Dear MJ: The US Senate is prominently mentioned in the original
Constitution. Such is an oligarchy, not a Representative Republic,
and is thus unconstitutional. The US Supreme Court was "mentioned",
and happened to be part of an entire article relative to the courts.
Airheads wrongly assumed that because the latter was explained in a
separate article that there was this intent (sic) that there be a
balance of power, with the courts being equal to the executive and to
the "Congress"—which as a 'total' (with the Senate) is
unconstitutional. Nowhere is the Supreme Court given the power to do
anything other than to say, "yea or nay" to Constitutionality, and to
refer any questionable law back to the Congress to bring into
compliance, or else to rescind that law. But what we have is BIASED
justices being so thrilled to have been nominated, that they vote on
issues the way the President(s) who nominated them would wish. Thus,
the God damned Supreme Court has become this "alternate" way to get
controversial things enacted, such as the clearly UNCONSTITUTIONAL
Obama Care!!! My "NC" castrates the entire court system to never be
considered part of some imaginary "balance of power". I know that I
am right on this, because the "swing" vote of a single justice now has
more 'power' than the entire Congress. I can assure you that the
Founding Fathers only wanted levels of appeal in order to be certain
that no individual wrongly gets long sentences or is put to death.
The above should point out the "constitutionality" is an issue of
effect, not of the means. The effect of political parties is to allow
either of two biased groups to control our government. If FAIRNESS
matters to you, MJ, you will understand that political parties have no
more right to be controlling our government than labor unions and
right-to-lifers. Deciding issues by which group is the strongest was
the norm for millennia, and THAT is what our forefathers were fleeing
from when they formed the USA. Anyone who defends 'group' anything,
is against having the USA survive as a nation. Get on-board, MJ!
There are worthy adversaries to moral government that you should be
attacking. I want the USA to survive! And the quicker Obama can be
hanged for TREASON, the better! — John A. Armistead —
On Sep 19, 12:42 pm, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> <sigh>
> LOTS of things are not mentioned in the Constitution -- does not make them unconstitutional.
> The people will NEVER be in equal control of the Government nor should they. Government -- legitimate Government -- secures (natural) rights <period>. Anything else necessarily provides advantage to some at the expense of everyone else. This reduces Government to just another run-of-the-mill GANG.
> What does this 'control' look like? 50%+1 forcing 50%-1 to do as they wish?
> A Political Party -- an association of people with an 'elective' goal -- is in no way unconstitutional.
> Members of said Parties USING Government to garner advantage for said parties and similar *IS* unconstitutional.
> Regard$,
> --MJ
> "Americans upset by laws, regulations, and policies are constantly demanding government reforms. But, on reflection, this demand is almost preposterous, because the people are calling on the very persons who, to promote their own interests, created the offensive laws, regulations, and policies in the first place. Calling for the rulers to reform the government is like calling for cats to befriend mice or for cannibals to take up vegetarianism." -- Robert HiggsAt 08:26 AM 9/19/2012, you wrote:Dear MJ: Political parties aren't mentioned in the original
> Constitution. The main objective of the latter is to have the people
> to be equally in control of government. I've explained the rationale
> quite clearly. What you state is freedom of association. Apart from
> that, when any group having any ideology interjects itself between the
> people and the government that they are supposed to control, that is
> an entirely different form of government than the sought, but never
> realized, Representative Republic the Founding Fathers had in mind.
> Look at the EFFECTS not just the associations, and you will realize
> that having dominate group power is NOT why the USA was formed! — J.
> A. A. —
> On Sep 18, 8:51 am, MJ <micha...@america.net> wrote:
> > Political parties are NOT unconstitutional.
> > When they use Government to secure advantage, those ACTIONS are certainly unconstitutional.
> > Regard$,
> > --MJ
> > "Politics under democracy consists almost wholly of the discovery, chase and scotching of bugaboos. The statesman becomes, in the last analysis, a mere witch-hunter, a glorified smeller and snooper, eternally chanting Fe, Fi, Fo, Fum! It has been so in the United States since the earliest days. The whole history of the country has been a history of melodramatic pursuits of horrendous monsters, most of them imaginary: the red-coats, the Hessians, the monocrats, again the red-coats, the Bank, the Catholics, Simon Legree, the Slave Power, Jeff Davis, Mormonism, Wall Street, the rum demon, John Bull, the hell hounds of plutocracy, the trusts, General Weyler, Pancho Villa, German spies, hyphenates, the Kaiser, Bolshevism. The list might be lengthened indefinitely; a complete chronicle of the Republic could be written in terms of it, and without omitting a single important episode." -- H.L. Mencken, 1926At 09:23 AM 9/16/2012, you wrote:Dear Keith: Political parties began with the objective of "beating-the-
> > bushes" to be sure there would be candidates running who would be
> > acceptable to a particular faction if such candidate(s) got elected.
> > Soon it was realized that the best benefit to the faction would be to
> > use its growing influence to try to assure that the candidate favored
> > by the faction would get elected. At that point, political parties
> > became UNCONSTITUTIONAL! A process too many of us now accept as the
> --
> Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
> For options & help seehttp://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
> * Visit our other community athttp://www.PoliticalForum.com/
> * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
> * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
--
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment