Friday, August 20, 2010

**JP** While politicians are having photo-ops, our nation and military is busy saving lives

Has anyone seen zardari appearing on telivision and talking to the nation about this great disaster that the country is facing? Oh, i forgot, he must be in Russia today on a very important visit, as lots of coctail parties are to be attended... and here, in the country, millions of people in distress are being supported by millions of Pakistanis and our military is all out there helping out as many as possible and started to build the nation back to where it was...a huge work is to be accomplished, but first, its the hungry and the needy to be take care of...I salute all those who participated in the relief activities, in material, in duas, in anyway, and I salute our military jawans for their efforts, and they are one organization that will be there whenever the nation needs, and the nation can rely on them....while our miserable politicians do their photo-ops!
 
Now the big issue is of incoming aid, whatever amount it may be, all these politicians are lining up, with their mouths open with their 'raal tapking', and their is glitter in their eyes, as they hear dollars!!! Shame on their faces. I wish the military takes control of all development and rehabilitation works and takes in control all fundings that comes for the purpose!!!!
 

Pakistan military enhances image with flood relief effort

NOWSHERA | Tue Aug 17, 2010 9:32am EDT

 

NOWSHERA Pakistan (Reuters) - With little aid from a weak civilian government, many Pakistani flood victims are pinning hopes on the military as the only institution capable of helping them rebuild their lives.

Survivors of the country's worst floods in history are increasingly impatient over a lack of food and relief goods, and are criticizing President Asif Ali Zardari's government for mismanagement.

"The military has improved its stature because they know that it is the time that they can demonstrate to the people that they can come to their rescue when civilians fail," security and political analyst Hasan Askari Rizvi said.

"This is the game that ultimately undermines civilians in Pakistan."

The sheer magnitude of the disaster in an area roughly the size of England would have tested any government, but the Islamabad's response -- particularly Zardari's European trip when the floods unfolded -- contrasted with prompt army help.

"The government has thrown us here like dogs. No one cares about us," says laborer Kifayat Khan, standing at a relief center in the northwestern town of Nowshera as dirty-faced children played in deep mud.

"Government leaders and politicians come here just for media publicity, just for photographs. They have not given us any help," he complained.

As Khan spoke, a man in a gathered crowd shouted "Army Zindabad (long live). They saved my brother from drowning. They saved us from the jaws of death.

Almost everyone at the relief center set up at the sprawling Government College of Technology in flood-battered Nowshera praised the army.

"The soldiers have set up these tents for us and gave us food but they have gone now," said Gul Bibi, a 40-year-old woman, holding her shirtless son in her lap. "Now we are not getting much help."

Many Pakistanis are ambivalent about the army. While they welcomed the return of democracy in 2008 after military President Pervez Musharraf's fall, perceived graft and political bickering in Zardari's government have made many nostalgic.

While nostalgia does not meant the army will return to power in a coup, it underscores the fragile line that Zardari must negotiate with the most powerful institution in Pakistan.

"It's only the army which is working day and night. It is because of the army that we are here," said Mohammad Munshi Shah, who fled to Muzaffarabad in Punjab province along with 23 family members after floods swept away his village.

Despite its enhanced image, the army is unlikely to rise against the unpopular Zardari at a time when it is fighting a growing insurgency by militants linked to al Qaeda and Taliban.

"The Army has improved its image domestically and it wants to improve its image internationally by fighting militants," Rizvi said.

(Additional reporting by Asim Tanveer in Muzaffargarh; Editing by Alistair Scrutton)


We should be so lucky

Barney Frank’s Big, Fat, Fear-Driven Political Ploy

Filed under: Economy, Taxes & Government — TBlumer @ 9:13 am

The Wall Street Journal’s editorialists are pleased today:

Barney to Fannie: Drop Dead
Wonder of wonders, miracle of miracles.

Barney Frank has been all over the airwaves this week with a clear and—we never thought we’d say this—perfectly sound message about Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac: “They should be abolished.”

Well, praise be. Two years ago next month, then Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson put the two government-sponsored mortgage-finance giants into conservatorship, and Congressman Frank declared himself pleased that there was a good chance, according to government bean-counters, that the rescue wouldn’t cost taxpayers a dime. Also at the time, Mr. Frank scoffed at the Bush Administration’s view that Fan and Fred should be wound down, saying it would never happen. One and a half trillion dimes ($149 billion) later, Mr. Frank appears to have seen the light.

