Friday, February 18, 2011

Re: The poor are not getting poorer

everyone in my world has more than enough, are you saying that's not
possible? anyway things could still be shared a lot more equally.

(Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be required of thee: then whose
shall those things be) ???

16And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The ground of a certain
rich man brought forth plentifully: 17And he thought within himself,
saying, What shall I do, because I have no room where to bestow my
fruits? 18And he said, This will I do: I will pull down my barns, and
build greater; and there will I bestow all my fruits and my goods.

20But God said unto him, Thou fool, this night thy soul shall be
required of thee: then whose shall those things be, which thou hast
provided? 21So is he that layeth up treasure for himself, and is not
rich toward God. 16And he spake a parable unto them, saying, The
ground of a certain rich man brought forth plentifully:
http://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=Luke+12&version=KJV

On Feb 17, 6:14 pm, BB47 <mde...@socal.rr.com> wrote:
> On Feb 17, 3:46 pm, Wes <wesleykell...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Nobody should be expected to work and not afford a car (plus repairs),
> > rent, health insurance, retirement and also little things that make
> > life worthwhile (Cable TV could be one). Why do you want to pay people
> > less than they need, you can't or you won't? you always act like their
> > friends till it comes to payday then you're more of a rapist.
>
>  Just picture a world filled with YOUs.  Everyone complaining to each
> other that you should buy the other a car and everything else on your
> list.  Think about that for a little while.  Spend some time
> surrounded by multiple yous'
> Insane isn't it?
>
> What you fail to see is that all that stuff you ask for costs WAY more
> than you "put in" at a low end job.
> Therefore you are forcing someone else to buy it for you with THEIR
> work.  Can you see how unfair that is?
> It is mathematically impossible to make your scenario work.
>
>    You act like all those things are your right!  Just by being born
> and able to say "welcome to Walmart"  gets you a car, retirement,
> health care, cable TV, repairs, the whole life? (which costs hundreds
> of thousands of dollars)
> How can you think that? That is just crazy.  Somebody had to earn that
> money.  Somebody that did everything way better than you did and your
> low skill job.  You don't deserve their hard work.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: **JP** URGENT: Office Assistant Required (Female)

Dear Talha!

You are always great and i hat off you, the issue you and Atta Alvi raised is genuine and common. Today's Pakistan is in much dangerous and sensitive situation, there are many crimes populated by that type of different tricks and traps, even some send their id card's copy attached with their resume which increases the threat.

Sumera Afzal showed her natural response but in this emotional reply she did not mention company officials contact number or any other useful information which may lead to her genuine approach.
 

--


*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*-*&*
Best Regards,

Hassan Shahbaz
Web Developer/Designer
+92-321-771-3956
+92-345-330-1111
www.awamicouncil.org

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** Bahrain: US Naval Base or Iranian Asset?




Bahrain: US Naval Base or Iranian Asset?

Posted: 15 Feb 2011 11:52 PM PST

What is at stake for Americans in the Bahrain unrest?

1. Bahrain is a major center for the refining of crude petroleum, refining some 270,000 barrels a day. This amount is not large, but given tight petroleum supplies and a price of over $100 a barrel for Brent Crude, an outage there would certainly put up world prices.

2. Bahrain hosts a naval base for the US Fifth Fleet, important to the US security architecture for the Persian Gulf (the Arabs say Arabian Gulf). Nearly 2/3s of the world's proven petroleum reserves and 45% of the world's natural gas reserves are in the Gulf region.

3. Bahrain is an important finance center.

The Shiite majority is attempting to assert itself there. A Shiite-dominated government in Bahrain might well demand a closure of the US naval base. It would not be an Iranian puppet, insofar as Arab Shiites are jealous of their independence and most Bahraini Shiites don't follow ayatollahs; but it would certainly have warm relations with Tehran. A Shiite victory there would politically embolden other Gulf Arab Shiites, in KuwaitSaudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates(Shiites are a minority in all three). Insofar as Iran enjoys soft power with the region's Shiites, the net result would certainly favor Iran and at least somewhat disadvantage the United States, which already shot itself in the foot by helping install a Shiite government in Baghdad that has excellent relations with Iran. For the Bahrain government to become more democratic and more Shiite-influenced would annoy the Wahhabi Saudi state, which now sees the Sunni Bahraini king as a strategic asset.

Persian Gulf

Gulf

Thousands of Shiite demonstrators came out yet again in Bahrain on Tuesday. They are demanding that prime minister Sheikh Khalifa bin Salman Al Khalifa step down. An uncle of the king, Sheikh Khalifa has been appointed PM for four decades. The Shiite protesters want an elected prime minister who would reflect their demographic dominance.

The killings of two demonstrators, one on Monday and another on Tuesday, have helped to galvanize the crowds. In an unusual concession, the king, Hamad Al Khalifa, apologized Tuesday for the deaths and promised that the shooters would be brought to justice.

The demonstrators thronged into the downtown Pearl Roundabout, and some are insisting on spending the night there. The main Shiite political party, with 18 seats in the lower house of 40 seats, is Wifaq. It suspended its participation in parliament on Tuesday in protest against the killings of the two demonstrators.

Bahrain has a little over 1.2 million people, of whom 54 percent are expatriate guest workers, nearly half of them from India. I can remember, on the occasions I was in Manama, the way signs in Malayalam festooned the market and the money-changer stalls. The other 568,000 are Bahrainis. Of these, social scientists think about two-thirds, or about 374,000, are Shiites. In turn, about 100,000 of these are Ajamis, i.e. Shiites of Iranian heritage who are now Arabs. The rest are Baharna or indigenous Bahraini Shiites, who mainly adhere to the conservative Akhbari school that does not believe in following ayatollahs. Many of them live in rural villages outside the capital.

The other 187,000 or so are Sunni Bahrainis, the community to which King Hamad Al Khalifah belongs. He has reigned as king since 2002 (having come to power as emir in 1999).

Bahrain

Bahrain

In the Gulf, typically guest workers cannot vote and don't have permanent residency or a path to citizenship, though it is rumored that the Sunni monarch, King Hamad Al Khalifa, has bestowed Bahraini citizenship on some expatriate Sunnis in a so far vain attempt offset the indigenous Shiite majority.

The Bahrain constitution lets the Sunni king appoint the 40 members of the upper house of parliament. The lower house also has 40 members, and in the 2010 election only 18 of them were captured by the Shiite religious party, Wifaq, led by cleric Ali Salman. The other 22 went to Sunnis of various stripes.

Ali Salman

Ali Salman

So, in a country where citizens are probably two-thirds Shiite, Shiites have little representation in the senate and are a minority even in the elected lower house. Not only can the Sunni-dominated upper house veto measures passed by the lower house, but the king himself can veto legislation at will and can prorogue parliament whenever he likes.

Many Shiites in rural areas are poor, despite Bahrain's riches, derived from its small petroleum industry, its vital finance sector, and strategic rent from the US for the US naval base for the Fifth Fleet. Wifaq not only seeks more equitable representation for the Shiite majority but also a better economic deal for the poor.

Aljazeera English has video on Bahrain:

">

Pressman: "Coup with a mass(ive) twist"

Posted: 15 Feb 2011 09:35 PM PST

Jeremy Pressman writes in a guest column for Informed Comment:

Since Mubarak's departure, I have followed several discussions among academics and analysts about what just happened. Some contend it was a military coup . Many others call it a popular revolution.

I am not surprised about this disagreement because while the general pressure that was brought to bear on Mubarak came from millions of Egyptians taking to the streets, the final push came from Egypt's generals who saw the writing on the wall, even when Mubarak himself stubbornly clung to power. (Maybe it was a coupvolution?)

But the coup vs. revolution divide is not just an academic debate. The combination of these two elements will likely greatly influence the direction Egypt takes over the next 6-12 months. As Juan Cole noted on February 13, "For the moment, Egypt is a strange kind of military dictatorship, with various safety valves for popular input and a set of promises for the future. But then, it has been that for some time– it is just that the promises may now be more credible and a transition to something else may be possible."

Will the leaders of the armed forces still think about how to protect their military, political, and economic power? Absolutely, and I would not expect them to do otherwise.

At the same time, we know the generals witnessed the same mass movement that captivated not only the Egyptian populace but also the rest of the world. The cost of blocking genuine political reform would clearly be higher than in the aftermath of a conventional coup where the initial pressure for change came from the military itself. In this case, the January 25 movement was an impressive mass movement with extensive preparation, transnational learning, and broad public involvement.

Moreover, I fear the understandable focus on the fact that it took only 18 days to topple Mubarak – amazing, yes – obscures the years of planning, protesting, organizing, and learning by many Egyptian groups. By all appearances, this was a hard-fought and well-earned victory, not a flash in the pan.

What I am left wondering is whether the military can relinquish political power, perhaps even to the point of formal civilian rule over the armed forces, and still hold onto its economic empire. With Gamal Mubarak "badly in need of a good career counselor," the military's economic arms might even have a freer hand.

(A succinct take is here: "And it seems that the military, now as "national capitalists," have seen themselves as the blood rivals of the neoliberal "crony capitalists" associated with Hosni Mubarak's son Gamal who have privatized anything they can get their hands on and sold the country's assets off to China, the US, and Persian Gulf capital.") Because while the desire for political freedom played a central role in the uprising, economic want did as well. What happens if Egyptians see progress on one but not the other?

Jeremy Pressman
Alan R. Bennett Honors Professor
Associate Professor
Department of Political Science
University of Connecticut


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197

**JP** Lahore Incident & Droan attacks...


very good 

 

 

___

Point to be noted:

 The Dismissal of Federal Cabinet, after the Lahore incident, may be taken into consideration in this scenario. I regret to say that it might be executed only to expel Mr. Shah Mahmood Qureshi, Ex Foreign Minister, from Cabinet as a part of punishment because of his true stand on logical & principle basis and disclosing facts & figures against the immunity of Mr. Rymind Davis. The current campaign by the PPP personnels, of expressing disinformation & creating ambiguity against him, confirms it true.

 

cid:4.2885677835@web130203.mail.mud.yahoo.com

 

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
International Urdu Writers' Club has been formed
to introduce great works by different writers and
poets around the globe. Here we all are gathered
to accomplish that gigantic task which was never
even accomplished by the governments that is
continuously reluctant to patronise writers and
their wonderful work.

Our International Urdu Writers' Club warmly
welcome all writers and poets from every corner
of the world and we shall try our best to explore
them around the globe. This group is not only for
all senior and professional writers, who are
exponents of a rich and exemplary culture and
traditions but it is also dedicated to educating
writers of all levels and disciplines in the
craft of writing and in the marketing of their
work.


Please join International Writers' Club:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/PakistaniWriters/join


or send a blank email to:
PakistaniWriters-subscribe@yahoogroups.com


If you want to be a part of International Writers' Club
but do not wish to receive daily emails, send a blank
email to:
PakistaniWriters-nomail@yahoogroups.com
.

__,_._,___

**JP** Facebook & Google are CIA Fronts



Facebook & Google are CIA Fronts

February 16, 2011 
 
In the case of both Google and Facebook, three talented students in their 20's came out of obscurity to establish multi-billion dollar enterprises. Do you suppose they had some help?
 
(for HenryMakow) 



BY SANDEEP PARWAGA


There used to be a saying: ''No one makes a name for himself without giving something up''

As a youngster, I was awed by people who ''made it to the top'' by creating and innovating corporations, technologies, or simply establishing themselves through sports, music, entertainment, etc. thus becoming millionaires.

Now as I have grown older, I realize how illusory this paradigm really is. I came to the conclusion that if you want to reach the ''top',' you have to give up your soul.  

