Sunday, January 23, 2011

Re: Keith Olbermann Leaves ‘Countdown’, But His Legacy Remains on MSNBC

Not annoyed, amused. Say Goodnight Faux Noise, Glenn Beck, Gretchen
Van Snide of Mouth, Ann Coulter, Pitbull Palin, and The Rest Of The
Crazy Wing Nut Unfair and Unbalanced Pundits

On 1/22/11, Sage2 <wisdom812@gmail.com> wrote:
> As an old radio talk show host Jerry Williams often would
> ask ! " What's the matter Tommy ? You sound ANNOYED " !
>
>
> ***************************************************************************************************************************************
>
> On Jan 22, 11:56 am, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Say Goodnight Faux Noise, Glenn Beck, Gretchen Van Snide of Mouth and
>> The Rest Of The Crazy Wing Nut Unfair and Unbalanced Pundits
>>
>> On 1/22/11, Keith In Köln <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >  Once Comcast completes the buy-out from G.E.,  rest assured that NBC,
>> > and
>> > MSNBC will return to profitability, and hopefully, a sense of
>> > rationality.
>> > I tend to believe this is the reason that Moonbat extradordiniare
>> > Olbermann
>> > flew the coop now, versus being termianted.  The writing was on the
>> > wall.
>> > Say G'Night Maddow, Schultz, and the rest of the crazy
>> > Anti-American's.....Your fifteen minutes of fame are over!
>>
>> >> Olbermann Leaves 'Countdown' on MSNBC
>> >> By BILL CARTER
>>
>> >> Virginia Sherwood/MSNBC
>>
>> >> Keith Olbermann in November.
>> >> 12:05 a.m. | Updated Keith Olbermann, the highest-rated host on MSNBC,
>> >> announced abruptly on the air Friday night that he was leaving his
>> >> show, "Countdown," immediately.
>>
>> >> The host, who has had a stormy relationship with the management of the
>> >> network for some time, especially since he was suspended for two days
>> >> last November, came to an agreement with NBC's corporate management
>> >> late this week to settle his contract and step down.
>>
>> >> In a closing statement on his show, Mr. Olbermann said simply that it
>> >> would be the last edition of the program. He offered no explanation
>> >> other than on occasion "all that surrounded the show – but never the
>> >> show itself – was just too much for me."
>>
>> >> Mr. Olbermann thanked his viewers for their enthusiastic support of a
>> >> show that had "gradually established its position as
>> >> antiestablishment."
>>
>> >> In a statement, MSNBC said: "MSNBC and Keith Olbermann have ended
>> >> their contract. The last broadcast of 'Countdown with Keith Olbermann'
>> >> will be this evening. MSNBC thanks Keith for his integral role in
>> >> MSNBC's success and we wish him well in his future endeavors."
>>
>> >> NBC executives said the move had nothing to do with the impending
>> >> takeover of NBC Universal by Comcast. With viewers and fans of Mr.
>> >> Olbermann suggesting that Comcast was responsible for forcing Mr.
>> >> Olbermann out, Comcast also released an official statement late Friday
>> >> night:
>>
>> >> "Comcast has not closed the transaction for NBC Universal and has no
>> >> operational control at any of its properties including MSNBC. We
>> >> pledged from the day the deal was announced that we would not
>> >> interfere with NBC Universal's news operations. We have not and we
>> >> will not."
>>
>> >> MSNBC announced that "The Last Word" with Lawrence O'Donnell would
>> >> replace "Countdown" at 8 p.m., with "The Ed Show" with Ed Schultz
>> >> taking Mr. O'Donnell's slot at 10 p.m. Mr. Olbermann did not discuss
>> >> any future plans, but NBC executives said one term of his settlement
>> >> would keep him from moving to another network for an extended period
>> >> of time.
>>
>> >> Mr. Olbermann signed a four-year contract extension in 2008 for an
>> >> estimated $30 million. He had hosted "Countdown" at 8 p.m. since 2003
>> >> and it became the foundation of the channel's surge to its status as
>> >> the second-ranked news channel on cable television, after Fox News,
>> >> surpassing the one-time leader CNN.
>>
>> >> Mr. Olbermann's outspoken, and sometimes controversial, support of
>> >> liberal positions and Democratic candidates redefined MSNBC from a
>> >> neutral news channel to one that openly offered a voice to viewers on
>> >> the left, much as Fox News has done for conservatives.
>>
>> >> Mr. Olbermann challenged Fox News publicly on numerous occasions,
>> >> especially the top-rated cable host Bill O'Reilly.
>>
>> >> Ratings for Mr. Olbermann's show grew, though he never approached Mr.
>> >> O'Reilly's level of popularity. But he helped expand the MSNBC brand
>> >> by his frequent invitations to Rachel Maddow, who was eventually
>> >> offered her own show on MSNBC.
>>
>> >> Ms. Maddow became the 9 p.m. host following Mr. Olbermann and has
>> >> built such a successful show that some NBC executives felt less
>> >> concerned about losing Mr. Olbermann as the signature star of the
>> >> network.
>>
>> >> According to several senior network executives, NBC's management had
>> >> been close to firing Mr. Olbermann on previous occasions, most
>> >> recently in November after he revealed that he had made donations to
>> >> several Democratic candidates in 2010 — one of them, coincidentally,
>> >> was Representative Gabrielle Giffords, who has been the subject of