Recall that in 2007 Mr. Frank had complained that the reason Fannie and Freddie hadn’t been reformed earlier was “the insistence of some economic conservative fundamentalists in the Bush Administration who, to be honest, don’t think there should be a Fannie Mae or a Freddie Mac.” Welcome aboard, Barney.

In another sign that he’s an avid reader of these columns, Mr. Frank even told Fox Business, “If we want to subsidize housing then we could do it upfront and let the budget be clear about that.” That is certainly a more honest way to subsidize housing and makes us think we don’t write in vain.

This is nice, but Captain Ed at Hot Air says we shouldn’t forget the history. He is of course correct (bold is mine):

That’s … a sea change for Frank. While he nearly dislocates his shoulder attempting to pat his own back by claiming that he has said this all along, it’s simply not true. Frank, in his role on the House Financial Services Committee, played a huge part in creating and maintaining the government intervention that severely distorted the lending markets. Whether or not he ever uttered a comment along the way about overdoing home ownership, Frank’s actions helped to create and maintain those policies, and he defended them repeatedly over the last twelve years.

… Just last year, Frank and his allies were busily claiming that the free market caused the collapse, and that only government intervention could restore American prosperity. Eighteen months into the Obama administration, Frank now wants to sound like a born-again acolyte of Adam Smith, or at least as close as Frank can approximate such a pose.

My theory: Barney “I Really Like the Free Market” Frank is frightened that Scott Bielat actually has a shot at pulling off the supposedly unthinkable — taking his congressional seat.

Here’s more from Bielat (bold is mine):

… Now, amid a heavily anti-incumbent election year, Frank has suddenly changed his tune on Fannie and Freddie, telling Fox News the companies should be “abolished”. Massachusetts voters should not be fooled by Frank’s election year conversion. He risked every hard working American’s economic well-being when he endorsed and protected Fannie and Freddie’s loaning practices.

“It’s pure election-year politics,” said Bielat, a Marine and successful businessman. “The voters are on to Congressman Frank. He is scared and knows Fannie and Freddie are a huge albatross around his neck going into November. Sub-prime mortgages were a primary reason our economy collapsed and why so many people are out of work. Nobody pushed harder to increase Fannie and Freddie’s stake in sub-prime mortgages than Barney Frank.”

This is Barney’s big, fat, fear-driven political ploy. No one in his district should even think about buying what he’s selling.

Other than the apparent need for an on-board grammarian (”loaning policies”?), Bielat looks like the real deal.

Impossible? Yeah, that’s what they said about Scott Brown.

The larger message is that this may be the first true “no incumbent in the president’s party is safe” election since the 1974 post-Watergate ballot box massacre. Pass the popcorn.


http://www.bizzyblog.com/2010/08/19/barney-franks-big-fat-fear-driven-political-ploy/

Interesting - check out this link -

   
Even In Martha's Vineyard?  The shift in public opinion toward Bush isn't surprising, but that it is showing up even there is.
- 12:33 PM, 18 August 2010   [link]

The Third Memorial




 

--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
 
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.

**JP** Flood relief and politics in Pakistan



 Aug 20, 2010

By Brian M Downing 

The world is seeing a tragedy unfold as monsoon rains swell the expansive Indus River and flood large parts of Pakistan from Khyber Pakhtoonkhwa province to the Arabian Sea. Whether directed by Pakistanis or outside agencies, relief will not always be a straightforward humanitarian effort - neither in intent nor result; it will be tempered with civil-military issues, international politics, and concerns with Pakistan's very future. 

Civilians and soldiers
Pakistan has alternated between civilian and military governments since its inception in 1947. Neither established a record of capable government in the eyes of the people and according to polling data, neither enjoys substantial support - Pakistanis are not supportive of rule by heavy-handed authoritarians or grasping oligarchs. 

Politicians and generals are vying for popular support not on the hustings but through relief programs. Campaign promises and legitimizing slogans have been pushed aside as each side must either deliver food, water and medical aid to millions of displaced Pakistanis or face reduced support, if not open opposition. 

