Tuesday, June 7, 2011

New home of Glenn Beck unveiled: GBTV




He is charging for this and I ain't buying.

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Glenn Beck <news@glennbeck.com>
Date: Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 9:15 AM
Subject: New home of Glenn Beck unveiled: GBTV


GBTV. The Truth Lives Here

Today the questions about Glenn's future end -- and the future itself begins.

Glenn Beck and Mercury Radio Arts are proud to announce a new network built from the ground-up. It's called GBTV, and it is the network of tomorrow, a day early.

Will Glenn's show be on GBTV?
Yes! Glenn's show will expand to two hours a night, five nights a week and be streamed live in HD exclusively on GBTV. For more details on Glenn's show, click HERE.

What is GBTV?
Simple: it's a live, streaming video network that, in addition to being the home of Glenn's new show, will also feature a wide variety of other programming. But the real secret to GBTV is what it doesn't have: an agenda. Glenn has financed the development of GBTV himself to ensure that he is only accountable to you.

How do I get GBTV?
The best thing about GBTV is that it goes wherever you do. From your laptop to your desktop to your iPad, iPhone or television (via a Roku device), GBTV is always available. No more faking illnesses to ensure you're home to watch Glenn -- if you've got Internet access, you've got GBTV.

How much does it cost?
Let's put it this way, a month of GBTV access is almost 40% cheaper than THIS. For full pricing details, including how to get a month free, click HERE.

OK, I'm sold. Now what?
Join us! It's time to roll up our sleeves and make a real difference. That's why GBTV is not just a place to view shows you love; it's a way to get involved and to turn ideas into action. We're going to leave the sensational scandals and partisan bickering to others and instead move forward and find real solutions. We hope you'll join us on this journey toward building a better tomorrow -- we promise, it'll be one heck of a ride.

Welcome to GBTV: The Truth Lives Here.

Still have questions? Join Glenn tomorrow night for the FREE GBTV Launch Event -- Wednesday, June 8th at 7 pm ET. Get all the details HERE.
 

Copyright & Trademark Notice  |  Privacy Policy  |  Terms of Use  |  Unsubscribe

Glenn Beck Program | 1270 Avenue of the Americas | New York, NY 10020

Glenn Beck - Premiere Radio Networks - All Rights Reserved 2011





--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Return of the Anti-Interventionist Right


Return of the Anti-Interventionist Right
by Patrick J. Buchanan, June 07, 2011

Late last month, when U.S. air strikes caused civilian casualties in Afghanistan, an angry Hamid Karzai issued an ultimatum.

If future U.S. strikes are not restricted, we will take "unilateral action" and America may be treated like an "occupying power."

That brought this blistering retort from one Republican hawk.

"If President Karzai continues with these public ultimatums, we must consider our options about the immediate future of U.S. troops in his country. If he actually follows through on his claim that Afghan forces will take 'unilateral action' against NATO forces which conduct such air raids to take out terrorists and terrorist positions, that should result in the immediate withdrawal of U.S. forces from Afghanistan and the suspension of U.S. aid."

Who was the GOP hawk shaking the fist at Karzai? Sarah Palin.

Insiders attribute Palin's shift from the neocon party line to the departure from her staff of Randy Scheunemann and Michael Goldfarb, and their replacement by Libya war skeptic Peter Schweizer.

Perhaps. But there are other straws in the wind that the GOP is coming to see that, like his "big government conservatism" ballyhooed by The Weekly Standard, Bush II's compulsive interventionism has proven as great a disaster for his country as it did for his party.

Last week, House Speaker John Boehner had to scramble to cobble up a substitute resolution to prevent half his GOP caucus from joining with Democrats to denounce President Obama's war in Libya as unconstitutional and to demand a total U.S. pullout in 15 days.

The author of the end-the-war resolution that seemed likely to pass was Dennis Kucinich. That Republicans would vote for a Kucinich resolution testifies to the anger on the Hill that Obama took us to war without congressional authorization and has treated the War Powers Act with manifest contempt.

Boehner's resolution, which gives the president longer to comply with the act and involves no deadline for withdrawal, passed 268 to 145.

But Kucinich's resolution, which would have cut off funds for the Libyan war, still garnered 148 votes, among them 87 Republicans.

More than a third of House Republicans voted to pull out of the NATO coalition attacking Moammar Gadhafi's forces, which would have forced a NATO withdrawal from that civil war. This is historic.

Yet another reflection of anti-interventionist sentiment can be seen in Defense Secretary Robert Gates' valedictory tour, where he felt compelled to assure U.S. allies in Asia we are there to stay.

In Afghanistan, Gates seemed to warn the White House not to make too large a withdrawal of forces in July, when President Obama begins to reverse the 30,000-soldier surge of 2009.

What explains the shift in political and public sentiment away from military interventionism?

First, the length and cost of the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq­the first in its 10th year, the latter in its eighth­with their endless bleedings of American blood and treasure for inconclusive results.

Over 6,000 dead, 40,000 wounded, and $1 trillion sunk, with a real possibility a U.S. pullout from Iraq in December could result in civil war, and a fear that the Afghan War, where the Taliban now conduct jailbreaks of 500 men in Kandahar and fight on the Af-Pak border in battalion strength, may ultimately be lost.

A second cause is our fiscal crisis. America cannot afford any more wars, or more billions in foreign aid to balance budgets of Arab countries whose treasuries have been looted by departing despots.

Third, there is the sense in Congress that it has let itself be steadily stripped of its constitutional power to declare war.

Harry Truman conducted America's first undeclared war in Korea, calling it a "police action."

Historians now believe Congress was misled or lied to when it approved the Tonkin Gulf Resolution authorizing LBJ to attack North Vietnam.

While George H.W. Bush got the support of both houses for Desert Storm, Bill Clinton launched his war on Serbia in defiance of a House vote not to authorize it.

George W. Bush got congressional approval for the invasion of Iraq by declaring that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction it did not have. We went to war for nothing.

Finally, the Libyan war Obama entered, egged on by Britain and France, but without the support of Congress, makes little sense.

Though Gadhafi is a repellent figure, the architect of the Lockerbie massacre, we have no vital interest in who rules Libya. Yet when Gadhafi falls, it will now be up to us to see to it that Libya is united and repaired and has a democratic government.

Obama has already committed us to take the lead in a $40 billion rescue of Egypt and Tunisia. Can we also afford to rescue a Yemen that is in terrible shape and a Libya that has been at war for months?

The return of the anti-interventionist right is welcome news. It may assure a real debate on foreign policy in the Republican primaries of 2012.

http://buchanan.org/blog/return-of-the-anti-interventionist-right-4770

Re: Check out the writeup and photos of this vacation trip

Dick,

I have been to all those places and it is well worth the trip !!! What
they didn't do was go to the aptly named "Whiskey Row" in Prescott
(but it was a kids trip). I love the Lizard's Lounge there. A GREAT
Blues venue.

On Jun 6, 11:33 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Don't let the tag home schooling fool you.  The photos are great and the
> trip looks like one I would love to take
>
> http://thepioneerwoman.com/homeschooling/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Smiting the In-Fiddle

McBilly Osfeiser is just another myth believing xian with an
inferiority complex that subordinates him to the jews.

have pity for the least of these

On Jun 7, 6:47 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> Smiting the In-FiddleAnd Malt Does More than Milton Can, to Justify God's Ways to Manby Fred ReedCyberg, Tennessee– The Reverend McBilly Osfeiser strode to the rostrum of of the Full Bible Perfect Word Baptist Church, a frame building reeking of plainness and Protestantism. He was a tall man, with the sharp facial planes and hard visage of a desert patriarch about to kill something. The congregation shrank in their pews. He was a man who brooked no sin, and no sinners, whom he consigned to eternal damnation, and thought they were getting off light. He looked fiercely about, and spoke:
> "Brethren, I come before you to preach the word of God, for these be evil times, and the children of Israel, and yea the parents and grandparents, even unto their heirs and assigns, are sore beset by the tribe of Mohammed, and Beelzebulb, and Luciferin and Luciferase. In the name of God we must gird our loins, whatever exactly gird means, and smite the followers of Allah, and suffer them not to live, neither child nor mother with child nor suckling babe. Their lands shall be accursed and nothing there shall prosper, neither tares nor the wild ass; thus saith the Lord God, the God of Israel , the god of love and mercy.
> "Today we shall begin our sermon with the story of Samsung and Delilah, in the book of Hezechiah, chapter fourteen, verses nine through twenty-seven, in the reign of Herod Agrippa. In that time Israel was sore beset by the Malachites and the Catamites, even the Stalactites and Stalagmites, and the Assyrians of King Areopagitica with many chariots threatened the city of Solomon. But Samsung spent three days and three nights fasting and praying, and sacrificed a sheep, and it was good in the eyes of the Lord. In the morning he went forth and slew them all, cutting through them with sling and samothrace as one scything wheat until not a Stalagmite was left standing, saving the city.
> "Today, brethren, we of Christ face the same test of our faith. In Afghanistan, as we speak, the Mohammedan Taliban build mighty forces which they will use to conquer all of Christendom and enslave us, having gotten here mysteriously.
> "The powers of the darkness are many and patient, and the Mohammedan awaits to make our wives and daughters into harem slaves. It is well said that if we do not slew them there, or perhaps slay them, they will slew us here, or a slew of them will slay a slew of us there, maybe here, or they will...whatever. Remember the second book of Malthusians, when Chay-suss expelled the Gadarene Swine from the woman afflicted with leprosy, "Rebus sic stantibus," he said. "Carthago delenda est," which is the Latin for "Get the back whence thou camest, and thy towel."
> "I urge you, brethren, to support our Christian troops who with magnificent courage are killing the heathen with drones strikes from thousands of feet while sitting in Colorado. To those weak in faith, who say that we are killing innocent women and children, I say unto ye, women are the source of all Taliban and thus must be military targets. If we destroy arms factories, should we not destroy Taliban factories? As the mighty warrior Jay-suss would want, we will smite them, and leave them bleeding and dying, and wailing over their broken children, blinded and crushed and burned, that they might learn to walk in the ways of righteousness.
> "And now, brethren, I want to introduce you to one of our own warriors for Christ, Willy Bill Bedford, who is just back from the heathen land of Afghanistan, and wounded – wounded, brethren! – smiting the in-fiddle for Jay-suss. Willy Bill, will you come up and testify?"
> Willy Bill was a big, chunky kid with a sloping forehead you could have used to bank a turn in a motorcycle race, and about every other tooth was missing so he looked like a piano keyboard. His left arm was in a cast. "Willy Bill," shouted Reverend Osfeiser, "Tell your brothers and sisters in Jay-suss how you been doing the Lord's work."
> Willy Bill seemed uncomfortable but he sort of scrunched up his courage and said, "Yeah, well. OK, Reverend. Well, we was out in Litani Province and there was twelve of us in a Humvee with 'bout a thousand rounds each of seven-six-two and a sack full of Bibles an'..."
> The reverend roared, "And tell the brethren why you had Bibles, the inherent perfect word of God, with you!"
> "Oh, yeah. We belong to Bible Spreaders, we try to bring Moslems to know Jesus, you know. BS is real important to us, so we always...."
> "You hear that? Bringing souls to God!"
> "Well, we came to Awali, that's this village, maybe three hundred sand-nig – Taliban and their kids, all dirty and livin' in mud huts because they don't love Jesus and the kids there beg for something to eat because they don't know that beggin' ain't right. Well, we told them to get away and smacked them around a little because they might be suicide bombers, you know, and you could just tell the grown-ups hated us for our religion and our freedoms and all, and then we heard a rifle go off. Well, they ain't supposed to have rifles. So the lieutenant called in a air strike and a couple of sixteens came in, and whoom, they just smacked the livin' dog-snot out of those fuckers and....."
> "Now, Willy Bill, don't be using language like that. Do you think Jay-suss talked that way? It's a sin."
> "I'm sorry, Reverend. I won't do it again. I don't want to commit no sin. Anyway, it was a good strike, killed almost everybody although a few was left screamin' and makin' a fuss and women was huggin' kids or what was left, I mean, how much sense does that make? I guess they learned their lesson. So we went through and left Bibles on top of some of the dead ones so whoever found them would come to Jesus and then I fell off the Humvee and broke my arm."
> At which the Reverend McBilly Osfeiser shouted, "Hosannah! Praise the Lord! While we have sat here, living a life of ease, Willy Bill, Cyburg's own Willy Bill, has smote the in-fiddles, and saved our precious daughters from being in harems, though perhaps not in back seats, and saved our holy Tennessee, where we are free and snakes have handles and the God of Wrath rules as he did with Noah in the Sinai!"
> I need a drink.http://www.fredoneverything.net/Jaysuss.shtml