>> >> many of his recent shows after being shot in an assassination attempt.
>>
>> >> The top MSNBC executive, Phil Griffin, said the donations had violated
>> >> NBC News standards and ordered Mr. Olbermann suspended. His fans
>> >> responded with a petition to reinstate him that attracted over 250,000
>> >> signatures. Mr. Olbermann returned two days later. In his response he
>> >> said the rules on donations had been "inconsistently applied."
>>
>> >> More:
>>
>> >>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/olbermann-hosts-last...
>>
>> >> Keith Olbermann out at MSNBC
>> >> By Greg Sargent
>> >> So Keith Olbermann is out. As best as I can tell, none of the news
>> >> accounts about his departure have gotten to the bottom of what
>> >> happened here. But Olbermann himself offered enough clues in his final
>> >> broadcast for us to reasonably speculate that he abruptly got the ax,
>> >> perhaps even as late as last night.
>>
>> >> A "knowledgeable official" at MSNBC told Howard Kurtz that the
>> >> separation was "mutual." But it's hard to see how that squares with
>> >> this, from Olbermann's last words on Countdown last night:
>>
>> >> "I think the same fantasy has popped into the head of everybody in my
>> >> business who has ever been told what I have been told, that this is
>> >> going to be the last edition of your show. You go directly to the
>> >> scene from the movie 'Network,' complete with the pajamas, and the
>> >> raincoat, and you go off on an existential, otherworldly journey of
>> >> profundity and vision...
>>
>> >> "When I resigned from ESPN 13 and a half years ago, I was literally
>> >> given 30 seconds to say goodbye at the very end of my last edition of
>> >> "Sports Center." As God is my witness, in the commercial break just
>> >> before the emotional moment, the producer got into my earpiece and he
>> >> said, `uh, can you cut it down to 15 seconds, so we can get in this
>> >> tennis result from Stuttgart? So I'm grateful that I have a little
>> >> more time to sign off here."
>>
>> >> Between this and the shell-shocked look Olbermann had last night, it
>> >> seems clear that he may have been abruptly informed that he was
>> >> history, perhaps even during last night's show. That would also square
>> >> with the experience of Josh Marshall, who was actually on Olbermann
>> >> last night and had no sense that anything was amiss.
>>
>> >> We already know that MSNBC president Phil Griffin had been gunning for
>> >> Olbermann for some time now. MSNBC was reportedly close to firing
>> >> Olbermann on several occasions. Recall that during the ridiculous flap
>> >> over Olbermann's political donations, in which he responded to his
>> >> suspension with a show of public defiance, Griffin flatly told
>> >> Olbermann's representative: "We are at war."
>>
>> >> Soon enough we'll have a clearer sense of why this happened, and we
>> >> can deal with it then. But for now, let's thank Olbermann for all his
>> >> hard work. He's rich, popular and has a huge following that's likely
>> >> to follow him to his next endeavor. He'll be just fine.
>>
>> >> What of Olbermann's legacy? There's a great deal of crowing on the
>> >> right about Olbermann's apparent ouster. But let's be clear on what he
>> >> accomplished: He helped clear a huge space on the airwaves for
>> >> "unapologetic liberalism," as Steve Benen puts it, when it remained
>> >> anything but certain that such a space could be created with any
>> >> measure of success.
>>
>> >> The unexpected popularity of Olbermann's show early on cleared the way
>> >> for MSNBC to stack its nighttime lineup with pugnacious lefty hosts.
>> >> Indeed, it was Olbermann who invited Rachel Maddow on repeatedly as a
>> >> guest, raising her profile to the point where she got her own show.
>> >> Olbermann, followed by Maddow, proved in the face of enormous
>> >> skepticism that there's a huge audience out there for real liberal
>> >> talk-show hosts to adopt the sort of take-no-prisoners approach once
>> >> monopolized by the right. Only they accomplished this without
>> >> descending into the crackpot conspiracy mongering and all-around
>> >> ugliness of Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck.
>>
>> >> Indeed, there's already talk that CNN might be interested in picking
>> >> up Olbermann. While that seems unlikely, given CNN's more staid air,
>> >> the mere fact that it's being discussed at all shows how much he
>> >> helped change the landscape.
>>
>> >> Olbermann may be gone, but the space he did so much to help create is
>> >> here to stay.
>>
>> >> More:
>>
>> >>http://mediadecoder.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/olbermann-hosts-last...
>> >> --
>> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> >> Have a great day,
>> >> Tommy
>>
>> >> --
>> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> >> * Visit our other community at
>> >>http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> > --
>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>>
>> - Show quoted text -
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Bizarre House Republicans Praise and Say They Will Replace Health Care Reform Law law and Consumer Protections they just voted to repeal

