Monday, April 18, 2011

IBD Responds to Obama's 'Third World' Rip at GOP

cr
j   

IBD Responds to Obama’s ‘Third World’ Rip at GOP

Filed under: Business Moves,Economy,Environment,Health Care,Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 10:17 am

In a Friday evening editorial (bolds are mine), in response to President Obama’s assertion that “Republicans will make US a ‘Third World’ country’” (AFP’s headline; bolds are mine):

Excuse us, isn’t that the way we’ve been heading under Obama? Consider for a moment these trends:

• Real earnings have fallen for five straight months, and are down 1% since the end of last year.

• Consumer price inflation is growing at a 6.1% annual rate over the last three months, while producer prices are rising an even-faster 13%. According to John Williams of the Shadow Government Statistics website, if we measure consumer prices the way we did before 1992, inflation is now running at 10% a year.

• The U.S. has added $6 trillion to its debt under Obama, a sure sign of being on the road to Third World status. Three years ago, the U.S. had $7.9 trillion in debt. Today, we have $14 trillion. Bankrupt, hyperinflated Zimbabwe couldn’t do any better.

• The U.S. dollar has fallen so much and foreign nations have so little confidence in our ability to run our fiscal affairs that the “BRIC” nations — the mostly fast-growing former Third World nations of Brazil, Russia, India and China — are talking about replacing the U.S. dollar in foreign trade with the Chinese yuan.

 Just 45.4% of Americans had jobs last year, the lowest since 1983, according to census data crunched by USA Today. Among men, just 66.8% had work last year, the lowest ever.

• Obama touts the “recovery” that supposedly began in June of 2009, but a look at the data show that last year’s real private sector GDP was in fact still down 1.1% from its peak in 2007 — so all of the “expansion” has been in government, not the private sector.

• While we’re at it, under Obama, spending has risen farther and faster than under any president in history.At current rates, government at all levels will take up more than half of all economic activity by 2050.

Can’t happen here, you say? In 1920, Argentina was one of the five richest countries on Earth. Then it followed policies similar to Obama’s — kowtowing to unions, government control of industry, price controls. It crashed, burned and never really recovered.

Third World nations also either lose respect or have longstanding disrespect for the rule of law. This administration would appear to care less about the rule of law, as exemplified by the following notorious items in a far less than complete list:

As IBD’s editorial intro states: “As psychologists say, it sounds like projection to us.” It IS projection to anyone looking at the administration’s record.


Breaking News: Andres Serrano’s controversial ‘Piss Christ’ photograph destroyed

Just another piece of garbage destroyed.  Was not art is any sense of the word.  Art requires talent to create.


 
 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Do Americans Owe Their Freedom to the Marines?


Do Americans Owe Their Freedom to the Marines?
Posted by Michael S. Rozeff on April 17, 2011 01:49 PM

If the Marines (and the U.S. military) had stayed home for nearly all their engagements, Americans would have been no less free. And for those few engagements that may be debatable, strong cases can be made that the U.S. government either drew the nation into war or could have avoided it. Many Americans do not believe this, however.

I give you Duncan Hunter who is a conservative Republican. In this video, he's being asked about the recent little budget impasse and his vote for it, rather than toughing it out with Obama. He makes clear that he voted for it so that the military would be paid. He explains why: "I'm not going to take a risk, and I'm not going to play chicken with the U.S. military. I owe them for my freedom more than I owe my constituents." [My added emphasis.] Hunter is an ex-marine who did two tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan. His bio says that "he and his fellow Marines were at the center of operations in Fallujah, Iraq."

Clearly he believes what he is saying when he says he owes the armed forces for his freedom. Although he may be accused of bias, being such a strong advocate of the military, I take his attitude as being rather common in America. For example, someone on Huffington Post wrote the following: "Bottom line is that we owe our Military the freedom with which we live and the very ground we stand on. If we cannot compensate them adequately and keep the promises that we make to them, then we, as a nation, are truly lost." For another example of this idea, see the web site of the "Defending Freedom" organization. For further examples emanating from top U.S. political officials, see here.

Now, it's ludicrous to think that Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan are bringing about freedom in America. Neither the Iraqis nor the Afghanis attacked the U.S. or even threatened it with attack. They could not amount an attack on North America, certainly not any kind of a sustained attack that represented a sustained threat to freedom on these shores. The Marines and other military units in those places can't possibly be defending freedom. If anything they draw, attract, and incite retaliations against Americans from some occupants of those lands.

