"I crossed a Democrat with a Democrat."
"What did you get?"
"An abortion!"
On Sep 5, 5:39 pm, NoEinstein <noeinst...@bellsouth.net> wrote:
> Dear Studio: The Constitution protects the FREEDOM of religion, it
> does not sanction allowing any religions nor non-religions to control
> government beyond the one-person-one-vote of their members. The
> Democratic Party is dominated by just two issues: Pro choice on
> abortions, and "rights" for gays. Since both of those are issues of
> high controversy, the American People should be allowed to decide once
> and for all in direct referenda. When that has been done, and single
> females can feel safe that they no longer need to be under the
> Democratic umbrella, the remaining socioeconomic problems facing this
> country can be solved in non-partisan, but effective ways. Know this:
> "Without change, there can be no progress!" Political parties and
> divisive group influences must go! — J. A. A. —
>
> On Sep 4, 10:36 pm, studio <tl...@hotmail.com> wrote:> Strange, but Atheists have never been in control of anything to
> > dictate anything...
>
> > Now what you gonna do about the believers dictating???
>
> > > For me, I would place the
>
> > "pro-choice" time limit at 2.5 to 3 months.
>
> > For you?
> > No MOST people would do it very similarly.
> > It's only the 2 major parties that are voted in power by minorities of
> > people who wouldn't.
>
> > The same holds true for many things...
> > i.e. Means Testing Social Security Insurance... both parties are
> > against it, yet common sense say's that's the way most insurances work.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment