Thursday, January 6, 2011

Re: The New Republican Congress Begins....say hello to...........

tommy isn't literate enough to do more than read a newsweek headline

a cautionary tale

I must remember should I ever be tempted (though I am not) not to swallow

bad cum apparently causes mad cow disease

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:10 AM, Mark <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
Bruce, Tommy is stuck on Marx, Engels for his base ideology and he relies on the new idea man Ayers for dealing with modern times.... Same list as NoBama.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:
no tommietard

most of what government does is bad

stopping them from doing things and spending money is good

you are too stupid to understand that, being illiterate

if you spent some time reading a book, something by James Buchanan or Bryan Caplan for instance

and less time spamming airheaded fascist press releases you would know that

at your age I am sure you will die first


On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 10:00 AM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
No, gridlock is bad, Brucie girl.

It means that NOTHING gets accomplished.

Stagnation and the status quo are bad.

On 1/6/11, Bruce Majors <majors.bruce@gmail.com> wrote:
> gridlock is good Tomie
>
> it means nazis like you and your owners don't get to hurt people
>
> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 2:55 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> The New Grand Obstructionist Tea Party Republican Congress
>> Begins....say hello to partisan gridlock, obstruction, investigations,
>> the demonization of Unions, legislation to harm the poor and working
>> class, efforts to make the President fail, and un-American bad
>> behavior for the next two years!
>>
>> Most of the Republicans in both the House and the Senate voted against
>> DADT repeal. I predict that they will now obstruct any further
>> Progressive and pro-LGBT legislation for as long as they hold control
>> of the House. We need to demonstrate and protest loudly.
>>
>> A polarized Congress in a US seeking pragmatism
>>
>> PHOTOS  Previous        Next
>> Outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of Calif. hands the gavel to the
>> new House Speaker John Boehner of Ohio during the first session of the
>> 112th Congress, Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011, on Capitol Hill in
>> Washington. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak) (Charles Dharapak - AP)
>>
>> House Speaker-desigante John Boehner of Ohio greets House members
>> during the first session of the 112th Congress, on Capitol Hill in
>> Washington, Wednesday, Jan. 5, 2011. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak)
>> (Charles Dharapak - AP)
>>
>> President Barack Obama pauses on the tarmac as he arrives at Andrews
>> Air Force Base, Md.,, Tuesday, Jan. 4, 2011, as he returned from
>> vacation in Hawaii. Col. Lee DePlao, commander of the 11th Wing, is
>> second from left. (AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster) (Carolyn Kaster - AP)
>>  Network NewsX Profile
>>
>>
>> View More Activity
>>
>>
>> TOOLBOX
>>  Resize Print E-mail Reprints
>> COMMENT
>> 0 Comments
>> Your browser's settings may be preventing you from commenting on and
>> viewing comments about this item. See instructions for fixing the
>> problem.
>> Discussion Policy CLOSEComments that include profanity or personal
>> attacks or other inappropriate comments or material will be removed
>> from the site. Additionally, entries that are unsigned or contain
>> "signatures" by someone other than the actual author will be removed.
>> Finally, we will take steps to block users who violate any of our
>> posting standards, terms of use or privacy policies or any other
>> policies governing this site. Please review the full rules governing
>> commentaries and discussions. You are fully responsible for the
>> content that you post.
>>
>> By LIZ SIDOTI
>> The Associated Press
>> Wednesday, January 5, 2011; 2:32 PM
>>
>> WASHINGTON -- There's an inherent conflict in the country's new
>> political reality: a much more polarized Congress must answer to an
>> increasingly powerful center of the electorate that abhors
>> partisanship or risk its wrath in 2012.
>>
>> Much like President Bill Clinton after his party's disastrous 1994
>> elections, President Barack Obama now has the chance to shift to the
>> middle as leaders on Capitol Hill struggle to strike a balance between
>> the desires of ideological purists in their ranks and the independent,
>> centrist voters who played a significant role in electing them.
>>
>> For Republicans and Democrats, that task began Wednesday when the new
>> Congress was sworn in; Republicans assumed control of the House and
>> padded their numbers in the Democratic-led Senate.
>>
>> "There's going to be politics. That's what happens in Washington. They
>> are going to play to their base for a certain period of time. But I'm
>> pretty confident that they're going to recognize that our job is to
>> govern . My hope is that John Boehner and Mitch McConnell will realize
>> that there will be plenty of time to campaign for 2012 in 2012," Obama
>> said this week about GOP leaders in the House and Senate, casting
>> himself as the compromiser in chief even while maneuvering for his
>> upcoming re-election.
>>
>> The president's tone was in stark contrast to his first two years when
>> he leveraged large Democratic majorities in Congress - and thwarted
>> Republicans - to enact sweeping laws, including an economic stimulus
>> measure and revamps of the health care and financial regulatory
>> systems, that independents greeted skeptically if not derisively.
>> After backing him heavily in his presidential bid, they punished him
>> in November by ending one-party rule in Washington.
>>
>> Now, with no serious Democratic primary challenger emerging to siphon
>> support from his liberal base, Obama already has begun moving to the
>> center. As 2010 ended, he compromised with Republicans to reach
>> bipartisan deals on tax cuts that paved the way for a rush of end of
>> year legislation, including repealing the ban on gays openly serving
>> in the military as well as a new nuclear treaty with Russia.
>>
>>
>> It's clear the 2012 elections are in everyone's sights with obvious
>> objectives: Obama needs to win back middle-of-the-road voters, and
>> Republicans need to keep them happy, or at least not anger them.
>>
>> Their power was strongly felt in the last three elections. In 2006 and
>> 2008, independents furious with Republican governance gave Democrats
>> power in Congress and the White House. By 2010, these voters had grown
>> disillusioned by Democratic rule and sided with the GOP.
>>
>> And their sway is only growing.
>>
>> Today, more Americans are identifying themselves as independent while
>> majorities of the country view both the Democratic and Republican
>> parties unfavorably. Disaffected Republican and Democratic operatives
>> are forming groups to advocate on behalf of - if not organize -
>> unaffiliated voters, indicating that momentum may be building among
>> the center for increased political action.
>>
>> So, given all that, how did the Republican and Democratic caucuses in
>> Congress end up so much more conservative and liberal?
>>
>> The two-party American political system produces polarization in
>> Congress. Both the Republican and the Democratic parties hold
>> primaries to choose general election candidates. Those nominating
>> contests are dominated by the most vocal, active party members -
>> conservatives and liberals who tend to support like-minded people.
>>
>> Last year, that situation was even more pronounced as the tea party
>> coalition roiled GOP primaries and produced Republican nominees who
>> were far more conservative than usual.
>>
>> Now, the House Republican roster includes some seven dozen tea
>> party-backed lawmakers and other staunch conservatives. And moderate
>> "Blue Dog" Democrats are virtually extinct; scores lost their
>> swing-voting districts in a coast-to-coast GOP wave.
>>
>> "Compromise is a dirty word to the new members of Congress and a vital
>> word to the people they were sent to represent," said Matt Bennett, a
>> former Clinton aide and a vice president of the centrist Democratic
>> group Third Way. "It's a more polarized House representing an
>> electorate that is really seeking moderation. There's a big disconnect
>> between their caucuses and their voters."
>>
>> The Senate is arguably less polarized than the House; Democrats
>> succeeded in limiting the number of GOP takeaways to six. Still, new
>> Republican senators include tea party-supported Rand Paul of Kentucky
>> and Ron Johnson of Wisconsin, as well as conservatives Pat Toomey of
>> Pennsylvania and Marco Rubio of Florida.
>>
>> From the outset, it's clear that Boehner is trying to strike a balance
>> between his constituents and his members.
>>
>> "This is the people's house. This is their Congress. It's about them,
>> not us," Boehner said after he took the gavel as speaker.
>>
>> Still, in a nod to his caucus' right flank, he scheduled a vote next
>> week on repealing the health care law. Republicans don't expect to
>> kill it. It makes sense for them not to; the GOP wants to run against
>> health care in 2012 and that important constituency - independents -
>> prefer that the law be changed, not repealed. House leaders facing
>> demands from the right to immediately cut spending also indicated they
>> wanted to cut $100 billion from the federal budget. But it didn't take
>> long before GOP leaders bowed to the reality of governing and scaled
>> back their goal.
>>
>>
>>  Come February, during debate over a massive spending bill to keep the
>> government running, the country will see how successful Boehner has
>> been at keeping the right in line and how much Obama is willing to
>> compromise.
>>
>> The challenge for Boehner is to avoid what happened after the 1994
>> Republican Revolution when the GOP took control of Congress.
>>
>> Back then, House Speaker Newt Gingrich failed to keep his
>> rabble-rousing conservative warriors in line, leading to a government
>> shutdown. Clinton came out on top, and handily won re-election in
>> 1996.
>>
>> Obama already has signaled a desire to go the route of Clinton,
>> signaling a willingness to work with Republicans on several issues,
>> including trade deals with Colombia and Panama as well as the
>> reauthorization of the No Child Left Behind education act.
>>
>> On Day 1 of the new Congress, the fight for middle-of-the-road voters
>> was well under way. It won't end until November 2012.
>>
>> More:
>> http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2011/01/05/AR2011010503216_2.html
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.



--
Mark M. Kahle H.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Republican Hot Air


Republican Hot Air
Posted by Laurence Vance on January 6, 2011 09:16 AM

So, the Republicans in the House are now promising to follow the Constitution. Does this mean Social Security and the federal minimum wage will be abolished, to name just two out of hundreds of thousands of unconstitutional federal programs? Don't hold your breath.

I note also that Republicans in the House are going to vote on repealing Obamacare. Does this mean they will also vote to repeal Bushcare, otherwise known as the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003? How about the Combat Methamphetamine Epidemic Act, which makes criminals out of people who want Sudafed for their stuffy nose (see Jeff Tucker's great article on this)? Again, don't hold your breath.

And don't ever mistake Republican hot air for "libertarian themes."

Re: The New Republican Congress Begins....say hello to...........

John-

I do not like calling anyone names, but I do lower myself down to the
level of, and defend myself, from hateful, venemous personal attacks
from the likes of immature fools like Bruce.

On 1/6/11, john sumner <jp33441@gmail.com> wrote:
> bruce i guess you and tommy dont really like each other, i guess you two
> like calling each others names
>
> On 1/6/2011 10:03 AM, Bruce Majors wrote:
>> no tommietard
>>
>> most of what government does is bad
>>
>> stopping them from doing things and spending money is good
>>
>> you are too stupid to understand that, being illiterate
>>
>> if you spent some time reading a book, something by James Buchanan or
>> Bryan Caplan for instance
>>
>> and less time spamming airheaded fascist press releases you would know
>> that
>>
>> at your age I am sure you will die first
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Muslim KFC Employee Goes Apeshit Crazy When Customer Orders Bacon

I want bacon on my chicken sandwich.  Im wearing my bacon ribbon when ordering and my money is in my bacon wallet. And I have bacon-flavored air freshners in my home and car.  I am waiting on someone to produce a bacon shirt and jacket.

On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 5:14 AM, Keith In Köln <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
Yes, the religion of peace.  
 
I'll have cole slaw on my barbeque sandwich with bacon, a side order of shrimp cocktail, and bring me a beer with that!
 
