Except for 'policing' the actual 'crime' of counterfeiting (which the Federal Government is the largest perpetrator), the Secret Service activities are wholly unconstitutional.
Amendment II prohibits the Federal Government from infringing <period>.
Amendment II by way of Amendment XIV prohibits States from infringing <period>.
The unconstitutional activities of the Secret Service do not trump state or local law.
That our unconstitutional, immoral, out-of-control Federal Government does as it pleases .... does not change these realities.
Regard$,
--MJ
I was about to say that I'd hate to live in a country where the law could mean whatever its rulers said it meant, when it occurred to me that I already do. -- Joseph Sobran
At 01:21 PM 4/6/2012, you wrote:
Thats just wrong! Secret Service is NOT bound by state or local law! Duh! Massachusetts has conceal/carry. Guess where you could neither conceal nor carry in Boston at the DNC in 2004.
Ridiculous!!!!!!!!
On Friday, April 6, 2012 1:16:06 PM UTC-4, THE ANNOINTED ONE wrote:
--
- Florida Law is what counts... the SS must comply with the local rules.
- On Apr 6, 8:24 am, GregfromBoston <greg.vinc...@yahoo.com> wrote:
- > And wrong.
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- >
- > On Thursday, April 5, 2012 1:59:28 PM UTC-4, MJ wrote:
- >
- > > My comment, of course, was in response to:
- >
- > > Its a load of crap. Florida law is irrelevant once the Secret Service
- > > arrives. Same as Boston 2004 and the dems. No weapons inside the
- > > perimeter. Period. Have a nice scare
- >
- > > At 11:41 AM 4/5/2012, you wrote:
- >
- > > Jesus H., are you cupcakes really this dumb?
- >
- > > There will be no guns allowed in the convention or within the SS perimeter.
- >
- > > Why not admit you fell for it, and move on.org?
- >
- > > Duh!
- >
- > > Stupid question. My bad
- >
- > > On Thursday, April 5, 2012 9:46:25 AM UTC-4, MJ wrote:
- >
- > > Reality-wise it may be true ... but legally/constitutionally ... the
- > > secret service performing such unconstitutional nonsense must follow
- > > Florida law.
- >
- > > Regard$,
- > > --MJ
- >
- > > "Usurpation, the exercise of power not granted, is not legitimized by
- > > repetition" -- Raoul Berger.
- >
- > > At 08:51 AM 4/5/2012, you wrote:
- >
- > > Its a load of crap. Florida law is irrelevant once the Secret Service
- > > arrives. Same as Boston 2004 and the dems. No weapons inside the
- > > perimeter. Period. Have a nice scare
- >
- > > --
- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > > For options & help seehttp:// groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > > * Visit our other community athttp:// www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
- >
- > > --
- > > Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
- > > For options & help seehttp:// groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
- >
- > > * Visit our other community athttp:// www.PoliticalForum.com/
- > > * It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
- > > * Read the latest breaking news, and more.
Thanks for being part of "PoliticalForum" at Google Groups.
For options & help see http://groups.google.com/group/PoliticalForum
* Visit our other community at http://www.PoliticalForum.com/
* It's active and moderated. Register and vote in our polls.
* Read the latest breaking news, and more.
No comments:
Post a Comment