Monday, November 22, 2010

Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame

Oh no...are you from NE?

The Colts are having a very tough season this year.

On Nov 21, 4:07 pm, Cold Water <coldwater...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Too bad you guys had to wait to get your butts kicked.  ;-)
>
> CW
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Perplexed" <openlyincogn...@yahoo.com>
> To: "PoliticalForum" <politicalforum@googlegroups.com>
> Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2010 03:46
> Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame
>
> I am on the board this early afternoon, only because my beloved Buc's
> are on
> at 4:00 P.M.;
> ------------
>
> My beloved Colts are likely to get their asses handed to them in their
> 4pm game.  I don't know if I even want to watch!
>
> On Nov 21, 1:48 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Good Afternoon Nom,
>
> > I am on the board this early afternoon, only because my beloved Buc's are
> > on
> > at 4:00 P.M.;
>
> > What is the point? What is it that you wish to accomplish here, and why?
>
> > There is no argument, there is no discussion, as I stated to you the other
> > day, "It Is, What It Is".
>
> > Mark didn't do anything that was out of line or as you put it,
> > "Cosmo-Like,
> > Magrest-Like, or Nazi-Like". Merc has done this to herself, and it was not
> > just one event or transgression. Merc is known throughout all of the
> > political boards in Google, Yahoo, ABC, CBS, and throughout the world wide
> > web as a trouble maker, and unstable.
>
> > As I told you, Merc can come back, if she wishes to participate, act like
> > a
> > lady, and Merc agrees to remain moderated while on this board.
>
> > Again, what is it that you wish to accomplish here?
>
> > KeithInTampa
>
> > On Sun, Nov 21, 2010 at 1:41 PM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> > > Mark M. Kahle H. , you evaded the point... you are further victimizing
> > > Merc, a person who has been subjected to the conduct that you yourself
> > > seem to condemn....
> > > "Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > > someones
> > > elses kid were also ill is wrong."
> > > Answer the direct question and please don't double-talk....Stop
> > > grandstanding, or behaving like a sententious, dictatorial NAZI ...
> > > The Hell Pits of Nominal9's Censorship Hall of Shame are looming
> > > near....
> > > Nominal9
>
> > > PS... Listen to Ewe who goes BAAAAHHHH... and you are more than Half-
> > > Way there.... you too, can join the likes of the Cecotrophic Rabbit,
> > > the Pusillanimous Pellet... or Cosmo Cornuto Magcrest, and their
> > > Board... Euwe-topia... since renamed... Cornuto-pia.
>
> > > Hypocrites.... one and all....
>
> > > On Nov 19, 12:40 pm, Mark <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > We have decided and it is rather simple:
>
> > > > Kids, mentioned in a negative manner or any misguided wish that
> > > > someones
> > > > elses kid were also ill is wrong.
>
> > > > KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS, NO SECOND CHANCES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
>
> > > > Nominal9 if you can't live with that, I am sorry.
>
> > > > On Fri, Nov 19, 2010 at 11:22 AM, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > > > bring
> > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the same
> > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > > > will
> > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my
> > > > > country.
> > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > There are NO second chances. /Annointed One
>
> > > > > I've only known Merc on the boards for about one year....
> > > > > Point is, her child is the one who is (however it is prioperly
> > > > > put).... disabled... not anyone else's child. I truly believe that
> > > > > Merc has and conntinues to lash out at others (incluing their
> > > > > children) because those others have lashed out at her own child (of
> > > > > course, Merc sometimes gets confused in her emotional outbursts and
> > > > > happens to target innocent bystanders, but she "usually" corrects
> > > > > herself when she is made aware of the error) .... Merc is the
> > > > > victim,
> > > > > and anyone seeking to make her the "perpetrator" is just very
> > > > > ignorant
> > > > > or is trying to pull some sort of "reverse-discrimination"
> > > > > scam....You. Annointed One speak of yourself as being a liberal-
> > > > > progressive sort of person and here you champiion the interestes of
> > > > > "children'... If that is true, I definitely think that you missed
> > > > > the
> > > > > boat in using that "angle" to censure Merc....As I understand it,
> > > > > Merc
> > > > > is also trained to somne extent in medicine, I believe that she is a
> > > > > registered nurse of some kind... So, in terms of medical knowledge
> > > > > or
> > > > > even psychological stability.... I think she has a leg up on most
> > > > > others here abouts....
> > > > > There's reality and then there's what "posters" spew out to make
> > > > > points in arguments [on [political bioards and such.].. Merc is
> > > > > living
> > > > > a reality, when it comes to at least this one issue.....Cheap shots
> > > > > just do not carry the same eight... or they shouldn't... among
> > > > > "half-
> > > > > way serious folks" who try to deal in mutually respectful
> > > > > relationships.... of course... if people just want to sling the crap
> > > > > around... tha'ts alright, too, as long as it's understood for the
> > > > > crap
> > > > > that it is and given it's due "weight".....The crap that has been
> > > > > slung against Merc... IMO.... is not worth censorship or
> > > > > "banning".....
> > > > > Let me know awhat "y'all" decide....
>
> > > > > On Nov 18, 9:21 pm, THE ANNOINTED ONE <markmka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > Nominal9,
>
> > > > > > I was discomforted when Merc brought her child into a string. To
> > > bring
> > > > > > in a child is distasteful at best. She then went on to wish the
> > > > > > same
> > > > > > upon another posters child and in rather raunchy terms.... This I
> > > will
> > > > > > not abide from anyone about any child. The words she used about
> > > > > > children (regardless of whose) is (thank God) a felony in my
> > > > > > country.
> > > > > > To have allowed them to post would have made me complicit.
>
> > > > > > One last Time............ KIDS ARE OFF LIMITS IN THIS FORUM.
>
> > > > > > There are NO second chances.
>
> > > > > > On Nov 18, 4:26 pm, nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > > Annointed One, Keith from Tampa...
> > > > > > > Mark M. Kahle H.
> > > > > > > Kindly reconsider.... I don't like censors.... lowest of the
> > > > > > > low,
> > > in
> > > > > > > my book.... usually the jaclass stupidest of the jackass stupid,
> > > as
> > > > > > > well..... have to be, to think censorship is any sort of
> > > answer....
> > > > > > > Always room in the Hell Pits.... head up the ass with shit for
> > > > > > > brains... for eternity....
> > > > > > > nominal9
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/493434e.
> > > > > ..
>
> > >http://groups.google.com/group/number-71/browse_thread/thread/f0e0237.
> > > > > ..
> > > > > > > Sadly, I must enter the Owner "sysop" Rabbit... the
> > > > > > > Pusillanimous
> > > > > > > Pellet..... into my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of Shame, along
> > > > > > > with
> > > the
> > > > > > > Message Board.... 72....
>
> > > > > > > The Pusillanimous Pellet censored and apparently "banned" at
> > > > > > > least
> > > > > > > two
> > > > > > > posters from 72....les and merc.
> > > > > > > Granted that les and merc can be irritating, still .....whatever
> > > > > > > offense they may have ostensibly given amounts to naught in
> > > > > > > comparison
> > > > > > > to the general level of offense prevalent on the 72 board and of
> > > the
> > > > > > > offense that they, themselves, received.Rather, it seems that
> > > > > > > les
> > > and
> > > > > > > merc were subject to the usual "cabal" of social castigation
> > > > > > > irrespective of politics, ideology or affiliation that seems to
> > > > > > > run
> > > > > > > rampant among censors and sysops..... which is to say...
> > > > > > > censorship
> > > > > > > for the sake of dominance, sadism and control....
>
> > > > > > > I have given Rabbit, the Pusillanimous Pellet, more than ample
> > > > > > > warning of his impending dishonor , shame and eternal damnation
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > being relegated to my Nominal9 Censorship Hall of
> > > Shame....Consigned
> > > > > > > to an eternity of literal punishment to correspond to the
> > > > > > > metaphorical condition in which he lives his life as the censor
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > sysop of 72... which is to say, Damnerd to an Eternity in Hell
> > > > > > > with
> > > > > > > his Head Stuck Up His Ass and with Shit for Brains. But Rabbit,
> > > > > > > the
> > > > > > > Pusilllanomous Pellet, seems to scoff at this most foul and dire
> > > > > > > opprobrium... seemingly glad to join the ranks of his fellow
> > > > > > > Head
> > > Up
> > > > > > > The Ass and Shit For Brains sysops and Censors in their eternal
> > > > > > > misery...
>
> > > > > > > So be it....Abandon All Hope...forever...
>
> > > > > > > nominal9
>
> > > > > > > Rogue View profile
> > > > > > > More options Aug 27, 12:46 pm
>
> > > > > > > From: Rogue <rogueplan...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 12:46:29 -0400
> > > > > > > Local: Fri, Aug 27 2010 12:46 pm
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter...
> > > Rabbit...
> > > > > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
> > > > > > > Forward | Print | Individual message | Show original | Report
> > > > > > > this
> > > > > > > message | Find messages by this author
> > > > > > > Rabbit? Ban posters?
>
> > > > > > > Say it ain't so! / rogue
>
> > > > > > > - Hide quoted text -
> > > > > > > -Reporting spam
> > > > > > > Message reported
> > > > > > > Rate this post:
>
> > > > > > > nominal9 View profile
> > > > > > > More options Aug 30, 2:33 pm
>
> > > > > > > From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
> > > > > > > Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:33:51 -0700 (PDT)
> > > > > > > Local: Mon, Aug 30 2010 2:33 pm
> > > > > > > Subject: Re: Nominal9 Censorship Hall Of Shame.... enter...
> > > Rabbit...
> > > > > > > the "Pusillanimous Pellet"
>
> ...
>
> read more »

