Tuesday, November 2, 2010

Re: BILLS THE REPUBLICAN PARTY OF NO HAVE BLOCKED (UPDATED!)

When life gives you lemons...

...screw - FAST!

On Nov 1, 10:30 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> The DREAM Act- Gives immigrant youth who were brought here as
> children
> a path to citizenship by earning a college degree or serving the
> military for 2 years. Republicans blocked this.
>
> Repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"- Would have repealed the law that
> forces gay and lesbian services members to lie about their sexuality
> and gives the military the right to discharge soldiers based on their
> sexuality. Republicans blocked this.
>
> ---------------------------------------------
>
> You're just setting your self up.  Reid piggy backed Dream and DADT on
> a defense appropriations bill.  So, you don't know what republicans
> blocked.  Ooops!  Reid promises a lame duck vote on Dream all by
> itself.  Good!  I support it.
>
> But your bigger problem with repealing DADT, is that a federal court
> just did, and Obama is fighting it!  That and of course its a dem
> policy to begin with.  Oops!
> On Oct 31, 8:25 pm, Tommy News <tommysn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > BILLS THE REPUBLICANS HAVE BLOCKED (UPDATED!)by Fay Easter
> > By Matthew Desmond
>
> > Here's just a short list of some of the bills that Republicans have
> > blocked, or attempted to block, since Obama became President:
>
> > Tax on Companies that ship jobs overseas- A bill that would have
> > eliminated a tax break that companies get when they ship jobs
> > overseas. Republicans blocked this, allowing companies to keep the tax
> > break they receive when they ship jobs to other countries.
>
> > Political Ad disclosure bill- Would have required all donors to
> > political campaigns to reveal themselves. Republicans blocked this,
> > not once but twice.
>
> > Subpoena Power for the Committee investigating the BP Oil Spill – Give
> > subpoena power to the independent committee responsible for
> > investigating BP's roll in the oil spill. Republicans attempted to
> > block this.
>
> > The Small Business Jobs Act -would give LOCAL, community banks access
> > to billions of dollars to loan to small businesses. Republicans
> > blocked this, then attempted to block it a second time and failed.
>
> > The DREAM Act- Gives immigrant youth who were brought here as children
> > a path to citizenship by earning a college degree or serving the
> > military for 2 years. Republicans blocked this.
>
> > Repeal of "Don't Ask, Don't Tell"- Would have repealed the law that
> > forces gay and lesbian services members to lie about their sexuality
> > and gives the military the right to discharge soldiers based on their
> > sexuality. Republicans blocked this.
>
> > From Crooks and Liars - When John McCain led the filibuster of the
> > Defense Appropriations Act yesterday, he blocked far more than the
> > DREAM Act and repeal of DADT. Here are just a few of the other blocked
> > provisions, courtesy of Mother Jones.
>
> > No permanent military bases in Afghanistan.
> > Report identifying hybrid or electric propulsion systems and other
> > fuel-saving technologies for incorporation into tactical motor
> > vehicles.
> > Protection of child custody arrangements for parents who are members
> > of the Armed Forces deployed in support of a contingency operation.
> > Improvements to Department of Defense domestic violence programs.
> > Department of Defense recognition of spouses of members of the Armed Forces.
> > Department of Defense recognition of children of members of the Armed Forces.
> > Enhancements to the Troops-to-Teachers Program.
> > Fiscal year 2011 increase in military basic pay.
> > Improving aural protection for members of the Armed Forces.
> > Comprehensive policy on neurocognitive assessment by the military
> > health care system.
> > Authority to make excess nonlethal supplies available for domestic
> > emergency assistance.
> > And those were just some of the progressive provisions. On the
> > conservative side, there are these, and more:
>
> > Prohibition on the use of funds for the transfer or release of
> > individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay,
> > Cuba.
> > Prohibition on the use of funds to modify or construct facilities in
> > the United States to house detainees transferred from United States
> > Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba.
> > Prohibition on use of funds to give Miranda warnings to Al Qaeda terrorists.
>
> > And here's the bills that Republicans had blocked when we compiled our
> > first list;
>
> > Senator Franken's Anti-Rape Amendment to the Defense Appropriations
> > Bill - Makes it so that women raped overseas while working for foreign
> > contractors have the right to have their case heard in an American
> > court instead of having their case mediated by the company they work
> > for. Only Republican men voted against this, but it passed.
>
> > Benefits for Homeless Veterans- Would have expanded benefits to
> > homeless veterans and homeless veterans with children. Republicans
> > blocked this.
>
> > Affordable Health Care For America Act- Prevents insurance companies
> > from discriminating against you on the basis of "pre-existing
> > conditions". Requires that insurance companies spend 85 cents of every
> > dollar that you pay on your actual health care. Limits health
> > insurance companies profit margins. Republicans blocked this for
> > months before it finally passed and have vowed to repeal it if they
> > are elected.
>
> > Health Care for the 9/11 First Responders who got sick from being at
> > Ground Zero- Would provide billions of dollars in health care to help
> > the 9/11 First Responders who were at Ground Zero on 9/11 and are now
> > sick because of it. Republicans blocked this.
>
> > The Jobs Bill- Offsets the payroll tax for 1 year for companies that
> > hire new employees, or people receiving unemployment insurance. Also
> > gives other tax incentives to companies hiring new employees.
> > Republicans attempted to block this.
>
> > Wall Street Reform- Puts stricter regulations on the banks, preventing
> > them from becoming "too big to fail". Curbs reckless spending
> > practices that caused the banking crisis. Republicans attempted to
> > block this.
>
> > American Recovery and Reinvestment Act- Pumped billions of dollars
> > into state and local Governments to prevent us from sinking into a
> > second Great Depression. Republicans opposed this but now want to take
> > credit for the parts of it that we know are successful.
>
> > Oil Spill Liability- Raises the liability on what companies can be
> > made to pay to clean up after an oil spill. Republicans blocked this.
>
> > Immigration Reform- Republican suggested comprehensive immigration
> > reform until Obama supported it. Now they're rabidly opposed to it and
> > even voted against their own legislation. Republicans blocked this.
>
> > Unemployment extension bill HR-4213- Would provide additional aid to
> > the millions of Americans still on unemployment who are just trying to
> > support themselves and their families. Republicans blocked this bill
> > for 8 weeks before it finally passed. Republicans blocked this for 8
> > weeks before it finally passed.
>
> > Fair Pay Act of 2009- Also called the Lily Ledbetter bill. Requires
> > that women receive equal compensation to men for doing the same work.
> > Republicans attempted to block this.
>
> > The next time someone tells you that the Republicans care about the
> > American people just give them this list of all the bill Republicans
> > wanted to fail.
>
> > --
> > Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
> > Have a great day,
> > Tommy- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: The Libertarian Pledge to America