It is not even clear that Congressman Hunter and others who claim that the military is providing us with freedom even understand what freedom is. After a century and more of foreign expeditions of the U.S. military, is the country actually more free today? Are our lives, liberty, and property more secure from the depredations of our own governments now than in 1895? Hardly. Have our governments even moved forward on programs of greater freedom for Americans, in confirmation that freedom is the aim of our many government? Clearly, they have mostly done just the opposite.

Let's be more precise. What engagements have the Marines actually been involved in? Where were they? When were they? Why did they occur? What if the Marines had been kept at home? For a tabulation of such engagements, see the web site of Dr. Zoltan Grossman. It is impossible after perusing this list to conclude that we owe our freedom to the Marines. Most all the foreign engagements are in pursuit of various special interests, but not the freedom of Americans.

Although the U.S. government had come to some sort of accommodations with Canada and Mexico as well as with Great Britain, France, and Spain by 1895, its expansion into the Pacific, its war with Spain, and its entry into World War I signalled its decision to girdle the globe, insofar as possible. It submerged this ambition beneath a rhetoric of peace, freedom, democracy, security, and humanitarianism to the point where Americans cannot recognize their own hypocrisy. In point of fact, the military expansion has diminished freedom at home. The military draft for most of the 20th century is hardly an institution of freedom, nor are higher taxes and inflation.

Various fighting forces on this continent might be useful in defending against attack. The Marines might be one of them. But that does not imply that we owe our freedom to the Marines as currently constituted or as they have been employed for the past 120 years. The main attack on the U.S. in this period from an organized state with substantial armed force was the Japanese attack on Hawaii, a chain of islands that the U.S. annexed in 1893, and this attack followed upon unnecessary and warlike U.S. provocations. If the U.S. government had acted differently, that threat to the freedom of Americans could probably have been averted. America could probably have been secured without entering a major war in the Pacific. Even in this case which is the main clear case of an attack on the U.S., it cannot be said that Americans owe their freedom to the Marines. Rather, they were the instrument of U.S. policies in the Pacific.

As for 9/11, this was not an attack by an armed foreign state. There is no state of war between the U.S. and any antagonist, terrorist or otherwise, held to be responsible for that attack. The reasons behind that attack trace back to U.S. interventions in foreign lands. Those are what brought about whatever threat to Americans such terrorism constitutes. There is no generalized threat or war against American freedom stemming from terrorist sources. The terrorists who might like to hit targets in America do not have an agenda of destroying American freedom here in America. The Marines in Iraq and Afghanistan are not keeping Americans free from terrorists in that sense because that is not what the terrorists are after. Their objectives are more to keep Americans from using force in Muslim lands and from supporting anti-Muslim governments in those lands.

The notion that Americans owe their freedom to the Marines (or military in general) is a simple-minded idea that reduces to blind support of the American military as a tool of the national government in its expansionist aims. It is simply a slogan in support of American empire. It is a false slogan. The opposite is more nearly true. Every dollar spent in support of  the empire's worldwide military is another dollar that is a tax burden on Americans, and this burden enslaves Americans. Since half of Americans no longer pay taxes, the empire has conveniently arranged matters so that most Americans do not care and do not question its policies.

**JP** Thank you, Muammar


Author: J.Perez

Thank you, Muammar Al-Qathafi. For the vast majority of human beings, time on this planet is an anonymous passage. They are born naked, leave nothing and die lying down. In your case, you have left a legacy and a philosophy of Governance which will serve as a beacon of light for thousands of generations. And you  refuse to lie down.

Thank you Muammar Al-Qathafi. I sincerely hope that you live among us for many years to come and that you weather this imperialistic storm, dampening the flames of religious extremism and terrorism, fanned by a clique of sickening protagonists who wish to rape Libya and Africa, whose murderous campaign is based around greed and lies.

Many of us in the international community saw this coming. They tried and failed in (where else?) Benghazi in the 1990s and have been itching for a second attempt. The "innocent civilians" they refer to are none other than the terrorists they have trained and into whose ranks the Benghazi Islamist extremists have flocked. They lied about Libyan bombing campaigns, they now lie about cluster bombs (why would your forces deploy cluster weaponry into areas they have to pass through?) and let us be honest, if a "regime" is turning "the full weight of its heavy weaponry" on unarmed civilians the death toll would thousands, not six. Lies and stupidity go hand in hand and the ones who believe in the nonsense being spread by the mainstream media are those sheep whose passage on Earth will remain anonymous, as indeed it should.