 


 
On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Travis <baconlard@gmail.com> wrote:



Muslim KFC Employee Goes Apeshit Crazy When Customer Orders Bacon

Scotty Starnes | January 5, 2011 at 9:38 PM | Tags: Austrailia, bacon, Islam, KFC, Muslims, religion of peace | Categories: Uncategorized | URL: http://wp.me/pvnFC-40u

Holy Allah. These followers of the 'religion of peace' need anger management.

BACON...BACON...BACON...BACON...BACON...BACON...BACON...BACON!!!!!!

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The dire negative consequences of health reform repeal

Wrong again, Keithie Keith.

Here is the logical empirical data you request:

http://giveme10.files.wordpress.com/2009/02/budget_deficit_or_surplus1.gif?w=500&h=358

On 1/6/11, Keith In Köln <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Tom cannot respond to logical, thoughtful, empirical data and fact
> Mark......Waste of time.
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 4:03 PM, Mark <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Tommy,
>>
>> After you read the real numbers from the US Government Treasury below
>> (please follow the links) your continued cry that Clinton left a surplus
>> would make you an absolute and resolute liar. Facts are a bitch.
>>
>> Here are the facts and how to find them regarding the bogus Clinton
>> surplus
>> as well as a quote from the leading Democratic Congressman of the time:
>>
>> *Both Democrats and Republicans are all running this year and next and
>> saying surplus, surplus.* Look what we have done. *It is false. The actual
>> figures show that from the beginning of the fiscal year until now we had
>> to
>> borrow $127,800,000,000*. - *Democratic Senator Ernest Hollings, October
>> 28, 1999*
>>
>>
>> Fiscal
>> Year Year
>> Ending National Debt Deficit FY1993 09/30/1993 $4.411488 trillion
>> FY1994 09/30/1994 $4.692749 trillion $281.26 billion FY1995
>> 09/29/1995 $4.973982 trillion $281.23 billion FY1996 09/30/1996
>> $5.224810
>> trillion $250.83 billion FY1997 09/30/1997 $5.413146 trillion $188.34
>> billion FY1998 09/30/1998 $5.526193 trillion $113.05 billion FY1999
>> 09/30/1999 $5.656270 trillion $130.08 billion FY2000 09/29/2000
>> $5.674178
>> trillion $17.91 billion FY2001 09/28/2001 $5.807463 trillion $133.29
>> billion
>> Looking at the makeup of the national debt and the claimed surpluses for
>> the last 4 Clinton fiscal years, we have the following table:
>>
>> *Fiscal
>> Year* *End
>> Date* *Claimed
>> Surplus* *Public
>> Debt* *Intra-gov
>> Holdings* *Total National
>> Debt* FY1997 09/30/1997 $3.789667T $1.623478T $5.413146T FY1998
>> 09/30/1998 $69.2B $3.733864T $55.8B $1.792328T $168.9B $5.526193T $113B
>> FY1999 09/30/1999 $122.7B $3.636104T $97.8B $2.020166T $227.8B
>> $5.656270T $130.1B FY2000 09/29/2000 $230.0B $3.405303T $230.8B
>> $2.268874T $248.7B $5.674178T $17.9B FY2001 09/28/2001 $3.339310T
>> $66.0B $2.468153T $199.3B $5.807463T $133.3B
>>
>> 1. Go to the U.S. Treasury website: http://www.ustreas.gov/
>> 2. Click on "Bureaus": Takes you to http://www.ustreas.gov/bureaus/
>> 3. Click on "Bureau of the Public Debt": Takes you to
>> http://www.publicdebt.treas.gov/
>> 4. Scroll down to the section "The U.S. Public Debt" and click on "See
>> the U.S. Public Debt to the Penny."
>> 5. This takes you to the link:
>> http://www.treasurydirect.gov/NP/BPDLogin?application=np
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 6, 2011 at 8:37 AM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Wrong again, Fool.
>>>
>>> Clinton did indeed leave a surplus, which Dubya squandered away.
>>>
>>> Look it up.
>>>
>>> On 1/5/11, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> > Fool, Clinton did not leave a surplus. The Bush recession you keep
>>> > blabbing about started in 2000 under Clinton and was in its 3rd quarter
>>> > when Bush was inaugurated.
>>> >
>>> > On 01/05/2011 10:17 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>> >> "Obamacare" is an offensive and misleading negative term.
>>> >>
>>> >> Government plans rarely come in on or under
>>> >> budget.
>>> >> W. Bush caused the gigantic deficit and squandered the Clinton
>>> >> surplus. Yes, he did.
>>> >>
>>> >> On 1/5/11, Mark<markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>> Tommy,
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Is it not a health care plan championed by Obama ?? On ewould think
>>> >>> he
>>> >>> would
>>> >>> be PROUDER than a peacock to have his name so closely associated.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> Please list any and all Government plans that have come in on or
>>> >>> under
>>> >>> budget and accomplished at least 80% of their goals.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I am waiting.
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 8:26 PM, Tommy News<tommysnews@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>> That is a plain lie.
>>> >>>> That is another plain lie.
>>> >>>> That is yet another plain lie.
>>> >>>> The derogatory term "Obamacare" is an offensive misnomer, and yet
>>> >>>> another
>>> >>>> lie.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> On 1/5/11, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>>> >>>>> That is a plain lie. Your various insurance companies will have to
>>> >>>>> offer the plan as defined by the administration, not the plan the
>>> >>>>> individual may want or need. As an example I would have to buy a
>>> plan
>>> >>>>> that had neo-natal care and pregnancy care even though I am 70,
>>> single
>>> >>>>> and male. That is a change that makes no sense to me. As it
>>> >>>>> stands
>>> >>>>> now
>>> >>>>> I can pick and choose what plan I want or even have a plan that
>>> allows
>>> >>>>> me to pay for most of my current needs and have in addition a plan
>>> for
>>> >>>>> catastrophic care. The Obamacare plan does not allow that at all.
>>> >>>>> That is the lies and false smear that should be fought, not what
>>> >>>>> the
>>> >>>>> Republicans are talking about.
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> On 01/05/2011 08:47 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>>> >>>>>> Point is, Markie, those plans were unaffordable for many and
>>> >>>>>> unobtainable for those with "pre-existing conditions" like cancer
>>> and
>>> >>>>>> other diseases, and even to pregnant women needing natal care.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> In the United States, under President Obama's health reform bill,
>>> your
>>> >>>>>> ability to choose personally the people to be involved in your
>>> health
>>> >>>>>> care does not change one iota. Not one bit. You still have the
>>> exact
>>> >>>>>> same feeedom of choice you had before. The Reich wing and the
>>> >>>>>> corporate profiteers spread false lies about this and other
>>> provisions
>>> >>>>>> of the bill constantly.
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> Fight the lies and false smear!
>>> >>>>>>
>>> >>>>>> On 1/5/11, Mark<markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>> Point is Tommy, the alternative was already in place. A free
>>> >>>>>>> enterprise
>>> >>>>>>> system that allowed every working man, woman in the US to choose
>>> his
>>> >>>>>>> or
>>> >>>>>>> her
>>> >>>>>>> own best policy.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> We simply need to go back to that which worked and was the envy
>>> >>>>>>> of
>>> >>>>>>> the
>>> >>>>>>> world
>>> >>>>>>> as far as health care was concerned.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> I want the people I choose personally to be involved in my
>>> >>>>>>> healthy
>>> >>>>>>> care... I
>>> >>>>>>> do not want to be in a healthcare "queue" managed by faceless
>>> >>>> bureaucrats
>>> >>>>>>> Check those social welfare systems in any socialized medicine
>>> country
>>> >>>> and
>>> >>>>>>> see how many more people are eligible yet add in the numbers that
>>> >>>>>>> literally
>>> >>>>>>> die waiting. All of those countries have developed private
>>> >>>>>>> systems
>>> to
>>> >>>>>>> serve
>>> >>>>>>> the working man.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Tommy News<tommysnews@gmail.com>
>>> >>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>> Wrong. You are not everyone.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> Does Mr Boehner know about whom he's speaking when he and any of
>>> his
>>> >>>>>>>> conservative cronies say "the American people". I think he and
>>> they
>>> >>>>>>>> mean "it has to be my way". I wonder what their consituents
>>> >>>>>>>> will
>>> do
>>> >>>>>>>> when they learn that they can't get the health care they need
>>> >>>>>>>> because
>>> >>>>>>>> insurance companies ... well, we all know about that part of it.
>>> >>>>>>>> The
>>> >>>>>>>> Republicans have been bitching and moaning about what they like
>>> to
>>> >>>>>>>> derisively call "Obamacare", yet not one of them has come
>>> >>>>>>>> forward
>>> >>>>>>>> with
>>> >>>>>>>> a scintilla of an alternative. I doubt if they have a plan
>>> >>>>>>>> since
>>> it
>>> >>>>>>>> seems to me that they've mostly been concerned with knocking
>>> >>>>>>>> down
>>> >>>>>>>> President Obama at every turn. Our health insurance system is
>>> one
>>> >>>>>>>> of
>>> >>>>>>>> the most cumbersome in the world, since it's really not a system
>>> by
>>> >>>>>>>> subject to the individual money-grabbing whims of the insurance
>>> >>>>>>>> companies. We are supposedly the richest country in the world.
>>> >>>>>>>> While
>>> >>>>>>>> we spend mountains of moolah on every kind of war effort,
>>> >>>>>>>> there's
>>> >>>>>>>> never any money to take care of our citizens. It's interesting
>>> that
>>> >>>>>>>> in all this talk about saving money, it's never once been
>>> >>>>>>>> brought
>>> up
>>> >>>>>>>> that perhaps we should cut back in the war mongering department.
>>> We
>>> >>>>>>>> say we're a peace-loving nation. Our actions do not back up our
>>> >>>>>>>> words. I was born in 1940 and have lived through 5 wars (WW2,
>>> >>>>>>>> Korea,
>>> >>>>>>>> Vietnam, Iraq, Afghanistan). That seems a bit on the excessive
>>> >>>>>>>> side.
>>> >>>>>>>> I think it's important to remember that when it comes to war we
>>> are
>>> >>>>>>>> not always in the right.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> On 1/5/11, Mark<markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>> I bought the "rider" on my policy.... that is not an option
