World News

Saturday, April 2, 2011

Re: Traitor Bradley Manning threatened stepmother w/ a knife

You need more than if you're in the military, release classified data,
and get caught, you're going to jail?

Really?

On Apr 1, 1:39 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You still have not answered the questions Tommy....er Einstein .... er Greg.
>
> On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:38 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > CLASSIFIED means under the table. Way under. Welcome to Earth.
>
> > He had the authority to download them. He did NOT have the authority
> > to hand them out. He broke the law. Lots of them. Thats frowned
> > upon here. Even moreso by the military. That means jail. A whole
> > lotta jail.
>
> > On Apr 1, 1:26 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > I see that just as Einstein does not answer questions, neither do you.
>
> > > If the US were doing business above the table instead of below it there
> > > would be no need.
>
> > > Now answer the questions.
>
> > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com
> > >wrote:
>
> > > > You want all Americans privvy to drone footage and classified
> > > > documents?
>
> > > > Thats nice, but its a court martial offence(s), and Manning not only
> > > > knew that, but bragged about it. That makes him both dumb and a
> > > > criminal. The UCMJ is most unforgiving on this shit. He's toast, and
> > > > Julian can laugh all the way to the bank.
>
> > > > Good deal there Brad.
>
> > > > On Apr 1, 12:31 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > Greg,
>
> > > > > Other than the intangible pride and feelings of a few politicians and
> > > > > professional scoundrels explain to me just who and what was damaged
> > by
> > > > > Mannings act of moral conscious.
>
> > > > > Then explain why an act of moral consciousness that falls well within
> > the
> > > > > scope of truth, honesty and openness that ALL Americans expect from
> > their
> > > > > Government and its actions is truly wrong.
>
> > > > > Was there an intent to damage or to simply throw light on the wrongs
> > > > being
> > > > > done ??
>
> > > > > On Fri, Apr 1, 2011 at 10:00 AM, GregfromBoston <
> > greg.vinc...@yahoo.com
> > > > >wrote:
>
> > > > > > It *may* certainly *have* been the property of the US Government at
> > > > > > some time ...
>
> > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > --MJ
>
> > > > > > Still is. Manning is gonna die in jail as an old man.
>
> > > > > > All hail WikiLeaks.
>
> > > > > > On Apr 1, 8:58 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > It *may* certainly *have* been the property of the US Government
> > at
> > > > some
> > > > > > time ...
> > > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > > --MJ"The Nazi party was elected to office by the freely cast
> > ballots
> > > > of
> > > > > > millions of German voters . . . . In the national election of July
> > > > 1932, the
> > > > > > Nazis obtained 37 percent of the vote and a plurality of seats in
> > the
> > > > > > Reichstag. On January 30, 1933, in full accordance with the
> > country's
> > > > legal
> > > > > > and constitutional principles, Hitler was appointed Chancellor.
> > Five
> > > > weeks
> > > > > > later, in the last (and semi-free) election of the pre-totalitarian
> > > > period,
> > > > > > the Nazis obtained 17 million votes, 44 percent of the total.The
> > voters
> > > > were
> > > > > > aware of the Nazi ideology.
> > > > > > > "Nazi literature, including statements of the Nazi plans for the
> > > > future,
> > > > > > papered the country during the last years of the Weimar Republic.
> > Mein
> > > > Kampf
> > > > > > alone sold more than 200,000 copies between 1925 and 1932. The
> > essence
> > > > of
> > > > > > the political system which Hitler intended to establish in Germany
> > was
> > > > > > clear. -- Leonard PeikoffAt 08:54 AM 4/1/2011, you wrote:What
> > makes
> > > > > > camera footage from US drones, and documents from military
> > > > > > > databases, US Property?
> > > > > > > Really?
> > > > > > > On Mar 31, 1:11 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Assange had no right to disseminate ANYTHING that belonged to
> > the
> > > > > > United States, (e.g.;you and I) and I don't give a crap where he
> > was
> > > > > > propped up at. In this case, "MIght Makes Right"; and Assange was
> > > > warned a
> > > > > > number of times NOT to publish information that didn't belong to
> > him,
> > > > but
> > > > > > rather, belonged to us.What made this 'US Property'?
> > > > > > > > Regard$,
> > > > > > > > --MJ... where corruption and public crimes are not carefully
> > > > opposed,
> > > > > > and severely punished, neither liberty nor security can possibly
> > > > subsist. --
> > > > > > Cato's Letters (1721)
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > > > For options & help seehttp://
> > groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > > > --
> > > > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > > > *
> > > > > *
> > > > > *Presidente, Piroliticos del Sur*
> > > > > *440 Mtrs Este del Cementerio*
> > > > > *Uvita de Osa, Puntarenas *
> > > > > *2743-8142, 8607-7648*
> > > > > *markmka...@gmail.com*- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > > > --
> > > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > > > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > > > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> > > --
> > > *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *
> > > *- Hide quoted text -
>
> > > - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> *Mark M. Kahle H.*
> *
> *
> *
> *- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Why in the world would the NYT print this story - why not just point a finger at the CIA agents and tell the Libyans there they are

We are on the same page.