It is obvious that NONE of these GOP House fools ever read the HCR Act
in the first damned place! They certainly do not know that their 'for
life' health care and retirement are 'government-paid for' out of our
taxes! In other words, they are working hard to keep all that they
get from the "government being involved, blah, blah" but their
ultimate goal is take back ALL the new rules, the new benefits, that
now are LAW.

The system berfore reform was BROKEN, Keithie Keith.

On 1/22/11, Keith In Köln <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
> I only got a few paragraphs into this article, before I realized that this
> is just flat out ignorant. Robert Pear is a Moonbat, who hasn't a clue,
> which is pretty much why and how Tommy TomTom is posting this as "News".
>
> The GOP upcoming proposed legislation will be about enforcing current
> legislation, allowing for competition within the market, by allowing
> companies to market their product beyond state lines which now keeps some
> companies from providing their services in other states, (thanks to past
> Democratic legislation) and will in general, make health care affordable
> to most Americans.
>
> Something the socialists, communists, Marxists and most within the
> Democratic Party have been fighting for decades.
>
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Bizarre House Republicans Praise and Say They Will Replace Health Care
>> Reform Law law and Consumer Protections they just voted to repeal
>>
>> Will These New Replacement Health Care Reform Bills be Called GOPCARE?
>> BUSHCARE? ORANGEBONERCARE? -T
>>
>> House Republicans Plan Their Own Health Bills
>> By ROBERT PEAR
>>
>> WASHINGTON — Less than 24 hours after voting to repeal the new health
>> care law, House Republicans said Thursday that they would pass
>> discrete bills to achieve some of the same goals, but with more
>> restraint in the use of federal power.
>>
>> At the same time, the speaker, John A. Boehner, said House Republicans
>> would push for much stricter limits on abortion in federal programs,
>> including those created by the new law.
>>
>> By a vote of 253 to 175, the House on Thursday directed four
>> committees to draft legislation that would replace the health care
>> law. The directive sets forth 13 objectives.
>>
>> It says, for example, that the legislation should "lower health care
>> premiums through increased competition and choice," provide access to
>> affordable coverage for people with pre-existing conditions, increase
>> the number of Americans with insurance and provide states with
>> "greater flexibility" to run their Medicaid programs.
>>
>> Republicans did not say how they would achieve those goals, but made
>> clear that they did not want to impose detailed federal requirements
>> on individuals, families, employers or states.
>>
>> Representative Rob Woodall, a freshman Republican from Georgia, said
>> he was proud to have voted for repeal of the new law so Congress could
>> "go back to the drawing board and bring things forward one at a time."
>>
>> Another freshman Republican, Representative Steve Stivers of Ohio,
>> praised a provision of the law that allows children to stay on their
>> parents' insurance until they reach the age of 26.
>>
>> "I am committed to working with my colleagues in a bipartisan manner
>> to support reforms we agree on, like allowing young adults to stay on
>> their parents' plan," Mr. Stivers said.
>>
>> Other Republicans praised a section of the new law that helps older
>> Americans with prescription drug costs.
>>
>> President Obama said this week that he was "willing and eager" to work
>> with members of both parties to improve the law. But aides said he
>> would adamantly resist efforts to repeal it.
>>
>> On the House floor on Thursday, Democrats said it was bizarre to see
>> Republicans praising consumer protections in a law they had just voted
>> to dismantle.
>>
>> "It's like Alice in Wonderland," said Representative John Garamendi of
>> California, a former state insurance commissioner.
>>
>> Representative Lloyd Doggett, Democrat of Texas, said: "With last
>> year's health insurance reform law, we provided real guarantees to
>> American families against insurance abuses. Today, Republicans tell
>> these families, 'Forget the binding guarantees, we have 12 platitudes
>> for you.' This is not a Republican prescription. It's a placebo."
>>
>> Democrats said it would be difficult for Republicans to pick and
>> choose among provisions of the law because the popular and unpopular
>> parts were locked together.
>>
>> Consumers like the assurance that they can obtain coverage regardless
>> of any pre-existing condition, but dislike the requirement to carry
>> insurance. Without such a requirement, insurers say, people could go
>> without coverage until they needed care, driving up costs for everyone
>> else.
>>
>> In addition, Democrats said they were skeptical of Republican plans
>> because, when Republicans controlled Congress, they did little to
>> cover the uninsured.
>>
>> Republicans recalled, however, that they secured approval of two huge
>> changes in domestic social policy that worked much better than
>> Democrats had predicted. They remade welfare programs in 1996 and
>> added a prescription drug benefit to Medicare in 2003.
>>
>> "The idea that Republicans are just not interested in health care and
>> won't do anything is belied by history," said Stuart M. Butler,
>> director of the Center for Policy Innovation at the conservative
>> Heritage Foundation.
>>
>> The new law will set up insurance exchanges where people can shop for
>> coverage. Millions of low- and moderate-income people will be able to
>> obtain federal subsidies to help defray the cost.
>>
>> Mr. Boehner and other House Republican leaders on Thursday embraced a
>> bill stipulating that — with narrow exceptions — no federal money,
>> subsidies or tax credits could be used to pay for abortion or for any
>> health insurance plan that includes coverage of abortion. "It's one of
>> our highest legislative priorities," Mr. Boehner said, referring to
>> the bill, offered by Representatives Christopher H. Smith, Republican
>> of New Jersey, and Daniel Lipinski, Democrat of Illinois.
>>
>> Abortion rights groups vowed to fight the proposal.
>>
>> Nancy Keenan, president of Naral Pro-Choice America, said Republicans
>> had told voters they wanted to "focus on creating jobs while limiting
>> the role of government in our lives." But now, she said, having taken
>> control of the House, "they want to be able to interfere in our
>> personal, private decisions, especially a woman's right to choose."
>>
>> The White House said it would plow ahead with the health law,
>> undeterred by the political uproar over it on Capitol Hill.
>>
>> Kathleen Sebelius, the secretary of health and human services, offered
>> federal money to states to help them establish insurance exchanges.
>>
>> "Beginning in 2014," Ms. Sebelius said, "these marketplaces will allow
>> individuals and small-business owners to pool their purchasing power
>> so the mom-and-pop shop can have the same negotiating clout as the big
>> chain down the street."
>>
>> California and other states have begun work to set up exchanges. "It
>> would be a huge mistake to undo this progress" by repealing the new
>> federal law, Ms. Sebelius said.
>>
>> More:
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/01/21/health/policy/21health.html?_r=1&ref=politics
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Canadian Man Charged After Using Gun to Defend His Home From Fire Bombers