>>> >>>>>>>>> they
>>> >>>> have.
>>> >>>>>>>> Free
>>> >>>>>>>>> enterprise means getting what you pay for.
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 3:17 PM, Tommy News<tommysnews@gmail.com
>>> >
>>> >>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> Markie Mark Mark-
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> And what happens when you get cancer or some other disease
>>> >>>>>>>>>> and
>>> >>>>>>>>>> your
>>> >>>>>>>>>> insurance company "death panel" drops your policy and you
>>> cannot
>>> >>>>>>>>>> buy
>>> >>>>>>>>>> another policy because you now have a "pre-existing
>>> >>>>>>>>>> condition"?
>>> >>>> What
>>> >>>>>>>>>> then, Markie Mark?
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 1/5/11, THE ANNOINTED ONE<markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> @@@@ they want to put insurance companies back in charge of
>>> our
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> health
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> care.@@@@
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> You bet I want that. I work hard and pay my own bills. I want
>>> to
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> be
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> able to hire any one or any company I choose to meet my
>>> personal
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> needs
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> whether it is health care or which gas station to fill my
>>> tank.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Jan 5, 2:13 pm, Tommy News<tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The dire negative consequences of health reform repeal
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> From Mitch Stewart, BarackObama . com
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy --
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Our progress is under attack.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Their majority is not even a day old, but House Republicans
>>> are
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> already getting ready to pass a bill to repeal health
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> reform.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Instead of focusing on the future, they want to put
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> insurance
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> companies back in charge of our health care. To go back to
>>> the
>>> >>>> days
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> when these companies could deny coverage to children based
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> on
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> pre-existing conditions, cancel coverage when people would
>>> get
>>> >>>> sick,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or limit the care you could receive -- even when you needed
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> more.
>>> >>>>>>>> When
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> seniors would be forced to choose between paying their
>>> mortgage
>>> >>>> and
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> paying for their prescription drugs, simply because they
>>> landed
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> in
>>> >>>>>>>> the
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> "donut hole" in coverage.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They want to turn our progress into a partisan fight.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> But you and I know that the Affordable Care Act and other
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> reforms
>>> >>>> to
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> protect consumers did not pass because of a partisan or
>>> >>>> ideological
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> agenda.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> They passed because millions of Americans stood up and said
>>> we
>>> >>>> were
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ready for commonsense solutions after years of fraud and
>>> abuse,
>>> >>>> for
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> new era of responsibility after unchecked power. They passed
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> because,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> after 100 years of debate and negotiation, we said we would
>>> wait
>>> >>>> no
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> longer for health reform.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> These reforms passed because of you. Now, we must prepare to
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> stand
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> up
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> for them again.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Organizing for America is pulling together a team of
>>> organizers
>>> >>>> and
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> volunteers to defend reform -- and we need you on this team.
