Tuesday, November 23, 2010

Fwd: Network Double Standard: Obama's TSA vs. Bush's NSA



While the broadcast networks have generally empathized with the distress of airline passengers over the TSA's new and intrusive airport searches, they have not — thus far, at least — gone so far as to impugn the Obama administration as launching a war against Americans' civil liberties.

Indeed, NBC's Matt Lauer on Monday even sympathized with TSA Administrator John Pistole: "I hate to even think of what happens if the government caves in on this, and relaxes these procedures, and someone manages to get something on board a plane and causes harm. Imagine the questions you'll be asked at that point."

But that's not the approach those networks took when it was the Bush administration taking steps to protect citizens against potential attack. Instead, as a 2006 analysis by the Media Research Center documented, the networks firmly aligned themselves with those who saw the Patriot Act and the electronic surveillance of international phone calls as a dire threat to civil liberties.

 

National Public Radio is right to defend itself against charges of Nazism leveled at the radio station by Fox News chief Roger Ailes, who has since apologized for the remark. But NPR decided to make the leap from defending the station to attacking Fox News as uniquely disposed to Nazi comparisons, an absurd claim on its face.

There are commentators on both sides of the political spectrum who routinely prove Godwin right. But being the predictably-liberal news outlet that it is, NPR invoked vague claims by far-left Washington Post columnist Dana Milbank (neither his ideological leanings nor the multitude of his most recent baseless Fox accusations are mentioned) to paint FNC as unique in its invocation of Nazism.

 

David Gregory is clearly concerned that if Republicans don't vote in favor of the START treaty with Russia, President Obama's international image, as well as American prestige abroad, will be damaged.

On Sunday's "Meet the Press," Gregory asked Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, "Is this going to potentially be a problem with the president not being able to get what he wants on the world stage because of Republicans?"



Click to view this email in a browser

If you no longer wish to receive these emails, please reply to this message with "Unsubscribe" in the subject line or simply click on the following link: Unsubscribe

Media Research Center
325 S. Patrick St.
Alexandria, Virginia 22314

Read the VerticalResponse marketing policy.

Try Email Marketing with VerticalResponse!

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: I want my president back

He's all yours bitch.  Take him back.  No one else wants him!

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Nita Chaudhary, MoveOn.org Political Action <moveon-help@list.moveon.org> wrote:
In the wake of the election, it's more crucial than ever that President Obama stand up for progressive change. But instead he's considering giving in to GOP demands for a tax bailout for the rich. We need the bold, progressive Obama we elected in 2008 back—and we've got to send him that message. Can you record a video of yourself today, urging President Obama to fight for what we all believe in?

Share your video
Dear MoveOn member,

Remember Barack Obama in 2008? The guy who refused to go along with a "dumb war" and said, "In the unlikely story that is America, there has never been anything false about hope."

I miss that guy. Imagine if someone told you in 2008 that Barack Obama was actually thinking about signing legislation to extend the Bush tax giveaways for the rich.1 I wouldn't have believed it.

Now more than ever, we need the Barack Obama we elected in 2008—the smart, tough, hopeful progressive champion who inspired millions of us—to stand up and say "no" to a millionaire bailout.

Right now, with the change we all fought for hanging in the balance, President Obama needs to hear from those of us who supported him the most.

So we're asking MoveOn members nationwide to record a video message from the heart to tell President Obama to go to the mat to stop any extension of the millionaire tax giveaways—and to bring back the progressive fighter we all knew and supported in 2008.

Can you record and share a video message to President Obama today? Click here to get started:

http://pol.moveon.org/obamavideo/?id=25271-17271492-0OO7csx&t=2

A personal appeal from so many of us who worked hard to elect President Obama will send a strong message. And to make sure the White House and millions of Americans hear it, we'll take the best videos and turn them into an ad that we'll air on national television.

Can you share a video message today? Just click here to get started:

http://pol.moveon.org/obamavideo/?id=25271-17271492-0OO7csx&t=3

Thanks for all you do.

–Nita, Marika, Duncan, Steven, and the rest of the team

Source:

1. "Obama Returns, Facing Unpredictable Congress in a Lame-Duck Session" The New York Times, November 14, 2010
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/11/15/us/politics/15obama.html

Want to support our work? We're entirely funded by our 5 million members—no corporate contributions, no big checks from CEOs. And our tiny staff ensures that small contributions go a long way. Chip in here.


PAID FOR BY MOVEON.ORG POLITICAL ACTION, http://pol.moveon.org/. Not authorized by any candidate or candidate's committee. This email was sent to baruch majorsky on November 22, 2010. To change your email address or update your contact info, click here. To remove yourself from this list, click here.


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Monday, November 22, 2010

It's Not Too Late To Get Your Inflatable Turkey










PrankPlace.com Find PrankPlace on Facebook Follow PrankPlace on Twitter Subscribe to PrankPlace on YouTube Subscribe to PrankPlace's RSS Feed
PrankPlace.com Seach for Gag Gifts
What's New Weekly Top 100 Popular T-Shirts
Inflatable Turkey
Only $12.98!
Order Online 24 Hours a Day OR Call 1-800-901-1163
Since 2001, Prankplace.com has offered 1000's of the funniest Gag Gifts and
Products, Funny T-Shirts and Practical Jokes, In-Stock with Same Day Shipping.
prankplace.com 1212 W Fourth Plain Blvd, Vancouver, WA 98660

Click here to view this email as a web page.
Copyright © 2010 prankplace.com All rights reserved.


Email Marketing by
iContact - Try It Free!


Manage your subscription  



--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: {Tea Party Patriots} Obama Using Executive Orders To Implement Radical Agenda

TSA stands for Taxpaying Serf Attitude Adjustment.  Though that phrase is mine and I have been saying the purpose is to instill a culture of regimentation, since the screening, among other things, does not either image or probe internal body cavities where explosives could be hidden, and is hence either incompetent, or just for show, or to regiment us.  Evidence of the latter is that the screening did not begin last year after the Underwear Bomber.  It started, as Rush points out today, this year after the Tea Party electoral revolt.

On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 1:23 PM, Brian 
From: Dick Morris Reports <subscribers@dickmorris.com>
Subject: Obama Using Executive Orders To Implement Radical Agenda

OBAMA USING EXECUTIVE ORDERS TO IMPLEMENT RADICAL AGENDA

By DICK MORRIS & EILEEN MCGANN

Published on DickMorris.com on November 22, 2010

Printer-Friendly Version


Does President Obama plan to move to the center in response to his overwhelming rejection at the polls on November 2nd?  No way!  Instead, he is moving to implement, through executive action, two of the most controversial items in his 2010 agenda -- a carbon tax and pollution permit system and a ban on the use of secret ballots in union elections.  Through executive action by the Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) and the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB), the Obama Administration is planning to effectuate both policies without asking Congress.

Never mind that he couldn't persuade even a top heavy Democratic Congress to pass either program.  Or that public opinion polls show massive rejection of both measures.  Or that each is a sure job killer by itself -- and together, they are even worse.  This arrogant, ideologically-driven radical is determined to have his way and the public be damned!

Sarah Palin's New Book Makes Waves, Get Free Offer The EPA is currently soliciting public comments for its plan to use the Clean Air Act of 1970 to regulate carbon dioxide emissions.  The Clean Air Act, as the name indicates, is designed to fight against pollution -- unhealthy chemicals that are belched into the air by smokestacks.  It was passed to fight sulfur dioxide, particulates, nitrous oxides and other chemicals that cause human diseases.  To use it to fight carbon dioxide -- which we all breathe without ill effects -- because of concerns about global warming -- is a perversion of the law.

Worse, because the Clean Air Act is designed to protect public health by measuring aggregate pollution in each geographic area, it limits economic development in communities where the pollution levels exceed prescribed standards.  But carbon dioxide doesn't poison anyone.  It makes no sense to ban factory expansion in areas where the nature of the industries is that there will be high carbon dioxide levels (like oil area of Texas and Louisiana).  But that's what the EPA plans to do, virtually making economic growth illegal in large parts of the United States.

Meanwhile, Craig Becker, the former chief counsel of the SEIU (Service Employees International Union) -- now the head of the NLRB -- has secured a 3-2 majority party line majority to repeal the Dana decision which mandates secret ballots in unionization elections.  The NLRB will rule that if a majority of workers check off that they want a union on cards then the union will automatically be approved without a secret ballot vote of the entire workforce.  Currently, if a majority of the workers sign the cards, a secret ballot vote is then triggered.  Frequently, the union loses these elections, proving that the card check off is subject to coercion and bullying.  The Democratic majority in the Senate wouldn't approve the card check change so the NLRB is planning to accomplish the same objective administratively, trapping workers into unionization they would reject if afforded the opportunity to vote by secret ballot.