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

FLASHBACK: PENN JILLETTE CALLS COPS ON GROPING TSA AGENT


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Please, "Touch My Junk!"




Please, "Touch My Junk!"

Snidely Whiplash

I am wondering what in the Hell was going through the "Don't Touch my Junk" guy's mind? Lemme hook my reader's up here.

First, props to the TSA folks. I am sure that most of them are no happier with this situation than the traveling public seems to be. For the record, as a heterosexual type, touching another fellas "junk" is not high on my list of to do's. But that brings me to my point. Why don't they let male TSA guys do the girls, and female TSA types do the guys? What? Don't like that idea? Why?

We spend our early lives trying to determine who's junk we want to touch and who we want to touch ours and suddenly now it's a problem? Did I miss something here? For me personally, lemme see a nice size 12 or 14, kinda robust, matronly woman of 40 or so wanting to pat me down and I am there dude! Can ya see it now?"

"Next!' she announces. I step up. She looks at me. "Sir, haven't you been through this pat down line already?" "Yes" I smile back, my eyes glazed over in hopes of an intrusive violation by her lovely little latex gloved digits. "Sir, you only need to go through the line once. You might miss your flight," she admonishes, concern all over her pretty little face as I stare into her baby blues.

"Flight? What flight?" I reply. "Sir" she replies, a look of concern and puzzle crossing her lovely countenance, "this line is only for passengers prior to boarding." "Hell Baby," I reply,"if you touch me there one more time we will need to 'board' ourselves, if ya get my drift there Toots! Now quit yer chattin' and get to groping. Ya had me at 'next' so no need to keep sweet talkin' me Sugar. Let's go find a place where we can be alone and I can return the pat down."

So, wonder how that exchange would go over? Either I hook up with her or with an inmate in some local Federal detention facility somewhere, what? Either way, I hook up. Sweet. Beats the Hell out of having to buy her a drink first, right?

Continue reading>>>

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Reach out to your own subscribers with WordPress.com.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

I Screen Myself (TSA Parody) by Lynda McLaughlin (Video)





WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Publish text, photos, music, and videos by email using our Post by Email feature.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Michael Adams' New Song: "Don't Touch My Junk"




Michael Adams' New Song: "Don't Touch My Junk"

doctorbulldog | 21 November, 2010 at 11:37 am | Categories: Obama Sucks, Orwellian, security | URL: http://wp.me/p1NPg-6Kd

Yup, you just knew that phrase was going to inspire some rappers and songwriters:

Warning:  Not appropriate for younger children.

Add a comment to this post


WordPress

WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!
Manage Subscriptions | Unsubscribe | Express yourself. Start a blog.

Trouble clicking? Copy and paste this URL into your browser: http://subscribe.wordpress.com


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.