictatorships. But revolutionary Islamists have failed to reach them, as can be seen from the terrorists' own websites and publications, which constantly bemoan the dearth of willing recruits.
Kurzman notes that it takes only a small cadre of committed killers to wreak unspeakable havoc. But that very fact underscores his point. As easy as terrorism is to commit, few Muslims turn to violence. Out of 140,000 murders in the United States since 9/11, Islamist terrorists have killed at most three dozen people. Of the 150,000 people who die each day, worldwide, Islamist militants account for fewer than fifty fatalities--and only ten per day outside of the hotspots of Afghanistan, Iraq, and Pakistan. The real bulwark against Islamist violence, Kurzman finds, is Muslims themselves, who reject both the goals of the terrorists and their bloody means. With each bombing, the terrorists lose support among Muslims.
Incisive and authoritative, The Missing Martyrs provides much-needed corrective to deep-seated and destructive misconceptions about Muslims and the Islamic world. The threat of Islamist terrorism is real, Kurzman shows, but its dimensions are, so far, tightly confined.


Features

  • Directly and thoughtfully addresses concerns about terrorism
  • Contains specific recommendations to improve U.S. relations with Muslim societies
  • Illustrated with vivid anecdotes and memorable facts


Reviews

"Kurzman provides a significant answer to a question that needs to be addressed: in a world of more than a billion Muslims, why are there so few Muslim terrorists? So much attention is given by policy makers and media experts to the small number of extremists that Kurzman's crucial question is too often ignored. For anyone interested in reducing the threat of global terrorism, this study is required reading." -John Voll, Professor of Islamic History, Georgetown University

"The best scholarship asks uncomfortable questions, and then attempts to provide trenchant answers. Charles Kurzman has asked: why does fear of terrorism persist, despite the meagre number of actual casualties caused by those who claim to be Islamists or violent jihadi warriors? His answer is as bracing as it is counterintuitive: media need to tune down the obsession with violent episodes, but the American public also needs to clamor for an open, honest debate about terrorism. This book is a hard-headed manifesto, calling for a return to pragmatism, with more reliance on academics and less on interest-driven think tanks engaged with Middle East politics." -Bruce B. Lawrence, co-editor, with Aisha Karim, of On Violence: A Reader


Product Details

256 pages; 6-1/8 x 9-1/4; ISBN13: 978-0-19-976687-1ISBN10: 0-19-976687-8


About the Author(s)

Charles Kurzman is a professor of sociology at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill. His books include Democracy Denied and The Unthinkable Revolution in Iran.

**JP** Fw: [alwayz2gather] APPEAL TO THE PATRIOTIC PAKISTANI NATION

PLZ  DONT  MIND  MUSLIMS NEVER UNITED NOW NOR IN FUTURE. MUSLIMS
MUSLIMS  NEVER UNITED NEITHER WILL IN FUTURE ????

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: mohammed bawany <zaheerbawany@yahoo.com>
To: Awaz-e-Dost <awaz-e-dost@yahoogroups.com>; awaz-e-dost@yahoogroups.co.in; Ethad-e-Islami <ethad-e-islami@yahoogroups.com>; Mail-Center Serra Maschinenbau GmbH <mailcenter@serra.de>; Cafe Hyderabad <Cafe_Hyderabad@yahoogroups.com>; Islam everywhere <Islam_everywhere313@yahoogroups.com>; Islamtrue <islamistrue@yahoogroups.com>; Maria Kazmi <MariaKazmi@yahoogroups.com>; Lots of Laugh Lots of Love <lolx_group@yahoogroups.com>; muslimcity <muslimcity@yahoogroups.com>; PublishYourself <publishyourself@yahoogroups.com>; Quran_Academy@yahoogroups.com; Rahe Hidayat <rahehidayat@yahoogroups.com>; Sublimeway <Sublimeway@yahoogroups.com>; USQuagmire Yahoo groups <USQuagmire@yahoogroups.com>; Yaadein_Meri <yaadein_meri@yahoogroups.com>; Always2gather Yahoogroups <alwayz2gather@yahoogroups.com>; The Pak-world Yahoogroups.com <The-Pakistan-World@yahoogroups.com>; Muslim Youth <muslimyouth2010@yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, May 24, 2011 6:31 PM
Subject: [alwayz2gather] APPEAL TO THE PATRIOTIC PAKISTANI NATION
 
