Monday, December 6, 2010

Re: Republicans block tax cuts for US middle class

Just as important, the Democrats are wanting a tax increase on those small businesses that are S corporations, who exceed 250k a year. This would kill the economy, and is typical of the class warfare card that the Marxists are so notorious for.

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 6:20 PM, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmkahle@gmail.com> wrote:

Tommy, Tommy, Tommy,

It was blocked for EVERYONE not "the middle class".

The problem was the Dems wanted to include yet another extension of
"unreimbursed, unfunded unemployment that totaled in the billions.

The Republicans voted against this and said openly that if unfunded
mandates were left out they would pass your tax cut extension. The
dems just could not let the bill go through without adding a rider.

On Dec 5, 12:56 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> GOP Senators unanimously block House-passed extension of tax breaks to
> ordinary people (while not extending Bush's tax cuts to the rich).
> Dispicable Grand Opressive Party Behavior. Who voted for these wealthy
> eletist criminals?
>
> Republicans block tax cuts for US middle class
>
> http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h5ylCoSn1PNl-pRXPU...
>
> --

> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Republicans block tax cuts for US middle class

Tommy, Tommy, Tommy,

It was blocked for EVERYONE not "the middle class".

The problem was the Dems wanted to include yet another extension of
"unreimbursed, unfunded unemployment that totaled in the billions.

The Republicans voted against this and said openly that if unfunded
mandates were left out they would pass your tax cut extension. The
dems just could not let the bill go through without adding a rider.

On Dec 5, 12:56 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> GOP Senators unanimously block House-passed extension of tax breaks to
> ordinary people (while not extending Bush's tax cuts to the rich).
> Dispicable Grand Opressive Party Behavior. Who voted for these wealthy
> eletist criminals?
>
> Republicans block tax cuts for US middle class
>
> http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5h5ylCoSn1PNl-pRXPU...
>
> --
> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> Have a great day,
> Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Live in the US ?? Can't access WikiLeaks ??

I have to admit I was shocked when I tried to go to Wikileaks and the
site in the states was down due to these DOS attacks. I guess I must
be naive. I've been active in the fight for the freedom of the
internet in other countries, but really didn't delve into our own
other than to back the net neutrality issue. And again when I got up
this Sunday morning the "talking heads" weren't talking about this
very much at all. Is the majority of the press just going to ignore
this? Can the justice system ignore this (the information the leaks
contain)? And as another member said that the majority of the American
people will not read this, just the rest of the world. My Grandmother
who died in 1984 told me that she had seen the greatest days in
American history, and she didn't want to see any more. I understand
exactly what she meant now. So many times in international forums I
have defended the fact that you can't lump us all as "Americans this"
or "Americans that", but what is the world to think? Respectfully,
Truth_Sojourner

On Dec 5, 11:05 am, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Here are a few of the mirror sites:
>
> wikileaks.enzym.su
> freeus.jsdev.org wikileaks.kafe-in.net ipv6 wl.opsec.eu ipv6
> wikileaks.challet.eu wl.gernox.de wikileaks.morningtime.com
> wikileaks.renout.nl wikileaks.fdn.fr wikileaks.gonte.se
> wikileaks.kaptenkong.se leaks.gooby.org wikileaks.dubronetwork.fr ipv6
> wikileaks.perry.ch wikileaks.sbr.im wikileaks.u0d.de
> wikileaks.81-89-98-125.blue... wikileaks.psytek.net wl.mrkva.eu
> wikileaks.joworld.net wikileaks.chiquitico.org wikileaks.rout0r.orgwww.gruiiik.org wikileaks.high-color.de wikileaks.holarse-
> linuxgaming.de ipv6
> wl.alfeldr.de wikileaks.huissoud.ch wikileaks.geekview.be
> wikileaks.franslundberg.com wikileaks.krkr.eu ipv6 wl.yoltie.net
> wikileaks.aelmans.eu wikileaks.serverius.net wikileaks.synssans.nl
> wl.ernstchan.net wikileaks.dena-design.de wleaks.3sge.pulsedmedia.com
> wleaks.hellfire.pulsedmedia.com wikileaks.palisades-berlin.de
> wikileaks.dokansoft.com.ar
> wikileaks.gonte2.nu leaks.stumcomie.com wikileaks.timburke.org
> wikileaks.myscripts24.de wikileaks.breit.ws wikileaks.now-pages.com
> wikileaks.ego-world.org cablegate.r3blog.nl ipv6 www.wikileakz.eu
> wikileaks.realprogrammer.org wikileaks.the-secret-world.info
> wikileaks.rtjuette.de
> wikileaks.rustigereigers.nl mirror1.wikileaks.lu mirror2.wikileaks.lu
> internaluse.net wikileaks.r00t.la wikileaks.cordover.id.au
> brd.mcbf.net wikileaks.1407.org wikileaks.mollar.me
> azow.selb.us wikileaks.furdev.org wikileaks.datkan.net ipv6
> wikileaks.threefingers.ca wikileaks.brenne.nu ipv6
> wikileaks.hutonline.nl
> vm8157.vps.tagadab.com nl1.wikileaksmirror.nl wikileaks.xcplanet.comwww.wikileaks.nw-ds.com wikileaks.infinium.org.uk peoplerule.info
> wikileaks.solvare.se wikileaks.marktaff.com wikileaks.hmaks.com