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Tea Party Is a Brown-Shirt Movement, Mostly

only the convicted need a savior

you're welcome

On Jun 7, 10:11 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> My Lord and Savior, is a Jewish Rabbi.
>
> Thanks, man
>
> On Jun 7, 10:34 am, plainolamerican <plainolameri...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > I have changed the title, however, to be slightly more nuanced
> > ---
> > the jews will love you for it
>
> > OMy Lordn Jun 6, 7:52 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
> > > The Tea Party Is a Brown-Shirt Movement, MostlyPosted byAnthony Gregoryon June 6, 2011 12:55 PM
> > > It was obvious in the beginning when all of a sudden they sprung up crying out for their liberty, after years of silence under the fascist Bush administration. They focused on culture-war hot buttons and symbolic battles while ignoring the programs that actually threatened fiscal catastrophe: Medicare and Social Security, which the older demographic behind this movement tended always to support since they guaranteed their status as tax feeders. Meanwhile, most of the Tea Party types complained that Obama the alleged Marxist Muslim wasn't murdering enough people abroad, torturing and detaining enough Muslims and enemies of the state, or deporting enough people for the crime of crossing the border -- although in every case, Obama has actually been like Bush but more so.
> > > Now a big Tea Party leader says, on behalf of her movement, thatthey will support any Republican in 2012-- even Mitt Romney, the socialist who doesn't even have a better position on free market health care than Obama. This is a partisan and hypocritical movement, as many on LRC warned from the beginning (Ryan McMakenandI sounded the alarmmore than two years ago;Laurence Vancewarned about it consistently, even up to the 2010 election;Lew Rockwelltold us to brace ourselves for betrayal). Regime libertarians have been praising this movement for two years, but LRC writers always saw through the subterfuge.
> > > Is this to say there was no one decent in these protests? That no libertarian impulse was there? That no good-faith, everyday Americans frustrated by the status quo jumped on the bandwagon for understandable reasons? Of course not. But in the main, the Tea Party was always even more of a disingenuous coalition than the antiwar movement of 2003, which has turned out to be an anti-Bush movement more interested in electing Democrats and socializing the economy than stopping the slaughter of innocents overseas.
> > > How do we identify a mass movement that's actually for freedom? The Ron Paul movement, especially its youth, is a great example of one: It is passionate about war, opposed to the central bank, jealous of all civil liberties protected by the Bill of Rights, opposed to the federal police state, wants to end the income tax outright and looks at the entire national leviathan as the enemy, not as savior or an extension of the national will. In short, it loves personal liberty, economic liberty, and peace with all foreign nations, and hates government. If you want to know if someone is serious about freedom, ask him about the last president, U.S. war, or major federal program that he admires. If he names anything from the last sixty years, he is obviously not serious about the short-term threat and long-term struggle for liberty.UPDATE: Am I being far too harsh? After all, there were pro-Ron Paul "tea parties" in 2007. And grassroots organizers are true patriots who seek libertynot just Republican victories. Sure, but at some point, whether in 2008, 2009, or 2010, the movement became hijacked. When almost anyone thinks about the Tea Party, they don't think about the antiwar Ron Paul movement of 2007they think of the Palin/Bachman/Gingrich movement of the last two years. Maybe it was a good movement thatwas hijacked sometime ago. But today it is not a pro-freedom movement, just a pro-Republican one. I have changed the title, however, to be slightly more nuanced.- Hide quoted text -
>
> > - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.