Sunday, August 8, 2010

**JP** Job: FEMALE customer service executives -different cities




Ideas by Gulahmed is looking for FEMALE customer service executives in different cities of Punjab (LHR, FSBD, SKT, GJW,PINDI) 

Requirements;
Min Qualification : Graduation
Min Experience : 1 Year

Email CV at Jobs@ideas.gulahmed .com & cc to practitioner. hr@gmail. com Mention CSE and location which you are applying for in subject line

Regards,
Global Career Consultancy
"The Resource People"



Subscribe to receive latest Job Notifications:

Blog: http://cvarchive.wordpress.com/
YahooGroup: http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/gcc_verticals/
GoogleGroup: http://groups.google.com/group/CVArchive


--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "JoinPakistan" group.
You all are invited to come and share your information with other group members.
To post to this group, send email to joinpakistan@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com.pk/group/joinpakistan?hl=en?hl=en
You can also visit our blog site : www.joinpakistan.blogspot.com

**JP** A nice video

I think Jim Miller has this one about right


Machine Politics And The Sotomayor And Kagan Judicial Picks:  
In 2008, David Freddoso argued that Obama was best understood, not through his unusual ancestry, but through his "political pedigree", a mix of 1960s radicalism and machine politics.

What strikes me about Obama's two Supreme Court nominees, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan, is that they are the kind of picks a machine politician would make.

To get an idea of what kind of judges a machine politician would want, let's go back to the original Mayor Daley, and one of his strongest supporters, Vito Marzullo.  Here's how Mike Royko introduced Marzullo in Boss, his biography of Mayor Daley.
Vito Marzullo is a ward committeeman and an alderman.  He was born in Italy and has an elementary education, but for years when he arrived at political functions, a judge walked a few steps behind him, moving ahead when there was a door to be opened.  Marzullo had put him on the bench. (pp. 67-68)
Judgeships were patronage positions, given out to lawyers who were strong supporters of the machine.   Because they were so valuable, the lawyers had to prove their loyalty over the years, and almost always had to be a friend of the party official who controlled their appointment.

Because the Chicago machine relied on many ethnic groups for support, they tried to choose judges, like candidates, for ethnic balance.  Now, achieving that balance is more complicated, because the Democratic party also has to satisfy feminists, gays, et cetera, but the basic idea is the same: The party wins votes by choosing representatives of various groups for top positions.  Taxes and crime may be high, but many voters will be satisfied if they can see someone they identify with in court, or on the city council.

When the judges are in office, a machine expects them to follow party policy, just as it expects everyone else who owes their jobs to the political machine to follow party policy.  In other words, the machine's judges are not supposed to think of themselves as independent of the machine, regardless of what the law may say.

Typically, the judges chosen by political machines are undistinguished, as you would expect, given that kind of selection process.

By now, you can probably see that the first Mayor Daley would understand exactly why Obama picked Sotomayor; she is a representative of two constituencies, Latinos and feminists.  A white male judge of English ancestry with identical accomplishments and views would never have been considered for the position.  She was chosen because of her ancestry, and because she emphasized it with her disgraceful claim that a "wise Latina" would be a better judge than a white guy.  (Not that long ago, most people of Puerto Rican descent in the United States did not think of themselves as Latino, so it was important to Obama that she did, or at least said she did.)

Kagan, too, was chosen because she represents several constituencies, feminists, again, of course.  The Obama administration is especially sensitive on that point because of his long primary fight with Clinton.)  She also represents Jews, who were extremely important to political machines in the past, and still are in a few places.  (Reports that she is a closeted lesbian, whether true or not — I have no idea whether they are, and don't much care — were probably another plus, as long as she stayed in the closet.)  She also represents leftist academics.  We don't usually think of them as an ethnic group, but, given their frequently tribal behavior, that's often appropriate.

Sotomayor has had an undistinguished judicial career; Kagan has had an undistinguished academic career, with few important publications.  Both, however, have shown that they can be good politicians, in fact, Kagan has shown that she is an exceptional academic politician.

Neither is likely to be a distinguished justice.  Obama won't mind that; they were chosen because he believes they will support his policies on the court, and because their nominations can be used in his 2012 campaign.

(If Obama gets another Supreme Court pick, what kind of person will he choose?  Mostly likely someone of East Asian descent, Chinese, Japanese, Vietnamese, or Korean.  And this time it might be a man.

Of course, I very much hope that he does not get another pick, but I do think that we'll see many lower court appointments from those groups.)
- 10:55 AM, 7 August 2010   [link]

Corzine and his actions now that he is no longer governor -

Why couldn't he do stuff like this as governor instead of totally bankrupting the state as he did.



Private Corzine, Public Corzine, Private Corzine:  
Success, failure, success.  Former New Jersey Governor Jon Corzine made stacks of money at Goldman Sachs.  Which he then used to buy himself, first a place in the Senate, and then the New Jersey governorship.  (Whether he earned the money, as opposed to just making it, is hard to tell without knowing more than I do about the innards of Goldman Sachs.)

As New Jersey governor, he made a good start toward bankrupting a state that was already in serious fiscal trouble.

Now that Chris Christie has given Corzine more time to spend — though not, it would appear, with his family — Corzine is back to making money.
MF Global Holdings Ltd (MF.N) reported better-than-expected quarterly earnings on Thursday, returning to profitability in the brokerage's first full quarter under new CEO Jon Corzine.

MF Global shares climbed 5 percent to $7.01 in premarket trade, their best level since mid-June.

The futures- and options-focused company made good on its aggressive plan to streamline operations, cutting 12 percent of its staff, or about 400 employees, mostly in the latest quarter.
There are many Democratic politicians (and more Republican politicians than I would like) who have no idea how to balance a budget.  Obviously, Corzine is not one of them.

So, here's what I have been wondering for years:  Why is a man who is so good at making private money so bad at managing public money?

(There may be a clue in this long-running scandal.)
- 12:49 PM, 6 August 2010   [link]


The generosity of the lib pols is overwhelming

http://gatewaypundit.firstthings.com/2010/08/hillarys-generous-10-donation-to-pakistan-flood-relief/