The military has the edge in this competition, though an appearance of cooperation will be maintained. It is the army that has the trucks and helicopters, the logistical skill in moving large quantities of goods into place, large-scale medical resources, and the hierarchical command structure. Paradoxically, perhaps, many of the resources and skills of modern warfare are essential for relief work. 

There is little likelihood that the military will once again seize power in the near future. The military will, however, present itself as a competent institution embodying the principles of national honor and aspirations. Whatever new presence it establishes in stricken districts will be used to enhance its prestige. Depending on its success in relief operations, the military will be able to maintain its position in public affairs and resist efforts by civilians - and the US - to exit from politics altogether. 

US efforts
American diplomacy has alternately supported civilian and military governments - sometimes out of geopolitical necessity, sometimes out of the government's incompetence or brutality. At present, the US supports the civilian government of President Asif Ali Zardari and Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani, but the floods will require it to work closely with the military on logistical, medical and other matters. 

The US has been leaning on the Pakistani military, especially Inter-Services Intelligence, to end its support for militant groups such as the Taliban, the Haqqani network, Lashkar-e Taiba and even al-Qaeda. American diplomats and military officials have been decrying military support, formal and informal, to these groups and pressing the Pakistani generals to force the Taliban to the bargaining table. 

But this pressure will likely be reduced as the immediacy of the disaster and the need for cooperation on relief take precedence. And cooperation may well strengthen the Pakistani military's standing in the country. 

The US will seek to enhance its abysmal image in a country where anti-Americanism and related conspiracy theories abound. Results on this score are unlikely to be impressive. Hostility is simply too deeply embedded in the culture and the US presence in relief work will be often seen as an effort to dominate the country, probably in conjunction with India. 

United States relief efforts will in some respects mesh with those of Pakistan's other geopolitical partner, China, but in other respects the two powers will be competitive if not antagonistic. The US wishes to contain China's influence in Pakistan as it might lead to sharper tensions between Pakistan and India, which has a decades-long hostility toward China and which opposes any expansion of Chinese influence in South Asia. 

China has longstanding cooperation with the Pakistani military, including arms sales and military planning. China is less ideologically motivated in its approach to Pakistan. It cares little about civil-military rivalries and looks chiefly for a stable partner to oppose India and to exploit the mineralogical wealth of Afghanistan. Insomuch as China already operates an immense copper mine above the Af-Pak border - with little if any insurgent obstruction - one might suspect that China and the Pakistani military formed at least the basis of a partnership on this regard some time ago. 

Pakistan's future
The deluge is of such a magnitude as to pose a risk to the country's stability and unity. The military's resources are formidable but not limitless, even with the influx of foreign help. Relief efforts will take resources away from the campaign against the Pakistani Taliban in the northwest and related development programs in the region. 

This will afford related groups - the Afghan Taliban and al-Qaeda among them - to enjoy greater freedom of action in the region and in Afghanistan. 

Resources may also be reallocated from Balochistan - the country's restive western province where a separatist movement has been gathering momentum. Separatists may avail themselves of the state's attention being shifted to the Indus valley and use it to further their cause. 

A more serious challenge has already been launched by al-Qaeda. A year ago or so, al-Qaeda was of limited importance in Pakistan. Its forces were thought to be withdrawing from the region for more promising campaigns in Yemen, Somalia and elsewhere outside South Asia. 

More recently, however, with open fighting between the Pakistani military and its erstwhile client group known as the Pakistani Taliban (Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan - TTP), al-Qaeda has regrouped and made common cause with the TTP to effect the country's break with the US and support, even more openly, the Afghan Taliban in order to drive the West out of the region. 

Al-Qaeda has been notably effective in establishing itself in the port city of Karachi, which has a large Pashtun refugee population that could be used to interdict North Atlantic Treaty Organization supplies there. 

Perhaps of less immediate concern is the potential for discontent in the Punjab region to develop into another insurgency. Land ownership is highly concentrated in the area - a longstanding problem that the country's political elite, which contains numerous big landholders, has neglected. The Punjab's century-long tradition of military service would provide an insurgency with experienced leaders and a rank-and-file with military knowledge. 

The monsoon rains are expected to continue for several weeks. 

Brian M Downing is a political/military analyst and author of The Military Revolution and Political Change and The Paths of Glory: War and Social Change in America from the Great War to Vietnam. He can be reached at brianmdowning@gmail.com 


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com &
on facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/Join-Pakistan/125610937483197