Both the pollution permit/carbon tax and the forced unionization proposals will be job killers.  The U.S. has maintained its 25% share of global manufacturing by replacing workers with energy driven machines.  In the past ten years, the number of manufacturing employees has declined by 33% but our production has risen by 50%.  But automation takes energy -- lots of it -- by taxing energy, we are eliminating the strategy that has preserved our jobs.  And massive unionization of the private sector will also drive out our jobs.  Since 1990, unionized manufacturing jobs have declined by 75%.  But non-union manufacturing jobs have actually risen over the same period by 15%.

After he lost Congress in 1992, Bill Clinton, too, resorted to executive orders to maintain his momentum as president.  With Congress unwilling to pass anything he proposed, the president canvassed the Administration for ideas that could be implemented by executive orders.  A very productive period followed during which tobacco regulation, higher educational standards, affirmative action reform, and other key measures were implemented without asking Congress' permission.  But Clinton's executive orders were on subjects on which Congress had not voted.  They did not contradict the express will of the body.  Obama is using the strategy to act in direct defiance of Congressional action.  He is passing ideas Congress refused to pass, even when he had huge majorities.

Obama will live to regret these moves.  Republicans in the House will defund these actions and insert legislative language making it a crime to spend appropriated funds to implement them.  By this strategy, all of the controversial Obama legislation will be at issue during the budget fight -- taxes, Obamacare, cap and trade, and card check.  The more these issues are inserted into the budget fight, the greater the chances of Republican victory.

So President Obama has not learned the lessons of 2010 and likely never will.

Sarah Palin's New Book Makes Waves, Get Free Offer

Doctor Shows How to Accurately Test Your Thyroid at Home

Economists Predict Financial Meltdown Directly Ahead

__________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

GO TO DICKMORRIS.COM! TO READ ALL OF DICK'S COLUMNS!

PLEASE FORWARD THIS EMAIL TO FRIENDS & FAMILY AND INVITE THEM TO RECEIVE OUR FREE COLUMNS BY SUBSCRIBING HERE. THANKS!

THANK YOU!

***COPYRIGHT EILEEN MCGANN AND DICK MORRIS 2010.  REPRINTS WITH PERMISSION ONLY***

 

You are currently subscribed to dickmorris-reports as: brianprince100@yahoo.com
Add subscribers@dickmorris.com to your email address book to ensure delivery.
Forward to a Friend  |  Manage Subscription  |   Subscribe  |   Unsubscribe
Net Atlantic

__._,_.___
Recent Activity:
.

__,_._,___

--
This group is created for discussing national issues to stop the current administration from transforming this country into something not intended by the founders. Any discussions that are not relevant to that topic will be deleted.
 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Tea Party Patriots" group.
To post to this group, send email to tea-party-patriots@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
tea-party-patriots+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/tea-party-patriots?hl=en?hl=en
 
For more information on Tea Party Patriots, please visit http://www.teapartypatriots.org.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame

Nominal,
 
I'm tired of this.
 
Although I am not in favor of closing this thread, or any thread; like Mark, I don't see the point here, and I support him in his decision.
 
With regard to Perp,  she is a big girl, (And I don't mean in the literal sense); and can handle herself.  I only point out that once again,  you have misjudged her, and are once again  way off base.
 
We are not censoring anyone,  we just don't allow for the kind of behavior that Merc brings to this forum, and as she is known to do and does in each and every forum that she has made her presence known.
 
  We have but one rule here, "Govern yourself with dignity, and be respectful of each and every member". 
 
 
Merc is in violation of that rule, period. 
 
Further, according to our guidelines:
 
"When Discussing Pornography:  and asked to describe what constitutes "pornography", Justice Potter Stewart replied, "I Know It When I See It". The same guideline applies here in Political Forum; your moderators "know it' when a message, thread or specific converstation is improper or is getting out of hand. Unlike algebra, calculus, accounting, or any other science, moderation on a board like Political Forum sometimes requires making subjective calls.  Your Moderators are without a doubt, the most kindly, astute, brilliant, good looking people that you have ever met, and they will always attempt to be fair!  Nevertheless, any content or media posted by members of Political Forum which is deemed inappropriate, unbefitting, vexatious, harrassing, incendiary or in any way discordant or unsuitable to the Group is subject to removal, without notice.   Any member of Political Forum who is deemed to be unbefitting to the Group Political Forum, is  subject to  removal from the Group, without notice."
 
 
=====
 
So Nominal, there you have it.   If I choose to remove a moderated individual's posts, because I feel that it is incendiary, harassing and just flat out unbecoming, especially to any other member,  believe me, "I/We" have done so, and "I/We" will continue to do so.  There is such a thing as good manners and good taste, and Merc lacks those qualities.
 
I'm done with this. 
 
KeithInTampa
 

 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.