"A C.I.A. spokesman declined to comment."

Ya think? Its called SSS. Sargent Schultz Syndrome.

On Apr 1, 2:37 pm, dick thompson <rhomp2...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Not any more. Question is should it have been in the first place. Next
> question is who leaked it to the NYT and why and who told them to, who
> is behind the leak at the ultimate end. I just find it strange that the
> NYT feels entitled to release anything like this with what was said
> about it to begin with. If it was secret, if it was clandestine, if it
> was authorized for the CIA to act, then it should not be up to the NYT
> to decide to print the info.
>
> On 04/01/2011 11:20 AM, GregfromBoston wrote:
>
>
>
> > Note that the president has issued a secret finding - authorize the
> > CIA - clandestine effort. What part of that tells us that the
> > president
> > wants this broadcast to the world. Note the word secret, CIA,
> > clandestine. Which of those words do you not understand.
> > -------------------------------------
>
> > If you're reading about it in the New York Times, its neither
> > clandestine nor secret.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Why in the world would the NYT print this story - why not just point a finger at the CIA agents and tell the Libyans there they are

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Arizona Sheriff: Federal Agents told to reduce border arrests

Blame otraitorbama and the demotraitorcrats.

Arizona Sheriff: Federal Agents told to reduce border arrests

Scotty Starnes | April 1, 2011 at 12:30 PM | Tags: Arizona, border security, Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever, illegal immigrants, Illegal immigration, immigration laws, U.S. Border Patrol | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-4VW

Nothing knew. The Obama regime continues with their backdoor amnesty plan which includes the refusal to enforce immigration laws.

Fox News reports:

An Arizona sheriff says U.S. Border Patrol officials have repeatedly told him they have been ordered to reduce -- at times even stop -- arrests of illegal immigrants caught trying to cross the U.S. border.

Cochise County Sheriff Larry Dever told FoxNews.com that a supervisor with the U.S. Border Patrol told him as recently as this month that the federal agency's office on Arizona's southern border was under orders to keep apprehension numbers down during specific reporting time periods.

"The senior supervisor agent is telling me about how their mission is now to scare people back," Dever said in an interview with FoxNews.com. "He said, 'I had to go back to my guys and tell them not to catch anybody, that their job is to chase people away. … They were not to catch anyone, arrest anyone. Their job was to set up posture, to intimidate people, to get them to go back."

Dever said his recent conversation with the Border Patrol supervisor was the latest in a series of communications on the subject that he has had with various federal agents over the last two years. Dever said he plans to relay the substance of these conversations when he testifies under oath next month before the Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.

"I will raise my hand to tell the truth and swear to God, and nothing is more serious or important than that," he said. "I'm going to tell them that, here's what I hear and see every day: I had conversation with agent A, B, C, D and this is what they told me."

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Farrakhan blames Demons for altering Obama's mind

aka blaming himself.

Farrakhan blames Demons for altering Obama's mind

Scotty Starnes | April 1, 2011 at 1:30 PM | Tags: demons, Louis Farrakhan, Moammar Gadhafi, Nation of Islam, President Obama | Categories: Political Issues | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-4VZ

Racist Demon Louis Farrakhan

Would that be white demons or Jewish demons? Since Farrakhan is a racist and anti-Semite, I'm guessing both.

CBN reports:

Warning that destruction could be on America's doorstep because it oppresses "God's chosen people," Minister Louis Farrakhan, the controversial Nation of Islam leader, defended Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi today, calling the U.S. action in Libya hypocrisy.

Speaking from the pulpit of Chicago's Mosque Maryam, the Nation of Islam's international headquarters, purchased 40 years ago with a $3 million loan from Gadhafi, Farrakhan blamed demons for altering President Barack Obama's moral conscience and driving the assault on Gadhafi, who he calls a brother.

"It is a terrible thing for me to hear my brother called all these ugly and filthy names when I can't recognize him as that," Farrakhan said to the crowd assembled at the mosque on Chicago's South Side. "Even though the current tide is moving against him … how can I refuse to raise my voice in his defense? Why would I back down from those who have given so much?"

Though they haven't spoken since 2005, Farrakhan and Gadhafi have been allies for decades. In 1996, around the time Gadhafi shifted from pan-Arab to pan-African ambitions, Farrakhan was criticized for traveling to meet the leader in Tripoli.

Add a comment to this post

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com