APPEAL TO THE PATRIOTIC PAKISTANI NATION:      
We, the Pakistani nation are passing through very crucial and dangerous time. We must pay heeds to the circumstantial evidences. The responsibilities of rowing out the nation from the quagmire lays on the shoulders of Ruling Party and its alliances however, it also lies equally upon the shoulders of Nation as a whole.
If USA, Israel and India can unite to finish the remaining of Pakistan, Why we the Pakistanis, can not unite within one country and majority, being the Muslims.
On USA agenda, is to occupy seven Muslim countries within five years, for the control over Petroleum. Those countries are: Saudia, Libya, Iraq, Iran, UAE, Syria, & Bahrain + Oman.
Pakistan’s  Khyber Pakhtun Khawa and Baluchistan are very valuable lands as these areas contain the ores of Uranium, Molybdenum, Aluminum, Copper, Gold, & etc. and also precious stones like Rubies, Emeralds etc. â€" Also Pakistan is the only Muslim country which possess the teeth of Elephant (Nukes), which is intolerable to the rest of the World.
PLEASE UNITE UNDER ONE FLAG WITH ONE SLOGAN: UNITY, FAITH & DISCIPLENE. PLEASE SHUN ALL THE DIFFERENCES AND EACH OF US MAY PLEASE FULFIL OUR RESPONSIBILITIES.
FIRST OF ALL SHUN SECTS BATTLE, EACH ONE MAY GO BY HIS RELIGION BUT EACH OF US MUST CONSIDER OURSELVES AS â€" ‘FIRST PAKISTANI’ AND ‘LAST PAKISTANI.’
PLEASE SHUN RACIAL DIFFERENCES. THERE IS NO SINGHI, NO PUNJABI, NO MUHAJIR, NO PATHAN, NO BALUCHI. WE ARE ALL PAKISTANI.
WE ARE FIRST, ONLY PAKISTANI THEN POLTICIAN, BEUROCRAT, GENERAL, JUDGE, INDUSTRIALIST, ETC.
POLITICIANS MUST UNITE AS THE FINGERS OF HAND UNITE WITH THE PALM & PAKISTAN MUST BE ABOVE PARTY POLITICS.
I APPEAL TO ALL CONCIUOS PAKISTANIS TO RISE ON THE OCCASION AND WRITE MORE AND MORE AND CREAT PATRIOTIC ENTHUSIASM AND UNITY IN THE PUBLIC.
REMEMBER, IF WE ARE NOT SERIOUS TODAY, WE WILL BE OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED AS  'OCCUPIED' BY TOMORROW.
CHINA IS A GREAT FRIEND AND TRUST WORTHY BUT DO YOU THINK IT WISE TO FIGHT WAR WITH SUPER POWERS (USA+ISREAL+INDIA) FOR THE SAKE OF PAKISTAN? IT WILL GIVE HELP BUT YOU WILL HAVE TO FIGHT YOUR OWN WAR.
 
     
 
                              
 
__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.-"""-.    .-"""-.                        /       '..'       \                 .-"""-;    .-"""-.         |         _      /       `..'       \        |      .-' /    |                    |      /  /////     <   (==========)               | (======<<<<<      '-._\     \    Alwayz 2Gather   /    /`    \\\\\                 \    Group    /   /'                  `\   Connected /'  /'                    `\   Hearts  /'`\/'                      `\    /'                        `\/' Welcome To Alwayz 2Gather group (`'•.¸(`'•.¸ ¸.•'´) ¸.•'´) Sheikh Sabi & Ayusha Raja The owner of Alwayz 2Gather Group. Moderator! (Mj) Minhaj Mumtaz (`'•.¸(`'•.¸ ¸.•'´) ¸.•'´) Post message..>      alwayz2gather@yahoogroups.com Subscribe..> alwayz2gather-subscribe@yahoogroups.com Unsubscribe..> alwayz2gather-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.comhttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/alwayz2gather/http://groups.yahoo.com/group/alwayz2gather/
.
__,_._,___

**JP** Fw: Evil Activities Blocked Video of Child Allegedly Tortured in Syria

CHIEF EXECUTIVE ANTI EVIL AND TERRORISM INTERNATIONAL MOVEMENT OVERSEAS <journalist.hasnain@yahoo.com>

----- Forwarded Message -----
From: kh.ch <khaldee.w@gmail.com>
To: pakistani-girls@googlegroups.com; pakistan-pal@googlegroups.com; sublimeway@yahoogroups.com
Cc: media-tribe@googlegroups.com; pakistan-media@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Saturday, June 4, 2011 12:38 AM
Subject: [Sublimeway] Blocked Video of Child Allegedly Tortured in Syria

 
.