Canadian Man Charged After Using Gun to Defend His Home From Fire Bombers
http://www.theblaze.com/stories/canadian-man-charged-after-using-gun-to-defend-his-home-from-firebombers/
--
"Attempting to debate with a person who has abandoned reason is like giving medicine to the dead."
- Thomas Paine

When dealing with legal issues, far too many people rely on stupid ideas offered by amateurs who send out emails or hold weekend seminars! Learn how to control judges and lawyers from a lawyer with a quarter-century of experience winning lawsuits!

Re: Curing the constipation of bad government.

Folks: Saving the USA from bad government must compete with the
sports diseases gripping this country Tell your friends and neighbors
that a SC man has penned and polished a 'New Constitution of the
United States of America' that will put the PEOPLE back at the top of
the pecking order. Isn't the financial and social well-being of your
grandchildren more important than your "spectator" sports—Democratic
Party vs. Republican Party included? If so, then learn from the posts
of John A. Armistead. Saving this country is easy. It only requires
a fair and prosperous free-enterprise system, and people willing to
take responsibility for their own successes or failures in the GAME of
life. Government isn't the solution; government is the problem! —
John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
On Jan 21, 2:33 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> On Jan 19, 10:34 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
>
> Dear MJ:  Thanks for your "deep" quote!  I don't disagree.  If you
> suppose that I do, I hope you will purchase my recently published
> book: 'The Shortest Distance; Harmony Through Prosperity' available at
> Amazon or B & N.  I am an ultra, ultra fiscal conservative, and a...
> "The most liberty parallels the smallest government." civil
> libertarian.  This one sentence, if adhered to to the max, would be a
> fit constitution: "Fair play and democracy shall have supremacy in the
> USA!"  That is right up there with: "Do unto others as you would have
> them do unto you."  The latter sentence negates the need for organized
> religion of any kind.  Bill Maher isn't too off base regarding
> religion.  If the growing of HEMP was legalized in the USA, we would
> have all the ethanol and paper products we need.  "Government is the
> PROBLEM, not the SOLUTION!"  — John A. Armistead — Patriot
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >  "It is not the business of government to make men virtuous or religious or to preserve the fool from the consequences of his own folly. Government should be repressive no further than is necessary to secure liberty by protecting the equal rights of each from aggression...[when] governmental prohibitions extend beyond this line they are in danger of defeating the very ends they are intended to serve" --Henry GeorgeAt 10:31 PM 1/19/2011, you wrote:Greg:  Since you've just begun replying to me, answer this:  Do you
> > believe government should control the people, or the people should
> > control the government?  — John A. Armistead —  Patriot
> > On Jan 18, 12:58 pm, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > You just gimme a call when I do.
>
> > > On Jan 18, 12:53 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > On Jan 18, 12:50 pm, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > We do not defend "democracy", because it sucks.  We have never been
> > > > > one, and never will be one, God willing.
>
> > > > So don't complain when Obama does anything without the votes of
> > > > Republitards.
> > --
> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Paul Beats Palin


Paul Beats Palin
Posted by James Ostrowski on January 22, 2011 03:29 PM

Ron Paul (11%) beat Sarah Palin (7%) in a presidential straw poll of Republican Party committee members in New Hampshire today. Dr. Paul came in second to full-time candidate Mitt "Bob Dole" Romney (35%) and also defeated another active candidate Tim Pawlenty (8%).

This result is impressive because, (1) Ron Paul is busy fighting the Fed, not campaigning; (2) it is not a poll of grass roots activists but party regulars; and (3) it means Ron Paul was the leading tea party candidate ranged against the country club GOP man–and likely loser against the neo-centrist Obama–Mitt Romney.