I promise to repeal the PATRIOT ACT
-----------------------------------------------------------

98-1


VERY Repubican eh?


--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Halliburton Influence on the Upcoming Election- - by Professor Robert Reich

Your op. I asked, if leftists such as Reich, had a problem with
Haiburton (Brown and Root) CREATING LBJ, and that NO president since
has backed off that?

No Halliburton - no LBJ. Which POTUS set the scale for Hallibuton
getting no bids? LBJ!

Suck it up dems, YOU own it. Cheney divested. LBJ and said estate,
never did, and as MAJORITY, shareholders.

Oooooooops!

On Nov 1, 3:19 pm, Keith In Tampa <keithinta...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Robert Reich is a Marxist midget.
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:20 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> > Reich is certainly an unbiased source.  I wonder if he had the same
> > problem when Haliburton created LBJ, and LBJ responded in kind (and no
> > president has changed that since)?
>
> > --
> >  Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> > For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> > * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Urgent Message to New York State Voters: Don't Let Obstructionist Republicans Win Back The State Senate

Hopefully, you might begin to fathom just how out of touch you really
are with your proposed return to the failed Bush policies.

On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yep, that's the ticket Lil'MarxistMoonbatTommyTomTomForNews. A homophobe
> racist who doesn't agree with you and your ilk's "redistribution of wealth"
> plans.....
>
> Hopefully, you might begin to fathom just how out of touch you really are
> with "Mainstream" America tomorrow evening.
>
>
> On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 3:08 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Wrong and false again.
>>
>> Civil marriage is distinct and separate from religious marriage. As
>> long as the government codifies marriage, all people must be included
>> in those laws equally regardless of gender. Churches are then free to
>> bless those civil marriage contracts or not as they choose.
>>
>> Civil rights matters should NEVER be placed on the ballot, for the
>> majority almost always votes AGAINST the minority.
>>
>> Your homophobia and discrimination is showing again, Keithie.
>>
>> On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa <keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dick was right on the money TommyTomTomForNews.....What you seek is
>> "special
>> > rights" and additional privileges above what every other American has,
>> > because of who you want to hop in the sack with.
>> >
>> > As it stands now, you can marry anyone that you so choose, just as any
>> other
>> > man, or woman can.
>> >
>> > If you want to redefine the definition of marriage, (which is an
>> > ecclesiastical function, and throughout history is defined as being
>> between
>> > a man and a woman) then put it up for a vote. Let's see how that goes
>> for
>> > ya.
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 2:15 PM, Tommy News <tommysnews@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> >> False twisted pretzel logic. No dice, no points to Dick.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On 11/1/10, dick thompson <rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> > And the support of the people of NY state is what? Do you have
>> numbers
>> >> > as to what support this has?
>> >> >
>> >> > Also remember that members of legislative bodies represent their
>> >> > constituents. Suppose the constituents supported civil unions but
>> not
>> >> > marriage, something which is common across the country. If the civil
>> >> > union gave you the benefits of marriage, why would you give a damn.
>> And
>> >> > if the constituents supported civil unions but not marriage, then
>> >> > that
>> >> > is what their senators should vote. Did you ask why the 8 Dems voted
>> >> > against? If they had not voted against it would have passed 32-30.
>> >> > Blame them!
>> >> >
>> >> > On 11/01/2010 02:01 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>> >> >> On December 2nd, 2009, by a vote of 38
>> >> >> Nays to 24 Yeas, The New York State Senate Voted Against Marriage
>> >> >> Equality.
>> >> >> Every single Republican and eight Democrats voted for
>> >> >> discrimination.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> On 11/1/10, dick thompson<rhomp2002@earthlink.net> wrote:
>> >> >>> What stand-alone bill did the Republicans vote for discrimination.
