World News

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Re: What a mean-spirited editorial from the Boston Globe

I don't think the sale has gone through yet. Still owned by the NYT. The people who are going to purchase were announcing that they had the funding and that the sale would most likely go through. I surely do hope that the editorial board gets changed. They are in dire need of it IMNSHO.

On 01/29/2011 04:24 PM, Keith In Köln wrote:

This is shameful. Isn't the Boston Globe still owned by the NYT Company? I recall just recently that it was purchased by another private consortium.....Obviously, if this is the case, they have not changed the editorial board.

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:

If I were on the SCOTUS I would have skipped this mess also. Why should they sit there as targets for whatever ruffled Junior's feelings this time. His speech was very missable in the first place and by staying away they did not lose anything at all that was of any value. And why the Globe thought that their staying away brought politics to the court when sitting there while Zero lied about the court decision last year didn't bring politics to the court? I think the Globe is doing nothing but pushing their own agenda for no good reason at all.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2011/01/27/by_skipping_obama_speech_justices_bring_politics_to_court/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: What a mean-spirited editorial from the Boston Globe

This is shameful. Isn't the Boston Globe still owned by the NYT Company? I recall just recently that it was purchased by another private consortium.....Obviously, if this is the case, they have not changed the editorial board.

On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:29 AM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:

If I were on the SCOTUS I would have skipped this mess also. Why should they sit there as targets for whatever ruffled Junior's feelings this time. His speech was very missable in the first place and by staying away they did not lose anything at all that was of any value. And why the Globe thought that their staying away brought politics to the court when sitting there while Zero lied about the court decision last year didn't bring politics to the court? I think the Globe is doing nothing but pushing their own agenda for no good reason at all.

http://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/editorials/articles/2011/01/27/by_skipping_obama_speech_justices_bring_politics_to_court/

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Truth:

It took me awhile to find this but here it is http://bible.cc/john/2-17.htm
The zeal of thine house hath eaten me up. They saw it as a prophecy
fullilled when Jesus made the mistake? of letting his anger get the
better of him.

> the Bible was written
> by men, not by God.

some of it contains prophecy wich men can't do see here -
http://www.biblegateway.com/keyword/index.php?search=fulfilled&searchtype=phrase&version1=9&spanbegin=1&spanend=73startnumber%3D251startnumber%3D501startnumber%3D751startnumber%3D1001startnumber%3D1251startnumber%3D1501startnumber%3D1751&startnumber=26

> Lets take this one step further, and overturn the tables of the
> Supreme Court: Corporations are not people!

corps. get everlasting life (too big to fail) while people get eternal
death (too small to matter)

On Jan 29, 6:31 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I will say something.
>
> Much of the Bible is allegorical, and meant as lessons for life. Much
> of it is figurative, and not literal. Remember, the Bible was written
> by men, not by God.
>
> The point of this whole money changer passage is the lesson expressed
> in the last sentence when Jesus exclaims: "Make not my Father's house
> a
> house of merchandise."
>
> Lets take this one step further, and overturn the tables of the
> Supreme Court: Corporations are not people!
>
> Bless you and have a great weekend. -Tommy
>
> On 1/28/11, Wes <wesleykell...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Say something
>
> > On Jan 25, 5:41 pm, Wes <wesleykell...@hotmail.com> wrote:
> >> > > I wouldn't say Jesus was a Socialist and he did use force that one
> >> > > time in the temple (maybe that was a mistake)
>
> >> > Force against a table?
> >> > He knocked over tables, he didn't knock over people.
>
> >> 15And when he had made a scourge of small cords, he drove them all out
> >> of the temple, and the sheep, and the oxen; and poured out the
> >> changers' money, and overthrew the tables; 16And said unto them that
> >> sold doves, Take these things hence; make not my Father's house an
> >> house of
> >> merchandise.http://www.biblegateway.com/keyword/index.php?search=overthrew+tables...
>
> >> He made a whip and drove them out. like I said, maybe he regrets it
> >> because it gave them a reason to have him killed.
>
> >> On Jan 23, 10:05 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > On Jan 23, 4:44 pm, Wes <wesleykell...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> >> > > I wouldn't say Jesus was a Socialist and he did use force that one
> >> > > time in the temple (maybe that was a mistake)
>
> >> > Force against a table?
> >> > He knocked over tables, he didn't knock over people.- Hide quoted text -
>
> >> - Show quoted text -
>
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Love this guy - he makes sense

http://washingtonexaminer.com/blogs/beltway-confidential/2011/01/gov-christie-public-employees-dont-be-angry-first-guy-came-here-a

What I thought was totally ridiculous was that the Dems countered this
by saying that when he said 9% he didn't exclude kids so it was not
really 9%. Now tell me that that makes any sense at all.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Interview with Clint Eastwood - I like the way he thinks

Good article....

On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 6:34 PM, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703293204576106080298279672.html?mod=djemEditorialPage_h

Strikes me as a very bright and thoughtful guy.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls. * Read the latest breaking news, and more.