In your case, Muammar Al-Qathafi, your passage among us will never be anonymous and you will be remembered for generations to come, thousands of years in the future, as a man who showed us a Third Option and who has left a written legacy which should be fundamental and compulsory reading for every primary school student. It is a manual of Governance for a perfect society.

Your Green Book is not a Utopic treatise but indeed the blueprint behind what you successfully implemented in your country, which was the poorest in the world when you received it and which you have transformed into the richest in Africa in terms of human development indices. For this you will be remembered.

You will be remembered for the system of Governance which was going to receive a UN humanitarian prize in March. You will be remembered for your model which provided free education, free healthcare, free houses. You will be remembered for your agricultural revolution which turned the desert green. You will be remembered for making your people prosperous and proud to be Libyans while taking little for yourself.

You will be remembered for living in a tent when others built palaces and you will be remembered for never turning your back on your roots and your people. You will be remembered for your system of democratic governance through People's Committees and Popular Congresses (Jamahiriya) – real democracy which rises above the mafia-style governance of western "parliamentary democracy". What sort of democracy is that?

You will be remembered for providing a social model which answers the needs of Humankind, taking into account the need for an umbrella State and also introducing the vector to reward human endeavour. Decades ago you saw through the weak points in the Socialist Model and the Capitalist Model and gave us a Third Way.

You will be remembered for your Third Universal Theory providing a manual of economic government which you successfully introduced into your country. Your enemies – they are few but powerful – whatever the result of today's debacle, will be remembered as the self-seeking protagonists they are. Within a single decade, they will be seen as the failures that are and their entry into the annals of history may be a few lines, maybe less and they will have contributed absolutely nothing whatsoever towards the future of humanity. Nothing.

You will be remembered for your political, economic and social axes of your Third Universal Theory which is truly universal and will, I have no doubt, provide a model of Governance for this Planet and all those discovered in the Cosmos in the millennia to come. For this, Muammar Al-Qathafi, you will be remembered.

Yet your work did not end in Libya and with your people. After freeing thousands from the tyranny of colonialist practices and the humiliating yolk of Imperialism, you exported your ideas and ideals, benefiting not just a few cronies (like your enemies do) but directly affecting and building institutions for hundreds of millions of people across Africa. That is why Africans call you the King of Kings.

Your African legacy

The media controlled by your enemies are certainly not ignorant of the facts I am about to refer to but for sure they will never mention them. You will be remembered for your pioneering work in the African Continent – it was you who gave Africa the possibility to connect all countries and cities – and rural areas – in a vast telecommunications project facilitating distance learning, telemedicine and so on.

You will be remembered for your satellite technology which cost 400 million USD, freeing Africa from the burden of paying 500 million USD a year for the use of Western satellites. You paid 300 million USD of this. You will be remembered for having that 30 billion USD set aside – which Obama stole – money destined for African banking projects which would have circumvented western financial interests, holding Africa down for decades with high interest rates. That is why they attacked.

You will be remembered for standing up for the entire African continent at a time when Europeans were trying to fan the flames of racism, dividing North Africa from the rest of the continent. You will be remembered for your support of the ANC against apartheid, for your open approach to religious tolerance, you will be remembered for bringing prosperity, dignity and above all, hope, to Africa.

So nobody is fooled by the lies of your enemies. Hoping you will remain among us for many more years, understanding that nobody is eternal, and respecting your tremendous legacy…

In the name of thousand of millions of human beings, here today or to come tomorrow, thank you, from the bottom of our hearts.

Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

http://english.pravda.ru/opinion/columnists/17-04-2011/117596-thank_muammar-0/

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CvSpnvipRIA&feature=player_embedded


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** Fwd: The War in Tripoli



---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Javed Kaleem <kaleemjavediqbal@gmail.com>

Dear All,

            I am enclosing my new writeup on war in Tripoli. You can see how  Allah helps those leaders who obey Allah and support the cause of Islam. US generals have admitted that defeating forces of  Col Muammar Qazzafi is not likely in foreseeable future.

                                                                         Muhammad Javed Iqbal

 
Kashif Chatha
Sheikhupura

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197