Protests in Syria were reinvigorated this week, after a wrenching video documenting the alleged torture and killing of a 13-year-old boy went viral online. The boy was separated from his parents at a protest against the Assad government, which allegedly mutilated, castrated and killed him, then returned the corpse to his family, who risked their lives to produce the video. The boy's father is now reportedly missing as well. By Tuesday, however, the video that shot from the web to Al Jazeera to the streets of Syria—where people marched carrying signs emblazoned with the deceased child's portrait—had been blocked on YouTube, the very site where it first launched.
     The temporary blockage of the brutal video, which YouTube has since restored, is another reminder that the same social media platforms which help spread protests can also seriously hinder activists.
The video of the Syrian child, Hamza Ali al-Khateeb, is disturbing and ghastly. The camera pans across the boy's "battered, purple face," as the New York Times reported, revealing skin "scrawled with cuts, gashes, deep burns and bullet wounds that would probably have injured but not killed. His jaw and kneecaps are shattered, according to an unidentified narrator, and his penis chopped off." After gaining significant attention in the Middle East, the video was blocked under YouTube's policy against "shocking and disgusting content." Thus visitors were greeted with this message instead of the video:
However, after an inquiry by The Nation on Tuesday evening, the video was restored.
"With the massive volume of videos on our site, sometimes we make the wrong call," said a YouTube spokesperson, who emphasized that the company has a policy against commenting on specific videos. As a general matter, though, the spokesman explained that "when it's brought to our attention that a video has been removed mistakenly, we act quickly to reinstate it."
YouTube, which is owned by Google, has company guidelines banning shocking or graphic content. "We make exceptions," the spokesperson added, "for videos that have a clear educational, documentary, scientific or artistic value." (That phrasing is somewhat similar to the Supreme Court's obscenity test, as it happens, which exempts works of serious literary, artistic, political or scientific value from government bans on obscenity.)
In this case, the mistake would seem to be removing a video that was aimed at documenting and exposing, rather than promoting, violence allegedly used against protesters.
YouTube was not alone in struggling with whether or how to carry the video. NPR reported that it was "too graphic" to post, but then provided links to excerpts of the video, along with the observation that the footage was "not hard to find." CNN ran two excerpts, but declared the rest of it too grisly to air. By contrast, Al Jazeera, which broadcasts more graphic images than most Western television, repeatedly played the video. Now the channel is credited with turning al-Khateeb into a child martyr across the Arab world. And veteran American journalist Martin Schram, the former Washington bureau chief for Newsday, even likened the images to the iconic Vietnam photo (and video) of a South Vietnamese general executing a Viet Cong fighter with a bullet to the head.
Jillian York, who researches digital human rights in the Middle East and was recently appointed Director for International Freedom of Expression at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, said YouTube performs pretty well when it comes to making these calls.
"Generally, I've found that YouTube does a good job at keeping graphic violence up when there's context," she said. "I've helped activists at times get their videos back up on YouTube," York recounted, "by going through the appeals process and adding context."
Last year, YouTube reinstated the account of an Egyptian blogger who was blocked for posting gratuitious violence, after public criticism, and ultimately restored over 100 of his videos with a request that he add more context. It provided a similar process for a Tunisian activist. Ethan Zuckerkman, a Harvard researcher who co-founded Global Voices, an international hub for citizen media, recounted both incidents last year, lamenting how powerful corporations played such a pivotal role in hosting or trimming campaigns against powerful governments. While governments constrain activists' ability to report on misconduct, he argued, YouTube also constrains activists through their terms of service:
Hosting your political movement on YouTube is a little like trying to hold a rally in a shopping mall. It looks like a public space, but it's not—it's a private space, and your use of it is governed by an agreement that works harder to protect YouTube's fiscal viability than to protect your rights of free speech. Even if YouTube's rulers take their function as a free speech platform seriously and work to ensure you've got rights to post content, they're a benevolent despot, not a representative government.
Finally, at the practical level, York proposed that who contacts a social media company can matter more than the substance of the contested content.
"I think it often takes a high-level complaint to get their attention. I don't totally blame them, as I imagine they're flooded with appeals," she told The Nation. "Nevertheless," she concluded, "there is something to be said for instituting a human rights channel of sorts." It would be a hard channel to watch, but worthwhile, as courageous citizens across the Middle East continue to risk their lives in order to expose and fight their brutal oppressors.


__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___


**JP** Who Really Zaid Hamid Is! [1 Attachment]



Who Really Zaid Hamid Is!

I am writing this email to send all of you a pdf document of 11 pages. In this document some facts are mentioned about Mr. Zaid Hamid who is known as Defence Analyst.