>> >> >>> If
>> >> >>> you are still harping on DADT, they should have noted against that
>> >> >>> debacle. The garbage that was tacked onto that bill made it
>> >> imperative
>> >> >>> to see it did not get passed.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> If you want repeal of DADT passed, then put up a bill that repeals
>> >> >>> DADT. Also make sure that you also change the UCMJ as well. As
>> >> >>> it
>> >> >>> stands now if all you do is let the judge say DADT is bad, then it
>> >> >>> defaults to the older legislation in UCMJ which actually does not
>> even
>> >> >>> include DADT but only dismissal. Stop playing stupid games with
>> the
>> >> >>> crap. Pitiful! Also remember who first passed and signed DADT.
>> And
>> >> >>> no, it was not the Republicans. Thank your hero, Bubba, and his
>> crew
>> >> >>> that were in charge.
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> On 11/01/2010 01:21 PM, Tommy News wrote:
>> >> >>>> Every single Republican voted for discrimination.
>> >> >>>> Every single one. No exceptions.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> Do NOT vote for a Republican obstructionist under ANY
>> circumstances.
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> A Republican Mammoth:
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>>
>> >>
>> https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEgNhVxhrwnnsNAk0dYuT8PvXUIV9y9tWhKf2_uKzKfQ_0KcsIjKkbhYhvdcAIE04c5AKTqYjLLuy27i1NoX737NSx04zgkVJK3kVk68RR3WGAuKqlzZHkDGbhMmIKv3nzOdp6PS9Fe6DSnd/s400/GOP+mammoth+large.jpg
>> >> >>>>
>> >> >>>> On 11/1/10, Keith In Tampa<keithintampa@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> >>>>> --
>> >> >>>>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >> >>>>> For options& help see
>> >> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >> >>>>>
>> >> >>>>> * Visit our other community at
>> >> >>>>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ <http://www.politicalforum.com/><
>> http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >> >>>>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >> >>>>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >> >>> --
>> >> >>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >> >>> For options& help see
>> http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >> >>>
>> >> >>> * Visit our other community at
>> >> >>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ <http://www.politicalforum.com/><
>> http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >> >>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >> >>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >> >
>> >> > * Visit our other community at
>> >> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ <http://www.politicalforum.com/><
>> http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> >> Have a great day,
>> >> Tommy
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> >> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >>
>> >> * Visit our other community at
>> >> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/ <http://www.politicalforum.com/><
>> http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> >> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> >> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>> >>
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> > For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>> >
>> > * Visit our other community at
>> > http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
>> Have a great day,
>> Tommy
>>
>> --
>> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
>> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>>
>> * Visit our other community at
>> http://www.PoliticalForum.com/<http://www.politicalforum.com/>
>> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
>> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
>>
>
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
>
> * Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.


--
Together, we can change the world, one mind at a time.
Have a great day,
Tommy

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

Re: Halliburton Influence on the Upcoming Election- - by Professor Robert Reich

Robert Reich is a Marxist midget.
 


 
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 10:20 AM, GregfromBoston <greg.vincent@yahoo.com> wrote:
Reich is certainly an unbiased source.  I wonder if he had the same
problem when Haliburton created LBJ, and LBJ responded in kind (and no
president has changed that since)?

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum

* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.