Take Mark Zuckerberg for example. He is one of the most ''successful entrepreneurs'' in the last decade. Having made a fortune through his Facebook empire, he reaches more than 500 million people worldwide. It seems like a fairytale. A student creates a new interface to connect the people throughout the world. Well, it sounds great doesn't it? It would, if we were true.  

Here is 
a good video that demonstrates that Facebook was indirectly funded by the CIA with the goal of learning and storing everything there is to know about you. Why? To monitor and ultimately control.   

Again, the people have been totally duped by the Facebook-mania and can only see what they are told to see. As my friends say: ''It is to connect people and share information''. In the wake of the recent crisis in Egypt, we might add that Facebook has become not just a data-mining operation, but also a soft power proxy for crisis-creation.

Let's look at headlines that should cast no doubt about the true character of CIAbook:

Facebook's Zuckerberg Says The Age of Privacy is Over -

Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg says privacy is no longer a 'social norm' 

Facebook - the CIA conspiracy 

The Face of Facebook -  (Pay particular notice to the IMs that got leaked and confirmed to be true by the New Yorker)

Facebook & Social Media: A Convenient Cover For Spying - 

US spies invest in internet monitoring technology - Quoted from this article: ''In an attempt to sift through the blizzard of information, the investment arm of the CIA, In-Q-Tel, has invested in a software firm that monitors social media.''

Nihilists of The World Unite: Wikileaks Is 
The "Cognitive Infiltration" Operation Demanded by Cass Sunstein - 

TIME Mag Person of the Year 2010 - This link is just a mere reminder of past history and the perversion of ''honoring''those who don't deserve it. Would you like to share this front cover with Hitler, Stalin, Kissinger, etc.? I sure wouldn't. Obviously Zuckerberg has done something ''great''. Just my 2 cents about this garbage.

GOOGLE 

Google has come under scrutiny over its attempt to eliminate competing search engines and block ''controversial'' sites and people, but the biggest controversy came over its alleged ties to the CIA and NSA

Google founders Sergey M. Brin and Lawrence E. Page are portrayed as average folks, Stanford University students, who teamed up to create a ''superior search engine''. Their attempt to do just that turned out to be so successful that they started to get funding from big players, for example Sun Microsystems. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sergey_Brin#Search_engine_development

It can be assumed that the
 CIA and NSA funded them as well. As in the above example of Facebook, don't forget the Google scandal connected to China last year, where Google simply evaded censorship laws by moving to Hong Kong

The CIA might have used Google as a soft power proxy in China as well for destabilization operations. Here are a few issues that made the news regarding Google:

Tarpley: US Gov uses Google proxy to attack China - (Vid) 

Google-NSA collaboration draws alarm - 

YouTube's Parent Google is a 
Corporate Member of the Council on Foreign Relations 

Ex-Agent:
 CIA Seed Money Helped Launch Google - 

The Google-NSA Alliance: Questions and Answers - 

 
CONCLUSION

I admit I have Facebook. I am not particularly happy about it, but it does facilitate being connected with friends from other places. I try to keep a low profile. Don't reveal anything or don't click on trivial buttons, for example the ''Likes''. 

Use alternatives to make contact if you can, e.g. email or other messengers. If you have Facebook, you have probably realized how people have literally sold their lives over to it.

Every time I see people revealing things to the finest detail, they don't think about any consequences, or let's say, they are not smart enough to care. The scientific dictatorship has done a ''good'' job in brainwashing and manipulating the masses. Don't be fooled by the deceit. The mainstream media has been very reluctant to cover the disturbing Google/Facebook ties as it would expose important assets for the Big Brother machine and its secret use to destabilize.

 Zuckerberg or the Google founders would never have gotten the publicity, wealth and success without a CIA or NSA  connection. To elaborate on the opening quote, I assume they have been initiated into the Illuminati Order and sold their soul. 

------------

Sandeep Parwaga is a 22 yr old Indian student who currently lives in the UK.

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197