I have a request to all of you that do read this document it is really very important one.

The document (pdf) is attached. The size of the document (pdf) is 601KB. Please download it from attachments.

With Best Wishes.

 

**JP** Ban mobile phones and wireless networks in schools, say European leaders [1 Attachment]

Ban mobile phones and wireless networks in schools, say European leaders
 
Mobile phones and computers with wireless internet connections pose a risk to human health and should be banned from schools, a powerful European body has ruled.
 
By Richard Gray - 14 May 2011
 
A Council of Europe committee examined evidence that the technologies have "potentially harmful" effects on humans, and concluded that immediate action was required to protect children.
 
In a report, the committee said it was crucial to avoid repeating the mistakes made when public health officials were slow to recognise the dangers of asbestos, tobacco smoking and lead in petrol.
 
The report also highlighted the potential health risks of cordless telephones and baby monitors, which rely on similar technology and are widely used in British homes.
 
Fears have been raised that electromagnetic radiation emitted by wireless devices can cause cancers and affect the developing brain.
 
The findings were seized on by campaigners who oppose the spread of wireless devices.
 

The committee concluded that member states should:

·         Set thresholds for levels of long-term exposure to microwaves of the type emitted by mobile phones;

·         Introduce clear labelling on products indicating the presence of electromagnetic fields and any health risks associated with use;

·         Ban all mobile phones and wireless networks in classrooms and schools;

·         Run information campaigns aimed at children and young adults about the risks to human health;

·         Step up research on less-dangerous types of antennae and mobile phones.

The conclusions contradict advice from the World Health Organisation and the Department of Health, which says exposure to electromagnetic fields poses little or no risk to human health.

The Council of Europe, which has 47 member states and is based in Strasbourg, cannot impose its will on governments, but is highly influential in policy-making and has often seen its decisions enacted through conventions and treaties.
 
A draft resolution – calling on governments to "take all reasonable measures to reduce exposure to electromagnetic fields" from mobile phones and similar devices, including the ban in schools – was adopted unanimously by the organisation's Committee on the Environment, Agriculture and Local and Regional Affairs.
 
The committee is composed of 84 MPs and politicians from member states, and its vice-chairman is Lord Prescott, the former Deputy Prime Minister. Its members reviewed the latest research on the effects of electromagnetic fields and took fresh evidence from experts before reaching its conclusions.
 
The draft resolution will now go before the council's full Parliamentary Assembly for approval.
 
Public health and telecommunication experts are divided on the dangers posed by mobile phones and other wireless devices.
 
A report by Britain's Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research Programme in 2007 said that there was no association between mobile phones and adverse health effects, but it is now conducting a more detailed study into the long-term effects of mobile phones.
 
Other researchers have found no association between short-term mobile phone use and cancer. A major epidemiological study published last year found no increased risk of cancer from using mobile phones over a ten-year period.
 
Prof Les Barclay, the vice-chairman of the Mobile Telecommunications and Health Research Programme, said: "We haven't had mobile phones for very long and there are now studies going on to look for longer-term effects.
 
"There is very little evidence at the moment for harmful effects. The powers that mobile phones emit are getting less and less, and they are well below the limits set by the International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection. Banning mobile phones and wireless networks in schools is a step too far in my eyes."
 
Prof Paul Elliot, of Imperial College, London, who is leading a major international study of the long-term effects of mobile phone use on 200,000 people, said: "There are potential questions about whether mobile phones might have cognitive effects and impact on sleep.
 
"Mobile phone technology is clearly incredibly beneficial and useful, but we have to weigh up those potential health effects, so it is responsible to do research on that. In children, that research has not yet really been done, so we need more research in this area. In the meantime the advice is not to be excessive in use."
 
Powerwatch, a campaign group that aims to raise awareness of the risks from electromagnetic fields, welcomed the draft resolution. A spokesman said: "It is long past the time when governments all around Europe should have started being more precautionary about these issues."
 
Russell Hobby, general secretary of the National Association of Head Teachers, warned that a ban on mobile phones and wireless networks in schools would bring widespread disruption.
 
He said: "The impact on schools would be enormous. Most schools have Wi-Fi networks now, while pupils and teachers carry mobile phones. Many schools are shifting towards far more mobile computing so pupils can have laptops they can take home to do their homework on. This would prevent all of that."
 
A Department of Health spokesman said: "As you would expect, we keep all available scientific evidence under review. Our guidance remains the same. Children should only use mobile phones for essential purposes and keep all calls short."