>>> >>>>>>>> Together,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> we'll show how our progress is already improving lives
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> across
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> country -- and take on those who are pushing for repeal.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Join the fight to protect our progress and keep Congress
>>> focused
>>> >>>> on
>>> >>>>>>>> the
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> future:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://my.barackobama.com/ProtectOurProgress7
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> It's clear that's not where House Republicans are looking --
>>> >>>> they're
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> putting the car in reverse and heading straight toward the
>>> ditch
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> that
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> we just spent two years climbing out of.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> As the President said this week, we are still emerging from
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> a
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> recession that took a toll on millions of families, many of
>>> whom
>>> >>>> are
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> still trying to get their lives back on track. The
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Affordable
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Care
>>> >>>>>>>> Act
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> and Wall Street reform were important steps forward on the
>>> road
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> recovery, and we can't afford to play political games with
>>> them
>>> >>>> now.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We have an obligation to ensure our progress is not
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> rewritten
>>> by
>>> >>>> the
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> insurance industry and big banks.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> This year, we'll need to stand by the President as he works
>>> to
>>> >>>> grow
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> our economy, make the United States more competitive, and
>>> keep
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> moving
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the country forward -- but we're also going to have to work
>>> hard
>>> >>>> to
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> defend what we have already achieved.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Join the campaign to protect our progress:
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://my.barackobama.com/ProtectOurProgress7
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mitch
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Mitch Stewart
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Director
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Organizing for America
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have a great day,
>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Tommy
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> For options& help see
>>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>> >>>>>>>>>> Have a great day,
>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tommy
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>>>>>>>> For options& help see
>>> >>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>> Mark M. Kahle H.
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>>>>>>> For options& help see
>>> >>>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>> >>>>>>>> Have a great day,
>>> >>>>>>>> Tommy
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>>>>>> For options& help see
>>> >>>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>> Mark M. Kahle H.
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> --
>>> >>>>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>>>>> For options& help see
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>>>>
>>> >>>>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>> --
>>> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>>> For options& help see
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>>
>>> >>>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>> >>>> Have a great day,
>>> >>>> Tommy
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> --
>>> >>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Mark M. Kahle H.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> --
>>> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> >>> For options& help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >>>
>>> >>> * Visit our other community at
>>> >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>> >
>>> > * Visit our other community at
>>> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>>> Have a great day,
>>> Tommy
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>>
>>> * Visit our other community at
>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Mark M. Kahle H.
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.