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

What the Soros concubines are up to

Gearing up: David Brock to launch outside group for 2012

By Greg Sargent

With the White House now signaling it wants outside groups on the left to ramp up for 2012, Media Matters founder David Brock is in discussions to form a new group designed to raise and spend big bucks to counter the right's powerful new infrastructure, a person who's spoken directly with Brock about his plans tells me.

Brock's move represents the first clear sign that lefty Beltway power players will heed the White House's call to arms. It also indicates that they've decided the quasi-collapse of the campaign finance system has left them with no choice but to gear up in order to counter the massive spending of outfits like the U.S Chamber of Commerce and Karl Rove's groups.

"David is on the road right now talking to donors and strategists who would be interested in this," the source tells me, adding that Brock intends to create a 527, which has partial donor disclosure rules. "He's out pitching it right now."

"There's a general sense that in 2010 nothing was done and it cost Democrats," the source continues. "People realize, including in the White House, that something needs to be done in 2012 or progressives will suffer at the ballot box again."

Reached for comment, Media Matters spokesman Ari Rabin-Havt would only say: "No comment."

During the 2008 campaign, Obama famously directed outside liberal groups to close down and let his enormously successful fundraising operation dominate. But as the magnitude of the right's 2010 spending in the wake of the Citizens United decision became apparent, White House senior adviser David Axelrod began quietly signaling a new openness to outside spending on the left.

As Brock's efforts clearly show, the message has been received.

UPDATE, 2:42 p.m.: Brock tried to form a similar group against John McCain in 2008 but it was one of the groups Obama shut down. Things will be different this time around.

By Greg Sargent | November 10, 2010; 2:23 PM ET
Categories: 2010 elections, 2012, Campaign finance

__._,_.___

Reply to sender | Reply to group | Reply via web post | Start a New Topic

Messages in this topic (1)

Recent Activity:

Visit Your Group

[DailyKos]
A group for readers of DailyKos and other progressive sites.
Group Email Addresses
Post message:       DailyKos@yahoogroups.com
Subscribe:       DailyKos-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
Unsubscribe:       DailyKos-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
List owner:       DailyKos-owner@yahoogroups.com

MARKETPLACE

Stay on top of your group activity without leaving the page you're on - Get the Yahoo! Toolbar now.

Get great advice about dogs and cats. Visit the Dog & Cat Answers Center.

Hobbies & Activities Zone: Find others who share your passions! Explore new interests.

Switch to: Text-Only, Daily Digest • Unsubscribe • Terms of Use

__,_._,___

"Why are there no jobs ?"

LinkedIn Groups

Group: Atlas Shrugged
Discussion: Why are there no jobs posted on Atlas Shrugged Discussion Board?

I believe the unemployment rate is 13.47% based on the number of missing jobs I calculate using January 2000 as a basis for the percentage of working age people who wish to have a job. 67.49% working age Americans had or wanted a job then when the unemployment rate by the standard Bureau of Labor Statistics method was 4.0%. The number of missing jobs then was 5,689,000. By December 2007, just before the recession hit the U.S. in a big way, the missing job count was up to 11,023,000 jobs. At its worst in the Great Socialist Recession, in January 2010, the number of missing jobs was up to 23,029,000 jobs and the real unemployment rate had climbed to 14.41%. Then there was improvement through July when a local minimum real unemployment rate of 12.72% was achieved. Each month since then the number of missing jobs has grown, as has the unemployment rate. In November, the real unemployment rate was 13.47% and we were missing 21,694,000 jobs. I discuss this more fully at my blog http://objectivistindividualist.blogspot.com/2010/12/missing-jobs-increase-again-in-november.html
Posted by Charles R. Anderson, Ph.D.

Like this discussion » Comment » Stop Following Discussion »